Comparison of sampling methods for 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate, (HDI) in a commercial spray box

Abstract

In this study three different types of samplers for the determination of 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate in air were compared. The experimental set up was a simulation of real life conditions with spray painting operations performed inside a commercial, full sized, spray box. The sampling methods were 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-piperazine impregnated on glass fibre filter, and the same reagent in impinger, and also dibutylamine in impinger. All analyses were performed by LC-MS-MS. The determined concentrations varied between 20 and 90 μg m⁻³ with relative standard deviations from 7 to 17% for each method. No significant difference was found between the three methods using ANOVA with a significance level of α = 0.05.