Issue 4, 2000

Abstract

Two methods of thallium quantification by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry were validated: isotope dilution (ID) after spiking by 203Tl and external calibration (EC) where the sum of 205Tl + 203Tl was measured. Both methods are almost specific. The results are significantly influenced only by 1000-fold excess of tungsten due to the interference of 186W17O. The limits of detection of both techniques are 0.15 ng g−1 and 0.20 ng g−1 for ID and EC, respectively. The ID technique is robust with respect to instrument parameters settings (rf power, nebulizer Ar flow and lens voltage). The results of EC analysis can be slightly affected by alteration of rf power. For the verification of accuracy of results, three approaches were applied. (1) The analysis of samples prepared from standard thallium solution gave results in agreement with theoretical values. (2) The analysis of spiked plant samples with a very low (wheat flour) and high (defatted rape-seed meal) thallium content proved the accuracy of the ID method (recovery values of 99.5 and 99.8%, respectively do not differ significantly from 100%). On the other hand, EC analysis gave recovery values of 99.2 and 101.6%, respectively, which are more than satisfactory for routine trace analysis, but owing to high precision of measurement these values are statistically different from 100%. (3) Analysis of several CRMs by ID gave results in agreement with certified values except for SRM NIST 2709 San Joaquin Soil. Results of EC analysis can be affected by the choice of internal standard. The usage of rhodium was the best choice. The repeatabilities of both analytical procedures are comparable; relative standard deviations ranged from 0.4 to 1.0%.

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
01 Oct 1999
Accepted
16 Feb 2000
First published
23 Mar 2000

J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2000,15, 403-407

Determination of thallium in environmental samples by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: comparison and validation of isotope dilution and external calibration methods

O. Mestek, R. Koplík, H. Fingerová and M. Suchánek, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 2000, 15, 403 DOI: 10.1039/A907921A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements