Issue 11, 2010

Mechanistic insight into the recognition of single-stranded and double-stranded DNA substrates by ABH2 and ABH3

Abstract

The human ABH2 and ABH3 proteins are functionally complementary in the oxidative demethylation of N1-methyl adenine (1-meA) and N3-methyl cytosine (3-meC) nucleotide bases. ABH3 displays higher activities with single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) in vitro, whereas ABH2 acts as the primary housekeeping enzyme in mammals for effectively repairing endogenously formed alkylated lesions in double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). Structurally, their overall protein folding is quite similar, but the most significant differences occur in the nucleotide recognition lid and the β-hairpin motif. We present here a site-directed mutational analysis and motif-swapping study to gain mechanistic insight into DNA substrate selection by ABH2 and ABH3. A V101A-F102A double mutant notably reduced ABH2 activity in dsDNA, indicating that this hydrophobic region appears to be important for damage searching and repair. The phenylalanine finger F102 is found to be crucial for ssDNA selection and repair as well; however, V101 shows reduced demethylating activity for only ssDNA and not dsDNA. The ABH2 R110A mutant completely loses the methyl base repair activity, suggesting that R110 is likely to be involved in the base flipping process. E175 and F124 contribute to nucleotide base specific selection and stabilization in the active site for repair. Additionally, swapping the RED residues in ABH3 to equivalent VFG residues in ABH2 endows ABH3 with activity in dsDNA repair as efficient as wild-type ABH2. Surprisingly, by changing just a few residues, the ABH3 protein can have very different selectivity towards ssDNA or dsDNA. This result indicates that the RED motif most likely prevents ABH3 binding and repair of dsDNA. Consistently, swapped ABH3 cross-links with dsDNA very well, confirming the determining roles of these residues in the initial DNA strand recognition. Overall, this work has provided a detailed understanding of the structural features of the ssDNA and dsDNA preferences of ABH2 and ABH3.

Graphical abstract: Mechanistic insight into the recognition of single-stranded and double-stranded DNA substrates by ABH2 and ABH3

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
19 Apr 2010
Accepted
04 Jun 2010
First published
11 Aug 2010

Mol. BioSyst., 2010,6, 2143-2149

Mechanistic insight into the recognition of single-stranded and double-stranded DNA substrates by ABH2 and ABH3

B. Chen, H. Liu, X. Sun and C. Yang, Mol. BioSyst., 2010, 6, 2143 DOI: 10.1039/C005148A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements