Issue 7, 2024

Critical evaluation of current isolation, detection, and genotyping methods of Cryptosporidium species and future direction

Abstract

Globally, Cryptosporidium continues to pose a significant health and economic burden despite significant efforts to develop effective on-site biosecurity and best management practices. According to the Global Burden of Disease Study (2016), this parasitic protozoan is responsible for more than 48 thousand deaths in children under the age of five and 7.2 million disability-adjusted life-years worldwide. Additionally, most Cryptosporidium species (e.g., Cryptosporidium hominis, Cryptosporidium parvum, etc.) are resistant to the majority of common disinfectants and can survive outside the body for extended periods. Consequently, it is crucial to establish a prompt and accurate diagnosis as well as the severity of the disease to prevent the spread of parasites and to enable effective management strategies. USEPA Method 1623 is currently used in centralized laboratories to perform routine diagnostic tests for this parasite. This process is laborious, expensive, and time-consuming. In the past ten years, a multitude of techniques based on conventional molecular biology techniques, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), nested-PCR, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification, have been utilized to analyze Cryptosporidium species. Similarly, several biosensing techniques have been developed in recent years, including electrochemical biosensors and the CRISPR-Cas system in lateral flow assays. This review discusses the most frequently employed techniques for isolating, quantifying, and genotyping Cryptosporidium species, and their implication on the diagnostic landscape. A subsequent evaluation of the most significant technical and biological challenges and limitations of these techniques is also undertaken.

Graphical abstract: Critical evaluation of current isolation, detection, and genotyping methods of Cryptosporidium species and future direction

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Critical Review
Submitted
26 Jun 2023
Accepted
15 Apr 2024
First published
24 Apr 2024

Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2024,10, 1527-1551

Critical evaluation of current isolation, detection, and genotyping methods of Cryptosporidium species and future direction

R. G. Mahmudunnabi, S. Kasetsirikul, N. Soda, M. Sallam, A. S. Pannu, N. Nguyen, H. Stratton and M. J. A. Shiddiky, Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol., 2024, 10, 1527 DOI: 10.1039/D3EW00469D

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements