Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 25, 2006
Previous Article Next Article

DFT calculations of d0 M(NR)(CHtBu)(X)(Y) (M = Mo, W; R = CPh3, 2,6-iPr–C6H3; X and Y = CH2tBu, OtBu, OSi(OtBu)3) olefin metathesis catalysts: structural, spectroscopic and electronic properties

Author affiliations

Abstract

DFT(B3PW91) calculations have been carried out to rationalise the structural, electronic and spectroscopic properties of Mo and W imido M(NR1)(CHR2)(X)(Y) olefin metathesis catalysts by using either simplified or actual ligands of the experimental complexes. The calculated structures, energetics (preference for the syn isomer and alkylidene rotational barrier for the syn/anti interconversion), and spectroscopic properties (NMR JC–H coupling constants) are in good agreement with available experimental data. Additionally, the alkylidene νC–H stretching frequencies, not available experimentally, have been calculated. These quasi-tetrahedral complexes have a linear imido group and a C–H alkylidene agostic interaction, which stabilizes the syn isomer. Whether looking at M(NR1)(CHR2)(X)(Y), M = Mo, W, or the isolobal Re complexes, Re(CR1)(CHR2)(X)(Y), a linear correlation is obtained between both the alkylidene νC–H stretching frequencies and JC–H coupling constants with the calculated alkylidene C–H bond lengths. These correlations show that the strength of the α-C–H agostic interaction increases from alkylidyne Re to imido group 6 complexes and from Mo to W. The NBO and AIM Bader analyses show firstly that the imido and alkylidyne groups are both triply bonded to the metal, but that the triply bonded imido ligand is a weaker electron donor than the alkylidyne, hence the stronger α-C–H agostic interaction for group 6 imido complexes. Secondly, one of the π bonds of the triply bonded ligand is weakened at the transition state of the alkylidene rotation: while no lone pair is formed, the metal–ligand triple bond is polarized. This is more favourable for an imido than for an alkylidyne ligand, hence the lower alkylidene rotational barrier for the former complexes. Conversely, the aryl imido is even less of an electron donor than the alkyl imido group, which in turn strengthens the α-C–H agostic interaction and lowers the alkylidene rotational barrier even more.

Graphical abstract: DFT calculations of d0 M(NR)(CHtBu)(X)(Y) (M = Mo, W; R = CPh3, 2,6-iPr–C6H3; X and Y = CH2tBu, OtBu, OSi(OtBu)3) olefin metathesis catalysts: structural, spectroscopic and electronic properties

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Publication details

The article was received on 27 Mar 2006, accepted on 05 May 2006 and first published on 30 May 2006


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/B604481F
Citation: Dalton Trans., 2006,0, 3077-3087

  •   Request permissions

    DFT calculations of d0 M(NR)(CHtBu)(X)(Y) (M = Mo, W; R = CPh3, 2,6-iPr–C6H3; X and Y = CH2tBu, OtBu, OSi(OtBu)3) olefin metathesis catalysts: structural, spectroscopic and electronic properties

    A. Poater, X. Solans-Monfort, E. Clot, C. Copéret and O. Eisenstein, Dalton Trans., 2006, 0, 3077
    DOI: 10.1039/B604481F

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements