Lite Version|Standard version

To gain access to this content please
Log in with your free Royal Society of Chemistry publishing personal account.
Log in via your home Institution.
Log in with your member or subscriber username and password.
Download

There is now abundant evidence that we analytical chemists are tending to underestimate the uncertainty of our measurements. There are two main underlying reasons for this. One reason is technical: it is easy to overlook important contributions to uncertainty, so the models used to estimate uncertainty may be incomplete. The second reason may be psychological: there may be an unconscious selection bias in the information we use to assess uncertainty. What should we do about this missing, ‘dark’, uncertainty?

Graphical abstract: Dark uncertainty

Page: ^ Top