Issue 12, 1998

Performance comparison between furnace atomisation plasma emission spectrometry and microwave induced plasma-atomic emission spectrometry for the determination of mercury species in gas chromatography effluents

Abstract

A Beenakker microwave-induced plasma (MIP) and a furnace atomization plasma excitation spectrometry (FAPES) source were compared with respect to performance capabilities for the analysis of derivatised mercury species when coupled with high resolution GC for sample introduction. Natural gas condensate was used as a test material. Emission was monitored at the 253.6 nm mercury line. For standard solutions, comparable LODs were estimated for dimethyl-, methylbutyl- and dibutylmercury for both sources that were between 0.5 and 4.1 pg. In diluted condensate (5%) detection limits were between 1.5 and 4.7 pg. However, measurement of dimethylmercury was not possible with the MIP as the plasma was extinguished due to solvent vapour overload. Precision of replicate measurement of dimethyl-, methylbutyl- and dibutylmercury was better than 2% RSD for 2.5 µl injections to the FAPES at concentrations well above the LOD. The linear range spans 3 decades in both sources. Molecular emission from NO bands gives rise to background in both sources. In the FAPES source, hydrocarbon effluents reduce NO concentrations giving rise to background fluctuations, whereas in the MIP background fluctuations arise mainly from quenching of the plasma.

Article information

Article type
Paper

J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1998,13, 1347-1353

Performance comparison between furnace atomisation plasma emission spectrometry and microwave induced plasma-atomic emission spectrometry for the determination of mercury species in gas chromatography effluents

F. Wolfgang, J. P. Snell and R. E. Sturgeon, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1998, 13, 1347 DOI: 10.1039/A803149E

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements