Issue 12, 1998

The interpretation of data from collaborative trials: comparing the harmonised protocol with the Analytical Methods Committee robust method

Abstract

Two methods of interpreting collaborative trial data containing discordant values were compared. The trials studied included 32 different materials with analyte concentrations covering a wide range. The bootstrap was used to estimate the frequency distributions and standard errors of the statistics. There was no meaningful difference between the results of the two methods of interpretation.

Article information

Article type
Paper

Analyst, 1998,123, 2803-2807

The interpretation of data from collaborative trials: comparing the harmonised protocol with the Analytical Methods Committee robust method

P. J. Lowthian, M. Thompson and R. Wood, Analyst, 1998, 123, 2803 DOI: 10.1039/A807462C

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements