Issue 1, 2002

Ring closure synthetic strategies toward buckybowls: benzannulation versus cyclopentannulation

Abstract

Computations were performed on idealized retrosynthetic routes towards two model buckybowl compunds, sumanene (I) and pinakene (II). Two possible paths for sumanene (I) and six for pinakene (II) were analyzed. The computational results unequivocally predict that benzannulation is a significantly easier process compared to cyclopentannulation in the ring closure strategies in both cases. The suitability of the theoretical models for obtaining reliable trends is assessed and generalizations for the synthetic strategies directed towards buckybowls and C60 were made.

Graphical abstract: Ring closure synthetic strategies toward buckybowls: benzannulation versus cyclopentannulation

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
05 Sep 2001
Accepted
31 Oct 2001
First published
05 Dec 2001

J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 2002, 94-101

Ring closure synthetic strategies toward buckybowls: benzannulation versus cyclopentannulation

T. C. Dinadayalane, U. D. Priyakumar and G. N. Sastry, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 2002, 94 DOI: 10.1039/B108030J

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements