Volume 173, 2014

Maximum aromaticity or maximum pentagon separation; which is the origin behind the stability of endohedral metallofullerenes?

Abstract

Two different interpretations have been recently proposed to rationalize the stabilization of some hosting cages in endohedral metallofullerenes as a consequence of the larger localization of the negative charge on pentagonal rather than on hexagonal faces. We try to figure out the physical origin that mainly governs the stability of charged fullerenes; is it aromaticity or electrostatics?

Associated articles

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
06 May 2014
Accepted
19 Jun 2014
First published
19 Jun 2014

Faraday Discuss., 2014,173, 201-213

Maximum aromaticity or maximum pentagon separation; which is the origin behind the stability of endohedral metallofullerenes?

A. Rodríguez-Fortea and J. M. Poblet, Faraday Discuss., 2014, 173, 201 DOI: 10.1039/C4FD00096J

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements