Preparation of RuOx from RuO4, as well as from in situ generated ‘ruthenium hydroxide’ or ruthenate ions, followed by calcinations at 400 °C, reproducibly affords active catalysts generally without noxious oxidation of the CdS support, whereas impregnation of RuCl3·3H2O and subsequent annealing yield poor materials; in the latter procedure the Cds is irretrievably damaged.
D. H. M. W. Thewissen, K. Timmer, E. A. van der Zouwen-Assink, A. H. A. Tinnemans and A. Mackor, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1985, 1485 DOI: 10.1039/C39850001485
To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.
If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.
If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.
Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.
Please wait while we load your content...