Issue 8, 2010

‘Heavy metal’—time to move on from semantics to pragmatics?

Abstract

Despite the repeated calls to stop, most notably in a technical publication of the International Union for Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), the use of the term ‘heavy metal’ appears not to have declined in the scientific literature and there is little evidence that the IUPAC instructions and those of other publications have had any measurable impact on this widespread usage. Indeed, the use of the term is increasing rather than declining. Four options are presented to solve this dilemma.

Graphical abstract: ‘Heavy metal’—time to move on from semantics to pragmatics?

Article information

Article type
Perspective
Submitted
18 Mar 2010
Accepted
16 Jun 2010
First published
08 Jul 2010

J. Environ. Monit., 2010,12, 1511-1514

‘Heavy metal’—time to move on from semantics to pragmatics?

R. Hübner, K. B. Astin and R. J. H. Herbert, J. Environ. Monit., 2010, 12, 1511 DOI: 10.1039/C0EM00056F

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements