Volume 116, 2000

Development and comparison of biosensors for in-vivo applications

Abstract

Electrochemical biosensors have been of increasing interest, especially those developed to be directly applied in diagnostic areas, such as neuroscience. We have been interested in developing a range of biosensors for monitoring glucose, lactate, pyruvate, and glutamate in order to study on-line both brain function in the laboratory and to monitor brain health in neurointensive care. For a biosensor to function effectively in these situations, it has to combine the following characteristics: quick response and high sensitivity, good reproducibility and adequate stability. In this study we compared the performance of a number of different amperometric biosensors strategies. These included ferrocene mediation of immobilised enzymes (system A), a redox hydrogel based system (system B), and a conducting polymer approach using polyaniline (system C). All assays were operated as flow-injection systems with upstream immobilised enzyme beds if necessary. When calibrated for H2O2 systems A and B reacted quickly enough to give quantitative conversion up to 0.2 mM. Above this concentration the response was limited by horseradish peroxidase enzyme kinetics and eventually enzyme loading. System C showed a restricted H2O2 response. When calibrated for glucose (by use of immobilised glucose oxidase) system B exhibited the highest sensitivity but its analytical range was restricted because the system became limited by H2O2 response. System A had low sensitivity for analyte compared to H2O2 and system B, but a greater useful range. Problems of mediator cycling between the immobilised enzymes are discussed. System C gave an excellent linear range but sensitivity was limited by background noise. Stability and reproducibility of the systems are also described. In conclusion, from this study the ferrocene system proved to be overall most useful and has now been used in the first dual on-line monitoring of glucose and lactate in patients in neurointensive care.

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
25 Apr 2000
First published
23 Aug 2000

Faraday Discuss., 2000,116, 291-303

Development and comparison of biosensors for in-vivo applications

D. G. Georganopoulou, R. Carley, D. A. Jones and M. G. Boutelle, Faraday Discuss., 2000, 116, 291 DOI: 10.1039/B003256P

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements