Guangén Yuan,
Guoquan Zhang*,
Yufei Zhou and
Fenglin Yang
Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China. E-mail: guoquanz@126.com; Fax: +86-411-84706328; Tel: +86-411-84706328
First published on 9th March 2015
Leafy graphite nanosheet anchored iron(II) phthalocyanine nanorods (FePc@LGNS) were facilely synthesized without using a complex covalent anchoring procedure. FE-SEM, XRD, FTIR, and XPS characterizations confirmed the molecular configuration of FePc on the LGNS surface. The interlaced hydrophobic/hydrophilic regions and large specific-surface-area of the FePc@LGNS hybrid not only improved the adsorption capacity, but also promoted the oxidative ability of the FePc@LGNS–H2O2 system due to sufficient FePc catalytic active sites on LGNS surface. The optimal conditions for CR removal were initially pH 6.98, 50 mM H2O2 and 1.0 g L−1 FePc@LGNS hybrid. Different from the classical Fenton process, high-valent iron(IV)–oxo complexes and hydroxyl radicals are responsible for Congo red (CR) oxidative degradation. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis demonstrated the effective cleavage of both azo bonds and C–C bonds of CR molecules. A plausible oxidation mechanism of the FePc@LGNS–H2O2 system and the degradation pathway of CR were proposed. This FePc@LGNS–H2O2 system could be a highly efficient oxidation process for recalcitrant pollutants elimination over a wide pH range.
Anchoring MPc complexes onto the solid supports was an effective strategy to overcome the above drawbacks. Various supporting materials11–13 were utilized to support MPc complexes through the covalent bonding method. Recently, CoPc was covalently immobilized on some adsorbent materials,14–17 and these composites possessed high natural affinity to organic pollutants and exhibited strong H2O2-activating ability for organic pollutants degradation. Above-mentioned heterogeneous catalysts had good catalytic activities and stabilities, while the covalent anchoring method generally involves a series of chemical reactions, thus increasing the difficulty of catalyst preparation.
Exfoliated graphite (EG), a kind of porous carbon-based material composed of thin graphite sheets, has been widely used as adsorbent or catalyst support material16,18–21 in the field of wastewater treatment. Herein, we reported a simple synthesis method without covalent anchoring to prepare the diagonally accumulational FePc on leafy graphite nanosheets (LGNS) surface, which are composed of mesoporous FePc nanorods structures with the interlaced hydrophobic/hydrophilic regions and large specific surface area. Different characterization techniques were used to investigate the molecular configuration of FePc nanorods upon LGNS surface. The FePc nanorods induced synergy effect between adsorption and the catalytic oxidation of FePc@LGNS hybrid for Congo red (CR) degradation were investigated in detail in the presence of H2O2 over a wide pH range. The intermediate products were analyzed, and the plausible degradation pathway of CR and the catalytic oxidation mechanism of FePc@LGNS–H2O2 system were also proposed.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 FE-SEM images of (a) acid-intercalated graphite, (b) EG, (c) LGNS, (d–f) FePc@LGNS hybrid at different magnifications. |
It is reported the FePc molecular preferentially intended to organize with the phthalocyanine ring parallel to the substrate and aggregate themselves in water and polar solvent by taking advantage of their self-attraction properties between the phthalocyanine molecules.22–24 In terms of the hydrophobic phthalocyanine moieties, a diagonally co-facial stacking would take shape with the increases in solvent polarity and phthalocyanine concentration, due to the stronger directional intermolecular interactions than the molecule–substrate interactions.24 Concerning FePc concentration (0.6 mg mL−1) is used, the intermolecular distances of neighboring FePc molecules could decrease substantially. Thus, the directional FePc–FePc intermolecular interactions become predominant compared to FePc–LGNS molecule–substrate interactions, which assemble FePc molecules into short chains and even into distinctive nanorod configurations. Previous reports24 inspire the authors to speculate the FePc nanorod structure, similar to F16CuPc nanoribbon, as depicted in Fig. S2.† The FePc molecules are stacked along the diagonal growth direction, in the meanwhile, the coordination reaction between six N atoms and one Fe atom and the π–π interactions between FePc molecules could firmly hold FePc molecules together. Such molecular organization will further verified by FTIR and XPS characterizations.
The XRD patterns of FePc, graphite, LGNS and FePc@LGNS hybrid are shown in Fig. 2a. The diffraction peaks of FePc powder located at 6.8°, 15.5° and 24.9° correspond respectively to the lattice spacing of 13.0, 5.7 and 3.6 Å.25 In other three patterns, the peaks centered at ca. 26.4°, 44.4° and 54.5° can be indexed respectively to the (002), (101) and (004) planes of graphite crystal.25,26 The amplified XRD patterns in 22–30° are displayed in Fig. S3.† Apparently, no remarkable difference in G(002) peak was observed in other three samples as previously reported,21 suggesting no variation in the nanoscale lamellae structure after the expansion and exfoliation of graphite. To clearly distinguish the diffraction peak of (002) plane of FePc in FePc@LGNS hybrid, XRD patterns in 4–20° were extracted. As seen in Fig. 2b, the FePc@LGNS hybrid possesses two intensive peaks similar to pure FePc, and an additional peak located at ca. 13.8°, agreeing well with the status that FePc was anchored on graphene sheets through the π–π stacking interaction27 and further demonstrating the successful loading of FePc on LGNS surface.
![]() | ||
Fig. 2 (a) XRD patterns of FePc, graphite, LGNS and FePc@LGNS hybrid; (b) XRD patterns in the angular range of 4–20°. |
Fig. 3a shows the survey XPS patterns of graphite, LGNS, FePc@graphite and FePc@LGNS hybrids. The relative atomic percentages are summarized in Table 1.
![]() | ||
Fig. 3 (a) XPS survey scan of graphite, LGNS, FePc@graphite and FePc@LGNS hybrids; high resolution XPS spectra of (b) O 1s, (c) N 1s, and (d) Fe 2p of the FePc@LGNS hybrid. |
Samples | C (at%) | O (at%) | N (at%) | Fe (at%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Graphite | 94.54 | 5.46 | — | — |
LGNS | 88.66 | 11.34 | — | — |
FePc@graphite | 91.43 | 8.30 | 0.22 | 0.05 |
FePc@LGNS | 89.27 | 6.79 | 3.36 | 0.58 |
Obviously, graphite and LGNS samples are mainly composed of carbon (284.6 eV) and oxygen (532.8 eV) atoms. After the acid-intercalated oxidation, the C/O ratio of LGNS (17.33) are much higher than that of graphite (7.82). As to the FePc@graphite hybrid, a weak peak centered at ca. 398.6 eV was observed, which are assigned to nitrogen atoms of FePc.28 In comparison, XPS spectrum of FePc@LGNS hybrid shows much more intensive N 1s peak and Fe 2p peak. According to the relative atom percentages of Fe, more than 10 times of FePc molecules was supported on LGNS compared to commercial graphite, which is due mainly to the large specific surface area of LGNS, as described latter in BET measures. Fig. 3b–d shows the high resolution XPS patterns of O 1s, N 1s and Fe 2p of the FePc@LGNS hybrid, respectively. The O 1s spectra can be divided into three peaks at 531.8, 532.7 and 533.9 eV with the relative intensity ratio of 1.84:
1.34
:
1, which belong respectively to C
O, C–O and O–C
O groups.29 The N 1s spectrum also consists of three components, which are attributed to pyridinic-N (398.8 eV), pyrrolic-N (400.0 eV) and oxidized N (402.0 eV).30 The pyridinic-N peak accounts for ∼74.2%, corresponding to N atoms coordinating with Fe atoms, while the other two peaks account only for ∼14.7% and ∼11.1%, respectively. This result implies that about three quarters of N atoms are coordinated with Fe. The Fe 2p spectrum can be divided into two main peaks at 709.8 and 722.7 eV with the relative intensity ratio of 2
:
1, which are assigned respectively to Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2 asymmetric bands.31,32 Additionally, the spin splitting interval of Fe (2p1/2 − 2p3/2) was 12.9 eV, indicating the paramagnetic high-spin Fe(II) in FePc@LGNS hybrid. This result is consistent with the presumed structure of FePc nanorods, in which three quarters of N atoms are coordinated with Fe.
Fig. 4 shows the FTIR spectra of LGNS, FePc and FePc@LGNS hybrid. The spectrum of LGNS exhibits typical stretching vibration peaks at ∼1046 cm−1 for C–OH and ∼1282 cm−1 for C–O–C.33 The C–O stretching vibration of carboxyl group and –OH bending vibration of the combinative water on LGNS surface are located at ∼1396 and ∼1633 cm−1, respectively.21,33,34 The characteristic peak at ∼1718 cm−1 comes from the limbic C
O stretching of carbonyl group.34 The FTIR spectrum of FePc powders on KBr pallet is characterized by the strong bands at ∼729 cm−1 for C–H out-of-plane bending vibration and 750 cm−1 for benzene and isoindole (
) in-plane deformation and Fe–N stretching.22,23 The bands of 1084, 1117 and 1304 cm−1 are attributed to C–N stretching, Fe–N of pyrrole and C–H in-plane bending vibrations, and 1330 cm−1 and 1467 cm−1 are assigned to C
C or C
N stretching of pyrrole ring and isoindole stretching in the plane of FePc macrocycle, respectively.35,36 The above bands are also detected in FTIR spectrum of FePc@LGNS hybrid in addition to a new band at 1725 cm−1, which is attributed to Fe–N metal-axial ligands of the diagonally stacked FePc molecules on LGNS surface.22
N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of LGNS and FePc@LGNS hybrid are shown in Fig. 5. A little difference in typical type IV isotherms indicated the similar structures and adsorption properties of the two samples. Additionally, distinct type H3 hysteresis loops were observed in the large relative pressure (P/P0) range of 0.4–1.0, demonstrating the presence of hierarchical porosity and split materials. The dramatic increase in the adsorbed volumes at P/P0 from 0.9 to 1.0 indicates the occurrence of capillary condensation during the adsorption process.21,37 The measured BET surface areas of LGNS and FePc@LGNS samples were 39.3 and 64.8 m2 g−1, respectively. The pore distribution of LGNS and FePc@LGNS samples in inset of Fig. 5 showed that most of the pores concentrate upon the range from 3.7 to 15.3 nm, indicating the typical mesoporous structure of LGNS and FePc@LGNS samples. Undoubtedly, such porous structure provides efficient transport pathways for CR molecules to diffuse into the interior pore cavities, which would improve their removal efficiencies by FePc@LGNS–H2O2 system.
![]() | ||
Fig. 5 N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of LGNS and FePc@LGNS hybrid. The inset shows the pore size distribution curve obtained from the desorption branch through the BJH method. |
Except for the carbon atom layers, exfoliated graphite oxide nanosheets possess many hydrophilic oxygen-containing groups.21,30 Thus, an interlaced nanostructure containing the hydrophobic FePc and hydrophilic LGNS regions would form on FePc@LGNS hybrid surface. Compared to the adsorption performance of LGNS, the synergistic effect between FePc nanorods and LGNS causes the enhanced adsorption capacity of FePc@LGNS hybrid towards CR molecules containing both the hydrophobic and hydrophilic groups,38 where FePc nanorods play an important role in the adsorption process.
CR degradation through FePc@LGNS–H2O2 and FePc@graphite–H2O2 systems was carried out for the purpose of comparison. A significant CR elimination with a ∼94.4% decolorization rate was achieved in FePc@LGNS–H2O2 system after 150 min reaction, which is much more efficient than the FePc@graphite–H2O2 system. The higher CR decolorization percentage in the former case may be ascribed to the higher content of FePc (as demonstrated in Table 1) on the high-specific-surface-area LGNS, which provide larger quantity of active sites for the formation of strong oxidizing species and, equally important, for CR adsorption. In this context, the poor performance of the FePc@graphite–H2O2 system towards CR elimination is due mainly to the large size, low porosity and low surface area of the commercial graphite powders.
According to the results shown in Fig. 6a, we can easily quantify the contribution proportions of adsorption and catalytic oxidation of the FePc@LGNS–H2O2 system towards CR removal. As observed, ∼50.6% CR was removed through the adsorption process, whereas ∼72% CR was eliminated during the first 30 min. Therefore, the adsorption of FePc@LGNS hybrid is ∼70.3% and the catalytic oxidation is ∼29.7%. In latter 120 min, ∼12.1% and ∼22.4% CR was respectively removed by adsorption and catalytic oxidation, thus CR elimination attributed to catalytic oxidation grows to ∼55.8%. The contribution percentages of adsorption and catalytic oxidation toward CR elimination at different time regions was depicted in Fig. 6b, in which the detailed contribution rates of adsorption and catalytic oxidation regarding to sole LGNS and FePc@LGNS hybrid were also given. Above results confirmed that FePc nanorods play important roles toward CR removal, which not only facilitate the adsorption capacity of FePc@LGNS hybrid, but also promote the oxidative ability of FePc@LGNS–H2O2 system, indicating the excellent synergistic effect in FePc@LGNS–H2O2 system.
The change in UV-visible spectrum during FePc@LGNS–H2O2 oxidation process was depicted in Fig. 7. The original CR spectrum exhibited three peaks at 212, 332 and 488 nm, which are attributed respectively to benzene ring, naphthalene ring and azo bond of CR molecule.39 The absorption peak at 488 nm decreases rapidly and disappears nearly at 150 min, indicating the complete cleavage of azo bonds. In the meanwhile, the peak at 332 nm also drops to a certain level, while the 212 nm peak increases to the maximum value at 60 min and gradually declines afterwards. These findings demonstrate that the naphthalene ring of CR was cleaved into benzene derivatives first, and then transformed into non-aromatic organics.
![]() | ||
Fig. 7 UV-visible spectrum change of CR during FePc@LGNS–H2O2 process (conditions: pH 6.98, 1.0 g L−1 FePc@LGNS, and 50 mM H2O2). |
Effects of H2O2 dosage on CR removal were investigated in the range of 10–70 mM at pH 6.98. As shown in Fig. 8b, the decolorization rate increases with the increasing H2O2 concentration, which is different from the classic Fenton process that excess amount of H2O2 would consume ˙OH via the following side reactions:
H2O2 + ˙OH → HO2˙ + H2O | (1) |
HO2˙ + ˙OH → H2O + O2 | (2) |
This extraordinary phenomenon implied the occurrence of other strong oxidizing species in addition to hydroxyl radical, which will be discussed below.
Effect of FePc@LGNS dosage on CR removal was examined ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 g L−1. As seen in Fig. 8c, CR decolorization rate increases rapidly when FePc@LGNS dosage increased from 0.5 to 1.5 g L−1, which is due mainly to the enhanced adsorption of CR and the increasing amount of active sites on FePc@LGNS surface for the formation of strong oxidizing species toward CR degradation.
tert-Butanol can be used to verify the presence of ˙OH during the course of oxidation.41 As shown in Fig. 8d, CR decolorization rate decreases to ∼80.0% in the presence of 50 mM tert-butanol, implying the involvement of ˙OH in FePc@LGNS–H2O2 system. Theoretically, all ˙OH produced by 50 mM H2O2 and iron catalyst could be consumed by 50 mM tert-butanol. However, ∼73.5% CR was still removed within 150 min in the presence of 100 mM tert-butanol, which is 1.17 times as much that achieved only by FePc@LGNS hybrid adsorption. Result indicated that the addition of tert-butanol leads to a certain extent decrease in CR elimination, but the FePc@LGNS–H2O2 system still possesses considerable oxidative ability in the presence of excessive tert-butanol. Therefore, a kind of strong oxidizing species that is more dominant than ˙OH must be involved in FePc@LGNS–H2O2 system.
From the characterization data, it is obvious that no di-iron phthalocyanines were formed in the synthesis process of FePc@LGNS hybrid. Therefore, the role of FePc nanorods in oxidation process should similar to mononuclear iron complexes. Previous research5,15,17,42–45 reported that the iron–oxygen complexes (iron(III)–peroxo/oxo) were considered as the active intermediates in MPc–H2O2 systems. Iron(III)–peroxo complexes could be easily converted into iron(III)–hydroperoxo complexes via protonation, followed by generating high-valent iron(IV)–oxo complexes and ˙OH radicals via homolysis of O–O bonds.46,47 In present work, the π-electron reactions are widely exist between FePc molecules, which can undoubtedly promote the homolysis of O–O bonds. As seen in Scheme 1, the FePc molecules are first oxidized by H2O2 and then transformed into aquo complexes (HOFeIIIPc) via coordination reaction with OH−. Subsequently, H2O2 molecules replace OH− to give iron(III)–hydroperoxo complexes (HOOFeIIIPc) due to its nucleophilic nature.42,44 The O–O bonds of these iron(III)–hydroperoxo complexes are symmetrically cleaved into iron(IV)–oxo complexes (OFeIVPc) and ˙OH radicals. Finally, iron(IV)–oxo complexes are reduced back to aquo complexes and then step into the next cycle.
The catalytic stability of FePc@LGNS hybrid was evaluated by five consecutive cycles under the typical conditions of pH 6.98, 1.0 g L−1 FePc@LGNS, and 50 mM H2O2. As seen from Fig. 9, the catalytic activity of FePc@LGNS hybrid is reduced by only 6.0% after five runs. No free iron ions were detected in the aqueous phase, indicating that the catalytic activity was primarily attributed to the heterogeneous FePc@LGNS catalyst and not the homogeneous dissolved iron ions. The slight decrease in CR decolorization rate may be resulted from the loss of small amount of FePc@LGNS hybrid during the separation and transformation.
![]() | ||
Fig. 9 The stability of FePc@LGNS hybrid in five consecutive runs (conditions: pH 6.98, 50 mM H2O2, 1.0 g L−1 FePc@LGNS hybrid, and 0.1 mM CR). |
The plausible degradation pathway of CR is proposed in Fig. 10. A CR molecule was first decomposed into M1 and p-nitrophenol (not detected) through symmetrical cleavage of azo bonds and two benzene rings of CR. The naphthalene ring of M1 was cleaved via three ways, forming M2, M3, or M5 and M6. Compound M1 was converted into M4 through denitration. Decarboxylation of M2 generated M3, followed by hydroxylation to M7. Compound M4 was cleaved into M8 and M9 or transformed into M3, depending on the breaking position of naphthalene ring. Compound p-nitrophenol could be oxidized to M10 or M11 through denitration, and the hydroxylation of M10 can also generate M11. The above benzenic compounds obtained were subsequently transformed into M5, M12 or other organic acids through benzene ring opening.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Preparation and characterization of FePc@LGNS hybrid, crystal structure of FePc nanorods, XRD patterns in the angular range of 22–30°, ESI mass spectra and the detected intermediate products during CR degradation by FePc@LGNS–H2O2 system. See DOI: 10.1039/c4ra16530f |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 |