Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Trends in the energy and environmental applications of metal–organic framework-based materials

Mohammed Yusuf *a, Irina Kurzina a, Gulnara Voronova a, Md. Monjurul Islam b, Salisu Danlami Mohammed c and Nurudeen Abiola Oladoja *d
aInstitute of Smart Material and Technologies, National Research, Tomsk State University, 36 Lenin Ave, Tomsk, 634050, Russia. E-mail: dr.yusuf@mail.tsu.ru; Tel: +2348055438642 Tel: +79911181720
bSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, VIC 3001, Australia
cDepartment of Water Resources Engineering, Kaduna Polytechnic, P.M.B 2021, Kaduna, Nigeria
dHydrochemistry Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical Sciences, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba Akoko, Nigeria. E-mail: bioladoja@yahoo.com; nurudeen.oladoja@aaua.edu.ng

Received 1st June 2024 , Accepted 22nd July 2024

First published on 22nd July 2024


Abstract

Over the past 20 years, metal–organic framework (MOF) nanosheets have garnered a great deal of interest in the fields of energy and environmental management because of their inherent extraordinary qualities. These qualities include the vast surface areas, nanoscale and tunable pore sizes, adaptable structures and functions, good thermal and chemical stability, high aspect ratios, more exposed accessible active sites, flexible functionality, high electrical conductivity, and optical transparency. An overview of the current advancements in the applications of MOF-based materials in environmental science and renewable energy is provided in this review. Precisely, the advancements, advantages, history and characterization of MOF-based materials are first presented and discussed. Next, we focused on the use of MOF-based materials in the fields of environmental cleaning and monitoring, particularly for the treatment of wastewater and air purification, and energy storage and conversion. We concluded by summarizing the findings on the current state-of-the-art advancements and sharing the perspectives on the prospects and problems facing future research on MOF-based materials.


Mohammed Yusuf received both his MSc and PhD in Chemical and Environmental Engineering from Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) respectively. He previously worked as Research Assistant Professor at Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology Japan. He also worked as an Environmental Consultant at Oil and Gas Company in Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia. Furthermore, he worked as a Post-doctoral Research Fellow at Chinese Academy of Sciences Wuhan, China and Hanyang University Seoul, South Korea. Presently, he is working as an Associate Professor at Tomsk State University Russia. His current research is directed towards the development of composite materials and their utilization as an adsorbent for the abatement of organic and inorganic pollutants from both domestic and industrial wastewater.

Nurudeen Abiola Oladoja is a Professor and Chair of the Hydrochemistry Research Group, Department of Chemical Sciences, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba Akoko, Nigeria. He is also the Head of the Applied Research Unit at the African Centre of Excellence for Water and Environmental Research (ACEWATER), Redeemer’s University, Ede, Nigeria. His research has focused on environmental interfacial chemistry, aquatic ecological engineering, and resource recovery from wastewater.


1. Introduction

The intriguing structures of MOFs and their notable physical attributes, such as tunable pore size, large pore volume, high specific surface area, and the potential for case-specific customization of fundamental molecular architecture, make them an ideal platform for applications in energy storage and environmental management.1,2 MOFs are crystalline porous solids that are made up of organic ligands and metal ions connected by coordination bonds between the metal ions/clusters and the organic ligands.3 The majority of metals used are the transition metals from the d-block (Ti4+, Zr4+, V3+, Cr3+, Fe3+, Mn2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, and Cd2+) or other s-block (Mg2+)/p-block (Al3+ and Ga3+) metals. A small number of metals are also employed from the lanthanide/actinide series. The ligands are the donors that contain nitrogen or oxygen functional groups, which act as the linkers between the metal ions.4 Metal ions are modeled as nodes in the MOF structure, leading to the formation of intricate configurations with hydroxy or oxide anions, ranging from trimmer to octa-nuclear.5 Depending on whether or not guest molecules are present, MOFs are grouped according to their dimensionality, and because structures of the MOFs are distinct, they exhibit distinctive structural dimensionality on the order of 1D, 2D, or 3D.6

MOFs are characterized by their high porosity, which allows for up to 90% of free space, and exhibit a high specific surface area of around 6000 m2 g−1.7 MOFs have a wide range of desirable features, which include high porosity, large surface area, and chemical and thermal stability.8 When there are no guest molecules present in the MOFs' pores, the porosity of the material is maintained, and the pore structure maintains its porosity, even when the guest molecules are eliminated.9 Materials with special qualities are created by combining elements of organic and inorganic structures. MOFs are distinguished by their notable pore volume, which accounts for at least 50% of the overall volume and their exceptional strength.10 The selection of the starting building units allows for the modification of a number of parameters, which include the pore size (increasing the pore diameter to 98 Å),11 density (decreasing to 0.126 g cm−3),12 and specific surface area (up to 1000–10[thin space (1/6-em)]000 m2 g−1).13

In this discourse, we showcase the trend in the development of MOF nanosheets for the purpose of energy and environmental applications. In order to achieve the aim of this review, we have provided a brief introduction to the structural advantages of MOFs as well as their physical properties (such as stability, pore characteristics, and surface area) for practical applications. An overview of noteworthy advancements in the use of MOFs for energy storage systems (i.e., supercapacitors, batteries, solar cells, and fuel cells) is presented. The important developments in MOFs in the area of environmental applications, i.e., in the adsorptive removal of dyes and heavy metal contaminants from water and hazardous gases from the environment, were covered. The challenges and future prospects for environmental cleanup were discussed, and perspectives on the future directions in this field of research were highlighted.

1.1 Emergence of MOFs

The first mention of MOFs dates back to 1897, when Ni(CN)2(NH3)·C6H6, a coordination network bonded via the CN groups, was described in ref. 14. The molecule's crystal structure was not confirmed until 1952, when it was discovered to be a layered, square network of Ni(CN)2(NH3) groups with benzene occupying the channels, indicating that the structure is an extended network.15 With copper(I) as the metal node and organic nitrogen ligand as the linker, Robinson's research groups worked on the creation of a coordination polymer in 1989. They reported the synthesis of {Cu1[C(C6H4·CN4)]}n, a polymer with 3-D network architecture, which served as the initial step toward the development of the metal–organic frameworks when they brought the idea of topology into coordination polymers for the first time.16 In 1990, Hoskins and colleagues discovered porous coordination polymers that demonstrated ion exchange capabilities, marking the beginning of the development of functional microporous materials.17 The heterogeneous catalyst {Cu1[C(C6H4·CN4)]}n for the cyanosilylation of aldehydes was effectively prepared from a 2-D square network material created by the Japanese professor Fujita in 1994 using Cd(NO3)2 and 4,4-bipyridine. This material can readily form clathrates with certain aromatic guests with a specific shape. As a result, Fujita postulated that the reaction's selectivity will be influenced by the cavity size.18

It was not until 1995 that Yaghi and associates began referring to these materials as metal–organic frameworks.19 A multilayer material made of pyridine, octahedral Co centers, and 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate was successfully designed and synthesized, and it was able to bind aromatic molecules like benzene both reversibly and selectively. Meanwhile, as an alternative to zeolites and activated carbon, Omar M. Yaghi and colleagues synthesized a groundbreaking substance known as MOF-5, which is said to be the first strong and highly porous material.20

In 2002, a number of Zn dicarboxylates gained popularity, but the concept of isoreticular chemistry21 was also applied to other materials. In particular, it has been found that the mixed-linker compounds [M2(dicarboxylate)2(diamine)] (M = Zn, Cu) are a versatile class, and several experiments have been carried out by altering the two organic components.22 The imidazolate-based compounds, now referred to as zeolitic imidazole frameworks (ZIFs),23 were added to the MOF family in 2003.

1.2 Characterization of MOF based materials

Below is a summary of the instrumentation techniques investigated for the characterization of MOFs and their derivatives.

The microstructure of MOF materials is extensively studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), which offers insights into morphology, topography, crystal structure, compositional changes, phase distribution, and defect location.24 In order to investigate the form and porous structure of microscale adsorbents, the analysis can be carried out at low magnification (<1000×) or high magnification (>30[thin space (1/6-em)]000×) for nanoscale adsorbents, such as aggregate formation in metal–organic frameworks (MOFs).25 In order to evaluate adsorbents post-processing and following adsorption/desorption cycles, this method is helpful for determining materials' stability.26 The SEM image of yttrium-based metal oxide fillers (Y-MOFs), which is depicted in Fig. 1a, uncovered well-dispersed, sphere-like structures that ranged in size from 3 to 5 μm. The spheres are filled with nanosheets (200 nm wide and 40–50 nm thick), which resemble Allium giganteum (see the inset in Fig. 1b) in the extended pictures (Fig. 1b and c).


image file: d4ya00332b-f1.tif
Fig. 1 SEM and TEM images of as-prepared Y-MOF samples at 120 °C for 24 h: (a)–(c) low- and high-magnification SEM images (inset in (b) is the photo of Allium giganteum);26 (d) low- and high-magnification TEM images; (e) EDX spectrum;26 (f) nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms of Y-MOFs:10%Eu3+ (inset is pore size distribution).27

Particle form, thickness, and size may all be determined as well as defects such as vacancies and dislocations by using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), which is also used to examine the chemical and electrical structures of materials.28 TEM is perfect for analyzing very small adsorbents because, unlike SEM, it requires the electron beam to pass through the sample. In order to determine metal distribution, agglomeration, crystal size, and particle form on substrates, TEM is frequently used with MOFs.29 These data facilitate the development of separation techniques and the study of adsorbent behavior in solutions. A TEM image of Y-MOFs, which were synthesized in ref. 26, is shown in Fig. 1d. The analysis reveals radially oriented nanosheets. The presence of C, Y, O, and N is confirmed by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) in Fig. 1e, which is in line with the composition of Y-MOFs.

It is possible to determine the MOFs' surface area, pore volume, and pore size distribution using adsorption isotherms of non-reactive gases at cryogenic temperatures. For pores smaller than 0.7 nm, argon at 87.3 K is preferable, but N2 adsorption at 77 K produces an isotherm in this case.30 N2 adsorption at 77 K indicated a surface area of 2021 m2 g−1, pore width of 11.7 Å, and pore volume of 0.882 cm3 g−1 for the Ni-MOF produced in ref. 31 utilizing ultrasound irradiation. Their investigation produced MOFs with textural properties that were different from those found in earlier studies on surface areas and pore volumes, possibly due to ultrasonication. The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm and pore size distribution of the Y-MOF:10%Eu3+ sample are shown in Fig. 1f. Based on IUPAC standards, this isotherm is categorized as type IV with a hysteresis loop.27 According to Yang et al.,26 Y-MOFs have an average pore diameter of 12.5 nm and a BET surface area of about 90.1 m2 per g 10% Eu3+.

The identification of IR-active functional groups inside MOFs is a well-established use of Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), which is essential for investigating the adsorption performance of MOFs.32 For example, FT-IR peaks at 1400–1767 cm−1 for cross-linked terephthalic acid indicate the presence of carboxylic groups (–CO2), whereas peaks at 1650–1767 cm−1 for non-reacted terephthalic acid are observed.33 A new gadolinium–porphyrin MOF nanosheet was produced and FT-IR characterization was performed34 (Fig. 2a). The researchers detected absorption peaks at 963 cm−1 and 3315 cm−3, which correspond to in-plane vibrations and N–H stretching, respectively. They also noted alterations in peak intensities subsequent to coordination with gadolinium ions (Gd). While the C[double bond, length as m-dash]O stretching vibration of carboxyl groups dramatically attenuated to 1683 cm−1 upon coordination, the C[double bond, length as m-dash]C stretching vibration of porphyrin showed a new peak at 1651 cm−1 and vibration at 1683 cm−1. Furthermore, a decreased peak at 1485 cm−1 owing to sulfonic acid groups and a peak at 1582 cm−1 ascribed to the MOF structure's skeletal vibrations were seen (Fig. 2b shows the corresponding results for Gd-TPPS).


image file: d4ya00332b-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (a) FT-IR analysis of TCPP and Gd-TCPP.34 (b) FT-IR analysis of TPPS and Gd-TPPS. (c) Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of HKUST-1.35 (d) Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) spectra of Fe-, Zr-, and La-based metal–organic frameworks derived from recycled PET plastic bottles.36

In order to determine impurities, unreacted precursors, and breakdown temperatures, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) profiles are first acquired for freshly synthesized MOFs (pre-activation).37 MOFs break down in several ways based on the carrier gas (air, O2, or N2). To determine which compounds are producing mass changes and temperature variations, mass spectrometry and TGA are frequently employed in tandem.10 For HKUST-1 samples evaluated within a specific temperature range, the TGA curve in Fig. 2c shows a two-stage thermal breakdown. It is possible that the removal of lattice water/ethanol occurs in the first step (50–125 °C), and the thermal degradation of the organic ligand occurs in the second stage (300–400 °C).35

The main technique for accurately figuring out the atomic arrangement and structure of MOF materials in single crystals is X-ray diffraction (XRD). PXRD, or powdered X-ray diffraction, is used to describe MOFs when single-crystal XRD is not feasible because of the size of the crystal. PXRD spectra with sharp diffraction peaks reveal the bulk MOF materials' crystallinity and structural details. To verify the authenticity of a product, experimental powder patterns can be compared with patterns predicted from single crystal structures or computational models.38 PXRD analysis of Fe-, Zr-, and La-based MOFs made from recycled PET plastic bottles was performed in ref. 36 (Fig. 2d). For example, the production of Fe-BDC was confirmed by sharp (001) and (101) peaks at 9.5° and 10.7°.39 According to He et al.,40 the Zr-MOF displayed (111) and (002) peaks at 7.14° and 8.55°, respectively, suggesting intercalated molecular layers. Furthermore, Zr-MOF crystal planes were correlated with strong peaks at 11.87°, 14.71°, 17.33°, 25.73°, and 30.71°.41 Similar to this, the La-MOF showed crystalline peaks that corresponded to different crystal planes at 15.19°, 23.97°, 28.95°, and 32.87°.42

2. Energy applications of MOFs

2.1 MOFs for supercapacitors

Supercapacitors, also referred to as electrochemical capacitors or ultra-capacitors, are some of the most promising energy storage technologies that are gaining international interest from researchers because of their special qualities, which include high power density, long cycling life, and quick charge rates.43 Since pure MOF SCs have poor conductivity, they often have low specific capacitance despite having significant porosities. A new method for enhancing SC performance involves incorporating MOFs with conductive materials, like graphene and conductive polymers, to increase MOF conductivity. Supercapacitors can be primarily divided into three groups based on the principal charge-storage mechanism, electrode/electrolyte interface, and active materials utilized. (1) Via an electrochemical double-layer capacitor (EDLC) using electrostatic forces, electrical energy is transferred to their inside surfaces. By allowing electrolyte ions to adhere to the surface of electrode materials, the carbon-based electrodes, or their derivatives, are utilized to store charge.44 Carbon-based active materials having large surface areas, such as microporous or mesoporous carbon,45 graphene,46 carbon nanotubes,47 and so on, are typically used in these kinds of SCs. (2) Fast and reversible surface redox reactions are the foundation of pseudo-capacitors. Typical examples of active materials in pseudo-capacitors are transition metal oxides and conductive polymers,48 and (3) hybrid supercapacitors (HSCs) combine a capacitive electrode with a battery-type electrode (such Li/Na-ion type electrodes) in an electrochemical cell to provide high energy and high power densities.49

Excellent energy storage capabilities and high power densities can be achieved by utilizing various electrode materials, such as carbon-based electrodes for electrostatic double-layer supercapacitors or transition metal oxide electrodes for pseudocapacitors. Key factors include high conductivity, large surface areas, and convenient electrolyte access to active sites.50 Because of the coexistence of organic and metal components in MOFs, materials based on MOFs typically have high surface areas and porous architectures that provide enough electroactive sites for supercapacitors, particularly EDLCs and HSCs. While a great deal of studies have been done on using MOFs as templates to create nanostructured materials like metal oxides or nanoporous carbon, nano-MOFs in different shapes such as particles, rods, and sheets have also been studied for use as supercapacitor electrodes. When creating electrodes, the controlled porous structure of nano-MOFs offers much-desired benefits like low density and extraordinarily large exterior surface area. Furthermore, in contrast to practically inert commercial porous carbon electrodes, the presence of redox-active metal centers may enhance pseudo-capacitance.50 Depending on the electrode materials, MOFs can be used in three different ways: (i) utilizing pristine MOFs to store charges by physisorption of electrolyte ions on their internal surfaces or by taking advantage of reversible redox reactions of the metal centers; (ii) breaking down MOFs to obtain metal-oxides and preserving electrons through the charge transfer between the electrode and electrolyte; and (iii) pyrolyzing MOFs to yield porous carbons and increasing capacitance by increasing conductivity.44

A porous MOF Ni3(HITP)2 (HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene) with electrical conductivity has been studied for its possible application in ref. 51; when compared to the bulk electrical conductivity (>5000 S m−1) of porous graphite and active carbon (≈1000 S m−1), the EDLC behavior (Fig. 3) indicates 1D channels (≈1.5 nm in diameter).51 This is supposedly the first known instance of a supercapacitor made completely of pure MOFs as active materials, devoid of any binders or conductive additives. At a low discharge rate of 0.05 A g−1, the Ni3(HITP)2 electrodes had a very high surface area normalized capacitance of 18 mF cm−2 and a satisfactory gravimetric capacitance of 111 F g−1, which was among the highest values reported for most carbon material-based supercapacitors.52 With over 90% capacity retention after 10[thin space (1/6-em)]000 cycles, this MOF-based device demonstrated superior cycling performance and exhibited a high areal capacitance that surpassed most carbon-based materials.


image file: d4ya00332b-f3.tif
Fig. 3 MOF-based supercapacitors. (A) Schematic construction of MOF supercapacitors.53 (B) Structure and nanocrystal morphology of nMOF-867 and comparison of stack capacitances among various EDLC materials.51 (C) A space-filling diagram of idealized Ni3(HITP)2 (Ni, green; F, lime; N, blue; C, gray; B, brown; H, white).51 (D) Comparison of BET-surface-area-normalized areal capacitances among various EDLC materials.54

For high-performance supercapacitors, MOFs with high electrical conductivities are therefore created as appropriate electrode materials based on the aforementioned principles. For instance, Li et al.55 used a bottom-up synthetic approach to integrate Cu–HHTP single crystal nanowires onto carbon fibers to create conductive MOF nanowire arrays (NWAs). These NWAs were then grown on carbon fiber paper to create nanowire arrays of a copper-MOF that were 200–250 nm in diameter and 3–15 mm in length. The NWAs were then used as electrodes for solid-state supercapacitors.55 Effective charge/electron transfer at the MOF NWAs/electrolyte interface was made possible by the NWA electrode's significant reduction of the inherent resistance and charge transfer resistance at the electrode/electrolyte interface. The Cu–HHTP NWA electrode demonstrated a high specific capacitance of 202 F g−1 at a current density of 0.5 A g−1, which was twice as high as those of the Cu–HHTP powder electrode. This was made possible by the composite's high porosity and strong conductivity. With a strong rate performance, the symmetric solid-state supercapacitor made with Cu–HHTP NWA electrodes had a high surface area-normalized capacitance of ∼22 μF cm−1. Surprisingly, this work also showed that by manipulating the morphologies from the randomly shaped crystallite to the strongly oriented NWAs, which fully utilized their high porosity and conductivity, their electrochemical performances (e.g., rate performance and capacitance) could be improved.

Another advancement in increasing MOF conductivity was made in ref. 53, where MOFs were combined with conductive materials like graphene and conductive polymers, resulting in a novel approach for enhancing SC performance. The highest SC performance was demonstrated by Zr6O4(OH)4(BPYDC)6 (BPYDC = 2,2-bipyridine-5,5-dicarboxylate, termed nMOF-867), among the 23 distinct nanocrystalline MOFs that were examined. Its performance could be maintained for at least 10[thin space (1/6-em)]000 cycles. Its stack and areal capacitances were 0.64 and 5.09 mF cm−2, respectively. It was shown that MOF-801 nanocrystals, measuring approximately 100 nm, performed better than those measuring 500 nm. This was likely due to the ease with which electrolyte ions could diffuse into these tiny crystals. Liu et al.56 reported the first preparation of NPCs using MOF-5-FA composites (FA = furfuryl alcohol) as a secondary carbon source. The as-synthesised carbon electrode in 1.0 M H2SO4 electrolyte demonstrated the exceptional performance of the MOF-derived NPCs for the EDLCs, providing a capacitance of 204 F g−1 at a sweep rate of 5 mV s−1. The Ni-based MOF electrode's structural layer structure demonstrated capacitances of 1127 and 668 F g−1 at rates of 0.5 and 10 A g−1, respectively, as reported by Yang et al.57 An aqueous solution containing 6 M KOH was used to study the electrochemical behavior of the electrode, which was created by pressing a paste consisting of a 70 wt% Ni-based MOF combined with 20 wt% acetylene black and 10 wt% polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) binders onto a stainless steel plate. Over a 3000 cycle period, the PTFE binder demonstrated over a 90% cycle lifetime and a specific capacitance of 1127 F g−1 at 0.5 A g−1. The greatest exposed (1 0 0) facets and layered structural characteristics were found to be highly advantageous for the kinetics of surface redox reactions and the diffusion of charged species, which explains why the material showed a satisfactory high specific capacitance and outstanding rate capability.

In a related breakthrough, Wang et al.58 reported the creation of a flexible MOF-based supercapacitor using a two-step fabrication technique that involved coating ZIF-67 nanocrystals (∼300 nm) on a carbon cloth first and then electrochemically weaving polyaniline onto the cloth.

PANI electrochemically connected ZIF-67 had been chosen, after it had been first coated on carbon cloth; the resulting electrode was designated as PANI-ZIF-67-CC. Using polyaniline, which allowed electrons to reach the MOF surface and the open MOF pores, which made electrolyte diffusion simple, a very high areal capacitance of 2146 mF cm−2 at 10 mV s−1 was achieved. Additionally, two symmetric freestanding PANI-ZIF-67-CC electrodes were used to create a flexible solid-state SC device. After 2000 cycles, the SCC still maintained more than 80% of its initial capacitance and produced an amazing areal capacitance of 35 mF cm−2 at a current density of 0.05 mA cm−2.

According to Feng et al.,59 2D black MOFs, Cu-HAB and Ni-HAB, with an ultra-small hexaaminobenzene (HAB) linker demonstrated hexagonal pore packing with d100 = 1.5 nm, which in turn produced extremely dense skeletons with superior capacitive behaviors for electrochemical supercapacitors that are submillimeter thick. In 1 m KOH, both HAB MOF electrodes demonstrated distinct reversible redox behaviors in addition to having sizable gravimetric capacitances of 215 F g−1 for Cu-HAB and 420 F g−1 for Ni-HAB. It has been determined that the main mechanism of charge storage was pseudocapacitance from ligand-based reversible redox processes, with a small contribution from EDL capacitance (<10% for Ni-HAB and <20% for Cu-HAB) obtained from moderate SSA (150–200 m2 g−1). Additionally, after 12[thin space (1/6-em)]000 cycles, these HAB MOF electrodes showed good cycling stability with a capacitance retention of almost 90%.

Bi et al.60 investigated the EDL charge storage and charging dynamics of three 2D c-MOFs (Cu-THQ, Cu-HITP, and Cu-HITN; THQ = tetrahydroxy-1,4-quinone, HITN = 2,3,8,9,14,15-hexaimino-trinaphthalene) using constant-potential molecular dynamics simulations. Experiments on the electrochemical performance of macroscale EDL capacitor devices provided support for the results of the computer models. These 2D c-MOF-based devices demonstrate unprecedentedly large specific capacitances, low cell resistances, and unprecedentedly high energy and power densities. The energy density of the supercapacitors can be further enhanced by the crystalline 2D c-MOFs since they have a wider working voltage range and a greater specific surface area, which allows for a capacity that is almost equal to the theoretical value. Additionally, Li et al., 202061 presented a thorough investigation of a carbon material with a partial inheritance of the organized linked macroporous structures. Their research showed that when utilized as the electrode in a supercapacitor, the derivative carbon material demonstrated exceptional rate performances and improved cycle stability. These could be brought about by its enhanced diffusion, stronger structure, and decreased resistance. The technique offered significant promise for creating macro–microporous superstructures for a number of exciting energy storage device applications.

