Santosh K.
Gurung
,
Surendra
Thapa
,
Bijay
Shrestha
and
Ramesh
Giri
*
Department of Chemistry & Chemical Biology, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA. E-mail: rgiri@unm.edu; Tel: (+1) 505-277-1070, (+1) 505-277-2609
First published on 16th February 2015
CuI-catalysed coupling of arylboronate esters with aryl and heteroaryl iodides and bromides is described. The transformation affords products in good yields using 5–10 mol% catalyst loadings. The described reaction requires a P,N-based bidentate ligand in combination with CuI for aryl–aryl coupling, but it proceeds without external ligands for aryl–heteroaryl coupling to afford the products. The reaction protocol can also be applied to achieve biarylation of diiodoarenes in reasonable yields.
In 2002, Rothenberg et al. revealed that a copper nanocluster enabled the coupling of phenylboronic acid with iodobenzene.6 Despite this seminal work more than a decade ago and subsequent reports,7 Cu-catalysed coupling was typically limited to the reaction of arylboronic acids with aryl iodides8 and in most cases required 10–20 mol% catalyst7b–f and stoichiometric amounts in others.7b In 2011, Liu et al. demonstrated that the reaction could be extended to the coupling of organoboronate esters, ArB(OR)2.9 However, the reaction was only suitable for coupling with primary alkyl halides and pseudohalides, proceeding via the SN2 mechanism. Recently, we have shown that a variety of organoboron reagents, such as ArB(OR)2, ArB(OH)2, Ar3B, (ArBO)3, Ar4BCs and ArBF4K, can undergo cross-coupling with aryl and heteroaryl iodides when CuI is utilized as a catalyst with or without the addition of the ligand o-(di-tert-butylphosphino)-N,N-dimethylaniline) (PN) (Scheme 1).10 Brown et al. also demonstrated that a similar reaction of ArB(OR)2 with aryl iodides could be achieved by the application of a bidentate xantphos ligand with CuCl, further attesting to the generality of Cu-based catalytic systems for Suzuki–Miyaura type cross-couplings.11
We further conducted detailed mechanistic studies and proposed a catalytic cycle based on the synthesis and characterisation of reaction intermediates, as well as followed the progress of the reaction in situ by 1H, 11B, 19F and 31P NMR spectroscopy (Scheme 2).10 Based on our studies, the cross-coupling proceeds via three elementary steps – exchange of a fluoride with the iodide in (PN)CuI, transmetallation of arylboron reagents12 with (PN)CuF,13 and the reaction of ArI with (PN)CuAr.14 In this article, we demonstrate that the reaction protocol can be extended to a variety of other mono- and di-iodoarenes and iodoheteroarenes to afford mono- and di-arylated products. In addition, we also show for the first time that these reaction conditions can be easily extended to the couplings of arylboronate esters with electron-deficient and heteroaryl bromides.
The results of our ongoing studies on the substrate scope for aryl–aryl and aryl–heteroaryl couplings in the presence of 5 mol% each of CuI and PN are summarized in Table 1. While the reactions of arylboronate esters with non-heteroaryl iodides required the PN ligand, the couplings of heteroaryl iodides were conducted with 5 mol% CuI in the absence of PN ligands (entries 1, 4).15 Without PN, the heteroaryl substrates and products could function as ligands for Cu. Cross-couplings involving heteroaryl coupling partners are generally challenging for Pd-catalysts because the heteroarenes bind to Pd competitively over the ligands, thus resulting in reaction inhibition and catalyst deactivation. Pd-based cross-couplings with heteroaryl coupling partners typically require highly sterically hindered phosphine- and N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC)-based ligands.16 Therefore, our reaction protocol provides an excellent complementary approach to Pd-catalysis for the synthesis of heterobiaryl molecules. In addition, the reaction tolerates halide substituents, such as chloride on the heteroaryl iodides (entry 1) and fluoride on arylboronate esters (entries 1, 5–8), affording cross-coupled products in good to excellent yields. We further demonstrated that the current reaction protocol can also be applied to the synthesis of terphenyl derivatives in reasonable yields either by mono-arylation of iodobiaryls (entries 2–4) or diarylation of di-iodoarenes (entries 5–8) that were not reported previously. Terphenyl derivatives are industrially important molecules that are widely utilized as preservatives, sunscreens, liquid crystals and proteomimics.17 As shown in entries 6–8, arylboronate esters containing multiple fluorinated and 3,5-bis-trifluoromethylated aryl groups were coupled with 1,4-diiodobenzene to afford the corresponding diarylated products in 47–73% yields.
Entry | ArB(OR)2 | Ar′l | Ar–Ar′ | Yieldb (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
a 1.0 mmol scale. 5 mL DMF–dioxane (1![]() ![]() |
||||
1 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
70 |
2 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
64 |
3 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
66 |
4 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
69 |
5 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
69c |
6 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
71 |
7 | 47 | |||
8 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
73c |
We also have found that the current combination of CuI with the sterically hindered and electron-rich PN ligand as a catalyst has enabled us to conduct cross-couplings of activated aryl and heteroaryl bromides to afford the coupled products in reasonable yields (Table 2).18 Since the Cu-catalysed cross-coupling of aryl bromides, which are less expensive and more readily available than aryl iodides, are rare5j,7e–f and generally require stoichiometric quantities of Cu-catalysts,5l the current reaction protocol provides an excellent opportunity to synthesize biaryl molecules using catalytic amounts of Cu-salts. The reaction proceeds well with both the electron deficient and electron rich arylboronate esters, affording the products in good yields. The reaction tolerates very sensitive and synthetically useful functional groups, including nitriles (entries 1–7).19 In addition, the coupling with heteroaryl bromides does not require the addition of any ancillary ligands (entries 8–12), an observation that is analogous to the coupling with heteroaryl iodides. This Cu-catalysed process provides a very cost-effective alternative to Pd-based systems for the synthesis of heterobiaryl molecules.
Entry | ArB(OR)2 | Ar′Br | Ar–Ar′ | Yieldb (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
a 1.0 mmol scale. 5 mL DMF–dioxane (1![]() ![]() |
||||
1 | 69 | |||
2 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
48 |
3 | 45 | |||
4 | 48 | |||
5 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
34 |
6 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
53 |
7 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
42 |
8 | 65c | |||
9 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
74 |
10 | 47 | |||
11 | 61 | |||
12 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
84 |
Taking advantage of the differential reaction rates of aryl iodides and bromides, we have further demonstrated that the current protocol can be extended to sequential arylations of haloarenes containing both iodo- and bromo-substituents. As outlined in Scheme 3, 5-bromo-2-iodopyrimidine was successively arylated with 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl- and phenylboronic acid neopentyl glycol esters under the standard reaction conditions to afford the mono- and diarylated products 21 and 22 in 55% and 61% yields, respectively.
Footnotes |
† Dedicated to Professor Ei-ichi Negishi on the occasion of his 80th birthday. |
‡ Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Experimental procedures and the characterization data of new compounds. See DOI: 10.1039/c4qo00331d |
This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2015 |