Open Access Article
Nazia Aziza,
Hamida Panezai
*a,
Jihong Sun
b,
Noor Samad Shahc,
Raza Ullahd,
Ruohan Xub and
Zakira Jogezaia
aDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Balochistan University of Information Technology, Engineering and Management Sciences, Quetta, 87300, Pakistan. E-mail: hameeda.panezai@buitms.edu.pk; panezaihamida@yahoo.com
bBeijing Key Laboratory for Green Catalysis and Separation, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, PR China
cDepartment of Chemistry, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad-Campus, KPK 22060, Pakistan
dCollege of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Shandong 255000, China
First published on 15th October 2025
Textile industries release toxic organic dyes into wastewater, harming aquatic ecosystems and affecting photosynthesis. This study aims to synthesize a photocatalyst for the efficient degradation of crystal violet (CV) dye in aqueous media. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is the most preferable photo-catalyst, but its fast electron–hole recombination rate and low adsorption capacity have limited its applications on a large scale. To enhance the adsorption and degradation efficiency, a TiO2-supported clinoptilolite (CP) and a porous composite of zerovalent iron (Fe0) co-doped with titanium dioxide/clinoptilolite (Fe0–TiO2/CP) were synthesized using sol–gel and borohydride reduction methods, respectively. The effects of various parameters like acidity, temperature and concentration on the photo-catalytic activity, morphological and micro-structural features and surface areas of different TiO2/CP and Fe0–TiO2/CP composites were characterized by various techniques such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDXA), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, UV-Visible spectroscopy, thermogravimetric (TG) and differential thermogravimetric (DTG) analyses and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) isotherm. The as-synthesized composites (TiO2/CP and Fe0–TiO2/CP) were used as photocatalysts to remove CV dye from water. The parent CP and TiO2 achieved 51% and 58% removal efficiency of CV dye under UV radiation, respectively. The 0.25 M TiO2/CP composite showed the highest degradation efficiency (92.3%) under UV radiation, while 0.1 M TiO2/CP performed best under solar radiation (88.5% removal) in 120 minutes. Theoretical analysis via kinetic models revealed that the adsorption and degradation processes of CV dye followed pseudo-second-order (PSO) and pseudo-first-order (PFO) kinetic models, respectively. The TiO2/CP composite mainly produces hydroxyl radicals (˙OH) during dye degradation, while Fe0–TiO2/CP generates both ˙OH and superoxide radicals (˙O2−). This ˙O2− radical enhances the degradation efficiency of Fe0–TiO2/CP due to Fe0's favorable reduction potential. CV mineralization occurs through two pathways: N-de-methylation and hydroxyl radical attack on the central carbon, leading to degradation and complete mineralization. Moreover, the structure, morphology and particle size of the composite play vital roles in the extent of their photocatalytic efficiencies. Therefore, a combination of compositional and structural engineering of TiO2-based photocatalysts is expected to give better device performance. However, further investigation is needed in the near future.
To enhance the photo-catalytic and adsorption efficiency of TiO2, several strategies are employed, such as morphology controlling,8 elemental doping,9 surface loading7,10 and energy band engineering.11,12 Among these strategies, the most promising is the loading of TiO2 onto the surface of nanoporous adsorbents and elemental doping with TiO2 to overcome the drawbacks of TiO2 efficiency.7 Clinoptilolite is an effective supporting adsorbent for TiO2 due to its characteristics, such as porosity (34%), excellent resistance to extreme temperatures, ion-exchange capacity (2.16 meq g−1) and bulk density (1.15 g cm−3).5,6,13
The energy difference between the valence band (VB) and conduction band (CB) of TiO2 is in the UV radiation region, so the radiation absorption capability in the visible region is still relatively low. Using solar light as an energy source is less effective in the TiO2 photocatalytic process because the composition of UV light in the sun is only 5–7%.14 Thus, modification of the TiO2 photocatalyst is required in order to absorb light in the solar light region. To expand the photocatalyst response into the visible spectrum, an iron metal-doped TiO2 (Fe0–TiO2) composite was found to be an effective photocatalyst for dye degradation when exposed to UV and visible light.15
In the present study, different molar TiO2/CP composites were prepared using the sol–gel method. The second type of composites used for the degradation of CV dye was Fe0–TiO2 and Fe0–TiO2/CP, which were synthesized using a simple borohydride reduction method. The adsorption rate and photo-catalytic degradation efficiency of CV dye from aqueous solution by various molar composites of TiO2/CP, Fe0–TiO2 and Fe0–TiO2/CP and the role of active free radicals, such as OH, ˙O2− and h+, in CV dye degradation were studied using a UV-visible spectrophotometer. The effects of various parameters, like temperature, concentration on photo-catalytic activity, micro-structural feature, surface area, pore size, pore volume, crystal phase and photo-catalytic capacity of TiO2/CP, Fe0–TiO2 and Fe0–TiO2/CP composites, were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDXA), Brunauer–Emmett–Teller isotherm (BET), and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and thermogravimetric (TG) and differential thermogravimetric (DTG) analyses. The adsorption and degradation kinetic processes of CV dye were theoretically analyzed using pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order models, respectively. The degradation pathway of CV dye was studied using heated electrospray ionization (H-ESI) coupled with a mass spectrometer.
:
25 v/v), and 0.800 g of already synthesized TiO2 was added to the mixture with continuous stirring. Then, 1.200 g of FeSO4·7H2O was added to the TiO2 solution and stirred for 30 minutes under vacuum. After that, a 40 mL solution of sodium borohydride (1.200 g) was prepared in deionized water and added dropwise to the TiO2 solution under an inert atmosphere with continuous stirring to achieve maximum reduction. With the addition of the first drop of NaBH4, a black precipitate of Fe0/TiO2 was formed. The black precipitates were separated after complete reduction, washed with ethanol and then vacuum dried at 60 °C. The sample was ground and stored at room temperature in an air-tight container to protect the composite powder from oxidation by air. The Fe0–TiO2/CP was also prepared using the method mentioned above with already synthesized 0.1 M TiO2/CP (0.800 g) powder.
The light source used was a UV lamp (0.02 mW cm−2) enclosed in a rectangular wooden box. A UV-Vis spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Lambda 25) was used to analyze the absorbance of CV dye concentration at λmax (585 nm). The same dye degradation procedure that was previously performed under a UV source was employed using solar radiation in a photochemical reactor. The percentage removal efficiency and the adsorbed quantity of dye per unit mass (mg g−1) of adsorbent at equilibrium were calculated using the following equations:
![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
The crystalline structure of CP, as-synthesized TiO2, composites of synthesized TiO2/CP, and Fe0–TiO2/CP were characterized using XRD (Bruker D8) with Cu Ka (λ = 0.1542 nm) radiation. The morphology of the samples mentioned above was studied using SEM (JEOL SEM IT200) operated at an accelerating voltage between 13.0 and 16.0 kV, and TiO2 nanoparticles were investigated using a JEOL JEM-2100 TEM. The TG/DTG analysis was performed using a simultaneous thermal analyzer (PerkinElmer STA 8000) at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under N2 flow in the temperature range of 0–900 °C. A JW-BK-300C surface area and micropore size analyzer (Beijing JWGB Sci and Tech Co., Ltd) were used to assess the sample's BET surface area by N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms at 77 and 298 K. The FTIR spectrometer (Bruker ALPHA-T) was used in the wavenumber range of 4000–400 cm−1 to evaluate the chemical structures of the composites. The band gap of the composites was analyzed using the absorbance spectra of the samples recorded on a UV-VIS spectrometer (UV-2600, SHIMADZU).
In the Fe0–TiO2 composite, as shown in Fig. 1(B)-(g), the apparent peaks of Fe0 at 2θ = 44° with characteristic peaks of TiO2 are observed, which confirms the successful doping of Fe0 with TiO2. Two very small peaks at 2θ = 31.9° and 33.7°, as shown in Fig. 1(B)-(g), indicate the presence of iron oxide (FeO) in the sample, which is formed during the doping of Fe0, as reported in the literature. The crystalline structure of TiO2 was not affected by co-doping with Fe0, which is in close agreement with a previous study conducted by Bibi et al.17
In the XRD pattern of the Fe0–TiO2/CP composite (Fig. 1(B)-(h)), the characteristic peaks of TiO2 and Fe0 are relatively less intense compared to the peaks of CP. The loading of TiO2 and Fe0 onto the CP framework results in a decrease in the overall peak intensities of CP, TiO2 and Fe0. Notably, the incorporation of Fe0 does not significantly alter the crystalline structure of the zeolite, except for a reduction in peak intensities. This suggests that the Fe0 particles are likely dispersed or incorporated within the CP framework without disrupting its underlying structure.18
The incorporation of TiO2 into the clinoptilolite zeolite framework led to a reduction in crystallinity, resulting in decreased sharpness and intensity of the XRD peaks of CP in all molar composites. This phenomenon occurs because the introduction of TiO2 disrupts the ordered arrangement of the zeolite's framework, causing distortions and a slight decrease in crystallinity. As illustrated in Fig. 1(C), the surface and pores of CP become covered with TiO2 and Fe0 particles, leading to the formation of amorphous regions.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 2 SEM images of (A) TiO2 and (B) CP. Different molar composites: (C) 0.1, (D) 0.25, (E) 0.5, and (F) 1.0 M of TiO2/CP (G) Fe0–TiO2 and (H) Fe0–TiO2/CP, and (I) and (J) TEM of TiO2. | ||
Although TiO2 covers the surface of CP, it does not disrupt the structure; however, TiO2 covers the surface of CP and the sheet-like shape of CP that are clearly seen in the SEM images of all TiO2/CP composites and confirms the intact structure of the composites after doping.5,7 Fe0 particles exhibit a spherical shape and exist in chain form, which looks like spongy material.18,19 The surface structure of CP in Fe0–TiO2/CP composite looks highly rough and spongy due to the doping of Fe0, as shown in Fig. 2. Due to its spongy nature, the Fe0 doping on the surface of TiO2/CP composite covers the maximum area of CP zeolite. In terms of covering the maximum surface area of CP, the Fe0 doping decreases the adsorption capacity of the Fe0–TiO2/CP composite due to the decreased average mesopore size of the composite, and this decreased efficiency is in good agreement with the decreased peak intensities obtained in the XRD pattern of the Fe0–TiO2/CP composite. Meanwhile, the EDXA spectrum of each sample shows that the main elements, such as Al, Si, and O, are spread almost throughout the CP structure, as illustrated in Fig. S1. In addition, the EDXA spectrum contains high concentrations of key elements, such as Al, Si, and O, along with metals like Na, K, Ca, and Mg, while the peaks for Ti and Fe metals confirm the successful doping of TiO2 and Fe0 in the CP composites.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 3 TG/DTG profiles of pure CP, TiO2, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 M TiO2/CP, and Fe0–TiO2 and Fe0–TiO2/CP composites measured at a heating rate of 10 K min−1 under N2 flow. | ||
The TGA curve of TiO2 reveals a total weight loss of 2.5%, which can be attributed to a three-step dehydration process as evidenced by the three distinct peaks of DTG curve (Fig. 3). The first step, occurring between 46–91 and 39–226 °C in DTG and TG profiles, is characterized by a broad endothermic peak corresponds to a weight loss of 0.9%. This step is associated with the desorption of loosely bound physisorbed water located on the external surface of TiO2. The second step, observed between 196–273 and 226–381 °C of DTG and TG curves, exhibits a sharp endothermic peak and is linked to a weight loss of approximately 1.1%. This step is thought to be involved in the removal of tightly bound chemisorbed water from the framework structure of TiO2. The third step, taking place over a higher temperature range of 381–900 °C of TG, is marked by a gradual weight loss of 0.5% and may be attributed to the condensation of Ti(OH)2 to TiO2 in the TiO2 sample.22
In the TG curve of CP, a sharp decrease of 2.4% weight loss is observed due to the dehydration of physisorbed moisture from 40 to 225 °C, and a slow but continuous weight loss of 2.2% between 225 and 900 °C may be associated with the dehydration of water from internal cavities of the CP zeolite structure. The broad endothermic peak at 75–178 °C and a sharp endothermic peak at 224–272 °C in the DTG curve aid these two-step dehydration processes in CP zeolite.20
Total weight losses of about 6.0, 6.5, 6.3 and 5.6% in 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 M TiO2/CP composites are calculated from the TG curves, respectively. The first steep TG curves show the loss of physisorbed water in the temperature range of 38–240 °C. The second slight TG curve shows the slow dehydration of water from the internal CP cavities in the temperature range of 240–900 °C. These two-step dehydration processes in different molar composites of TiO2/CP are supported by the two endothermic peaks that appear in the DTG curves, as shown in Fig. 3.
The calculated weight losses of around 9.9 and 10.8% in Fe0–TiO2 and Fe0–TiO2/CP composites, respectively, are due to the evaporation of water and ethanol. A gradual and small increment in weight above 390 °C up to 760 °C is observed in both Fe0–TiO2 and Fe0–TiO2/CP composites possibly due to the formation of iron oxide at higher temperatures. This increment in the weight of Fe0-doped composites is also confirmed by the small exothermic DTG curves, as shown in Fig. 3.
Alver et al. also reported that generally in all zeolites, the weight loss up to 500 °C is due to dehydration, while the slow weight loss at high temperature is due to dehydroxylation.20 Generally, dehydroxylation is a slow process and occurs between 500 and 600 °C. At low temperatures, chemisorption took place between 28 and 41 °C on the surface of CP, as shown in Fig. 3. In the TG curves, a comparatively large peak is observed, leading to a weight gain of about 2% from 100 to 102% between 28 and 41 °C in almost all composites due to the absorption of water at low temperature. However, in Fe0–TiO2 and Fe0–TiO2/CP composites, a small peak is observed in the TG curves above 100%, indicating that the spongy structure of Fe0 decreases the adsorption capacity of the composites, which is why water is less adsorbed compared to other composites, reconfirming the above findings in SEM and XRD.
| S. no | Sample | Surface area (m2 g−1) | Mesopore volume (cm3 g−1) | Average mesopore size (nm) | Micropore volume (cm3 g−1) | Median micropore size (nm) | Direct bandgap (eV) | Indirect bandgap (eV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CP | 19.16 | 0.10 | 19.87 | 0.007 | 0.72 | 3.90 | 3.78 |
| 2 | TiO2 | 40.22 | 0.41 | 38.81 | 0.015 | 0.84 | 3.11 | 2.96 |
| 3 | 0.1 M TiO2/CP | 38.58 | 0.23 | 23.15 | 0.015 | 0.88 | 2.98 | 2.62 |
| 4 | 0.25 TiO2/CP | 53.53 | 0.28 | 19.79 | 0.020 | 0.89 | 3.02 | 2.66 |
| 5 | 0.5 TiO2/CP | 76.25 | 0.36 | 18.11 | 0.028 | 0.86 | 3.10 | 2.95 |
| 6 | 1.0 TiO2/CP | 71.61 | 0.39 | 20.58 | 0.028 | 0.88 | 3.01 | 2.91 |
| 7 | Fe0–TiO2 | 55.79 | 0.21 | 14.60 | 0.021 | 0.85 | 1.91 | 1.39 |
| 8 | Fe0–TiO2/CP | 69.73 | 0.26 | 13.95 | 0.026 | 0.86 | 2.24 | 1.10 |
BET isotherms are used to investigate the porous structure of materials, and the form of the isotherm indicates the type of porosity in the material. The modifications made by doping of TiO2 and Fe0 have caused structural variations, which result in strong effects on the BET surface area, micro and mesopore volume and size in all types of TiO2/CP composites due to the increasing molarity of TiO2. Compared to the parent CP, the TiO2 doped CP samples exhibit significantly increased surface area, particularly in the 0.5 M TiO2/CP composite (76.25 m2 g−1). In all the TiO2/CP and Fe0–TiO2/CP composites, both the surface area and micropore volume increase compared to parent CP and pristine TiO2, while the mesopore volume and average mesopore sizes decrease with increasing the molar ratio of TiO2 and with the co-doping of Fe0. These changes are attributed to the particle size of TiO2 (4.25 μm) and Fe0 (0.90 μm), as reported in the literature.18
The particle sizes of TiO2 and Fe0 are very small compared to the mesopore volume and size of the parent CP, where inside the mesopore both the TiO2 and Fe0 are adsorbed on the surface of CP and cover the maximum surface area, which results in decreasing adsorption of CV dye and is found in close agreement with a previous study conducted by Panezai et al.23
As shown in Fig. S2, the profile for TiO2 demonstrates a clearly defined plateau at lower relative pressures, indicating monolayer adsorption; as pressure increases, adsorption accelerates, indicating multilayer adsorption and capillary condensation at higher relative pressures. An obvious H3 hysteresis loop in the physisorption isotherm at higher relative pressures (0.4–0.1) is observed, which is a distinguishing feature of adsorption in mesoporous materials. The H3 type hysteresis loop according to the IUPAC classification observed in these composites is common for nonporous, macroporous, and mesoporous solids.23 This is due to differences in the gas adsorption and desorption paths within the pores.24 A steep desorption branch and a somewhat flat adsorption branch, with a hysteresis loop that closes at high relative pressure, are frequently connected with materials containing aggregation of platelet-like particles and slit-shaped pores.
The distinct increase in adsorbate volume in the low P/P0 region and a barely noticeable plateau, as well as an irregular shape, are observed in Type II and IV isotherms, revealing the presence of micropores associated with mesopores in the CP and its composites. An important feature is the closed hysteresis loop, with less steepness corresponding to a more uniform pore system containing capillaries with wider profile bodies and narrow, short necks. These phenomena are obviously illustrated in Table 1 and Fig. S2, where both the BET surface area and the relevant pore volume (0 < P/P0 < 0.1) of all the composites, with the exception of 0.1 M TiO2/CP are higher than parent CP (19.16 m2 g−1 and 0.10 cm3 g−1). This increase in both the surface area and pore volume could be attributed to increased nitrogen adsorption into TiO2, Fe0 and particularly on their CP support.
![]() | ||
| Fig. 4 FTIR spectra of A: (a) TiO2, (b) parent CP, (c) 0.1, (d) 0.25, (e) 0.5, (f) 1.0 M TiO2/CP, (g) Fe0–TiO2/CP and (h) Fe0–TiO2. B and C are the insets of A. | ||
The adsorption bands at 1600 and 1560 cm−1 in pure TiO2 represent the bending vibrations of Ti–OH, as shown in Fig. 4(B), and the very small absorption bands generated at 419 and 408 cm−1 in TiO2 and all molar composites of TiO2/CP are attributed to the bending vibrations of Ti–O–Ti bonds, as shown in Fig. 4(C).18
| (Ahν)n = B(hν − Eg), | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
In general, it is observed that rutile phase TiO2 has less photocatalytic property compared to the anatase phase. However, anatase phase TiO2 has a bandgap of 3.11 eV, which is best suited under UV radiation. Many studies have been conducted in order to tune and decrease the bandgap of TiO2 and shift its efficiency towards solar radiation by various metals and non-metal co-doping.12,18 The bandgap in TiO2-doped CP zeolite composites decreases with the increasing surface area. It can be observed in Table 1 and Fig. S3 that the bandgap of TiO2 decreased from 3.11 eV to 2.98 eV in the 0.1 M TiO2/CP composite. There is a very slight decrease observed in the bandgap of 0.25, 0.5 and 1 M composites; this indicates that if the molar ratio of TiO2 increases, then the amount (1 g) of the CP zeolite is not enough to decrease the bandgap.26
TiO2-supported clinoptilolite (TiO2/CP) composites can reduce TiO2's electron–hole pair recombination rate via numerous mechanisms:
• Electron trap: the clinoptilolite zeolite structure can serve as an electron trap, trapping electrons and preventing their recombination with holes. Zeolites can function as electron sinks, delaying recombination and increasing the lifespan of reactive charge carriers, which improves photocatalytic activity.
• Charge carrier separation: the interaction between TiO2 and CP allows for charge carrier separation. The CP structure can take electrons from TiO2, while the nanoparticles can deliver holes, minimizing recombination and enhancing photocatalytic performance. Zeolite-supported TiO2 composites promote the generation of reactive species like hydroxyl radicals (˙OH), which are necessary for the breakdown of organic contaminants.
• Better light absorption: particularly in the UV-Vis region, the unique structure of the CP can improve light absorption because of its high surface area and pore volume, which can scatter light in a way that lengthens the optical path within the composite. This scattering effect can increase the absorption of light by TiO2 nanoparticles, which can increase the generation of electron–hole pairs and improve photocatalytic activity.27
• Fe0 acts as a new conduction band, lies below the conduction band of TiO2 and reduces the bandgap difference of TiO2, which previously worked efficiently only under UV radiation. The electron present in the valence band of TiO2 can now easily jump to the new conduction band, i.e. Fe0, under solar radiation, as shown Fig. 5.28
A calibration curve for CV dye was constructed by plotting absorbance against concentration (in ppm), revealing a linear relationship, as shown in Fig. S4 Chart A. The resulting analytical equation and correlation coefficient (R2) were derived and utilized for data analysis, enabling the calculation of the removal percentage and adsorption capacity:
| y = 0.0776x − 0.0096, | (5) |
| R2 = 0.9956. | (6) |
TiO2-500 °C has a band gap energy of 3.30 eV.35 This high band energy is not suitable for the degradation of CV dye under solar radiation. The TiO2 synthesized via the sol–gel method was calcined at two different temperatures (500 and 600 °C). The photocatalytic performance of TiO2 calcined at 500 and 600 °C (TiO2-500 °C and TiO2-600 °C) temperatures was investigated, and the results summarized in Fig. S4 Chart B revealed that TiO2-600 °C has a high removal efficiency of CV dye compared to TiO2-500 °C.
| S. no | Photocatalyst/sample | Radiation source | Removal% | Adsorption capacity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CP | UV | 51.19 | 13.82 |
| 2 | TiO2-500 °C | UV | 39.29 | 20.22 |
| 3 | TiO2-600 °C | UV | 58.67 | 24.13 |
| 4 | TiO2-600 °C | Solar | 48.45 | 10.47 |
| 5 | 0.1 M TiO2/CP | UV | 90.00 | 21.51 |
| 6 | 0.25 TiO2/CP | UV | 92.36 | 22.08 |
| 7 | 0.5 TiO2/CP | UV | 88.06 | 21.05 |
| 8 | 1.0 TiO2/CP | UV | 81.87 | 19.57 |
| 9 | 0.1 TiO2/CP | Solar | 88.52 | 21.16 |
| 10 | 0.25 TiO2/CP | Solar | 84.24 | 20.14 |
| 11 | 0.5 TiO2/CP | Solar | 86.99 | 20.79 |
| 12 | 1.0 TiO2/CP | Solar | 71.40 | 17.07 |
| 13 | Fe0–TiO2/CP | Solar | 77.89 | 17.91 |
| 14 | Fe0–TiO2/CP | UV | 80.19 | 12.38 |
| 15 | Fe0–TiO2 | Solar | 76.01 | 16.37 |
| 16 | Fe0–TiO2 | UV | 84.77 | 16.89 |
![]() | ||
| Fig. 6 Removal percent vs. time in UV (A) and solar radiations (B). UV-Visible spectra of CV dye in UV (C) and solar radiations (D) D = dark and L = light. | ||
The UV-vis spectra of CV dye degradation using various photocatalysts show a decrease in absorbance over time, indicating a reduction in dye concentration (Fig. 6(C) and (D) and Fig. S5).
As irradiation time increases, the characteristic peak's absorbance decreases, and the peak shifts downward, signifying enhanced removal efficiency. After 120 minutes, the peaks nearly flatten, suggesting that optimal removal is achieved within this timeframe.
In order to improve TiO2 efficiency under solar radiation, the strategy used was to synthesize the Fe0–TiO2/CP composite. The co-doping of Fe0 with TiO2 reduces the band gap of TiO2, allowing it to operate efficiently under solar radiation. The degradation efficiency of Fe0–TiO2/CP composite under solar radiation was not enhanced after doping with Fe0. As shown in Table 2, the maximum degradation of Fe0–TiO2/CP composite is 77.8%, which is less than 0.1 M TiO2/CP with 88.5% removal of CV dye under solar radiation in 120 minutes. However, the degradation efficiency of bare TiO2 from TiO2-600 °C (48%) to Fe0–TiO2 (76%) under solar radiation is increased, as shown in Table 2. The Fe0 doping did not considerably increase the degradation efficiency of TiO2/CP, which is confirmed by the XRD patterns, SEM images, TG/DTG analysis and BET analysis. As the zerovalent iron particles do exist in chain like structure, which have a sponge-like morphology and cover the external surface area of the composite, it results in a decreased average pore size of the Fe0–TiO2/CP, as shown in Table 1. The BET analysis showed that the average pore size of 0.1 MTiO2/CP (23.1 nm) decreased in the Fe0–TiO2/CP (13.9 nm) composite, leading to less adsorption of CV dye. This was also confirmed by the results reported in Table 2, which showed that 0.1 M TiO2/CP composite showed 21 and 21.5 mg g−1 of maximum adsorption capacity under UV and solar radiations, respectively, while the same composite with Fe0 doped (Fe0–TiO2/CP) offered maximum adsorption capacities of 17 and 12 mg g−1 under UV and solar radiations, respectively.
ln(qe − qt) = ln qe − k1t,
| (7) |
![]() | (8) |
For PSO, the R2 values are higher than those for PFO, as shown in Table 3. The adsorption of CV dye on all TiO2/CP composites showed the best fit to PSO. As depicted in Fig. 7(A) and (B), the experimental curve is a straight line plotted with PSO and PFO, respectively, for the adsorption of CV dye on a 0.1 M TiO2/CP composite. R2 values for PSO is 0.9685 and for PFO is 0.6973, confirming that the adsorption process best fits the PSO kinetic model.
| S. no | Photocatalyst/sample | Radiation source used | qeexp | Adsorption | Degradation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pseudo 1st order | Pseudo 2nd order | Pseudo 1st order | |||||||||
| qecalc | k1 | R2 | qecalc | k2 | R2 | K | R2 | ||||
| 1 | CP | UV | 3.81 | 5.37 | 0.06 | 0.88 | 6.04 | 0.02 | 0.69 | — | — |
| 3 | TiO2-600 °C | UV | 10.43 | 5.03 | 0.07 | 0.59 | 10.36 | 0.16 | 0.99 | 0.004 | 0.77 |
| 4 | TiO2-600 °C | Solar | 9.32 | 6.48 | 0.08 | 0.73 | 9.57 | 0.06 | 0.99 | 0.0009 | 0.92 |
| 5 | 0.1 M TiO2/CP | UV | 19.86 | 9.13 | 0.10 | 0.69 | 16.98 | 0.03 | 0.99 | 0.011 | 0.98 |
| 6 | 0.25 TiO2/CP | UV | 20.44 | 8.10 | 0.09 | 0.62 | 19.19 | 0.13 | 0.99 | 0.008 | 0.86 |
| 7 | 0.5 TiO2/CP | UV | 19.99 | 11.30 | 0.09 | 0.80 | 19.38 | 0.04 | 0.99 | 0.005 | 0.89 |
| 8 | 1.0 TiO2/CP | UV | 14.08 | 6.06 | 0.09 | 0.53 | 15.95 | 0.04 | 0.98 | 0.003 | 0.80 |
| 9 | 0.1 TiO2/CP | Solar | 19.13 | 5.45 | 0.08 | 0.42 | 19.19 | 0.30 | 0.99 | 0.005 | 0.89 |
| 10 | 0.25 TiO2/CP | Solar | 19.39 | 11.05 | 0.09 | 0.81 | 19.05 | 0.04 | 0.99 | 0.001 | 0.92 |
| 11 | 0.5 TiO2/CP | Solar | 18.39 | 9.09 | 0.09 | 0.69 | 18.45 | 0.05 | 0.99 | 0.005 | 0.87 |
| 12 | 1.0 TiO2/CP | Solar | 14.54 | 7.45 | 0.09 | 0.62 | 14.59 | 0.09 | 0.99 | 0.001 | 0.94 |
| 13 | Fe0–TiO2/CP | Solar | 13.17 | 5.71 | 0.08 | 0.55 | 13.97 | 0.15 | 0.99 | 0.004 | 0.93 |
| 14 | Fe0–TiO2/CP | UV | 9.63 | 6.17 | 0.07 | 0.78 | 9.49 | 0.09 | 0.98 | 0.006 | 0.91 |
![]() | ||
| Fig. 7 (A) Adsorption study of CV dye using pseudo-second-order model and (B) pseudo-first-order model, and degradation kinetics of CV dye using (C) pseudo-first-order model. | ||
The degradation process follows the PFO model, in which the reaction depends on the initial concentration of the dye in the solution. In the process of CV dye degradation, ˙OH and O2˙− are continuously generated by UV and solar radiations falling on the photo-catalyst containing semiconductor TiO2. These radicals are in excess, and the reaction rate depends merely on the dye concentration. The following equation is applied for degradation:
![]() | (9) |
The migration direction of photogenerated charge carriers in a composite is closely related to the band edge positions of the semiconductors. To determine these positions, the following formulas are used:
| ECB = X − EC − 0.5 Eg | (10) |
| EVB = ECB + Eg | (11) |
Here, X represents the absolute electronegativity of the semiconductor (5.81 eV), and EC is the energy of free electrons on the hydrogen scale, which is 4.50 eV. Using these formulas, the calculated edge potentials for TiO2/CP are 2.8 eV for the valence band (EVB) and −0.18 eV for the conduction band (ECB).37,38
In the Fe0–TiO2/CP composite, the electrons associated with Fe0, which have a reduction potential of approximately −0.41 to −0.44 V,39,40 can combine with oxygen in water to form superoxide radicals (˙O2−). The potential for forming superoxide radicals is −0.046 eV vs. NHE, and these radicals can mineralize CV dye. Simultaneously, the holes in the valence band of TiO2, with an edge potential of 2.8 eV, can directly react with CV dye to mineralize it. Furthermore, the holes in the TiO2 valence band can react with water to form hydroxyl radicals (˙OH) due to the valence band potential being higher than the H2O/˙OH potential (2.40 eV vs. NHE). These hydroxyl radicals can then oxidize CV dye into degradation products. This proposed mechanism is consistent with the results of free radical scavenger experiments, which identify the reactive species involved in the photocatalytic degradation process using the Fe0–TiO2/CP composite.
The formation of superoxide radical anions (˙O2−) occurs when electrons in the CB of TiO2 or Fe0 combine with oxygen through a reduction process. A key reason why the Fe0–TiO2/CP system produces more superoxide radicals than the TiO2/CP system lies in the difference in their reduction potentials. Specifically, the conduction band potential of TiO2 (−0.18 eV) is not sufficiently negative to reduce oxygen molecules to form superoxide radicals, given that the O2/˙O2− potential is −0.046 eV vs. NHE. In contrast, the reduction potential of Fe0 (−0.41 to −0.44 V)39,40 is more negative than the O2/˙O2− potential, allowing it to easily reduce oxygen molecules and produce superoxide radicals. The redox potentials of the conduction band and valence band of TiO2/CP are −0.18 and 2.8 eV, respectively, indicating that TiO2/CP acts as a mild reducing and strong oxidizing photocatalyst.41
| H-ESI-MS peaks | Intermediates | ESI-MS spectrum ions (m/z) |
|---|---|---|
| A | N,N,N′,N′,N′′,N′′-Hexamethylpararosaniline CV | 372.42 |
| B | N,N-Dimethyl-N′,N′-dimethyl-N′′-methylpararosaniline | 358.50 |
| C | N,N-Dimethyl-N′-methyl-N′′-methylpararosaniline | 344.67 |
| D | N,N-Dimethyl-N′,N′-methylpararosaniline | 344.33 |
| E | N-Methyl-N′-methyl-N′′-methylpararosaniline | 332.83 |
| F | N,N-Dimethyl-N′-methylpararosaniline | 330.67 |
| G | N-Methyl-N′-methylpararosaniline | 316.75 |
| H | N,N-Dimethylpararosaniline | 316.50 |
| I | N-Methylpararosaniline | 302.25 |
| J | Pararosaniline | 288.83 |
| K | 4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenol | 138.08 |
| L | 4-(N,N-Dimethylamino)-4-(N,N-dimethylamino)benzophenone | 269.92 |
| M | 4-(N-Methylamino)phenol | 124.08 |
| N | 4-aminophenol | 110.83 |
| O | 4-(N,N-Dimethylamino)-4-(N-methylamino)benzophenone | 255.00 |
| P | 4-(N,N-Dimethylamino)-4-aminobenzophenone | 240.75 |
| Q | 4-(N-Methylamino)-4-(N-methylamino)benzophenone | 240.67 |
| R | 4-(N-Methylamino)-4-aminobenzophenone | 226.00 |
| S | 4,4-Bis-aminobenzophenone | 213.83 |
Route 1: the attack of radical species on the CV dye molecule is a crucial step in the N-de-methylation pathway. This process begins with a radical species, such as ˙OH, abstracting a hydrogen atom from a methyl substituent of the amino group, which forms a carbon-centered radical. Depending on the specific reaction conditions, other radical species such as superoxide (O2˙−) radicals may also be involved in the attack on the dimethylamine group. This carbon-centered radical is highly reactive and can undergo further reactions. Another radical species then attacks the dimethylamine group, leading to the formation of a mono-de-methylated intermediate.
After the second radical attack, the intermediate molecule remains positively charged due to the delocalized positive charge over the conjugated triphenylmethane system of the original CV molecule. Although a neutral methyl group is removed during demethylation, the positive charge persists albeit with a slightly altered distribution. This positively charged intermediate can still be adsorbed on the photocatalyst surface, where further stepwise demethylation occurs.42
The cleavage of the C–N bond during the second radical attack is a heterolytic process. The first attack involves homolytic cleavage, in which a radical abstracts a hydrogen atom from a methyl group, leaving a carbon-centered radical intermediate. The second radical species then interacts with this intermediate, triggering a rearrangement in which the C–N bond is broken unevenly.
The nitrogen atom retains both electrons from the bond, while the carbon-centered radical remains a smaller neutral molecule, such as formaldehyde. This heterolytic cleavage results in a final, less-methylated cationic intermediate and a neutral byproduct, with the positive charge remaining on the larger triphenylmethane structure.43
The N-de-methylated intermediates of CV were identified using H-ESI mass spectrometry. The molecular ion peaks, as shown in Fig. S6 and listed in Table 4, confirmed the presence of various intermediates. These species correspond to three pairs of isomeric molecules with two to four fewer methyl groups than CV. For instance, B is formed by the removal of a methyl group from the CV molecule. In the first pair of isomers, C is formed by the removal of two methyl groups from two sides of the CV molecule, while D is produced by the removal of two methyl groups from the same side of the CV structure.
In the second pair of isomers, E is formed by the removal of three methyl groups from each side of the CV molecule, while F is produced by the removal of two methyl groups from one side and one methyl group from the other side. In the third pair of isomers, H is formed by the removal of two methyl groups from two sides of the CV molecule, while G is produced by the removal of two methyl groups from the same side and one methyl group from the remaining two sides. Further, N-de-methylation leads to the formation of I and J. The N-de-methylated intermediates (A–J) are shown in Fig. 9, Scheme 1 (Route 1). After that, the direct attack of the (˙OH) radical on the central carbon of J produces N and S through chromophore cleavage.44
Route 2: however, the degradation of CV is initiated by the highly reactive hydroxyl radical (˙OH), which attacks the central carbon atom of the molecule. This central carbon is part of the extensively conjugated triphenylmethane chromophore responsible for CV's deep purple color. The attack likely occurs due to the electrophilic nature of the central carbon, making it susceptible to nucleophilic species like the hydroxyl radical or radical attack, leading to bond breaking. The hydroxyl radical's attack initiates the cleavage of a carbon–carbon bond connecting one of the N,N-dimethylaminophenyl rings to the central carbon atom, directly breaking the extended conjugation system of the CV molecule. This bond breaking results in the formation of intermediates, including 4-(dimethylamino) phenol (K), which is formed from the cleavage of one of the N,N-dimethylaminophenyl groups. Another intermediate, 4-(N,N dimethylamino)-4-(N,N-dimethylamino)benzo-phenone (L), also known as Michler's ketone, is formed from the remaining two N,N-dimethylaminophenyl groups still attached to the central carbon, which is now part of a ketone structure after bond rearrangement and oxygen incorporation. Afterwards, compounds N and S were possibly formed by a series of N-de-methylated intermediates in a stepwise manner from K and L, respectively, as shown in Fig. 9, Scheme 1 (Route 2). The degradation process does not necessarily stop at these intermediates. They can undergo further reactions, such as N-demethylation, ring-opening, and eventual mineralization to simpler, less toxic compounds, like CO2 and H2O, or other intermediates, like carboxylic acids, depending on the specific reaction conditions and the presence of other oxidizing agents.45,46
According to TG/DTG profiles, the CP, TiO2 and their composites showed thermal stability at higher temperatures up to 900 °C. Dehydration of water caused a very minor loss of weight, but no additional structural or internal changes were noticed. The TiO2 removed the maximum amount of CV dye (58 and 48%) under UV and solar irradiations. In addition, a maximum 92% removal of CV dye was achieved by 0.25 MTiO2/CP composite under UV radiation compared to solar radiation, whereas a maximum CV dye removal of 88% was achieved by 0.1 M TiO2/CP under solar radiation. Furthermore, the band gap of 0.1 M TiO2/CP was significantly reduced, which in turn showed higher removal efficiency in solar radiations.
Scavenger study showed that the TiO2/CP composite primarily generates ˙OH radicals in CV dye degradation, while the Fe0–TiO2/CP composite produces both ˙OH and ˙O2−radicals, which have played a vital role in enhancing photocatalytic efficiency due to the favorable reduction potential of Fe0. The degradation ability of Fe0–TiO2/CP composites to produce ˙O2− radicals significantly contributes to enhancing their efficiency.
The degradation of CV occurs through two routes: route 1 involves stepwise N-de-methylation via radical attacks, breaking C–N bonds and forming less-methylated intermediates, while Route 2 involves hydroxyl radical attack on the central carbon, cleaving C–C bonds and disrupting the conjugated chromophore structure. Both routes lead to the breakdown of the CV dye molecule. In conclusion, using CP as a support material for TiO2 is a significant option because CP is neutral, abundant in nature, and inexpensive, making TiO2/CP composites an eco-friendly photocatalyst that offers a promising solution for the removal of CV dye.
Raw data are available upon request from the corresponding author.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2025 |