Issue 3, 1998

Comparison of the rates and mechanisms of formation and solvolysis of [Fe(bipy)3]2+ (bipy = 2,2′-bipyridine) and [FeL]2+ [L = 1,4,7-tris(2,2′-bipyridyl-5-ylmethyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane] and their stabilities in dimethylformamide solution

Abstract

Multiwavelength stopped-flow spectrophotometry has been used to compare the rates and mechanisms of formation of [Fe(bipy)3]2+ (bipy = 2,2′-bipyridine) and [FeL]2+ [L = 1,4,7-tris(2,2′-bipyridyl-5-ylmethyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane, containing three co-ordinating bipy groups], in dimethylformamide (dmf ) solution. Molecular modelling of L, and kinetic studies of its reaction with [Fe(dmf  )6]2+, are consistent with the presence of two N-configurational isomers (RRR and RRS ); at 25 °C, the RRR isomer reacts with [Fe(dmf )6]2+ to give [FeL]2+ with a formation rate constant, 10–5kf = 2.34 ± 0.09 dm3 mol–1 s–1, and the RRS isomer reacts to give an intermediate bis(bipy) complex with 10–5kf = 1.04 ± 0.01 dm3 mol–1 s–1. This bis(bipy) intermediate rearranges to the tris(bipy) chelate with a first-order rate constant of 0.71 ± 0.02 s–1, but is also involved in the formation of a small amount of an [Fe2L2]4+ dimer. The kinetically determined dimer formation constant is (1.2 ± 0.1) × 105 dm3 mol–1. For the reaction of [Fe(dmf )6]2+ with bipy at 25 °C, rapid formation of [Fe(dmf )4(bipy)]2+ (10–5kf = 1.4 ± 0.1 dm3 mol–1 s–1) is followed by the much slower formation of [Fe(dmf )2(bipy)2]2+ (kf = 181 ± 7 dm3 mol–1 s–1) and [Fe(bipy)3]2+ (kf = 24.3 ± 0.9 dm3 mol–1 s–1). The complex [FeL]2+ is significantly more stable than [Fe(bipy)3]2+, as shown by the ready solvolysis of [Fe(bipy)3]2+ at low dilution in dmf, whilst [FeL]2+ is stable to solvolysis under the same conditions. At 25 °C first-order rate constants for the dissociation of bipy from [Fe(bipy)3]2+ and [Fe(dmf )2(bipy)2]2+ are (7.0 ± 0.3) × 10–3 s–1 and (1.4 ± 0.1) × 10–3 s–1 respectively, showing that both are inert, low-spin, t2g6 systems. This contrasts with the behaviour in water, since [Fe(OH2)2(bipy)2]2+ is known to be high spin and labile. The kinetically determined stepwise formation constants in dmf confirm this conclusion; values vary in the order 10–3K1/dm3 mol–1 = 9.6 ± 0.7 < 10–5K2/dm3 mol–1 = 1.3 ± 0.7 > 10–3K3/dm3 mol–1 = 3.5 ± 0.2 (in water K1 > K2 [double less-than, compressed] K3). Overall formation constants for [Fe(bipy)3]2+ in dmf (log10 β3 = 12.6) and in dimethyl sulfoxide (log10 β3 = 10.7) are significantly smaller than the value in water (log10 β3 = 17.4). Rates of solvolysis of [M(bipy)3]2+ (M = Fe or Ni) were also investigated in dimethyl sulfoxide solution.

Article information

Article type
Paper

J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1998, 369-374

Comparison of the rates and mechanisms of formation and solvolysis of [Fe(bipy)3]2+ (bipy = 2,2′-bipyridine) and [FeL]2+ [L = 1,4,7-tris(2,2′-bipyridyl-5-ylmethyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane] and their stabilities in dimethylformamide solution

A. Maria Josceanu and P. Moore, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1998, 369 DOI: 10.1039/A705824A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements