Enalos InSilicoNano platform: an online decision support tool for the design and virtual screening of nanoparticles

Georgia Melagraki and Antreas Afantitis

RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 50713
DOI: 10.1039/C4RA07756C

Predictive quantitative structure–property relationship (QSPR) modeling for adsorption of organic pollutants by carbon nanotubes (CNTs)

Joyita Roy, Sulekha Ghosh, Probir Kumar Ojha and Kunal Roy

Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2019, 6, 224
DOI: 10.1039/C8EN01059E

Development of nanostructure–activity relationships assisting the nanomaterial hazard categorization for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making

Guangchao Chen, Willie J. G. M. Peijnenburg, Vasyl Kovalishyn and Martina G. Vijver

RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 52227
DOI: 10.1039/C6RA06159A

Potentialities of selenium nanoparticles in biomedical science

Vanya Nayak, Kshitij RB Singh, Ajaya Kumar Singh and Ravindra Pratap Singh

New J. Chem., 2021, 45, 2849
DOI: 10.1039/D0NJ05884J

Atom-level descriptors and explainable prediction of iron carbide nanoparticles' cytotoxicity via the Enalos Cloud platform

Maria Antoniou, Dimitra-Danai Varsou, Andreas Tsoumanis, Georgia Melagraki, Iseult Lynch and Antreas Afantitis

Nanoscale Adv., 2026, 8, 646
DOI: 10.1039/D5NA00549C

QSAR modeling of the toxicity classification of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) in stem-cell monitoring applications: an integrated study from data curation to model development

Marianna I. Kotzabasaki, Iason Sotiropoulos and Haralambos Sarimveis

RSC Adv., 2020, 10, 5385
DOI: 10.1039/C9RA09475J

How to judge whether QSAR/read-across predictions can be trusted: a novel approach for establishing a model's applicability domain

A. Gajewicz

Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2018, 5, 408
DOI: 10.1039/C7EN00774D

Potentialities of bioinspired metal and metal oxide nanoparticles in biomedical sciences

Kshitij RB Singh, Vanya Nayak, Jay Singh, Ajaya Kumar Singh and Ravindra Pratap Singh

RSC Adv., 2021, 11, 24722
DOI: 10.1039/D1RA04273D

Second generation periodic table-based descriptors to encode toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles to multiple species: QSTR modeling for exploration of toxicity mechanisms

Priyanka De, Supratik Kar, Kunal Roy and Jerzy Leszczynski

Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2018, 5, 2742
DOI: 10.1039/C8EN00809D

Metal and metal oxide nanoparticle toxicity: moving towards a more holistic structure–activity approach

G. P. Gakis, I. G. Aviziotis and C. A. Charitidis

Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2023, 10, 761
DOI: 10.1039/D2EN00897A

In silicoprofiling nanoparticles: predictive nanomodeling using universal nanodescriptors and various machine learning approaches

Xiliang Yan, Alexander Sedykh, Wenyi Wang, Xiaoli Zhao, Bing Yan and Hao Zhu

Nanoscale, 2019, 11, 8352
DOI: 10.1039/C9NR00844F

Development of a nano-QSAR model for predicting the toxicity of nano-metal oxide mixtures to Aliivibrio fischeri

Minju Na, Sang Hwan Nam, Kyonghwan Moon and Jongwoon Kim

Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2023, 10, 325
DOI: 10.1039/D2EN00672C

Modeling the reactivity of ozone and sulphate radicals towards organic chemicals in water using machine learning approaches

Shikha Gupta and Nikita Basant

RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 108448
DOI: 10.1039/C6RA22865H

Addressing a bottle neck for regulation of nanomaterials: quantitative read-across (Nano-QRA) algorithm for cases when only limited data is available

A. Gajewicz, K. Jagiello, M. T. D. Cronin, J. Leszczynski and T. Puzyn

Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2017, 4, 346
DOI: 10.1039/C6EN00399K

Computer-aided nanotoxicology: risk assessment of metal oxide nanoparticlesvianano-QSAR

Jiakai Cao, Yong Pan, Yanting Jiang, Ronghua Qi, Beilei Yuan, Zhenhua Jia, Juncheng Jiang and Qingsheng Wang

Green Chem., 2020, 22, 3512
DOI: 10.1039/D0GC00933D

Towards defining new nano-descriptors: extracting morphological features from transmission electron microscopy images

Arafeh Bigdeli, Mohammad Reza Hormozi-Nezhad, Mehdi Jalali-Heravi, Mohammad Reza Abedini and Farzad Sharif-Bakhtiar

RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 60135
DOI: 10.1039/C4RA10375K

Computational approaches for the prediction of the selective uptake of magnetofluorescent nanoparticles into human cells

E. Papa, J. P. Doucet and A. Doucet-Panaye

RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 68806
DOI: 10.1039/C6RA07898B

What if the number of nanotoxicity data is too small for developing predictive Nano-QSAR models? An alternative read-across based approach for filling data gaps

Agnieszka Gajewicz

Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 8435
DOI: 10.1039/C7NR02211E

The nanosafety assessment of ENMs under a dermal exposure scenario: from key molecular events toin silicomodeling tools

Wenjing Xie, Ziyi Xiong, Huimin Wang, Xiaoyi Liu, Hongyan Cui, Qiongyi Huang and Ying Tang

Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2024, 11, 708
DOI: 10.1039/D3EN00585B

Multivariate statistical analysis methods in QSAR

Somayeh Pirhadi, Fereshteh Shiri and Jahan B. Ghasemi

RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 104635
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA10729F

Using nano-QSAR to determine the most responsible factor(s) in gold nanoparticle exocytosis

Arafeh Bigdeli, Mohammad Reza Hormozi-Nezhad and Hadi Parastar

RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 57030
DOI: 10.1039/C5RA06198A

Toxicity of engineered metal oxide nanomaterials mediated by nano–bio–eco–interactions: a review and perspective

Xiaojia He, Winfred G. Aker, Peter P. Fu and Huey-Min Hwang

Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2015, 2, 564
DOI: 10.1039/C5EN00094G

Predicting toxicities of ionic liquids in multiple test species – an aid in designing green chemicals

Kunwar P. Singh, Shikha Gupta and Nikita Basant

RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 64443
DOI: 10.1039/C4RA11252K

A safe-by-design tool for functionalised nanomaterials through the Enalos Nanoinformatics Cloud platform

Dimitra-Danai Varsou, Antreas Afantitis, Andreas Tsoumanis, Georgia Melagraki, Haralambos Sarimveis, Eugenia Valsami-Jones and Iseult Lynch

Nanoscale Adv., 2019, 1, 706
DOI: 10.1039/C8NA00142A

Predicting coated-nanoparticle drug release systems with perturbation-theory machine learning (PTML) models

Ricardo Santana, Robin Zuluaga, Piedad Gañán, Sonia Arrasate, Enrique Onieva and Humbert González-Díaz

Nanoscale, 2020, 12, 13471
DOI: 10.1039/D0NR01849J

NanoEHS beyond toxicity – focusing on biocorona

Sijie Lin, Monika Mortimer, Ran Chen, Aleksandr Kakinen, Jim E. Riviere, Thomas P. Davis, Feng Ding and Pu Chun Ke

Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2017, 4, 1433
DOI: 10.1039/C6EN00579A

Linking nanomaterial properties to biological outcomes: analytical chemistry challenges in nanotoxicology for the next decade

Tian A. Qiu, Peter L. Clement and Christy L. Haynes

Chem. Commun., 2018, 54, 12787
DOI: 10.1039/C8CC06473C

Development of valuable predictive read-across models based on “real-life” (sparse) nanotoxicity data

A. Gajewicz

Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2017, 4, 1389
DOI: 10.1039/C7EN00102A

The Role of Machine Learning in Centralized Authorization Process of Nanomedicines in European Union

Ricardo Santana , Enrique Onieva, Robin Zuluaga , Aliuska Duardo-Sánchez and Piedad Gañán

CTMC, 2021, 21, 828
DOI: 10.2174/1568026621666210319101847

How can machine learning and multiscale modeling benefit ocular drug development?

Nannan Wang, Yunsen Zhang, Wei Wang, Zhuyifan Ye, Hongyu Chen, Guanghui Hu and Defang Ouyang

Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2023, 196, 114772
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2023.114772

Nanotoxicology data for in silico tools: a literature review

Irini Furxhi, Finbarr Murphy, Martin Mullins, Athanasios Arvanitis and Craig A. Poland

Nanotoxicology, 2020, 14, 612
DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2020.1729439

Converting Nanotoxicity Data to Information Using Artificial Intelligence and Simulation

Xiliang Yan, Tongtao Yue, David A. Winkler, Yongguang Yin, Hao Zhu, Guibin Jiang and Bing Yan

Chem. Rev., 2023, 123, 8575
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00070

Toward comprehension of multiple human cells uptake of engineered nano metal oxides: quantitative inter cell line uptake specificity (QICLUS) modeling

Probir Kumar Ojha, Supratik Kar, Kunal Roy and Jerzy Leszczynski

Nanotoxicology, 2019, 13, 14
DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2018.1529836

Qualitative and quantitative structure–activity relationship modelling for predicting blood-brain barrier permeability of structurally diverse chemicals

S. Gupta, N. Basant and K.P. Singh

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 2015, 26, 95
DOI: 10.1080/1062936X.2014.994562

Predicting the hazardous dose of industrial chemicals in warm-blooded species using machine learning-based modelling approaches

S. Gupta, N. Basant and K.P. Singh

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 2015, 26, 479
DOI: 10.1080/1062936X.2015.1051584

Recent Advances in Machine Learning Models for Predicting Toxicity of Inorganic Nanoparticles

Mingli Li, Qiao-Zhi Li, Yuliang Zhao and Xingfa Gao

Chem Bio Eng., 2025, 2, 647
DOI: 10.1021/cbe.5c00048

Toxicity Classification of Oxide Nanomaterials: Effects of Data Gap Filling and PChem Score-based Screening Approaches

My Kieu Ha, Tung Xuan Trinh, Jang Sik Choi, Desy Maulina, Hyung Gi Byun and Tae Hyun Yoon

Sci Rep, 2018, 8
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21431-9

Current situation on the availability of nanostructure–biological activity data

C. Oksel, C.Y. Ma and X.Z. Wang

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 2015, 26, 79
DOI: 10.1080/1062936X.2014.993702

Current Knowledge on the Use of Computational Toxicology in Hazard Assessment of Metallic Engineered Nanomaterials

Guangchao Chen, Willie Peijnenburg, Yinlong Xiao and Martina Vijver

IJMS, 2017, 18, 1504
DOI: 10.3390/ijms18071504

NanoMixHamster: a web-based tool for predicting cytotoxicity of TiO2-based multicomponent nanomaterials toward Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells

Filip Stoliński, Anna Rybińska-Fryca, Maciej Gromelski, Alicja Mikolajczyk and Tomasz Puzyn

Nanotoxicology, 2022, 16, 276
DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2022.2080609

Ecotoxicological read-across models for predicting acute toxicity of freshly dispersed versus medium-aged NMs to Daphnia magna

Dimitra-Danai Varsou, Laura-Jayne A. Ellis, Antreas Afantitis, Georgia Melagraki and Iseult Lynch

Chemosphere, 2021, 285, 131452
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131452

Transcriptomics in Toxicogenomics, Part III: Data Modelling for Risk Assessment

Angela Serra, Michele Fratello, Luca Cattelani, Irene Liampa, Georgia Melagraki, Pekka Kohonen, Penny Nymark, Antonio Federico, Pia Anneli Sofia Kinaret, Karolina Jagiello, My Kieu Ha, Jang-Sik Choi, Natasha Sanabria, Mary Gulumian, Tomasz Puzyn, Tae-Hyun Yoon, Haralambos Sarimveis, Roland Grafström, Antreas Afantitis and Dario Greco

Nanomaterials, 2020, 10, 708
DOI: 10.3390/nano10040708

Prediction of protein corona on nanomaterials by machine learning using novel descriptors

Yaokai Duan, Roxana Coreas, Yang Liu, Dimitrios Bitounis, Zhenyuan Zhang, Dorsa Parviz, Michael Strano, Philip Demokritou and Wenwan Zhong

NanoImpact, 2020, 17, 100207
DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2020.100207

Nano(Q)SAR: Challenges, pitfalls and perspectives

Ratna Tantra, Ceyda Oksel, Tomasz Puzyn, Jian Wang, Kenneth N. Robinson, Xue Z. Wang, Cai Y. Ma and Terry Wilkins

Nanotoxicology, 2015, 9, 636
DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2014.952698

Thermodynamic Parameters at Bio–Nano Interface and Nanomaterial Toxicity: A Case Study on BSA Interaction with ZnO, SiO2, and TiO2

Aurica Precupas, Daniela Gheorghe, Alina Botea-Petcu, Anca Ruxandra Leonties, Romica Sandu, Vlad Tudor Popa, Espen Mariussen, El Yamani Naouale, Elise Rundén-Pran, Veronica Dumit, Ying Xue, Mihaela Roxana Cimpan, Maria Dusinska, Andrea Haase and Speranta Tanasescu

Chem. Res. Toxicol., 2020, 33, 2054
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00468

Integrating surface chemistry properties and machine learning to map the toxicity landscape of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles

Miroslava Nedkyalkova, Mahdi Vasighi and Marco Lattuada

Chemosphere, 2025, 378, 144381
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2025.144381

Quasi-QSAR for mutagenic potential of multi-walled carbon-nanotubes

Andrey A. Toropov and Alla P. Toropova

Chemosphere, 2015, 124, 40
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.10.067

Nano-(Q)SAR for Cytotoxicity Prediction of Engineered Nanomaterials

Andrey A. Buglak, Anatoly V. Zherdev and Boris B. Dzantiev

Molecules, 2019, 24, 4537
DOI: 10.3390/molecules24244537

Discovery and prediction capabilities in metal-based nanomaterials: An overview of the application of machine learning techniques and some recent advances

Emmanuel Anuoluwa Bamidele, Ahmed Olanrewaju Ijaola, Michael Bodunrin, Oluwaniyi Ajiteru, Afure Martha Oyibo, Elizabeth Makhatha and Eylem Asmatulu

Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2022, 52, 101593
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2022.101593

Synthesizing the impact of sea-dumped munition and related chemicals on humans and the environment

João Barbosa, Jana Asselman and Colin R. Janssen

Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2023, 187, 114601
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114601

Chemometrics tools in QSAR/QSPR studies: A historical perspective

Saeed Yousefinejad and Bahram Hemmateenejad

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2015, 149, 177
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.06.016

Harmonization Risks and Rewards: Nano-QSAR for Agricultural Nanomaterials

Ajay Vikram Singh, Amruta Shelar, Mansi Rai, Peter Laux, Manali Thakur, Ievgen Dosnkyi, Giulia Santomauro, Alok Kumar Singh, Andreas Luch, Rajendra Patil and Joachim Bill

J. Agric. Food Chem., 2024, 72, 2835
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c06466

Nano-SAR Modeling for Predicting the Cytotoxicity of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles to PaCa2

Haihua Shi, Yong Pan, Fan Yang, Jiakai Cao, Xinlong Tan, Beilei Yuan and Juncheng Jiang

Molecules, 2021, 26, 2188
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26082188

Analysis of good and bad fingerprint for identification of NIR based optical frameworks using Monte Carlo method

Surbhi Goyal, Payal Rani, Monika Chahar, Khalid Hussain, Parvin Kumar and Jayant Sindhu

Microchemical Journal, 2024, 196, 109549
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2023.109549

“NanoBRIDGES” software: Open access tools to perform QSAR and nano-QSAR modeling

Pravin Ambure, Rahul Balasaheb Aher, Agnieszka Gajewicz, Tomasz Puzyn and Kunal Roy

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2015, 147, 1
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.07.007

Computational MitoTarget Scanning Based on Topological Vacancies of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes with the Human Mitochondrial Voltage-Dependent Anion Channel (hVDAC1)

Michael González-Durruthy, José M. Monserrat, Patricia Viera de Oliveira, Solange Binotto Fagan, Adriano V. Werhli, Karina Machado, André Melo, Humberto González-Díaz, Riccardo Concu and M. Natália D. S. Cordeiro

Chem. Res. Toxicol., 2019, 32, 566
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.8b00266

The way to cover prediction for cytotoxicity for all existing nano-sized metal oxides by using neural network method

Natalja Fjodorova, Marjana Novic, Agnieszka Gajewicz and Bakhtiyor Rasulev

Nanotoxicology, 2017, 11, 475
DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2017.1310949

Practices and Trends of Machine Learning Application in Nanotoxicology

Irini Furxhi, Finbarr Murphy, Martin Mullins, Athanasios Arvanitis and Craig A. Poland

Nanomaterials, 2020, 10, 116
DOI: 10.3390/nano10010116

Computational Nanotoxicology Models for Environmental Risk Assessment of Engineered Nanomaterials

Weihao Tang, Xuejiao Zhang, Huixiao Hong, Jingwen Chen, Qing Zhao and Fengchang Wu

Nanomaterials, 2024, 14, 155
DOI: 10.3390/nano14020155

Advancing Predictive Risk Assessment of Chemicals via Integrating Machine Learning, Computational Modeling, and Chemical/Nano‐Quantitative Structure‐Activity Relationship Approaches

Ajay Vikram Singh, Mansi Varma, Mansi Rai, Shubham Pratap Singh, Girija Bansod, Peter Laux and Andreas Luch

Advanced Intelligent Systems, 2024, 6
DOI: 10.1002/aisy.202300366

Quasi-SMILES as a tool to utilize eclectic data for predicting the behavior of nanomaterials

Alla P. Toropova, Andrey A. Toropov, Serena Manganelli, Caterina Leone, Diego Baderna, Emilio Benfenati and Roberto Fanelli

NanoImpact, 2016, 1, 60
DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2016.04.003

Review of (Q)SAR models for regulatory assessment of nanomaterials risks

Enrico Burello

NanoImpact, 2017, 8, 48
DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2017.07.002

MFR-DTA: a multi-functional and robust model for predicting drug–target binding affinity and region

Yang Hua, Xiaoning Song, Zhenhua Feng, Xiaojun Wu and Inanc Birol

Bioinformatics, 2023, 39
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad056

Application of Bayesian networks for hazard ranking of nanomaterials to support human health risk assessment

Hans J. P. Marvin, Yamine Bouzembrak, Esmée M. Janssen, Meike van der Zande, Finbarr Murphy, Barry Sheehan, Martin Mullins and Hans Bouwmeester

Nanotoxicology, 2017, 11, 123
DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2016.1278481

The rat acute oral toxicity of trifluoromethyl compounds (TFMs): a computational toxicology study combining the 2D-QSTR, read-across and consensus modeling methods

Xinyi Lu, Xin Wang, Shuo Chen, Tengjiao Fan, Lijiao Zhao, Rugang Zhong and Guohui Sun

Arch Toxicol, 2024, 98, 2213
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-024-03739-w

Modeling of the process of intermolecular interaction for the selection of antidotes neutralizing the toxic impact on the components of the cellular membrane

И.М. Ажмухамедов and Л.И. Жарких

МОДЕЛИРОВАНИЕ, ОПТИМИЗАЦИЯ И ИНФОРМАЦИОННЫЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ, 2020, 8, 28
DOI: 10.26102/2310-6018/2020.28.1.028

Modeling uptake of nanoparticles in multiple human cells using structure–activity relationships and intercellular uptake correlations

Nikita Basant and Shikha Gupta

Nanotoxicology, 2017, 11, 20
DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2016.1257075

Characterization of oxidative damage induced by nanoparticles via mechanism-driven machine learning approaches

Xiaoqing Wang, Fei Li, Yuefa Teng, Chenglong Ji and Huifeng Wu

Science of The Total Environment, 2023, 871, 162103
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162103

On the Virtues of Automated Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship: The New Kid on the Block

Marcelo T de Oliveira and Edson Katekawa

Future Med. Chem., 2018, 10, 335
DOI: 10.4155/fmc-2017-0170

CORAL: Predictive models for cytotoxicity of functionalized nanozeolites based on quasi-SMILES

Caterina Leone, Elia E. Bertuzzi, Alla P. Toropova, Andrey A. Toropov and Emilio Benfenati

Chemosphere, 2018, 210, 52
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.161

Nanomaterials: Quasi-SMILES as a flexible basis for regulation and environmental risk assessment

Alla P. Toropova and Andrey A. Toropov

Science of The Total Environment, 2022, 823, 153747
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153747

Anticancer activity of Jasminum sambac and its bioactive phytochemicals against the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway: A literature-based in silico study

Md. Sakib Al Hasan, Md. Shimul Bhuia, Raihan Chowdhury, Md. Shadin, Emon Mia, Noshin Tasnim Yana, Imam Hossen Rakib, Siddique Akber Ansari, Irfan Aamer Ansari, Henrique Douglas Melo Coutinho and Muhammad Torequl Islam

South African Journal of Botany, 2025, 180, 431
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2025.03.004

Automated machine learning in nanotoxicity assessment: A comparative study of predictive model performance

Xiao Xiao, Tung X. Trinh, Zayakhuu Gerelkhuu, Eunyong Ha and Tae Hyun Yoon

Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 2024, 25, 9
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.02.003

Automated Grouping of Nanomaterials and Read-Across Prediction of Their Adverse Effects Based on Mathematical Optimization

Dimitra-Danai Varsou, Nikoletta-Maria Koutroumpa and Haralambos Sarimveis

J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2021, 61, 2766
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00199

Metal Oxide Nanomaterial QNAR Models: Available Structural Descriptors and Understanding of Toxicity Mechanisms

Jiali Ying, Ting Zhang and Meng Tang

Nanomaterials, 2015, 5, 1620
DOI: 10.3390/nano5041620

Recursive feature elimination in random forest classification supports nanomaterial grouping

Aileen Bahl, Bryan Hellack, Mihaela Balas, Anca Dinischiotu, Martin Wiemann, Joep Brinkmann, Andreas Luch, Bernhard Y. Renard and Andrea Haase

NanoImpact, 2019, 15, 100179
DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2019.100179

Three-Tier Strategy for Screening High-Energy Molecules Using Structure–Property Relationship Modeling Approaches

Shikha Gupta, Nikita Basant and Kunwar P. Singh

Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2016, 55, 820
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03575

Multi-source transfer learning with Graph Neural Network for excellent modelling the bioactivities of ligands targeting orphan G protein-coupled receptors

Shizhen Huang, ShaoDong Zheng and Ruiqi Chen

MBE, 2022, 20, 2588
DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2023121

Comparison of conventional and advancedin vitromodels in the toxicity testing of nanoparticles

Eleonore Fröhlich

Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, 2018, 46, 1091
DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2018.1479709

Use of size-dependent electron configuration fingerprint to develop general prediction models for nanomaterials

Hyun Kil Shin, Soojin Kim and Seokjoo Yoon

NanoImpact, 2021, 21, 100298
DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2021.100298

Computer-aided design of carbon nanotubes with the desired bioactivity and safety profiles

Denis Fourches, Dongqiuye Pu, Liwen Li, Hongyu Zhou, Qingxin Mu, Gaoxing Su, Bing Yan and Alexander Tropsha

Nanotoxicology, 2016, 10, 374
DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2015.1073397

Emerging Application of Nanorobotics and Artificial Intelligence To Cross the BBB: Advances in Design, Controlled Maneuvering, and Targeting of the Barriers

Ajay Vikram Singh, Vaisali Chandrasekar, Poonam Janapareddy, Divya Elsa Mathews, Peter Laux, Andreas Luch, Yin Yang, Beatriz Garcia-Canibano, Shidin Balakrishnan, Julien Abinahed, Abdulla Al Ansari and Sarada Prasad Dakua

ACS Chem. Neurosci., 2021, 12, 1835
DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.1c00087

(Q)SAR modelling of nanomaterial toxicity: A critical review

Ceyda Oksel, Cai Y. Ma, Jing J. Liu, Terry Wilkins and Xue Z. Wang

Particuology, 2015, 21, 1
DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2014.12.001

Designer nanoparticles for plant cell culture systems: Mechanisms of elicitation and harnessing of specialized metabolites

Sagar S. Arya, Sangram K. Lenka, David M. Cahill and James E. Rookes

BioEssays, 2021, 43
DOI: 10.1002/bies.202100081

Predicting aquatic toxicities of chemical pesticides in multiple test species using nonlinear QSTR modeling approaches

Nikita Basant, Shikha Gupta and Kunwar P. Singh

Chemosphere, 2015, 139, 246
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.063

In silico prediction of cellular permeability of diverse chemicals using qualitative and quantitative SAR modeling approaches

Kunwar P. Singh, Shikha Gupta and Nikita Basant

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2015, 140, 61
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2014.10.005

A Review of Recent Advances towards the Development of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships for Metallic Nanomaterials

Guangchao Chen, Martina Vijver, Yinlong Xiao and Willie Peijnenburg

Materials, 2017, 10, 1013
DOI: 10.3390/ma10091013

The cytotoxicity of nanomaterials: Modeling multiple human cells uptake of functionalized magneto-fluorescent nanoparticles via nano-QSAR

Ronghua Qi, Yong Pan, Jiakai Cao, Zhenhua Jia and Juncheng Jiang

Chemosphere, 2020, 249, 126175
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126175

QNAR modeling of cytotoxicity of mixing nano-TiO2 and heavy metals

Beilei Yuan, Pengfei Wang, Leqi Sang, Junhui Gong, Yong Pan and Yanhui Hu

Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2021, 208, 111634
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111634

Integrating machine learning and nano-QSAR models to predict the oxidative stress potential caused by single and mixed carbon nanomaterials in algal cells

Qi Qi and Zhuang Wang

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2025, 44, 2535
DOI: 10.1093/etojnl/vgae049

Radial basis function neural networks based on the projection pursuit and principal component analysis approaches: QSAR analysis of fullerene[C60]-based HIV-1 PR inhibitors

Zeinabe Hassanzadeh, Raouf Ghavami and Mohsen Kompany-Zareh

Med Chem Res, 2016, 25, 19
DOI: 10.1007/s00044-015-1466-x

Predicting Toxicities of Diverse Chemical Pesticides in Multiple Avian Species Using Tree-Based QSAR Approaches for Regulatory Purposes

Nikita Basant, Shikha Gupta and Kunwar P. Singh

J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2015, 55, 1337
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00139

Exploiting Endocytosis for Non-Spherical Nanoparticle Cellular Uptake

Saad Niaz, Ben Forbes and Bahijja Tolulope Raimi-Abraham

Nanomanufacturing, 2022, 2, 1
DOI: 10.3390/nanomanufacturing2010001

CORAL and Nano-QFAR: Quantitative feature – Activity relationships (QFAR) for bioavailability of nanoparticles (ZnO, CuO, Co 3 O 4 , and TiO 2 )

Alla P. Toropova, Andrey A. Toropov, Danuta Leszczynska and Jerzy Leszczynski

Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2017, 139, 404
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.01.054

Nanotoxicity prediction using computational modelling - review and future directions

Bhavna Saini and Sumit Srivastava

IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 2018, 348, 012005
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/348/1/012005

Alternative Testing Strategies for Nanomaterials: State of the Science and Considerations for Risk Analysis

J. A. Shatkin and K. J. Ong

Risk Analysis, 2016, 36, 1564
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12642

Optimal descriptor as a translator of eclectic information into the prediction of membrane damage: The case of a group of ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles

Alla P. Toropova, Andrey A. Toropov, Emilio Benfenati, Tomasz Puzyn, Danuta Leszczynska and Jerzy Leszczynski

Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2014, 108, 203
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.07.005

3D-QSAR and molecular docking study of LRRK2 kinase inhibitors by CoMFA and CoMSIA methods

E. Pourbasheer and R. Aalizadeh

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 2016, 27, 385
DOI: 10.1080/1062936X.2016.1184713

Assessment of nano-QSPR models of organic contaminant absorption by carbon nanotubes for ecological impact studies

Alla P. Toropova and Andrey A. Toropov

Materials Discovery, 2016, 4, 22
DOI: 10.1016/j.md.2016.03.003

Perspectives from the NanoSafety Modelling Cluster on the validation criteria for (Q)SAR models used in nanotechnology

Tomasz Puzyn, Nina Jeliazkova, Haralambos Sarimveis, Richard L. Marchese Robinson, Vladimir Lobaskin, Robert Rallo, Andrea-N. Richarz, Agnieszka Gajewicz, Manthos G. Papadopulos, Janna Hastings, Mark T.D. Cronin, Emilio Benfenati and Alberto Fernández

Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2018, 112, 478
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.09.037

Identification of structural features of surface modifiers in engineered nanostructured metal oxides regarding cell uptake through ML-based classification

Indrasis Dasgupta, Totan Das, Biplab Das and Shovanlal Gayen

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol., 2024, 15, 909
DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.15.75

Predicting human intestinal absorption of diverse chemicals using ensemble learning based QSAR modeling approaches

Nikita Basant, Shikha Gupta and Kunwar P. Singh

Computational Biology and Chemistry, 2016, 61, 178
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2016.01.005

Making use of available and emerging data to predict the hazards of engineered nanomaterials by means of in silico tools: A critical review

G. Basei, D. Hristozov, L. Lamon, A. Zabeo, N. Jeliazkova, G. Tsiliki, A. Marcomini and A. Torsello

NanoImpact, 2019, 13, 76
DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2019.01.003

Towards a generalized toxicity prediction model for oxide nanomaterials using integrated data from different sources

Jang-Sik Choi, My Kieu Ha, Tung Xuan Trinh, Tae Hyun Yoon and Hyung-Gi Byun

Sci Rep, 2018, 8
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24483-z

Genotoxicity induced by metal oxide nanoparticles: a weight of evidence study and effect of particle surface and electronic properties

Azadi Golbamaki, Nazanin Golbamaki, Natalia Sizochenko, Bakhtiyor Rasulev, Jerzy Leszczynski and Emilio Benfenati

Nanotoxicology, 2018, 12, 1113
DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2018.1478999

Predicting the Physicochemical Properties and Biological Activities of Monolayer-Protected Gold Nanoparticles Using Simulation-Derived Descriptors

Alex K. Chew, Joel A. Pedersen and Reid C. Van Lehn

ACS Nano, 2022, 16, 6282
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c00301

In Silico Simulation of Daphnia magna Immobilization Exposed to Mixtures of TiO2 Nanoparticles with Inorganic Compounds

Alla P. Toropova, Andrey A. Toropov, Alessandra Roncaglioni and Emilio Benfenati

J. Compos. Sci., 2025, 9, 16
DOI: 10.3390/jcs9010016

QSTR modeling for predicting aquatic toxicity of pharmacological active compounds in multiple test species for regulatory purpose

Kunwar P. Singh, Shikha Gupta and Nikita Basant

Chemosphere, 2015, 120, 680
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.10.025

Accurate and interpretable nanoSAR models from genetic programming-based decision tree construction approaches

Ceyda Oksel, David A. Winkler, Cai Y. Ma, Terry Wilkins and Xue Z. Wang

Nanotoxicology, 2016, 10, 1001
DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2016.1161857

toxFlow: A Web-Based Application for Read-Across Toxicity Prediction Using Omics and Physicochemical Data

Dimitra-Danai Varsou, Georgia Tsiliki, Penny Nymark, Pekka Kohonen, Roland Grafström and Haralambos Sarimveis

J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2018, 58, 543
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00160

Evaluating the cytotoxicity of a large pool of metal oxide nanoparticles to Escherichia coli: Mechanistic understanding through In Vitro and In Silico studies

Supratik Kar, Kavitha Pathakoti, Paul B. Tchounwou, Danuta Leszczynska and Jerzy Leszczynski

Chemosphere, 2021, 264, 128428
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128428

The 3D-QSAR Study, Molecular Docking, and ADMET Analysis of Darunavir Derivatives of HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors

Rui-Jing Fang, Yan-Jun Zhang, Wei-Xian Wang, Tian-Le Wu, Shuai-Jun Zhang, Yi-Yang He, Fei Xiong and Zhong-Hua Wang

LDDD, 2024, 21, 2590
DOI: 10.2174/1570180820666230818100059

Review of machine learning for lipid nanoparticle formulation and process development

Phillip J. Dorsey, Christina L. Lau, Ti-chiun Chang, Peter C. Doerschuk and Suzanne M. D'Addio

Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2024, 113, 3413
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2024.09.015

PTML Model for Selection of Nanoparticles, Anticancer Drugs, and Vitamins in the Design of Drug–Vitamin Nanoparticle Release Systems for Cancer Cotherapy

Ricardo Santana, Robin Zuluaga, Piedad Gañán, Sonia Arrasate, Enrique Onieva, Matthew M. Montemore and Humbert González-Díaz

Mol. Pharmaceutics, 2020, 17, 2612
DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00308

Structure-activity Relationship Models for Hazard Assessment and Risk Management of Engineered Nanomaterials

Ceyda Oksel, Cai Y. Ma and Xue Z. Wang

Procedia Engineering, 2015, 102, 1500
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.284

The role of PEG conformation in mixed layers: from protein corona substrate to steric stabilization avoiding protein adsorption

Joan Comenge and Víctor F. Puntes

ScienceOpen Research, 2015, 0
DOI: 10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-MATSCI.A0Z6OM.v1

SimBoost: a read-across approach for predicting drug–target binding affinities using gradient boosting machines

Tong He, Marten Heidemeyer, Fuqiang Ban, Artem Cherkasov and Martin Ester

J Cheminform, 2017, 9
DOI: 10.1186/s13321-017-0209-z

Multi-target QSTR modeling for simultaneous prediction of multiple toxicity endpoints of nano-metal oxides

Nikita Basant and Shikha Gupta

Nanotoxicology, 2017, 11, 339
DOI: 10.1080/17435390.2017.1302612

Effect of biogenic selenium nanoparticles on ERG11 and CDR1 gene expression in both fluconazole-resistant and -susceptible Candida albicans isolates

Nasrin Parsamehr, Sasan Rezaie, Sadegh Khodavaisy, Samira Salari, Sanaz Hadizadeh, Mohammad Kord and Seyed Amin Ayatollahi Mousavi

Curr Med Mycol, 2017, 3, 16
DOI: 10.29252/cmm.3.3.16

Developing quantitative structure–retention relationship model to prediction of retention factors of some alkyl-benzenes in nano-LC

Zahra Pahlavan Yali and Mohammad H. Fatemi

J IRAN CHEM SOC, 2019, 16, 1545
DOI: 10.1007/s13738-019-01624-3

Estimating sensory irritation potency of volatile organic chemicals using QSARs based on decision tree methods for regulatory purpose

Shikha Gupta, Nikita Basant and Kunwar P. Singh

Ecotoxicology, 2015, 24, 873
DOI: 10.1007/s10646-015-1431-y

Novel Methods and Approaches for Safety Evaluation of Nanoparticle Formulations: A Focus Towards In Vitro Models and Adverse Outcome Pathways

Mounika Gayathri Tirumala, Pratibha Anchi, Susmitha Raja, Mahesh Rachamalla and Chandraiah Godugu

Front. Pharmacol., 2021, 12
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.612659