Issue 22, 2014

Determination of carbon and oxygen isotopes of geological samples with a complicated matrix: comparison of different analytical methods

Abstract

Several automated on-line carbonate reaction devices coupled with isotope ratio mass spectrometers (IRMS) have been frequently used to determine the isotopic compositions of the carbon and oxygen in carbonates because of their high efficiency and small sample size. However, although the δ13C and δ18O values were measured with good precision with each device, whether the measured data remains consistent between these different analysis methods remains unknown. We report a systematic comparison for the δ13C and δ18O values in geological samples with complicated matrices measured using a Kiel IV and a GasBench II, as well as with dual-inlet isotope ratio mass spectrometry (DI-IRMS). Large variations were observed between the measured δ13C and δ18O values for some loess and lake sediments, with maximum differences of −0.4‰ to +0.3‰ for δ13C and −0.5‰ to +0.6‰ for δ18O relative to the mean values of the three methods. Furthermore, the δ13C values obtained using the Kiel IV IRMS method are generally lower than those obtained using the other two methods, whereas the δ18O values measured by the Kiel IV IRMS method are obviously higher than those obtained using DI-IRMS. These results might have been because of the different effects of the organic matter in the samples analyzed using different methods. However, vacuum roasting did not eliminate this effect and instead increased the variability of the δ13C and δ18O values in some samples. The usefulness of the Kiel IV was limited to the analysis of samples containing small amounts of carbonate because of this pronounced effect. In contrast, the GasBench II might produce data more reliably for these types of samples. Consequently, caution must be exercised when selecting a method for analyzing samples with complicated matrices to minimize any potential error.

Graphical abstract: Determination of carbon and oxygen isotopes of geological samples with a complicated matrix: comparison of different analytical methods

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Technical Note
Submitted
22 Jul 2014
Accepted
25 Sep 2014
First published
25 Sep 2014

Anal. Methods, 2014,6, 9173-9178

Author version available

Determination of carbon and oxygen isotopes of geological samples with a complicated matrix: comparison of different analytical methods

L. Cui and X. Wang, Anal. Methods, 2014, 6, 9173 DOI: 10.1039/C4AY01717J

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements