Issue 7, 2016

Reply to the ‘Comment on “The promise of microfluidic artificial lungs”’ by G. Wagner, A. Kaesler, U. Steinseifer, T. Schmitz-Rode and J. Arens, Lab Chip, 2016, 16, DOI: 10.1039/C5LC01508A

Abstract

This response explores and discusses the critiques of Wagner et al. in their “Comment on ‘The promise of microfluidic artificial lungs’ by Joseph A. Potkay, Lab Chip, 2014, 14, 4122–4138”.

Graphical abstract: Reply to the ‘Comment on “The promise of microfluidic artificial lungs”’ by G. Wagner, A. Kaesler, U. Steinseifer, T. Schmitz-Rode and J. Arens, Lab Chip, 2016, 16, DOI: 10.1039/C5LC01508A

Associated articles

Article information

Article type
Comment
Submitted
17 Feb 2016
Accepted
03 Mar 2016
First published
03 Mar 2016

Lab Chip, 2016,16, 1274-1277

Author version available

Reply to the ‘Comment on “The promise of microfluidic artificial lungs”’ by G. Wagner, A. Kaesler, U. Steinseifer, T. Schmitz-Rode and J. Arens, Lab Chip, 2016, 16, DOI: 10.1039/C5LC01508A

J. A. Potkay, Lab Chip, 2016, 16, 1274 DOI: 10.1039/C6LC00221H

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements