Diogo Alves
Gálico
,
Claudia Manuela
Santos Calado
and
Muralee
Murugesu
*
Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5, Canada. E-mail: m.murugesu@uottawa.ca
First published on 10th May 2023
In this perspective, we provide an overview of the recent achievements in luminescent lanthanide-based molecular cluster-aggregates (MCAs) and illustrate why MCAs can be seen as the next generation of highly efficient optical materials. MCAs are high nuclearity compounds composed of rigid multinuclear metal cores encapsulated by organic ligands. The combination of high nuclearity and molecular structure makes MCAs an ideal class of compounds that can unify the properties of traditional nanoparticles and small molecules. By bridging the gap between both domains, MCAs intrinsically retain unique features with tremendous impacts on their optical properties. Although homometallic luminescent MCAs have been extensively studied since the late 1990s, it was only recently that heterometallic luminescent MCAs were pioneered as tunable luminescent materials. These heterometallic systems have shown tremendous impacts in areas such as anti-counterfeiting materials, luminescent thermometry, and molecular upconversion, thus representing a new generation of lanthanide-based optical materials.
Although not restricted to nanoparticles36–40 and molecular complexes,41–45 both classes of materials represent the most studied systems for optical applications, each with its own merits and limitations. For example, much of the success in using nanoparticles relies on fine tunability of the composition due to the large number of metal ions within the crystalline lattice, enabling optimization of the optical properties through precise control of composition, with the main drawback still being the lack of homogeneity with size distribution. As a result, the observed property attained will be the result of different smaller parts. On the other hand, molecular compounds offer atomic-level control due to their well-defined structure. However, the limited number of metal ions in such compounds restricts the effectiveness of energy-transfer (ET) processes between different lanthanides, thereby limiting the possibilities for controlling optical output.
In this perspective, we will highlight an emerging class of lanthanide materials, molecular cluster-aggregates (MCAs), for their optical applications. We will discuss the advantages of this class of materials in terms of composition, ET, and control over their optical output. Our focus will be on recent achievements in the luminescence of trivalent lanthanide-based MCAs. Furthermore, we will not delve into the synthetic strategies46–50 or the theoretical aspects of lanthanides luminescence51–55 but rather we summarize and highlight some of the recent achievements in this area.
This article starts with a brief discussion about lanthanide-based MCAs (Section 2) and trivalent lanthanide luminescence (Section 3). We subsequently focused our attention on homometallic luminescent MCAs (Section 4) before discussing the impacts and potential that heterometallic MCAs could have in some applications which require effective control of ET processes, such as luminescent thermometers and anti-counterfeiting materials (Section 5). We conclude this perspective by providing an outlook on possible future directions and their potential implications for the field of optical materials.
Fig. 1 Molecular structure of selected MCAs. {Ln6} (CCDC number: 1958091);79{Ln9} (CCDC number: 956639);80{Ln20} (CCDC number: 2023766);81{Ln60} (CCDC number: 2152485);82 and {Ln140} (CCDC number: 1569507).83 Colour code: Dark orange: Ln3+; grey: carbon; red: oxygen; blue: nitrogen; light green: chlorine. Hydrogen atoms were omitted in all structures for clarity. |
For the latter, Staples, Zheng, and co-workers paved the way in the study of the synthetic coordination chemistry of lanthanides at high pH by pioneering the control of hydrolysis and halide-templating in a pentadecanuclear lanthanide system.84–86 This resulted in new strategies for producing high-nuclearity MCAs with a certain degree of control. Since then, several research groups have successfully reported intriguing and impressive giant complexes such as {Er60},82,87–90{Nd104},91 and {Gd140},83 mostly being developed by Long, Zheng, Kong and co-workers.
Structurally, MCAs can be viewed as a merging of the nanoparticle and molecular complex realms (Scheme 1). The sizes and high nuclearities resemble those observed for ultrasmall nanoparticles while maintaining high homogeneity in size and number of metal ions due to the molecular nature. Therefore, achieving high performance and fine-tunability in the composition akin to nanoparticles is possible while alleviating issues related to size distribution.
Scheme 1 Molecular cluster-aggregates. The union between molecular complex and nanoparticle worlds. Left: [Dy2(bpm)(tfaa)6] complex (CCDC number: 1859276).98 Centre: {Eu20} MCA (CCDC number: 2023766).81 Right: Representation of a heterometallic spherical nanoparticle. Colour code for left and centre: dark orange: Ln3+; grey: carbon; red: oxygen; blue: nitrogen; light green: chlorine; dark green: fluoride. Hydrogen atoms were omitted in all structures for clarity. For the nanoparticle representation, colours were randomly chosen and have no meaning. |
From the application perspective, earlier high-nuclearity MCAs were primarily designed for use as molecular magnetic coolers.62–70 Little attention was paid to exploring their potential as highly efficient optical materials. However, in recent years, our research group has been focused on developing heterometallic MCAs for various applications, unlocking the vast potential of this class of compounds.79,81,92–96
Fig. 2 Partial energy-levels diagram for trivalent lanthanides. Energies obtained from Carnall.99 |
Another crucial aspect of the 4f–4f transitions is the parity-forbidden nature of these transitions. Laporte's rule forbids intraconfigurational electric dipole transitions, such as 4f–4f.97 Consequently, due to the low transition probabilities, the absorption cross-sections for lanthanide ions are much smaller than other luminescent species. Hence, the relaxation of the selection rules is pivotal for making the 4f–4f transitions “less forbidden”.
This can be achieved by placing the lanthanide ion in a non-centrosymmetric coordination environment, resulting in mixing electronic and vibrational wavefunctions. Even though the wavefunctions mixing makes the 4f–4f transitions less forbidden, transition probabilities remain weak with molar absorption coefficients much smaller than 100 M−1 cm−1.
Considering this, some strategies have been developed to effectively harvest the energy to the emitter levels of each lanthanide. Some of the approaches relevant to understanding the examples in Sections 4 and 5 will be briefly discussed here.
When Ln3+ ions are placed in close proximity to each other, ET processes could be efficiently controlled to modulate the optical output.100–108 This is an easy task for nanoparticles, with hundreds to tens of thousands of metal ions, but more limited for low nuclearity molecular complexes. Since efficient ET transfer is at the crux of the upconversion (UC) mechanism (vide infra),109–112 it is easy to understand the supremacy of nanoparticles over molecular UC.
(1) An efficient ISC process: For this, an energy gap of at least 5000 cm−1 between the ligand S1 and T1 is required.116–118
(2) An efficient T1 to Ln3+ ET process: According to Latva's empirical rules, the optimal gap between the ligand T1 state and Ln3+ emitter level is around 2500–4000 cm−1. Energetic differences above 4000 cm−1 do not allow an efficient ET. Energetic differences below 2500 cm−1 result in a strong back energy-transfer (BET) from the Ln3+ ion to the ligand.119
Bloembergen first observed the phenomenon of upconversion in 1959,120 but it wasn't until the pioneering research of Auzel,121 Ovsyankin, and Feofilov122 in 1966 that an appropriate understanding and explanation was developed. Since then, UC has been extensively studied in low-phonon solid materials and nanoparticles, with applications in a variety of fields, including bioimaging,123–128 photodynamic therapy,129–133 optogenetics,134–138 upconversion lasing,139–143 super-resolution microscopy,144–148 luminescence thermometry,149–158 anti-counterfeiting materials,159–163 and many others.
Fig. 3 shows a simplified diagram for some of the UC mechanisms relevant to the discussion in Section 5. This perspective does not focus on reviewing the different UC mechanisms. For this, we recommend that readers to consider the review article by Auzel.109
Until the early 2000s, studies of the upconversion phenomena were mainly focused on Ln3+-based nanoparticles and low-phonon solid materials. Since then, some groups have started investigating the UC process in low-nuclearity molecular compounds to overcome some intrinsic issues inherent to nanoparticles (vide supra). Despite the success of the earlier works in observing UC in molecular species, the use of low-nuclearities compounds resulted in low upconversion quantum yields (UCQY),164–170 much below the values observed for nanoparticles and low-phonon solid materials.171–173
Capping ligand | Emitter ion | Lifetime/μs | Quantum yield/% | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
a PepCO2 = 2-[{3-(((tert-butoxycarbonyl)amino)methyl)benzyl}amino]acetic acid. L1 = 3,3′-((1E,1′E)-((4,5-dimethyl-1,2-phnylene)bis(azaneylylidene))bis(methaneylylidene))bis(benzene-1,2-diol). | |||||
{Ln5} | Dibenzoylmethane | Eu3+ | 0.06 | — | 174 |
{Ln5} | Dibenzoylmethane | Eu3+ | — | — | 183 |
{Ln5} | Dibenzoylmethane | Tb3+ | — | — | 183 |
{Ln5} | Dibenzoylmethane | Nd3+ | 8.29 | — | 184 |
{Ln5} | Dibenzoylmethane | Yb3+ | 9.95 | — | 184 |
{Ln6} | Triethanolamine | Er3+ | — | — | 79 |
{Ln8} | 2,2,6,6-Tetramethylheptane-3,5-dione | Eu3+ | — | — | 183 |
{Ln8} | 2,2,6,6-Tetramethylheptane-3,5-dione | Tb3+ | — | — | 183 |
{Ln9} | Benzoylacetone | Eu3+ | — | — | 176 |
{Ln9Na10} | 5′-Methyl-2,2′-bipyridyl-6-phosphonic acid | Eu3+ | 2370, 240 | 32 | 185 |
{Ln9Na10} | 5′-Methyl-2,2′-bipyridyl-6-phosphonic acid | Yb3+ | 9.3 | 0.22 | 185 |
{Ln9} | Hexylsalycilate | Tb3+ | 1200 | 90 | 179 |
{Ln9} | Hexylsalycilate | Yb3+ | 2, 0.6 | — | 179 |
{Ln9} | Acetylacetonate | Eu3+ | — | — | 183 |
{Ln9} | Acetylacetonate | Tb3+ | — | — | 183 |
{Y9-nLnn} | Acetylacetonate | Eu3+ | — | — | 186 |
{Ln9} | 2-(Hydroxymethyl)pyridine | Eu3+ | — | — | 187 |
{Ln9} | Methyl 4-methylsalicylate | Tb3+ | 815 | 31 | 180 |
{Ln9} | Methyl 5-methylsalicylate | Tb3+ | 190 | 2.4 | 180 |
{Ln9} | Methylsalicylate | Tb3+ | 264 | 6.7 | 180 |
{Ln1Gd8} | Butylsalicylate | Tb3+ | 960 | 14 | 188 |
{Ln2Gd7} | Butylsalicylate | Tb3+ | 1060 | 23 | 188 |
{Ln5Gd4} | Butylsalicylate | Tb3+ | 1160 | 33 | 188 |
{Ln8Gd1} | Butylsalicylate | Tb3+ | 1170 | 40 | 188 |
{Ln9} | Butylsalicylate | Tb3+ | 1160 | 39 | 188 |
{Ln1Gd8} | Butylsalicylate | Yb3+ | 0.57 | — | 189 |
{Ln3Gd6} | Butylsalicylate | Yb3+ | 0.56 | — | 189 |
{Ln7Gd2} | Butylsalicylate | Yb3+ | 0.57 | — | 189 |
{Ln1Lu8} | Butylsalicylate | Yb3+ | 0. 74 | — | 189 |
{Ln3Lu6} | Butylsalicylate | Yb3+ | 0.63 | — | 189 |
{Ln7Lu2} | Butylsalicylate | Yb3+ | 0.61 | — | 189 |
{Ln9} | Butylsalicylate | Yb3+ | 0.60 | — | 189 |
{Ln13} | (Ph4Si4O8)4− | Eu3+ | 884 | 50 | 181 |
{Ln14} | Acetylacetonate | Tb3+ | — | — | 190 |
{Ln14} | Acetylacetonate | Dy3+ | — | — | 190 |
{Ln14} | 2,3-Dihydroxybenzaldehyde | Yb3+ | 7.83 | 0.24 | 191 |
{Ln14} | 2,3-Dihydroxybenzaldehyde | Nd3+ | 192 | ||
{Ln15} | PepCO2 and dibenzoylmethane | Eu3+ | — | 16 | 182 |
{Ln15} | PepCO2 and dibenzoylmethane | Tb3+ | — | <3 | 182 |
{Ln18} | L1 and 2,3-dihydroxybenzaldehyde | Yb3+ | 9.11 | 0.16 | 193 |
{Ln18} | L1 and 2,3-dihydroxybenzaldehyde | Nd3+ | 6.44 | 0.17 | 194 |
{Ln18} | L1 and 2,3-dihydroxybenzaldehyde | Eu3+ | — | — | 195 |
{Ln20} | 3,5-Bis[3-(pyrid-2-yl)-1,2,4-triazolyl]-pyridine | Tb3+ | 605 | — | 196 |
{Ln20} | Chloro-2-pyridinol | Eu3+ | — | — | 81 |
{Ln20} | Chloro-2-pyridinol | Tb3+ | 1314, 454, 107 | 55.8 | 81 |
{Ln42} | 2-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde | Nd3+ | 6.37 | 0.76 | 197 |
{Ln42} | 2-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde | Yb3+ | 11.65 | 0.20 | 198 |
{Ln42} | 2-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde | Sm3+ | 15.65 | 0.33 | 198 |
{Ln42} | 2-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde | Eu3+ | 22.8 | 1.74 | 199 |
{Ln42} | 2-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde | Tb3+ | — | <0.1 | 199 |
{Ln48} | 2-Thiophenecarboxylic acid | Eu3+ | 284 | 8.40 | 200 |
{Ln48} | 3-Furancarboxylic acid | Tb3+ | 905 | 3.11 | 200 |
In 2020, our group reported the first demonstration of NIR-to-NIR emission on a water-soluble Er3+-based MCA.79 The [Er6(teaH)6(NO3)6] exhibit a wheel-like molecular structure in which each Er3+ is encapsulated by one teaH2− (doubly deprotonated triethanolamine) and one nitrate anion. We demonstrated the water stability via NMR of the Y3+ analogue and by TGA, powder X-ray, and FTIR analysis of the {Er6} MCA powder before and after a solubilization/drying procedure. By exciting the MCA with a 980 nm laser, we observed the characteristic telecom range 4I13/2 → 4I15/2 transition band centred at approximately 1530 nm. This was an exciting result as NIR-to-NIR emissions are critical for biomedical imaging, telecommunications, photonics and optoelectronics fields.175
Among all the possible nuclearities, nonanuclear hourglass-like MCAs are the most studied in luminescence. These robust systems can be seen as two square pyramids sharing the apical vertex (Fig. 4) and are easily synthesized, stable in several solvents, and the most attractive fact is that they can be prepared with different encapsulating ligands, promoting a toolbox to investigate the impact of other organic moieties on the MCAs luminescent properties.
Fig. 4 Metal core structure for {Ln9} MCAs. (a) Side view and (b) top view. CCDC number: 956639.80 Colour code: Dark orange: Ln3+; red: oxygen. Hydrogen atoms were omitted in the structure for clarity. |
The first luminescent nonanuclear MCA was reported by Yan and co-workers in 2002.176 These MCAs, [Ln9(μ4-O)2(μ3-OH)8(μ-BA)8(BA)8]−[HN(CH2CH3)3]+·(CH3OH)2(CHCl3) (Ln = Sm3+, Eu3+, Gd3+, Dy3+, and Er3+) were assembled using benzoylacetone (BA) as the ligand. However, luminescent properties were reported only for the {Eu9} congener. This outcome is not surprising, as the triplet state of BA is positioned at around 21700 cm−1,177,178 which makes it an ideal energetic position to sensitize Eu3+ ions, but not others.
On the other hand, in 2007, Kushida and co-workers reported Tb3+ and Yb3+ homometallic {Ln9} MCAs with the same metal core topology with hexylsalicylate as the capping ligand.179 The triplet state of this ligand is located approximately at 23200 cm−1, 2800 cm−1 above the Tb3+ 5D4 emitter level, thus, acting as a highly efficient antenna for Tb3+ sensitization. Consequently, an impressive emission quantum yield of 90% was observed. For the {Yb9} analogue, the NIR emission was observed but too weak to allow a complete study.
Posteriorly, Hasegawa and co-workers published a report describing the same nonanuclear core-structure surrounded by methylsalycilate, methyl 4-methylsalicylate, and methyl 5-methylsalicylate.180 The triplet state of these ligands occurs at lower energies than the previous example (hexylsalicylate) and the energetic proximity of the triplet state and Tb3+ emitter level results in a more pronounced back-ET, and consequently, lower quantum yields.
These previous works show the elegance of the nonanuclear hourglass-like MCAs. By changing the capping ligand, while keeping the same metal-core structure, the first system is optimal for sensitizing Eu3+ while the second one acts as a better sensitizer for Tb3+ ions. The study of luminescent homometallic {Ln9} MCAs were further extended for systems containing several other ligands (Table 1).
In 2022, Sun and co-workers reported a {Eu13} nanocage exhibiting a Keggin-like structure, prepared with a highly symmetric (Ph4Si4O8)4− capping ligand.181 This MCA has a similar fourfold symmetry as that of the macrocyclic tetrasilane and shows potential for application in optical, catalysis, and photoelectric fields. The rigid structure in which the Eu3+ atoms are bridged by O2− rather than the OH− bridges commonly observed for MCAs results in a higher quantum yield (50%) due to the reduced vibrational quenching pathways.
In 2013, Roesky and co-workers described a pentadecanuclear system as the first MCA prepared with peptoids as supporting ligands for nanoscale bio-compatible applications.182 The [Ln15(μ3-OH)20(PepCO2)10(DBM)10Cl]4+ MCA is assembled via heterocubane subunits organized in a pentagonal ring arrangement. The photoluminescence studies of Eu3+ and Tb3+-based systems showed the expected emission in the visible range, and their applicability as probes in cell culture was evaluated using time-resolved luminescent microscopy. In vitro studies with HeLa tumour cells revealed an accumulation of the clusters in the endosomal-lysosomal system with moderate cytotoxicity for these cells.
Recently, our group started studying one of the most versatile MCA for optical applications, {Ln20}.81 This icosanuclear MCA consists of a rigid spherical metal-core surrounded by chloro-2-pyridinol (chp) ligands with the [Ln20(chp)30(CO3)12(NO3)6(H2O)6] chemical formula. This MCA resembles ultrasmall nanoparticles of size with a diameter of approximately 2.2 nm. Within the cluster, lanthanide ions are located in 4 different coordination sites with different local pseudo-symmetries (two distinct D3h sites, one Cs and one C4v site). We proved the solubility and stability of this MCA in acetonitrile and methanol by means of NMR and DLS techniques. The chp ligand triplet state is located up to 24961 cm−1, enabling an efficient ET for Tb3+ ions but not for Eu3+ and Sm3+. The quantum yield for {Tb20} in solid-state was determined as 55.8% due to the efficient sensitization via chp ligands. The heterometallic {Ln20} MCAs represent a milestone in the optical applications of MCAs, as will be discussed in the next section.
Over the last few years, Schipper and Jones groups have developed nanoring-shaped homometallic MCAs with different nuclearities for optically sensing several analytes.191–195,197–199 Some remarkable examples include {Yb14}, {Yb18}, and {Nd42} for explosives sensing, {Nd14}, {Nd18}, and {Yb18} as antibiotics probes, {Nd14} for Cu2+, Co2+, H2PO4−, and F− detection, {Eu18} and {Yb18} for anthrax biomarkers sensing. These MCAs highlight the potential that this class of compound holds in the sensors field. However, as will be discussed in Section 5, we truly believe that studying heterometallic compositions for these nanorings could have more impact in consolidating MCAs as efficient optical materials.
More recently, Bu and co-workers reported the {Eu48} and {Tb48}, the largest luminescent MCA to date.200 These MCAs feature a nanopillar-like structure constructed from Ln3 triangles and Ln5 square pyramid units. The red and green characteristic emissions from Eu3+ and Tb3+ display a temperature-dependent behaviour over the 88–298 K range, which opens the possibility of using such nanoarchitecture as luminescent thermometers.
As discussed in this section, several examples homometallic luminescent MCAs are reported in the literature. While some unique and innovative systems have been reported, we believe that the true potential of MCAs can only be fully realized through heterometallic structures, which will be discussed in the following section.
The initial illustration of luminescent heterometallic MCA features the well-known nonanuclear hourglass-like MCA with acac− as the hydrolysis-limiting ligand.201 By synthesizing MCAs with varying Eu3+/Tb3+ ratios, the authors tuned the emission colour output. Despite the authors not fully recognizing its potential, this work marked the beginning of harnessing the power of heterometallic lanthanide-based MCAs for luminescence applications and stands as a milestone achievement in the field.
Inspired by this previous research, we questioned whether we could manipulate lanthanide–lanthanide ET processes within a single MCA unit.
To answer this question, we started our journey into heterometallic MCAs with the hexanuclear wheel, [Er3Yb3(teaH)6(NO3)6] (Fig. 5a). As aforementioned, the {Er6} wheel is the first example of a water-soluble MCA showing NIR-to-NIR emissions.79 In the same work, we demonstrated that by replacing three Er3+ atoms with Yb3+, an 85% enhancement of the NIR emission could be attained in the heterometallic {Er3Yb3} wheel owing to improved absorption of the 980 nm laser by Yb3+ ions (Fig. 5b). Furthermore, by changing the solvent to deuterated water, a significant emission increase was achieved, suggesting a strong interaction between the Er3+ ions with the OH oscillators from the solvent and pointing out that bulkier ligands would be more efficient in shielding the metal core from the external environment.
Fig. 5 (a) Single-crystal structure for {Ln6} MCAs (CCDC number: 1958091). (b) Energy-transfer mechanism for the NIR-to-NIR emission.79 Colour code: Dark orange: Ln3+; grey: carbon; red: oxygen; blue: nitrogen. Hydrogen atoms were omitted in the structure for clarity. |
Aiming to obtain molecular UC with MCAs, we synthesized a series of pentadecanuclear MCAs containing Yb3+ (absorber), Er3+ (emitter), and Y3+ (optically silent) ions.92 In these MCAs, 2,2-dimethylolpropionic acid (Hdmp) ligand was used to encapsulate the pentadecanuclear metal core (Fig. 6) in which the lanthanide ions are distributed in three different local symmetries (D4d, D2d, and C2v geometries in a ratio of 1:2:2). However, similarly to the teaH2− ligand in the {Er3Yb3} MCA, the use of Hdmp ligand do not effectively prevents interaction with the environment and the molecular UC was only observed at solid-state. Nevertheless, the UC quantum yields (UCQY) obtained in this work were unprecedented for the molecular UC field, reaching values of 10−4 to 10−3%. Although low, before this work, the maximum values obtained for UCQY were below 10−6%; hence, this work was pivotal in understanding the superiority of MCAs as molecular upconverters compared with low-nuclearity complexes.
Fig. 6 Single-crystal structure for {Ln15} MCAs (CCDC number: 2023378) and mechanism for red and green UC emissions.92 Colour code: Dark orange: Ln3+; grey: carbon; red: oxygen. Hydrogen atoms were omitted in the structure for clarity. |
More specifically, in this work, we synthesized five different compositions, {Er2Yb13}, {Er10Yb5}, {Y10Er1Yb4}, {Y13Er2}, and {Y10Er5}. The first composition was synthesized to ensure an excess of donor atoms in relation to acceptors. The second composition aimed the opposite. The third composition added Y3+ as an optically inactive atom to distance the optically active atoms. The last two compositions were synthesized containing only Er3+ as an optically active ion targeting to evaluate the possibility of Er3+-based ESA UC. These last two compositions do not show any emission upon excitation at 980 and 808 nm, confirming the absence of the ESA mechanism. The green and red emission components from Er3+ were observed for the other three compositions, occurring via the ETU mechanism (Fig. 6). The MCAs show extremely high UCQY compared to other molecular upconverters. The values obtained were 8.3 × 10−3% for {Y10Er1Yb4}, 1.5 × 10−3 for {Er2Yb13}, and 2.8 × 10−4 for {Er10Yb5}. These results indicate that the higher UCQY value observed for {Y10Er1Yb4} is due to the separation between the optically active ions, reducing the possibility of migration and concentration quenching within the MCA, thus, highlighting the impact of composition control when aiming molecular UC with MCAs.
Simultaneously with the previous work, Charbonnière and co-workers investigated the molecular UC in nonanuclear hourglass-like MCAs.202 By synthesizing the [TbYb8(acac)16(OH)10] MCA, they reported the first MCA showing the CUC mechanism with a UCQY of 1 × 10−5%. More recently,203 by changing the composition to [Tb4Yb5(acac)16(OH)10] and deuterating the ligands, solvent, and the OH− bridges, the overall performance was significantly improved (UCQY = 2.8 × 10−4%). In this elegant study, the authors report, for the first time in solution, cooperative upconversion of luminescence with the {Yb9} MCA. This process results in an emission band at 503 nm when excited by a 980 nm light source.
As previously discussed, our team has made a significant contribution to the field by focusing studying of the {Ln20} class of MCAs (Fig. 7). In our initial investigation with heterometallic {Ln20} MCAs, we successfully isolated a range of Eu3+/Tb3+-based compounds, varying in composition from {Eu1Tb19} to {Eu6Tb14}.81 This allowed us to fine-tune the emission colour output from green to red. This work clearly shows the impact that MCAs can have on the anticounterfeiting materials field, with the development of optical barcodes with the emission colour output finely tuned within the same MCA unit. The success in achieving this resides in how the composition control impacts the Tb3+ to Eu3+ ET processes. The ET efficiency is more than double in {Eu6Tb14} than observed for {Eu2Tb18} due to the increased number of acceptors within the same MCA unit. We have also been able to observe Tb3+ to Sm3+ ET by exploring {Sm4Tb16}, {Sm10Tb10}, and {Sm16Tb4} compositions, each one containing different ratios between Sm3+ and Tb3+ emission components. Additionally, by finely controlling the ratio of Eu3, Gd3+, and Tb3+ atoms and precisely selecting a suitable excitation energy (355 nm) we have been able to obtain white-light emission with the {Eu3Gd5Tb12} composition due to a favoured blue emission component from the chp ligand when adding Gd3+ to the MCA.
Fig. 7 Metal core structure of the {Ln20} MCAs (CCDC number: 2023766)81 and the energy transfer mechanism for antenna effect and UC emissions.81,95 Colour code: Dark orange: Ln3+; grey: carbon; red: oxygen. Hydrogen atoms were omitted in the structure for clarity. |
We further explored the Tb3+ to Eu3+ ET in {Ln20} MCAs for luminescence thermometry applications.93 We synthesized {Ln20} MCAs with four different compositions in which we kept the Eu3+/Tb3+ ratios constant (4:1). The {Eu4Tb16}, {Eu3Gd5Tb12}, {Eu2Gd10Tb8}, and {Eu1Gd15Tb4} compositions were synthesized, and the temperature-dependent emission properties were evaluated in an acetonitrile solution (0.1 mg mL−1). The increasing amount of Gd3+ atoms aimed for a physical distancing between the donor (Tb3+) and acceptor (Eu3+) atoms while keeping the ratios constant. Our results indicated a decrease in the Tb3 to Eu3+ ET efficiency from 86.7% for {Eu4Tb16} to 60.5% for {Eu1Gd15Tb4} MCA. This reduction of the ET efficiency negatively impacted the thermometric performance. For {Eu4Tb16}, a maximum relative sensitivity of 4.17% °C−1 was obtained, decreasing to 1.82% °C−1 for {Eu1Gd15Tb4}.
In this work, we also compared the photophysical and thermometric performances of {Eu4Tb16} in solution and solid-state, which shows no difference, suggesting a high composition homogeneity and proving that the ET processes operate solely within the MCA unit. The relative sensitivity obtained for these {Ln20} MCAs are in the same range as other Ln3+-based molecular luminescent ratiometric thermometers;204–219 however, the fact that the ET process occurs within the same cluster unit is a great advantage, as it allows us to control the performance at an individual cluster level.
More recently, our group used this same system to explore a new luminescence thermometry approach, the time-gated luminescence thermometry.96 We take advantage of the Tb3+ to Eu3+ ET processes and different decay dynamics for {Eu5Tb15} MCA to implement a strategy in which a pulsed lamp is used to excite the sample and various delays were employed on the detection channel. This promising new approach that can help move from laboratory equipment to real-life applications by eliminating any background emission that can plague the luminescence thermometry implementation. This approach also resulted in a 250% enhancement of the relative thermal sensitivity for {Eu5Tb15} MCA, from 2.79 to 9.78% °C−1.
After exploring the ligand-based sensitization for {Ln20} MCAs and understanding the composition control impact for optical barcoding81 and luminescence thermometry,93 we moved one step further, targeting the use of {Ln20} as molecular upconverters.95 To tap into this mechanism, we synthesized {Gd11Tb2Yb7}, aiming for a cooperative UC mechanism (Fig. 7). For this system, Yb3+ acts as the absorber (donor) species, Tb3+ as the emitter ion, and Gd3+ as an optically silent ion to guarantee a distancing of Tb3+ ions within the structure. Upconverted emission was successfully observed upon a 980 nm laser excitation. The rigid spherical shape of the {Ln20} MCA, which resembles spherical nanoparticles, enabled the reduction of molecular vibrations, minimizing possible vibrational mediated quenching pathways, thus resulting in a UCQY of 1.04 × 10−4%. Intending further to expand the possibilities in the molecular UC field, we target the demonstration of luminescence thermometry obtained via the molecular UC demonstrated in this work. It should be noted that prior to this work, molecular UC works were limited to demonstrating the presence of the mechanism, and there was no previous report of potential applications. To tap into the luminescence thermometry demonstration, we replaced some of the Gd3+ ions with Eu3+ intending to access the Yb3+ → Tb3+ → Eu3+ ET process (Fig. 7). Four different compositions were synthesized, namely, {Eu8Gd3Tb2Yb7}, {Eu9Gd2Tb2Yb7}, {Eu10Gd1Tb2Yb7}, and {Eu11Tb2Yb7}, and the temperature dependent UC was measured. We have observed considerable changes in the ratios of Tb3+ and Eu3+ emission bands and thermometric performances, reaching a maximum relative sensitivity of 3.05% °C−1 for {Eu9Gd2Tb2Yb7} MCA. The success in implementing molecular UC-based luminescence thermometry with {Ln20} opens new avenues for molecular upconverters.
After observing Yb3+/Tb3+-based cooperative UC with some of the {Ln20} MCAs, we decide to explore the Yb3+/Ho3+ pair (Fig. 8).94 Although widely demonstrated for nanoparticles, glasses, and other classes of low-phonon materials,220–224 Ho3+ UC was never observed with a molecular system. The main reason is the mismatching between Yb3+ (donor) and Ho3+ (acceptor) electronic states. In this work, we have shown for the first-time molecular UC (Fig. 8a) and molecular NIR-to-NIR emission (Fig. 8b) based on the Yb3+/Ho3+ pair. The UC process occurs via the ETU mechanism with the absorption of two 980 nm photons, thus populating Ho3+ green emitter states (5S2 and 5F4). Photons can be emitted by this state or non-radiatively decay to the red emitter state (5F5). Additionally, we proved that molecular vibrations are not always the villains for molecular UC with the νCO and/or νCCaromatic at ∼1595 cm−1 helping to bridge the gap between donor and acceptor levels (Fig. 8c and d) and allowing the energy-transfer UC mechanism. For the {Gd8Ho2Yb10} MCA, a UCQY of 5.24 × 10−6% was observed, thus expanding the molecular UC possibilities by adding another emitter ion as a potential candidate.
Fig. 8 (A) Upconversion spectra for a 0.1 mg mL−1 deuterated methanol solution of {Gd8Ho2Yb10} obtained at 20 °C with the incident laser power (λexc = 980 nm/νex = 10204 cm−1) focused on a spot size of ∼0.03 cm2. (B) NIR-to-NIR spectra of {Gd8Ho2Yb10}. (C) Partial energy level diagram for the MCA showing YbIII and HoIII levels. (D) Coupling between the vibration and electronic levels. Adapted from ref. 94 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry. |
These previous works highlight the versatility of heterometallic MCAs as highly efficient optical materials. The {Ln20} MCA has been demonstrated as an impressive toolbox for both ligand-sensitized and UC luminescence, with a significant impact in applications which require fine control of ET processes such as luminescent thermometry and anti-counterfeiting materials.
As discussed in Section 4 and summarized in Table 1, there are a small, but much higher number of examples related to homometallic luminescent MCAs. Further exploration and consolidation of this class of compounds could be achieved by evaluating these systems with mixed metal strategy. We believe that some of these underexplored homometallic systems, could result in excellent materials for luminescence thermometry, optical barcodes, and molecular upconverters upon investigation of their heterometallic counter parts.
In the field of molecular UC, MCAs already represent a turning point. The rigid metal core structure and the multiple metal ions enabled four orders of magnitude enhancement for UCQY when compared with low-nuclearity molecular upconverters, approaching the UCQY values observed for ultrasmall nanoparticles.
As in the case of all emerging fields, much more can and needs to be done to its consolidation. Up to now, the highest nuclearity explored for heterometallic luminescent MCAs is twenty. Efforts should be focused on understanding whether higher nuclearities can be beneficial or detrimental to the ET processes within the metal core. From one side, one can expect that more metal in the core will allow greater control of the ET and colour outputs, being valuable for thermometry and anti-counterfeiting applications. However, the great majority of highest-nuclearity MCAs (60 and higher metal ions) show a hollow structure with a void space on the centre of the cluster; thus, it is also possible that increasing the nuclearities in hollow MCAs can result in a detrimental distancing of the optically active ions, resulting in a poorer ET efficiency. Therefore, systematic studies with higher nuclearity heterometallic MCAs will dictate the future directions of the field in the coming years.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |