Issue 3, 2014

Fish toxicity testing with selenomethionine spiked feed – what's the real question being asked?

Abstract

The US Environmental Protection Agency and several U.S. states and Canadian provinces are currently developing national water quality criteria for selenium that are based in part on toxicity tests performed by feeding freshwater fish a selenomethionine-spiked diet. Using only selenomethionine to examine the toxicity of selenium is based in part on the limitations of the analytical chemistry methods commonly used in the 1990s and 2000s to speciate selenium in freshwater biota. While these methods provided a good starting point, recent improvements in analytical chemistry methodology have demonstrated that selenium speciation in biota is far more complex than originally thought. Here, we review the recent literature that suggests that there are numerous additional selenium species present in freshwater food chains and that the toxicities of these other selenium species, both individually and in combination, have not been evaluated in freshwater fishes. Evidence from studies on birds and mammals suggests that the other selenium forms differ in their metabolic pathways and toxicity from selenomethionine. Therefore, we conclude that toxicity testing using selenomethionine-spiked feed is only partly addressing the question “what is the toxicity of selenium to freshwater fishes?” and that using the results of these experiments to derive freshwater quality criteria may lead to biased water quality criteria. We also discuss additional studies that are needed in order to derive a more ecologically relevant freshwater quality criterion for selenium.

Graphical abstract: Fish toxicity testing with selenomethionine spiked feed – what's the real question being asked?

Article information

Article type
Critical Review
Submitted
18 Nov 2013
Accepted
20 Jan 2014
First published
20 Jan 2014

Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2014,16, 511-517

Author version available

Fish toxicity testing with selenomethionine spiked feed – what's the real question being asked?

M. C. Rigby, A. D. Lemly and R. Gerads, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2014, 16, 511 DOI: 10.1039/C3EM00612C

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements