Issue 27, 2011

Reply to the ‘Comment on “The electron density vs. NICS scan: a new approach to assess aromaticity in molecules with different ring sizes”’ by A. Stanger, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, DOI: 10.1039/c0cp02407d

Abstract

A graphical abstract is available for this content

Graphical abstract: Reply to the ‘Comment on “The electron density vs. NICS scan: a new approach to assess aromaticity in molecules with different ring sizes”’ by A. Stanger, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, DOI: 10.1039/c0cp02407d

Article information

Article type
Comment
Submitted
18 Apr 2011
Accepted
16 May 2011
First published
13 Jun 2011

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011,13, 12655-12658

Reply to the ‘Comment on “The electron density vs. NICS scan: a new approach to assess aromaticity in molecules with different ring sizes”’ by A. Stanger, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, DOI: 10.1039/c0cp02407d

C. Foroutan-Nejad, S. Shahbazian and P. Rashidi-Ranjbar, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, 12655 DOI: 10.1039/C1CP21224A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements