Issue 1207, 1976

Development of fluxes for the analysis of ceramic materials by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry

Abstract

From experience of the use of both lithium metaborate and tetraborate as fluxes for a wide variety of minerals and refractories, it is postulated that when the sample contains a preponderance of acidic oxides (e.g., silica), lithium metaborate has considerable advantages. The melts from metaborate are much more fluid and decomposition can be carried out by heating over gas burners. For samples that contain high contents of basic oxides (e.g., carbonate rocks), the more acidic tetraborate is recommended. A 1 + 4 mixture of metaborate and tetraborate forms a universal flux for samples containing silica and/or alumina as major contents. The most suitable flux can be predicted from the acidity or basicity of the sample.

Article information

Article type
Paper

Analyst, 1976,101, 803-807

Development of fluxes for the analysis of ceramic materials by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry

H. Bennett and G. J. Oliver, Analyst, 1976, 101, 803 DOI: 10.1039/AN9760100803

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements