Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 12, 2011
Previous Article Next Article

Titanium “constrained geometry” complexes with pendant arene groups

Author affiliations


The synthesis of the proligands C5Me4HSiMe2N(H)R) (R = CMe2Ph 1, 2-C6H4Ph 2) was accomplished via a straightforward salt metathesis reaction of the appropriate lithium amide and ClSiMe2(C5Me5H). Generation of the dilithio salt and reaction with TiCl3·(THF)3 followed by oxidation gave C5Me4SiMe2N(C6H4Ph)TiCl2 (3) in low yield. In contrast, deprotonation of 1 and 2 and reaction with (Me2N)2TiCl2 afforded C5Me4(SiMe2NR)Ti(NMe2)2 (R = CMe2Ph 4, 2-C6H4Ph 5), respectively, in good yields Treatment with MeI gave the analogs C5Me4(SiMe2NR)TiI2 (R = CMe2Ph 6, 2-C6H4Ph 7). Reduction of 7 with potassium graphite afforded C5Me4(SiMe2NC6H4Ph)Ti 8. Treatment of 6 and 7 with MeMgBr afforded C5Me4(SiMe2NR)TiMe2 (R = CMe2Ph 9, 2-C6H4Ph 10). Complexes 9 and 10 in combination with the activator [Ph3C][B(C6F5)4] catalyzed the polymerization of styrene and ethylene. Copolymerization was also investigated. While the catalyst derived from 10 showed poor activity, compound 9 showed markedly higher activity than 10 and (C5Me4)SiMe2(NtBu)]TiMe2.

Graphical abstract: Titanium “constrained geometry” complexes with pendant arene groups

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Article information

03 Nov 2010
18 Jan 2011
First published
07 Feb 2011

Dalton Trans., 2011,40, 2861-2867
Article type

Titanium “constrained geometry” complexes with pendant arene groups

M. A. Dureen, C. C. Brown, J. G. M. Morton and D. W. Stephan, Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 2861
DOI: 10.1039/C0DT01530J

Social activity

Search articles by author