Guan et al.62 reported the creation of multi-shelled metal sulfide particles with a distinctive hollow structure using a MOF-engaged technique as a battery-like electrode. The Co-based MOF precursor must first be directly pyrolyzed in order to produce the onion-like Co3O4 particles. These multi-shelled Co3O4 spheres can be transformed into NiCo2S4 and Co4S3 particles, which resemble onions, by a sequential ion-change process. Due to their high capacitance and exceptional cycling stability, the complex hollow-structured NiCo2S4 particles exhibit enhanced characteristics as a battery-type electrode. Furthermore, an HSC device based on the combination of these onion-like NiCo2S4 particles and the activated carbon manifests excellent cycling stability, enhanced energy density, and power capability. The enhanced performance may largely be attributed to the complex structure and composition of the onion-like NiCo2S4 particles. Specifically, the complex multi-shelled structure can improve the energy density of the electrode material. Moreover, the porous and hollow structure with much higher specific surface area should also be beneficial for electrochemical applications. In addition, incorporation of Ni2+ cations into the cobalt sulfide could result in increased conductivity and the creation of new active sites.

2.2 MOFs for solar cells

By creating electrical charges that are free to move about in semiconductors, solar cells use the photovoltaic effect to directly convert solar energy into electrical energy and produce electricity. In contrast to nuclear power plants and coal-fired power plants, solar cells produce no hazardous emissions during the electricity-producing process, which has led to a recent surge in research into solar cells as an environmentally acceptable energy source. The photovoltaic effect, which occurs when the cell's surface is exposed to light, is the basis for how solar cells function. Common solar cells are made of semiconductor materials, which can absorb light and has a bandgap less than visible light's energy. A cell's internal electric field causes the electrical charges created by this light to move, which results in the flow of electricity. By connecting p- and n-type semiconductors, the external voltage is generated. An electric field is created between the p- and n-type semiconductors at their interface, causing band bending due to the disparity in Fermi energy. Because of the band bending of the p–n junction, electrons transported upon light irradiation to the conduction band can pass from the p-type semiconductor to the n-type semiconductor, generating an electric current that flows along the circuit and is used as energy.

The kind of materials utilized and their composition can be used to classify solar cells. The most widely used type of solar cells are the silicon-based ones, which are further classified as amorphous, hybrid, polycrystalline, and monocrystalline silicon solar cells based on the crystallinity of silicon. When compared to other types of solar cells, single-crystal silicon solar cells have the best light conversion efficiency, but they also have the highest fabrication costs. First-generation solar cells are the name given to such solar cells.63

2.2.1 Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Due to their advantages of charge separation efficiency and low cost of manufacturing, dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have drawn significant attention from researchers worldwide for more than 20 years.64 Owing to these exceptional qualities, dye-sensitized solar cells, or DSSCs, have emerged as a viable option that might both alleviate the world's energy crisis and lead to a breakthrough in power conversion efficiency. A dye-sensitizer that may be obtained from natural resources, titanium dioxide (TiO2), makes up the photoanode of a dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC). In addition, the photoanode is made up of a thin layer of a conducting, transparent metal oxide that is porous and semiconducting; the most popular metal oxide for this purpose is TiO2. A photosensitizing dye is used to sensitize the metal oxide thin layer. DSSCs can be produced using a roll-to-roll technique, which is an affordable, continuous printing approach on flexible substrates. The dye molecule absorbs photons from the sun, which results in electron injection into the semiconducting metal oxide's conduction band. As seen in Fig. 4A, the electron moves toward the counter electron CE via the outer circuit. The electrocatalyst, which is typically a thin layer of platinum, is placed as a layer on another conducting substrate to form the CE. The space between the CE and the photoanode was filled with an electrolyte solution that contained a redox pair. As DSSCs can operate well with diffused light even under overcast conditions, they can be installed in a variety of spaces, including sunroofs and windows. Due to these benefits, DSSCs have been the subject of extensive research.65,66 Transition metal materials,67 metal alloys,68 carbon materials,69 and conductive polymers70 have been used as substitutes for the Pt counter electrode in DSSCs. Although their stability is not as good as that of metal-free electrode materials, carbon materials have a high surface area and electrical conductivity to make up for their drawbacks.
image file: d4ya00332b-f4.tif
Fig. 4 (A) Schematic representation of typical dye-sensitized solar cells. (B) The use of MOFs for the photoanodes in DSSCs as the blocking layer.71 (C) Schematic illustration of the preparation of 2D MOF nanosheets and their modified electron-extraction layer for photovoltaic devices.72

The application of MOFs as semiconductors has been extensively established by experimental and theoretical measurements.73 Subsequent studies also validate that the semiconducting characteristics of MOFs may be tuned through metal node size adjustments, organic ligand replacements, and coordination mode adjustment between the organic and inorganic constituents. The potential of MOF-based materials as photoanodes or auxiliaries for electrode sensitization in DSSCs should be explored due to their enormous surface area and capacity to harvest light.

Li et al.71 reported the investigation of a ZIF-8-coated TiO2 hybrid with different thicknesses, which was subsequently effectively applied in a DSSC. As a blocking layer on the photoanode, a thin layer of ZIF-8, a zinc-based zeolitic imidazolate framework, was formed on a TiO2 surface (Fig. 4B). By altering the reaction time, the thin ZIF-8 film's thickness may be precisely regulated. By submerging the built TiO2/ZIF-8 in the dye-containing ethanol solution, electrode sensitization is achieved. The adsorption of dyes is greatly enhanced by the thicker ZIF-8 coating layer. The interfacial charge recombination on the TiO2 surface can be inhibited by the ZIF-8 thin layer, leading to a notably higher open circuit voltage (Voc) than the pure DSSC without ZIF-8. It was also discovered that when ZIF-8 was present on the photoanode, the dye loading was significantly higher. With the ZIF-8 layer's assistance, the cell efficiency increased from 5.11% to 5.34% during the ideal growth period; however, when the growth time increased further, the cell efficiency decreased because of a sharp decline in the short-circuit current density (Jsc).

Lopez et al.74 reported the development of solar cells employing the MOF thin film consisting of Al2(bdc)3 (bdc: p-benzene dicarboxylate) as the active component in all-solid-state DSSCs. Their investigation showed that, with an optimum thickness of 2.7 mm, Al2(bdc)3 containing the 1,4-dimethoxybenzene guest molecule performs better than individual components (short-circuit current density = 36 mA cm−2, open-circuit voltage = 0.36 V, and fill factor = 40%). Additionally, materials generated from MOFs may inherit interesting properties from the related MOFs and exhibit high performance as photoanodes. With a pore size of 10 nm and a large Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area of 147 m2 g−1, Dou et al., 201675 created a porous TiO2 hierarchical structure using Ti-MIL-125 as a precursor. With a 7.2% increase in efficiency over commercial TiO2 (Degussa P25), the as-constructed TiO2 material has been effectively employed as a photoanode for the DSSC.

2.2.2 MOFs in organic solar cells. Polymer cells composed of carbon-based materials and organic electronics are known as organic solar cells, or OSCs for short. As opposed to the expanding uses in DSSCs and PVSCs, MOFs have not yet been thoroughly investigated in OSCs, and there are currently very few research studies that address this topic. As was previously indicated, using MOFs directly as photoactive materials is very difficult. Moreover, MOF sites in OSCs are limited to interlayer engineering due to the lower semiconducting qualities of organic materials compared to their inorganic counterparts. Plastic solar cells are significantly more robust and have a lot higher coverage area than traditional solar cells, but they lack high PCEs. In contrast, organic solar cells (OSCs) have highly adjustable architectures, are flexible, lightweight, and inexpensive, and are made up of thin films. In order to increase the PCE and stability of OSCs, numerous studies have been carried out.76–78 Furthermore, compared to silicon solar cells, organic solar cells are far thinner, providing significant material savings that are beneficial to the environment. High conductivity and charge transport mobilities are necessary for the interfacial layers, which include the hole extraction layer and electron extraction layer (EEL), which are critical components of organic solar cells (OSCs). Due to their superior electrical and optical capabilities and wide surface areas, 2D materials are employed as an addition to the interfacial layers.

By creating unique 2D tellurophene-based MOFs and exfoliating them using branched poly(ethylenimine)ethoxylate (PEIE) to create single- or few-layer MOF nanosheets, Xing et al.72 have presented an efficient peeling technique for MOFs. Using MOF nanosheets functionalized with PEIE as an interlayer, they were also able to improve the PCE of OSCs. According to the findings, a hybrid EEL with this kind of conductivity may outperform pristine PEIE and adjust the ETL's work function to reduce charge recombination in the resulting device. This would allow for a 15% increase in PCE when compared to the control device, as seen in Fig. 4C.72 Another advancement was the publication of Sasitharan et al.79 on production of ultrathin zinc porphyrin-based MOF nanosheets (MONs).

A PCE of 5.2% was demonstrated by the OSCs using MONs as the photoactive layer, which is nearly twice as much as the reference device. Because of their structural, optical, and electrical characteristics, MONs provided a surface template for poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) (P3HT) crystallization. Therefore, enhanced PCEs were obtained by lowering the grain size, increasing the hole mobility and raising the absorbance twice. These findings highlight the possibility of using tunable 2D MOF nanosheets as building blocks to raise the efficiency of various OSCs.

2.2.3 Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) with MOFs. Materials with particular crystal structures that exhibit photovoltaic (electricity from light) properties are known as perovskites. Due to their exceptional efficiency and low manufacturing costs, these materials have the potential to completely transform the solar industry. With efficiency rising quickly from reports of roughly 3% in 2009 to over 25% today, perovskite solar cells have made impressive strides in recent years.80 Perovskites have the general structural formula ABX3, where the X site is a halide (I, Br, Cl, or their mixtures; SCN), the B site is a divalent metal (Pb2, Sn2+, Bi2+, Ge2+), and the A site is an organic or inorganic cation (Cs+, Rb+, methylammonium Cs+, Rb+, methylammonium (MA) CH3NH3, formamidinium (FA); CH2(NH2)2+, guanidinium). Perovskite materials have several notable optoelectronic characteristics, including the capacity to transport ambipolar charges, strong and broad light absorption, extended exciting diffusion length, low cost, and solution processability. Relevant research projects are emerging because PSCs show promise for challenging the current inorganic-based photovoltaic approaches.81,82 Despite the rapid rise in efficiency of perovskite solar cells (Fig. 5A), several obstacles need to be overcome before this technology can be competitively adopted in the commercial sector. The produced perovskite film typically has many flaws and grain boundaries because of the polycrystalline nature restricted by the solution-based fabrication procedures, which will compromise the stability of the devices' performance. Therefore, when exposed to moisture, oxygen, heat, and light, PSCs are susceptible to degradation.83,84
image file: d4ya00332b-f5.tif
Fig. 5 (A) Schematic of where MOFs can be used in perovskite solar cells (PSCs), (B) schematic of perovskite solar cells with (a) n–i–p mesoscopic, (b) n–i–p planar, (c) p–i–n planar, and (d) p–i–n mesoscopic structures,85 and (C) (a) the transmission of TiO2 and nTi-MOF. (b) The energy level diagram.86

Perovskites provide excellent light-absorbing properties such as minimal recombination losses, easy bandgap tunability, long charge carrier diffusion lengths, and inexpensive manufacturing. An electron transport layer (ETL), a hole transport layer (HTL), a light absorber (a perovskite layer), a conductive substrate (either indium tin oxide (ITO) or fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO)), and a metal electrode make up a PSC. As illustrated in (Fig. 5B), PSCs are mainly classified into mesoporous or planar structures, which are further subdivided into conventional (n–i–p) and inverted (p–i–n) structures.85 Vinogradov et al.87 reported the insertion of a Ti-based MOF in a standard n–i–p PSC by depositing MIL-125 onto the surface of TiO2 nanoproducts via a single-step hydrothermal synthesis. Their research verified that micro-mesoporous MOFs can strengthen the interfacial contact between the perovskite films and promote perovskite crystallization, thereby suppressing interfacial charge recombination and improving device stability and performance. In comparison to the n–i–p structure, the p–i–n structure lowers the process temperature, which is advantageous; nevertheless, the somewhat lower efficiencies are a drawback. Moreover, Lee et al.88 added insulating porous Zr-MOFs, MOF-808 and UiO-66 at the NiOx/perovskite interface to give the perovskite materials another scaffold to develop on. These implanted MOFs support the crystallinity of the perovskite film formed on top, much like the advantages of the microporous scaffold that were previously discussed (Fig. 5C).

Li et al.89 have doped an indium-based MOF, in addition to employing a MOF in the ETL, [In2(phen)3Cl6]·CH3CN·2H2O (In2), into the HTL of spiro-OMeTAD. The authors first showed that a device can provide more photo-response by including In2 in the HTL. Furthermore, In2 has a strong UV absorption due to its large Eg, even though its emission was in the visible light spectrum. In a subsequent evolution, the HTL's cube-shaped In2 crystals might serve as the light-scattering center, generating many reflections that lengthen the light path inside the apparatus. This adds to the increase in absorption in the 500–700 nm range. With the use of rapid heat transfer, Ryu et al.86 carried out a thorough investigation to create nanocrystalline Ti-based MOF (nTi-MOF) NPs on ITO glass. This resulted in the successful production of an nTi-MOF as opposed to a Ti-MOF (MIL-125). Their overall electrical structures differed slightly, despite the fact that the chemical state of Ti in an nTi-MOF is comparable to Ti in TiO2. Because of its larger current energy level, an nTi-MOF has a greater transmittance than TiO2. Its ability to function as an ETL in a device is indicated by the fact that its energy level, as demonstrated, agrees well with that of the perovskite and ITO. Rather than altering the mesoporous TiO2 scaffold, Shen et al.90 inserted a type of insulating ZIF-8 on top of the mesoporous TiO2 (mp-TiO2) layer. ZIF-8 was added to the mp-TiO2 layer, roughening its surface in a way that encourages the crystallinity of the perovskite layer formed on top, similar to the effects reported in other investigations.

2.3 MOFs for batteries

Through an electrochemical process known as oxidation–reduction (redox), a battery directly transforms the chemical energy found in its active components into electric energy. For the purpose of powering electric vehicles, portable gadgets, grid energy storage, and renewable energy devices, in particular, dependable and efficient energy storage devices are key components of the sustainable use of renewable energy sources.91 The electrode materials are a crucial determinant of the rechargeable battery's performance. Consequently, a number of investigations have been carried out to create sophisticated electrode materials that have outstanding cycling stability, a high specific capacity, and good rate performance. Due to their unique structural and electronic properties, MOFs a novel class of porous crystalline coordination polymers have garnered significant attention in the field of batteries in recent decades. These features make them useful for investigating advanced batteries, such as zinc ion batteries (ZIBs), lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), lithium–sulfur batteries (Li–S), lithium–oxygen batteries (Li–O2), sodium-ion batteries (SIBs), and sodium iodine (Na–I2) batteries.92–94 Consequently, MOF-based materials show promise as electrode materials for the upcoming generation of long-cycle, high-capacity rechargeable batteries.
2.3.1 Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are the most significant and widely utilized energy storage technology in our daily lives; they are vital components of computers, electrical cars, and portable electronics. One of the main factors affecting LIBs' overall performance is the electrode material. Therefore, the creation and manufacturing of novel materials or materials with distinctive architectures, like LIB electrodes, have received enormous attention. Still, they are unable to fulfill today's greater energy and power demands despite their extended lifespan and simplicity of integration into portable devices.44 Aside from graphite, which is the material used in commercial negative electrodes, a number of nanostructured materials, including carbon nanotubes, graphene composites, transition metal oxides, etc., have been thoroughly studied recently for potential use in LIBs. The low capacity and energy density of graphite is the driving force behind the search for other suitable materials. Due to their large surface area and persistent porosity for Li+ ion storage and migration during charge and discharge processes, pristine MOFs have been used as replacements to traditional graphite anode materials. The MOF IN LIBs comprise the following: (1) rapid charging rates are caused by the rapid electron transport to the redox-active sites, which is facilitated by the high electrical conductivity of 2D c-MOFs.95 (2) Li ions and other anions are made easier to diffuse and inject by the regular channels of 2D c-MOFs. (3) Stiff and elongated structures ensure superior stability during Li insertion/extraction, ensuring electrodes' electrochemical longevity.96 (4) To obtain a better specific capacity and enough energy density, both organic linkers and transition metal ions can function as the redox active sites.97

A conductive bis(diimino)nickel framework (Ni-HITP) is used as a high-capacity LIB cathode material.98 The distinct energy storage mechanism that both the cation (Li+) and anion (PF6) provided as electron carriers to charge and discharge electrochemical energy was made clear by their discovery. Furthermore, due to the charge distribution between the metal ions and non-innocent ligands, Ni-HITP possesses several redox states. Thanks to its unique redox nature and satisfactory electronic conductivity, Ni-HITP demonstrated a faradaic reaction-driven energy storage function that demonstrated stable cycling performance for up to 300 cycles, an exciting specific capacity of 155 mA h g−1, and a high specific energy density of 434 W h kg−1 at a current density of 10 mA g−1. A redox-active 2D copper benzoquinoid MOF (Cu-THQ) was created by Jiang et al.99 as the cathode for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. According to their findings, plentiful porosity and intrinsic redox properties of Cu-THQ allowed for the achievement of a maximum capacity and specific energy density of 387 mA h g−1 and 775 W h kg−1, respectively. In a manner similar to Ni-HITP, there, Li+ and PF-6 were both embedded in the pores of 2D Cu-THQ frameworks as part of the energy storage process. Moreover, research on a variety of morphologies, including hollow microspherical, pillar-layer, lamellar, and shell-like morphologies, was reported in ref. 100 and 101. Their work is helpful for accommodating volume variation, electrolyte penetration, and lithium-ion transportation during the charge/discharge processes. The study conducted by Zou et al.102 on a multipodal composite of NiO/Ni/graphene derived from MOFs in the form of a hierarchical hollow ball-in-ball nanostructure showed that the material had a high reversible specific capacity of 1144 mA h g−1 and good cyclability, with nearly 100% capacity retention after 1000 cycles. Specifically, a NiO/Ni/graphene electrode has been used to create a sodium-ion battery that exhibits exceptional rate capability and great cyclability at a current density of 2 A g−1, with a capacity of 207 mA h g−1.

Qi et al.103 conducted a thorough investigation that demonstrates how ZrO2 produced from UiO-66 effectively acted as a protective layer to enhance the rate capability of the LiCoO2 cathode material. After 100 cycles, the resulting ZrO2@LiCoO2 hybrid cathode produced a reversible capacity of 148 mA h g−1 at a high current density of 2325 mA h g−1. By contrast, the capacity of pure LiCoO2 dropped quickly to 20 mA h g−1. It is noteworthy that after 100 cycles at 55 °C, the hybrid cathode also showed a reversible capacity of 132 mA h g−1, indicating remarkable thermal stability. The improved structural stability resulting from the ZrO2 coating, which successfully reduced the volume change of LiCoO2, may be responsible for the hybrid cathode's increased performance. Recently, Ziebel et al.95 reported the design of two iron semiquinoid frameworks based on a deprotonated 2,5-dichloro-3,6-dihydroxybenzoquinone (Cl2dhbqn) ligand, namely (H2NMe2)2Fe2(Cl2dhbq)3 (MOF 1) and (H2NMe2)4Fe3-(Cl2dhbq)3(SO4)2 (MOF 2). Their findings showed a notable difference in electrical conductivity of 2.6 × 10−3 for MOF 1 and 8.4 × 10−5 S cm−1 for MOF 2, respectively. MOF 2 demonstrated a rapid capacitance degradation with larger charging rates, along with a reasonable discharge capacity of 165 mA h g−1 (90% of the theoretical value) in 0.1 m LiBF4 propylene carbonate electrolyte at a modest charging rate of 10 mA g−1. On the other hand, MOF 1 retained a comparatively high capacity of 141 mA h g−1 (72% retention) even at a charging rate of up to 150 mA g−1, nearly 100% of its theoretical capacity of 195 mA h g−1 at 20 mA g−1. Meanwhile, MOF 1 achieved a coulombic efficiency higher than 100% and a benchmark-specific energy density of 533 W h kg−1 at 20 mA g−1.

Yang et al.104 developed porous ZnCo2O4 by carefully calcining Zn-doped MOF-74 at 400 °C. The substantial synergistic impact between Zn and Co has resulted in improved specific capacity, cycling stability, and rate capability of the developed porous nanostructured ZnCo2O4 when compared to Co3O4. It was discovered that adding a doping step to the MOF synthesis could result in metal/metal oxide complexes with improved characteristics during the pyrolysis process.

They created Co-MOFs using various organic linkers (1,4,5,8-naphthalene tetracarboxylic dianhydride (NTCDA) and perylene-3,4,9,10-tetracarboxylic dianhydride (PTCDA)) after realizing that Co3O4 had limited cycling stability and rate capability. They then treated the Co-MOFs with an organic amine solution before using calcination as a novel method to overcome these limitations, as reported by Su et al.105 The material that was developed demonstrated an improved capacity for lithium storage (1370 mA h g−1 reversible capacity at a mass normalized current of 100 mA g−1) and this demonstrated that the synthesis process was possible for the fabrication and manipulation of metal oxides/morphology. In addition, depositing metal oxides on electro-conductive substrates can enhance Co3O4's electrical conductivity. Hu et al.106 carried out an experiment using pyrolyzed Se-doped ZIF-67 to produce CoSe nanoparticles enclosed in a hollow carbon shell. The as-synthesised CoSe@C demonstrated outstanding cyclability by maintaining 91.6% discharge capacity, benefiting from the structural protection and charge transport channels supplied by the hollow carbon matrix. In order to increase the theoretical capacity, Zhang et al.97 used a newly developed MOF of Cu(2,7-AQDC) (2,7-H2AQDC = 2,7-anthraquinonedicarboxylate), which has separate redox activities at both Cu2(Ac)4 nodes and anthraquinone ligands. This resulted in a high initial capacity (147 mA h g−1) (Fig. 6). Regrettably, there was a small capacity decrease (≈42 mA h g−1) following a reversible capacity of ∼105 mA h g−1 in 50 cycles. The electroactive MOF cathodes were also built using quinone-type ligands as well as a few additional ligands, such as 1,2,4,5-tetraaminobenzene,107 tetrathiafulvalene tetracarboxylic acid,108 and tricarboxytriphenyl amine.109 Guo et al.110 used a Cu–Ni bimetallic MOF as the precursor to create a binary metal oxide hybrid microsphere with multiple shells (CuO@NiO). Due to its distinct structure and molecular makeup, the CuO@NiO hybrid microsphere demonstrated a reversible capacity of 1000 mA h g−1 following 200 cycles, surpassing the theoretical capacities of CuO (674 mA h g−1) and NiO (718 mA h g−1). In order to achieve electrochemical Li storage, Ferey et al.111 studied the usage of the MIL-53(Fe) cathode material to exploit mixed-valence states of metals during discharge and charge. Due to the low density of the material and the restricted amount of Li ions introduced, the cathode exhibits a gravimetric capacity of 75 mA h g−1 and a volumetric capacity of 140 mA h L−1. MOFs have been employed as precursors for the synthesis of metal oxides, transition metal oxides, metal/metal oxides, and metal oxides/carbon composites for LIB negative electrode materials in addition to carbon materials. Yang et al.112 reported the production of porous carbon-coated ZnO quantum dots by the controlled pyrolysis of Zn4O-MOF-5. With a mass-normalized current of 75 mA g−1, the as-synthesised material demonstrated a high reversible capacity of 1200 mA h g−1.


image file: d4ya00332b-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Structure and performances of Cu(2,7-AQDC) in a battery. (A) The single Kagome layer of Cu(2,7-AQDC). (B) The indication picture of the glided adjacent layers. (C) Charge–discharge profiles of the 10 wt% MOF battery. (D) Cycle performances of the battery for 50 cycles. Reproduced with permission.97
2.3.2 Lithium–sulfur batteries (Li–S). Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are thought to be the most significant technologies for the upcoming generation of electrochemical energy storage. Li–S batteries have the potential to produce high energy densities of up to 2600 W h kg−1 and specific capacities of up to 1670 mA h g−1.113 Their high energy density and lightweight design have drawn more and more attention in recent years. Li–S batteries exhibit additional benefits over lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), including reduced fabrication costs, environmental friendliness, and widespread availability of the electrode-active sulfur material. These benefits offset some of the apparent benefits of sulfur, such as low cost, large natural abundance, and non-toxicity. Additionally, Li–S batteries outperform the existing LIBs in terms of economic viability.114 On the other hand, before Li–S batteries are widely used in electronic products and hybrid cars, there are a few issues that need to be resolved. The well-known “shuttle effect”, which results from the dissolution of intermediate products (i.e., polysulfides) in the organic electrolyte and causes electrode deactivation and poor cycling performance, leads to the following challenges, including low electrode utilization, poor high-rate performance, and rapid capacity fade. To address these problems, a Ni-MOF, {{Ni6(BTB)4(BP)3}}n (BTB = benzene-1,3,5-tribenzoate and BP = 4,40-bipyridyl), was chosen to confine sulfur.115 The typical charge and discharge behaviors of the Ni-MOF/S electrode mentioned above were revealed by galvanostatic charge and discharge tests. After 100 cycles, the Ni-MOF/S composite has a high-capacity retention of 89% at a current density of 0.1C (168 mA g−1). The dissolution and shuttle effects of polysulfides are inhibited by the hierarchical porous structure of the Ni-MOF and the strong contacts between Ni metals and polysulfides. The goal of this study is to improve the cyclability of Li–S batteries by designing Li–S electrodes that include sulfur within the pores of mesoporous MOFs.

However, limited sulfur consumption and a lower performance rate are caused by MOFs' insulating characteristics. An ionic sieve called the HKUST-1@GO separator functions as a buffer against shuttling in Li–S batteries by selectively allowing Li+ ion transport while inhibiting polysulfide migration. The HKUST-1@GO hybrid Li–S battery, used as an ionic sieve membrane for Li–S batteries, was reported by Bai et al.116 to have low capacity-fading rates of roughly 0.019% per cycle across 1500 cycles. Furthermore, Baumann et al.117 have demonstrated how to optimize the size of nanocrystals in HKUST-1. This is because the surface of the particle, which has exposed Cu sites, increases the number of sulfur binding sites on the external surface, reducing the particle size and improving the capture of escaping polysulfides from the pores, reducing their diffusion toward the anode. Higher sulfur loading with larger nanocrystals, as illustrated in (Fig. 7), is nevertheless not advantageous to battery performance in this scenario, despite the presence of capture sites on the surface. Through cooperation, these elements can get past the inherent mechanical brittleness and create a strong ionic sieve membrane that effectively suppresses the shuttle effect. With the MOF@GO hybrid-based separator, a low capacity decay rate over 1500 cycles is guaranteed in a Li–S battery with the cathode comprising a sulfur-functionalized mesoporous carbon material (around 70% sulfur content). The HKUST-1 modified separator did not degrade after cycling, according to He et al.118 They reasoned that since almost all of the Cu sites were occupied by oxygen groups, the quantity of Cu–S forms would be limited. Li et al.119 disclosed the capacity reduction resulting from irreversible Cu–S interactions in an additional HKUST-1 modified separator. Liu et al.120 produced a 3D monolith by inserting 20–100 nm HKUST-1 agglomerates or 200–400 nm ZIF-67 nanoparticles in a conductive polymer hydrogel. The polymer hydrogel was able to permeate both kinds of nanodomains, and their research showed that the MOFs' aperture openings ultimately determined the performance. Compared to ZIF-67, which has a tiny pore opening of 0.34 nm, HKUST-1, with its large pore opening of 0.90 nm, was more suited to encapsulate S8 (0.64 nm) and contain long chain polysulfides (>0.4 nm).


image file: d4ya00332b-f7.tif
Fig. 7 (A) Activation and sulfur loading of HKUST-1 with potential binding sites at the Cu paddlewheel. (B) Electrolyte samples of 0.16 mm and 5.9 mm CuBTC, and S/C electrodes during a galvanostatic discharge of C/20. Yellow discoloration indicates the amount of leached polysulfide. (C) Coin cell performance of 3 cells as a function of particle size, left: the average maximum capacity and right: the average capacity retention over 20 cycles.117

Xu et al.121 conducted an experiment, which demonstrated the synthesis of sulfur-encapsulated hierarchically porous carbon nanoplates (HPCN) by one-step pyrolysis of MOF-5. The nanoplates had a huge pore volume of 1.18 cm3 g−1, a high specific surface area of 1645 m2 g−1, and an average thickness of about 50 nm. High specific capacity and superior cycle performance are exhibited by sulfur contained in HPCN. With a reversible capacity of 730 mA h g−1, the hybrid cathode demonstrated exceptional cycling performance after 50 cycles at a current of 0.5C, with charging and discharging at 837.5 mA h g−1. MOFs themselves, with their highly organized pores and tunable porosity, can be used as ionic sieves in membrane separators to lessen the shuttling impact of polysulfides, in addition to the MOF-derived materials that are employed as the sulfur hosts. Wu et al.122 reported that the sulfur concentration in the hybrid and the type of electrolyte have an impact on the performance of MOF-derived carbon–sulfur hybrid cathodes in Li–S batteries. Furthermore, Liu et al.123 constructed lithium–selenium (Li–Se) batteries using porous carbon spheres generated from a MOF. It is noteworthy that at ambient temperature, Se has a substantially higher electrical conductivity than S (1 × 10−5vs. 5 × 10−30 S cm−1), which may accelerate the cathode material's rate of electron transportation. Cerium(IV) UiO-66 (Ce-MOF-1) and MOF-808 (Ce-MOF-2) nanoparticles (∼180 nm) produced on carbon nanotubes (CNT) were used in a study conducted by Hong et al.124 to explore the possibility of open-metal-site catalysis of long-chain polysulfide conversion. A high sulfur loading of 6.0 mg cm2 and an initial specific capacity of 993.5 mA h g−1 at 0.1C were achieved by the MOF-808-based hybrid, which consumed Li2S6 considerably better than the CNT or UiO-66-based hybrid, which had no unsaturated coordination sites at the Ce(IV) nodes.

Wu et al.125 have reported the development of MOF-derived microporous carbon polyhedron (MCP) encapsulated PAN nanofibers as an effective sulfur immobilizer for Li–S batteries. This is because sulfur can be uniformly dispersed inside the nanofibers and in the micropores of MCPs. A combination of MCPs and PAN was electrospun to achieve the encapsulation procedure, which was then achieved by loading sulfur through a two-step reaction at 155 °C and 300 °C, respectively. The enhanced S/MCPs–PAN composite, which had 52 wt% sulfur, had a large reversible capacity of about 790 mA h g−1 at first, which only slightly decreased to 789.7 mA h g−1 in the second cycle. After 200 cycles, the discharge capacity remained at 666.2 mA h g−1, demonstrating both good capacity retention (84.4%) and high sulfur utilization (90.7%). According to Zhou et al.,126 the particle size reduces with increasing sulfur utilization in a series of nanoscale ZIF-8 frameworks, with less than 20 nm providing a capacity of over 950 mA h g−1 at 0.5C. However, the best size for cycling stability (75% over 250 cycles at 0.5C) was ∼200 nm.

Furthermore, Hong et al.127 found that 100 nm-sized nanoparticles outperformed 200 nm-, 500 nm-, and 1 mm-sized particles for a Cu-MOF that used both ligand Lewis acid sites and node Cu sites for polysulfide interaction. Electrochemical reactions only take place on the particle surface, where electrons and Li ions are accessible due to the conductivity constraints of the MOFs in both scenarios.

2.3.3 Sodium-ion batteries (SIB). Even though Li-ion batteries are the industry leaders in the energy market for portable electronics, they still have a lot of drawbacks, including low power density, safety concerns, and a lack of lithium resources in the Earth's crust. In addition, the price of Li-ion batteries is very high due to the limited availability of lithium (20 ppm) on Earth.128 Furthermore, as noted by Hwang et al.,129 large-scale electrochemical energy storage systems (EESs) may also be hampered by LIBs' low power density and lack of safety. Nevertheless, because of their lower energy density, short lifespan, and higher ionic properties to many electrode materials that are appropriate for LIBs, SIBs are no longer able to meet their needs.130 Due to these constraints, researchers looked for appropriate electrodes for sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) that exhibit electrochemical behavior similar to that of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). These electrodes were thought to be a viable substitute for LIBs because of the low electrochemical cell potential (−2.71 V vs. SHE) and abundance of sodium.131

While a number of materials, including Prussian blue,132 transition metal oxides,128 and small organic molecules,133 have been extensively employed as cathode materials for SIBs, it is still difficult to find promising anode materials with a long cycle life, high capacity, and high energy density. In this regard, MOF-derived nanostructures offer a chance to develop SIB anodes with superior electrochemical performance in a sustainable manner. For instance, numerous published studies on Na1.40MnFe(CN)6Na1.72 MnFe(CN)6 and KMFe(CN)6 (M = Mn/Fe/Co/Ni/Cu/Zn) have demonstrated that the insertion and extraction of Na+ would cause a reversible reduction or oxidation of the metal ions.134 Zhang et al.135 developed a hollow porous CuO/Cu2O octahedron and evaluated it as an anode for SIBs using a different alternative Cu-BTC MOF as a template. The results of the studies showed that calcination temperature was critical to the CuO/Cu2O composite's electrochemical performance, and the optimized CuO/Cu2O-300 had good rate capability, high capacity retention, and a long lifespan. A study conducted by Yue et al.136 used the pore size and PBA shape to determine the rate capability in SIBs. The analysis of the KNiFe(CN)6/t series (t = 2, 18, and 72 h) revealed that the presence of big pores would make sodium ion transport significantly easier.

Park et al.137 reported the integration of a 2D c-MOF of Co–HAB (hexaaminobenzene) into high-power SIBs (Fig. 8(a) and (b)). HAB is a good candidate for primary design concepts for high-performance electrode materials since it can theoretically undergo a redox reaction involving up to six electrons and has the largest concentrations of redox centers. Co–HAB electrodes provided a specific capacity of 291 mA h g−1 at 50 mA g−1 and continued to maintain a capacity of 226 mA h g−1 at a higher current density of 500 mA g−1 after over 50 cycles with a coulombic efficiency of nearly 100% (Fig. 8(c) and (d)). Zhang et al.138 reported the production of a porous CoFe2O4 nanocube from the CoFe-PBA (Prussian blue) precursor. For a current density of 50 mA g−1, the sample showed a capacity of 394 mA h g−1 and a capacity retention of 91.4%. Upon 500 cycles, a maximum capacity of 152.6 mA h g−1 was retained, despite the high current density of 2.5 A g−1. In order to create MnFe2O4 hollow microboxes, Guo et al.139 additionally utilized MgFe-PBA as a precursor. Examined as an anode for SIBs, the as-prepared MnFe2O4 demonstrated good rate capability and cycle stability. With a theoretical specific capacity of 312 mA h g−1, the Co–HAB was able to store three electrons per HAB unit in addition to three sodium ions, indicating that the redox-active sites of the HAB had been nearly fully used. Furthermore, Kaneti et al.140 reported the synthesis of a Ni-doped Co/CoO/N-doped carbon (NC) hybrid employing bimetallic Ni-Co-ZIF as the precursor. The resulting Ni-doped Co/CoO/NC hybrid is very porous and has a specific surface area of 552 m2 g−1. As an electrode for SIBs, this hybrid may provide a discharge capacity of 218 mA h g−1 at a high current density of 500 mA g−1 while maintaining strong cycle stability and great rate performance.


image file: d4ya00332b-f8.tif
Fig. 8 Electrochemical performance of the Co–HAB electrode for SIBs. (a) Chemical structure of Co–HAB. (b) A space-filling diagram of Co–HAB and the size comparison of the pore with Na+, solvated Na+ and PF6@ions. Top: proposed three-electron reversible reaction of the HAB ligand in Co–HAB. (c) Cycling stability test of the Co–HAB electrode. (d) Comparison of areal capacity of Co–HAB with representative reported anode materials for SIBs.137

Another breakthrough by Zou et al.141 employed MOF-5(Zn4O(OOCC6H4COO)3) as a precursor to create porous carbon in the form of a cube. The porous carbon that was obtained demonstrated excellent overall electrochemical performance when used as a SIB anode. A high current density of 3.2 A g−1 was maintained for 5000 cycles, and a capacity of 100 mA h g−1 was achieved after 100 cycles at a current density of 100 mA g−1. Furthermore, MOF-derived materials such as Co3O4@nitrogen-doped carbon, CoP@C, CoSe/C, and TiO2@C have benefited from the integration of metal compound components with carbons and have functioned as efficient anode materials for the SIBs.142,143 Considering the aforementioned factors, MOFs and their derivatives are suitable electrode materials for high-power SIBs that show great promise and possess exceptional cycle stability and ultrafast storage capability.

2.3.4 Lithium–oxygen batteries. As one of the most researched types of metal–air batteries, the Li–O2 battery is made up of Li metal as the negative electrode, i.e. the anode, reduced oxygen as the cathode active mass, and an electrolyte solution containing Li+. The devices are made up of a cathode, which is a composite porous matrix with electronic conductivity that allows oxygen gas and Li ions in the electrolyte solution phase to interact electrochemically. As schematically shown in Fig. 9A, it primarily operates with the deposition/dissolution of lithium metal at the anode and an oxygen reduction reaction (ORR)/oxygen evolution reaction (OER) at the cathode.144 As opposed to Li–ion and Li–S batteries, which store just anode active material, the porous cathode of Li–ion batteries leverages atmospheric oxygen to produce a high energy density. Anode Li yields a high specific capacity of 3842 mA h g−1 and a specific energy of 40.1 MJ kg−1, which is comparable to gasoline (46.8 MJ kg−1). Even at a less capacity, a robust Li–O2 battery can supply enough power for automobiles or grid backup systems based on solar energy storage. Investigations are presently being conducted on four distinct categories of Li–O2 systems: aprotic, aqueous, hybrid, and solid-state batteries. Regarding the types of electrolytes involved, the four types differ from one another. Subsequently, the latter ascertains the particular electrochemical processes involved in energy retention and release. Tan et al.145 provided a schematic example of these four battery types in Fig. 9B. Poor cathode and electrolyte performances are the primary bottlenecks preventing Li–O2 batteries from being commercially viable.
image file: d4ya00332b-f9.tif
Fig. 9 (A) Schematic representation of a Li–O2 battery. (B) Schematic configuration of all types of Li–O2 cells.145

The first MOF-based Li–O2 batteries were developed by Wu et al.146 A number of MOFs were carefully chosen to correlate the relationship between the structure and performance, including MOF-5, HKUST-1, and M-MOF-74 (M = Mg, Mn, and Co). According to Wu et al.,146 MOF-74's accessible metal sites may result in a significant oxygen enrichment of frameworks, facilitating the Li–O2 reaction and enhancing the performance of MOF-74-based Li–O2 batteries. Consequently, at room temperature under 1 atm (O2), Mn-MOF-74@carbon-black exhibits the most notable discharge capacity of 9420 mA h g−1 among all cells, with an applied current density of 50 mA g−1 and operating voltages of 2.6–2.7 V. The enhanced stability and efficiency in the latter case should be attributed to the synergistic effects of the bimetallic sites, which employ the bimetallic MOF, MnCo-MOF-74, as the cathode. Mu et al.147 designed a soluble MOF based on heme as an electrolyte additive for Li–O2. The MOF was synthesized using a surfactant-assisted technique. Specifically, metal nodes function as structural building blocks, heme-like TCPP(Fe) ligands operate as catalytic active sites, and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) is used as a surfactant to regulate the formation of MOF crystals. According to McCloskey et al.148 paper on fundamental chemistry, the discharge product during the recharging of Li–O2 electrolytes is comparatively more stable. This can be attributed to the ether solvents' increased cathodic stability and resistance to nucleophilic attack.

Another breakthrough was reported by Liu et al.149 for a Li–O2 cell based on super-concentrated salt/DMSO that showed exceptional stability and reversibility even with an exposed Li anode. Additionally, Yuan et al.150 conducted an examination of the ORR and OER performances of 2D nanosheets. In comparison to the comparable 3D Mn-MOF, the 2D Mn-MOF nanosheets (5.30 nm thickness) showed greater round trip efficiency (66.7% vs. 63.2%), lower overpotential (1.34 V vs. 1.57 V at 200 mA h g−1), and higher electrochemical activity (1.66 V vs. 1.57 V at 200 mA h g−1). The increased catalytic performance of the Mn–O sites was facilitated by a higher percentage of unsaturated metal sites on the surface and the edges as well as better diffusion brought about by the nanoscale 2D structure. This resulted in initial discharge capacities of 9464 mA h g−1 and 1000 mA h g−1 after 200 cycles at 100 mA g−1. Nonetheless, Liu et al.149 found that even with an exposed Li anode, a super-concentrated salt/DMSO-based Li–O2 cell demonstrated outstanding stability and reversibility. The superior performance of the super-concentrated solutions can be ascribed to the presence of solely TFSI-Li+(DMSO)3 complexes and the absence of free DMSO solvent molecules, as DMSO molecules are unstable to O2-attack and corrosive to the Li metal anode.

Yan and colleagues examined the impact of decreasing crystal size of Co-MOF-74 rods with thicknesses of 1400 and 800 nm as well as nanofibers with a thickness of 20 nm.151 The enhanced performance of the Co-MOF-74 nanofiber is ascribed to the shorter ion transfer diffusion lengths and easier accessibility of the active Co sites. The existence of more defect sites in the nanofiber MOF, on the other hand, may have been caused by the employment of a size modulator during synthesis, which would account for the almost 2.5-fold increase in the initial specific capacity. Read152 reported the usage of ethers as electrolyte solvents. Utilizing DME (dimethoxyethane) and DOL (1,3-dioxolane), they reported a Li–O2 cell with good stability and exceptional rate capability. These characteristics are ascribed to the low viscosity and high oxygen solubility, which promote oxygen transport in the Li–O2 cell.

2.3.5 Zn-ion batteries (ZIBs). In society, rechargeable ZIBs are used for a variety of purposes. Zn-based batteries come in various varieties. According to Mao et al.,153 Zn–air batteries (ZABs) and Zn–ion batteries (ZIBs) are further subdivided into Ni–Zn batteries (NZBs) and Zn–Mn batteries (ZMBs). The cathode materials used in these various ZIB types differ, further defining their unique characteristics.

According to Yuan et al.,154 zinc-based batteries are predominantly used as primary batteries. Due to issues with recycling and disposal following usage, there has been significant resource waste and degradation of the environment.155 As a result, the creation of an ideal anode made of zinc that is inexpensive, nontoxic, nonflammable, and highly water compatible is crucial. In addition to using an aqueous electrolyte, Fang et al.156 reported rechargeable ZIBs with improved safety, cycle life, and accessibility, high current discharge performance157 and greater ionic conductivity (10@1 to 6 S cm−1).158

Although the overall construction of ZMBs is similar to that of NZBs, technically speaking, ZMBs are one of the ZIBs; the cathode material is typically MnO2. However, ZMBs are frequently discussed separately due to the excellent properties of the manganese-based materials that other positive electrode materials lack.153,159 Given their ZIB status, ZMBs inherit all of the ZIB's benefits by default, including low reduction potential, high specific capacity, stability, safety, and so forth.160 Furthermore, low toxicity, low cost, and an abundance of reserves are the benefits of using manganese oxide as the positive electrode. Mao et al.,153 explained that Zn air batteries (ZABs) and Zn–ion batteries are further, subdivided into Ni–Zn batteries (NZBs) and Zn–Mn batteries.

In contrast to standard commercial lithium-ion batteries, ZMBs do not have an exceptional specific capacity, and manganese oxide exhibits a low electrical conductivity and a slow rate of ion diffusion.161 Furthermore, when manganese oxide is used, it deforms in certain ways and collapses, dissolving manganese in the electrolyte. These drawbacks have an impact on ZMB usage going forward as well.162

Additionally, all of these various ZIB variants use zinc metal anodes. Zinc anodes frequently provide a lot of benefits. (1) According to Li et al.,163 they are reasonably priced and very simple to obtain. (2) Because of their low reduction potential, ZIBs' open-circuit voltage is raised, assuring their stability and safety. (3) Compared to other reactive metals, zinc is more stable and less reactive. (4) According to Sun et al.,164 zinc anodes have a large volume capacity and a very high theoretical specific capacity. (5) ZIBs are highly environmentally friendly and typically do not release any poisonous or damaging compounds when used.

ZIBs have great qualities, but there are a lot of practical challenges with them. During use, zinc anodes can generate zinc dendrites, which can puncture the septum and cause the ZIBs to short circuit.165 Additionally, the ZIBs' ion transport capacity needs to be enhanced.

Using a 3.0 M aqueous solution of Zn(CF3SO3)3 as the electrolyte (Fig. 10), Nam et al.157 created a 2D c-MOF, Cu3(HHTP)2, as a cathode material for rechargeable ZIBs. At 50 mA g−1, Cu3(HHTP)2 had a high reversible capacity of 228 mA h g−1. These maxima occurred at 0.65/1.10 V and 0.90/1.21 V (vs. Zn/Zn2+), which correlate to the two-electron absorption of HHTP and the Cu2+/Cu+ redox process. Additionally, after 500 cycles, it retained 75% of its capacity, or 124.4 mA h g−1 at 4000 mA g−1. With a Zn ion diffusion coefficient of 3.9 × 10−10 cm2 s−1, rapid redox reactions were evident. To improve the capacity and cycling performance of ZIB cathodes, Sang et al.166 created a highly crystalline 1D c-MOF called Cu-BTA-H. Cu-BTA-H has several pore configurations and a π–d conjugated structure that resembles a rod that helps with ion transport. Because of its decreased band gap energy, electrochemical performance is improved by ion–electron transport that is greatly improved. The built ZIBs maintained a capacity of 106.1 mA h g−1 after 500 cycles at a current density of 2.0 A g−1, and they were able to attain a reversible capacity of 330 mA h g−1at 0.2 A g−1. Increased Zn2+ storage is made possible by the extra Cu2+/Cu2 redox pair, which improves cycle stability and reversible capacity.


image file: d4ya00332b-f10.tif
Fig. 10 Cu3(HHTP)2 acting electrochemically as a cathode for rechargeable ZIBs. (a) Zn-Cu3(HHTP)2 cell schematic depiction. (b) The Cu3 (HHTP)2 chemical structure. (c) The anticipated redox mechanism in the Cu3 coordination unit (HHTP)2. (d) CV profile at 0.5 mV s @1, together with the capacitive contribution (shaded region). (e) Cycling efficiency at 500 mA g @1.157

Li et al.167 synthesized Ni–PTA–Mn, a 2D c-MOF intended to enhance the structural stability of electrode materials and inhibit deformation, using a hydrothermal process. This arrangement of parts resembles a flower and is characterized by a special hydrogen-bonded skeleton that was brought about by Mn. Conductivity is improved by the positively charged metal–H2BDC framework, which increases Zn2+ diffusion. Because of this, ZIBs built with Ni–PTA–Mn demonstrated exceptional stability, retaining good capacity after more than 300 cycles and 93% discharge capacity after 100 cycles at 1 A g−1. Outstanding long-term cycling stability was demonstrated by the reversible and steady production of zinc intermediates, as validated by in situ XRD.

He et al.168 used solvent heat and a self-sacrificing method to synthesize V-MOF-48@CNTF, a 3D c-MOF. Through self-assembly, this V-based MOF created a cascading nanowire bundle structure along the CNTF substrate. ZIB electrochemical performance is greatly increased by the special design, which reduces ion diffusion distances, improves ion migration efficiency, maximizes surface area, and increases active sites. Later, Bing employed V-MOF-48@CNTF in all-solid-state fiber-optic ZIBs, which maintained over 80% capacity after 300 cycles at 2.0 A cm−3 and produced an energy density of 17.47 mW h cm−3 at 1.46 W cm−3. This illustrates how 3D c-MOFs can improve ZIB applications and attributes.

2.3.6 Zn–air batteries (ZABs). Aqueous zinc–air batteries are the most developed class of metal–air batteries and have the most potential for use in future energy applications. The 1930s saw the emergence of commercial items.169 With a theoretical energy density of 1086 W h kg−1 (including oxygen), zinc–air batteries are approximately five times more energy dense than lithium-ion batteries as they stand today. They may be produced for as little as ∼10 $ per kW per h (ref. 170), which is around two orders of magnitude less expensive than lithium-ion batteries. Of all primary battery systems, zinc–air batteries provide the best energy density possible for a variety of applications.169

Fig. 11 illustrates the components of zinc–air cells: an air electrode with a gas diffusion layer and a catalytic active layer as the cathode, zinc metal as the anode, and a separator. Gaseous oxygen is used instead of liquid oxygen because oxygen is not very soluble at atmospheric pressure.171,172 In this process, pressure differentials force atmospheric oxygen to penetrate into the porous carbon electrode, where a catalyst harnesses electrons produced by zinc oxidation at the anode to promote its reduction to hydroxyl ions in the alkaline electrolyte. This process, which is depicted in Fig. 11 (red circle), is called a three-phase reaction and involves a solid catalyst, liquid electrolyte, and gaseous oxygen. In zinc–air batteries, this structural layout improves oxygen uptake. Zinc–air batteries (ZABs) are effective in aqueous electrolytes because of their high specific energy of 1218 W h kg−1 and volume energy density of 6136 W h L−1.173


image file: d4ya00332b-f11.tif
Fig. 11 Working principle and each electrode reaction of zinc–air batteries. Note the red circle where a three phase reaction (oxygen (gas), catalysts (solid) and electrolyte (liquid)) occurs in the air cathode.174

According to Guan et al.,175 ZABs generally consist of four main parts: an alkaline electrolyte, a separator, a zinc electrode, and an air electrode with a catalyst-coated gas diffusion layer. ZABs provide electricity when they discharge by connecting zinc metal to the air electrode in an alkaline setting.176 As atmospheric oxygen diffuses into the porous air electrode, an oxygen reduction process converts it to hydroxide ions. As these hydroxide ions move toward the zinc electrode, they create Zn(OH)42−, which, in supersaturated circumstances, breaks down into insoluble ZnO.

Zinc–air batteries (ZABs) rely heavily on the ORR and OER, which have a major impact on their reaction rates.177 On the other hand, the oxygen redox process occurs kinetically slowly during the charge–discharge cycle. Electrocatalysts are frequently used to improve this process.178 Because of their high specific surface area, porosity, and variety of architectures, MOFs are widely used in ZAB catalyst synthesis.179 Nevertheless, the electrical conductivity of pure MOFs is low. Consequently, to greatly increase the electrochemical performance of ZABs, modified c-MOFs, which have enhanced electrical conductivity, are favored as electrocatalysts.180

Pan et al.181 created a Ru-doped c-MOF, Ni5.7Ru0.3(HHTP)3(H2O)x, for use in ZABs, based on the superior charge transport capabilities of 2D-MOFs with π–π and π–d orbital overlap. When tested at 0.05 S m−1, [Ni5.7Ru0.3(HHTP)3(H2O)x] showed better electrical characteristics than other pure MOFs. Moreover, solid-state ZABs built using this c-MOF showed good stability and strong charge/discharge performance for a period of more than 200 cycles. Motivated by this possibility, Li created a 3D c-MOF called Co-CAT/NiFe-LDH/CNFs by synthesizing Co-CAT using solvent heat and integrating c-MOFs onto NiFe-LDH/CNFs.182 It was mostly composed of nanosheets organized in arrays with embedded nanorods. With solid electrolytes, assembled ZABs demonstrated superior stability and high power density, attaining 112.04 mW cm−2 at 11 mA cm−2 for more than 11 hours. Furthermore, after 56 hours of cycling at the same current density, the batteries showed minimal capacity loss and stability in liquid electrolytes, underscoring their great potential for real-world uses.

2.3.7 Calcium-ion batteries (CIB). Calcium-ion batteries (CIBs) have gained interest as possible lithium-ion battery (LIB) substitutes throughout the last seven years. The fifth most abundant element in the crust of Earth, calcium has low reduction potential (−2.87 V vs. SHE, 0.17 V higher than Li/Li+ and 0.5 V lower than Mg/Mg2+), theoretically competitive volumetric and gravimetric capacities, and great promise for secondary battery applications.183 Precursors for calcium are also far less expensive than those for sodium and lithium.184

Additionally, because calcium ions are less polarizing than Mg-ions, they have better reaction kinetics, which could improve performance.185 Furthermore, because CIBs cannot facilitate dendritic formation, which can result in short circuits and explosion, they are safer than LIBs.186 But CIB development is still in its infancy, and before going on sale, a few characteristics like superior electrolytes and high-performance cathodes need to be refined.

Using non-aqueous electrolytes in both three- and two-electrode cells, the majority of earlier research on CIB applications was conducted.187 Designing electrode materials that can withstand the enormous size of Ca2+ ions during charging and discharging without suffering significant structural damage is still a difficult task nevertheless. There have been several reported solutions to these cathode problems, including as the utilization of framework-based materials and metal oxides.188,189

At a rate of 0.5C, KVO exhibited a reversible 60 mA h g−1 Ca–ion intercalation capacity, maintaining 92% of its capacity after 100 cycles. The capacity increased to 78–100 mA h g−1 with an average voltage of ∼3.0 V versus Ca/Ca2+ when the current flow was reduced to 0.1C. Prussian blue nanodisks made from Prussian green and NaI reduction were described by Vo et al.189 In a full-cell configuration with Ni-MOF as the anode, the optimal sample, Na1.09FeFe(CN)5.11(CO)0.89-PAAPANi11(PB41_16/PAAPANi11) demonstrated promising Ca-storage behavior, achieving a specific capacity of 77.6 mA h g−1 at 100 mA g−1 current density. This impressive capacity retention of 91.0% was significantly higher than that of other Prussian blue analogues. For this reason, creating high-performance cathodes for CIB applications through the use of metal oxides and framework-based materials offers considerable potential.

2.4 MOFs for fuel cells

In recent times, fuel cells have garnered considerable interest due to their exceptional efficiency, high energy density, and minimal release of detrimental gases.190 Fuel cells, in contrast to most batteries, which store chemical energy inside the cell, use a continuous flow of chemical energy from outside the cell in the form of fuels (such as hydrogen, natural gas, and methanol) to produce electricity for use in stationary buildings, cars, and portable appliances. Internal combustion engines are not as eco-friendly as fuel cells; thus, they could be a viable replacement. An anode, a cathode, and an electrolyte are the three main components of fuel cells. Fuel is often oxidized at the anode using a catalyst to produce electrons and ions, which are subsequently transported to the cathode by the electrolyte for the ions and an external circuit for the electrons. At the cathode, a second catalyst is employed in conjunction with the electrons and ions to lessen the oxygen that is often provided by the air.

Research has been done on MOFs and their derivatives as potential electrode catalysts, electrolyte-holding membranes, and less expensive alternatives to catalysts based on precious metals. Several important electrocatalytic applications, including the following: (a) MOFs for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), (b) MOFs for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), and (c) composites of MOFs and proton conductive polymers for membranes, are the main drivers of the use of MOFs for increasing efficiency and lowering the cost of fuel cells.191

Fenoy et al.192 presented a compressive example of using a ZIF-8 top layer as an O2 adsorbent to raise the oxygen content on the conducting polymer catalytic surface. The ZIF-8 layer improved the O2 uptake from the solution, which improved the ORR in neutral media. Bureekaew et al.193 reported the encapsulation of imidazole (Im) molecules into aluminum MOFs, whereby Im@{Al(μ2-OH) (1,4-NDC)}n (1,4-NDC = 1,4-naphthalenedicarboxylate) and Im@{Al(μ2-OH) (1,4-BDC)}n present enhanced conductivities of 2.2 × 10−5 and 1.0 × 10−7 S cm−1, respectively, when compared to those of their parent MOFs at 120 °C. In a different investigation, Gui et al.194 synthesized a Zr-MOF with anionic zirconium phosphate chains supported by NH4+ cations, creating a continuous N–H/O–P chain for improved anhydrous proton conductivity. Taylor et al.195 reported a different study that utilized a zirconium–sulfoterephthalate MOF as an example to show how the defect affects proton-conducting behavior. The defect-containing samples were created by either immersing the prepared sample in 0.1 M H2SO4 or adding excess acetic or sulfoacetic acid during the preparation process.

According to Ji et al.196 multi-heteroatomic doping (e.g., N, Co, P, B, S, etc.) is frequently applied to MOF-derived 1D PCNFs or HCNFs to enhance their ORR by changing their surface polarity and electrical characteristics. They also described the one-step procedure for the tunable synthesis of ZIF-67 and PAN electrospun into carbon microsphere/nanofiber hybrids (CSFHs), and they showed how this process could be used to control the morphology of a nanofiber that resembled a pearl necklace to a microsphere/nanofiber 3D structure by varying the ZIF-67/PAN ratio.197

In the past, a bimetallic Zn, Co-ZIF was combined with electrospun Co2+/PAN fibers to create MOF-based hierarchical carbon fibers containing N, C (Fig. 12a and b). In comparison to Zn, Co-ZIF derived carbon (ZIF-C) and Zn, Co-ZIF free carbon fibers (CP-CFs) (Fig. 12c and d),198 the ZCP-CFs demonstrated high activity for the ORR in 0.1 M KOH. These features included a more positive half-wave potential (0.135 V vs. Ag/AgCl), higher diffusion-limited current density (5.95 mA cm−2) and kinetic limiting currents, a lower Tafel slope (62 mV dec−1), and higher selectivity (the number of electrons transferred, n = 3.97). The number of researchers working around the clock to create bifunctional catalysts for water splitting has grown recently.


image file: d4ya00332b-f12.tif
Fig. 12 (a) Schematic illustration of the preparation of the Zn, Co-ZIF-based hierarchical carbon fibers (ZCP-CFs) and (b) the corresponding TEM image of ZCP-CFs. (c) Tafel plots of ZIF-C, CP-CFs, ZCP-CFs, and Pt/C. (d) Kinetic-limiting current densities of ZIF-C, CP-CFs, ZCP-CFs-9, and Pt/C.198 (e) Schematic illustration of the fabrication of free-standing MoS2 nanosheet grafted Co–N-doped carbon flakes grown on electrospun carbon nanofibers (CoNC@MoS2/CNF). (f) Polarization curves of CoNC@MoS2/CNF, MoS2/CNF, CoNC/CNF, and RuO2 in 1 M KOH in the OER. (g) OER Tafel plots of CoNC@MoS2/CNF, MoS2/CNF, CoNC/CNF, and RuO2 in 1 M KOH. (h) OER cycling stability of CoNC@MoS2/CNFs in 1 M KOH.196

The hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) can be effectively catalyzed by molybdenum disulfide (MoS2); however, its low electrical conductivity limits both its charge transfer rate and electrocatalytic effectiveness. The solution to this problem is shown schematically in Fig. 12e, where MoS2 nanosheets were formed on carbon fibers generated from ZIF-67/PAN to increase their electrical conductivity. Furthermore, using the CoNC@MoS2/CNFs for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in 1 M KOH electrolyte, they showed a better catalytic activity with a low Z10 value of 350 mV compared to MoS2/CNFs and CoNC/CNFs (570 mV and 430 mV, respectively) (Fig. 12f). Additionally, as shown in Fig. 12g, the CoNC@MoS2/CNFs displayed a low Tafel slope of 51.9 mV−1, which was significantly lower than those of CoNC/CNF (89.7 mV−1), MoS2/CNF (119.3 mV−1), and RuO2 (98.1 mV−1). This suggests that the CoNC@MoS2/CNFs have high catalytic activity and enhanced catalytic kinetics.196 Further evidence of the exceptional OER stability of CoNC@MoS2/CNFs in a basic medium comes from the observation of a 17 mV increase in the Z100 value after 1500 continuous cycles (Fig. 12h).

Proton migration networks that are independent of water can be achieved by introducing acid–base pairs through linker alteration or guest encapsulation, as demonstrated by previous research. In an experiment, Dong et al.199 embedded isomorphous UiO-66 nanocrystals (40–100 nm) attached to NH2 and SO3H in a sugar-based chitosan polymer network. On the other hand, Guo et al.200 focused on creating a hybrid in which they threaded a zwitterionic polymer containing sulfonate and quaternary ammonium groups through ZIF-8, resulting in improved proton transfer. In addition to the previous quest encapsulation technique, Chen et al.201 reported adding several ionic liquids to the ∼500 nm pores of MIL-101 nanoparticles in order to produce enhanced proton conductivity via acid–base interactions.

A thorough explanation of the low-temperature area and the first proton-conducting MOF, {(NH4)2(adp)[Zn2(ox)3]·3H2O}n (ox = oxalic acid, adp = adipic acid), was provided by Sadakiyo et al.202 Water molecules, NH4+ ions, and the carboxyl groups of adipic acid acted as conducting media, which performed similarly to Nafion. At 98% relative humidity (RH) and 25 °C, this MOF exhibits proton conductivity as high as 8 × 10−3 S cm−1. When compared to Nafion, this MOF exhibits a greater activation energy (Ea) of 0.63 eV, suggesting that both Grotthuss and vehicle processes are involved in the proton conduction.

3. Environmental applications of MOFs

MOFs have several potential uses due to their superior qualities (large surface area, pore size controllability, and chemical and thermal endurance). Furthermore, they are also easily tunable to get desired characteristics. MOFs are ideal adsorbents for environmental applications because of their extremely high porosity (about 90% free volume) and specific surface areas (typically greater than 7000 m2 g−1).203 To eliminate these contaminants from either air or water, adsorbents such activated carbon, zeolite, metal oxide, resin, and biomass are typically used. Nevertheless, the majority of these materials have issues with their low adsorption capability, especially for low-level pollutants, and their high regeneration energy consumption. Furthermore, it is simple to alter their surface in order to include more functional groups that can help with the adsorption of specific contaminants.204 On the effectiveness of MOFs as adsorbents, numerous studies have been published. The ability to selectively adsorb gases is made possible by MOFs' enormous surface area and various pore diameters. The storage of hydrogen, methane, and carbon dioxide has been studied in relation to MOFs. MIL-101 and ZIF-8, for example, are two MOFs that have shown promise in the adsorption of carbon dioxide. These MOFs can release carbon dioxide after selectively adsorbing it under certain conditions.205–207 The potential application of MOFs in water filtration has been studied. MOFs can be used to remove organic materials, heavy metals, and pharmaceuticals from water.208 The effectiveness of MOFs as adsorbents has been the subject of numerous investigations.

3.1 Adsorption

3.1.1 Adsorption of dye pollutants. Given the availability of a library of anionic and cationic dyes, electrostatic interactions are thought to be one of the most significant types of non-covalent interactions involved in the binding of dye molecules by MOFs. For coloring cotton, silk, and wood, these dyes have been widely employed in industry.209 Ionic dyes are hazardous and used widely; hence, many MOFs have been created for their capture. In most cases, AC, zeolites, and chitosan beads are frequently used to remove colors like methyl orange (MO), methylene blue (MB), and malachite green (MG). Comparing MIL-100(Fe), MIL-101(Cr), MIL-53(Al), and AC, it was shown that MIL-100(Fe) had a greater adsorption capacity (146 mg g−1) for MG than the other three adsorbents. The electrostatic interaction between MOF and MG was suggested as the cause of MIL-100(Fe)'s excellent adsorption capacity and selectivity.210 The robust π–π interaction between the guest and host molecules was responsible for this performance, which exceeded several other conventional adsorbents' criteria.

An experiment to synthesize hierarchically mesostructured MIL-101(Cr) by using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as a surfactant to remove methyl blue MB was reported in ref. 211. For the adsorptive removal of MB in the liquid phase, the material displayed dramatically faster adsorption kinetics. In around 110 minutes, they noticed that all of the MB molecules with a 30 ppm initial concentration had been adsorbed onto the hierarchically mesostructured MIL-101(Cr). In another development, for the purpose of removing methylene blue (MB) dyes from aqueous environments, Li et al.212 investigated the use of MOF/graphite oxide hybrid (MOF/HKUST1) materials. Investigations were also conducted into the isothermal, kinetics, and regeneration studies. It was discovered that the adsorption of MB followed both the Freundlich and Langmuir adsorption isotherms. Finally, it was discovered that HKUST-1/GO had superior reusability and a greater capacity for MB dye adsorption.

In order to capture the Brilliant Blue R-250 (BBR) dye molecule from aqueous solution, Liu et al.213 produced a number of three-dimensional 4,4-connected MOFs based on copper paddlewheel secondary building units and tetracarboxylate linkers made from tetraphenylmethane. There was a direct correlation between the pore diameters of the 4,4-connected MOFs and the dye uptake. The maximum dye absorption capability of the MOF with the biggest pore size was 73 wt%, whereas MOFs with pores smaller than the dimensions of BBR-250 showed negligible dye uptake. The batch adsorption approach was used to remove the methyl red (MR) dye using MOFs loaded onto iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe3O4@MIL-100(Fe)).214 When compared with other adsorbents, the MR removal onto MIL-100(Fe) demonstrated an improved capacity.

For the adsorptive removal of methyl orange, Haque et al.215 reported the use of two MOFs based on chromium terephthalates, namely MIL-53(Cr) and MIL-101(Cr). Both MOFs were superior to activated carbon in the adsorption of methyl orange, with MIL-101(Cr) showing a higher adsorption capacity than MIL-53(Cr). The adsorption capacities and kinetic constants were in the following order: activated carbon < MIL-101(Cr) < ethylenediamine-grafted MIL-101(Cr) (or ED-MIL-101(Cr)) < protonated ethylenediamine-grafted MIL-101(Cr), and PED-MIL-101(Cr), with a 194 mg g−1 adsorption capacity. The cationic PED-MIL-101(Cr) MOF displayed the strongest interaction with the anionic methyl orange molecules because protonated PED-MIL-101(Cr) was positively-charged, and ED-MIL-101(Cr) also displayed a partial positive charge, suggesting that electrostatic interactions were involved in the adsorption mechanism.

Adsorption of methyl orange and methylene blue onto Fe3O4–PSS@ZIF-67 (PSS = polystyrene sulfonic acid) with a core–shell structure, named MZIF-67, was reported by Yang et al.216 According to the tests, an amount of 5 mg and an initial concentration of 400 mg L−1 resulted in an optimum adsorption capacity of 738 mg g−1 within 7 hours. This outstanding performance was attributed to its high porosity, the presence of unsaturated cobalt sites, and magnetic characteristics, which further increased the removal efficiency for methyl orange and methylene blue. Further investigation revealed that MZIF-67 has the selectivity ability to gradually separate the methyl orange dye from a mixture of solutions that contained 0.04 mg L−1 methyl orange and methylene blue dyes. As a result, the removal rate and separation efficiency were both increased to 92 and 96%, respectively.

According to ref. 217, defective UiO-66(Zr) was synthesized utilizing hydrochloric acid as a post-synthetic treatment and benzoic acid as a modulator. The adsorption capacity of safranin T was found to be nine times higher in the faulty MOF (366 mg g−1) than in the defect-free counterpart (30 mg g−1). Because of the size-exclusion effect, the defective UiO-66(Zr) was nevertheless able to selectively adsorb safranin T over crystal violet in spite of having a bigger cavity and a more uniform distribution of pore sizes.

Under different circumstances, Lin and Chang218 reported the adsorption of malachite green onto zeolite imidazole frameworks (ZIFs) at 20 °C, with an adsorption capacity of 1500 mg g−1, which quickly increased to 2500 mg g−1 at 60 °C. This demonstrated that raising the temperature of the adsorption process had a beneficial effect on the system's performance. After four cycles, the ZIF-67 regeneration and reusability study revealed a 95% discharge rate for regeneration, making it an effective adsorbent for removing the malachite green dye.

Qin and Zeng219 reported the preparation of ultra-small nanoparticles of several MOFs, such as HKUST-1, ZIF-8, and ZIF-67, supported on copper silicate nanotubes (CuSiNT), for the adsorption of methyl orange, Congo red, and thymol blue. The CuSiNT-supported HKUST-1 nanocomposites exhibited improved methyl orange, Congo red, and thymol blue adsorption when compared with their microsized counterparts. The increased adsorption capability was due to the CuSiNT support, which might offer more accessible functional groups and open metal sites and thus reduce the dye molecules' diffusion barrier in the process. Wang et al.220 reported the potential of a crystalline triazine-based organic framework (CTF) as a promising adsorbent for removing organic dyes. This material showed an uptake of 0.48 mmol g−1 for RhB within 55 min (the weight ratio of RhB/CTF was 0.24), with the adsorption capability for RhB onto CTF reaching 1.01 mmol g−1, showing that CTF was more effective in removing Rhodamine B (RhB).

Haque et al.221 expanded their research to a MOF based on iron terephthalate, MOF-235(Fe) or [Fe3O(terephthalate)3(DMF)3][FeCl4]. Despite being non-porous to nitrogen at low temperatures, this MOF absorbed both anionic methyl orange and cationic methylene blue dyes in the liquid phase. With MOF-235, MO and MB had adsorption capacities of 477 and 187 mg g−1, respectively, in comparison with just 11 and 26 mg g−1 for each respective dye with activated carbon. They also confirmed that the solution pH had a significant impact on the adsorption of the MO and MB dyes. It was posited that the positive charge density on the MOF-235(Fe) decreased at higher pH levels, leading to a reduction in the adsorption of methyl orange. A low pH value enhanced the negative charge density of the MOF's, which boosted the adsorption capacity for methylene blue.

In another development, MIL-101(Al) was functionalized with amino groups to produce NH2–MIL-101(Al).222 NH2–MIL-101(Al) showed a high methylene blue adsorption capability of up to 762 mg g−1. It was posited that the electrostatic interactions between the MOF and methylene blue increased as a result of the presence of amino moieties on the MOF surface. However, the MOF's X-ray photoelectron spectrum showed that structural changes happened to the MOF during the adsorption procedure and that about 30% of the Al(III) ions were lost to the solution, rendering the MOF useless. A single-walled metal–organic nanotube with an armchair (3,3) structure, ([CH3NH3][Zn(NTB)(NMF)])·4.5NMF (H3NTB = 4,4′,4′′-nitrilotrisbenzoic acid, NMF = N-methylformamide), has recently been discovered by Zhou et al.223 and reported to display an interior channel diameter of 21 Å. The metal–organic nanotube adsorbed dye molecules (i.e., basic red 9 and basic violet 14) with remarkable efficiency (>1650 mg g−1), because of the vast open mesoporous channels.

Another advancement was made by Huo and Yan,210 when they developed MIL-100(Fe) for the adsorption of the cationic triphenylmethane dye (i.e., malachite green). The study showed that MIL-100(Fe) demonstrated an adsorption capacity of 205 mg g−1 at room temperature, which was much greater than those of MIL-101(Cr) and MIL-53(Al). Electrostatic interactions played a role in the adsorption mechanism, as evidenced by the dependence of the adsorption process on pH and the zeta potential measurements. Malachite green and MIL-100(Fe)'s benzene rings also interacted with one another in a π–π fashion. Malachite green was demonstrated to adsorb on MIL-100(Fe) in an endothermic manner, with an increase in adsorption capacity at higher adsorption temperatures. Thermodynamic investigations showed that a positive entropy change is beneficial for the spontaneous adsorption of malachite green on MIL-100(Fe), whereas a positive enthalpy change is undesirable. The open metal sites in MIL-100(Fe) were occupied by water molecules, which may help to explain this. On the other hand, the weaker adsorption of malachite green would be caused by the absence of open metal sites in MIL-53(Al) and the repulsion brought about by surface positive charges on MIL-101(Cr).

In a different study, Li et al.224 prepared NH2–MIL-53(Al) for the adsorption of the cationic dyes methylene blue and malachite green using the amino functional group. The adsorption process in this instance was not fueled by electrostatic interactions, as evidenced by the comparison of the pH-dependent adsorption studies. Instead, it was found that the amino hydrogen of NH2–MIL-53(Al) and the nitrogen atoms on methylene blue or malachite green exhibited strong hydrogen bonding interactions. The benzene rings of NH2–MIL-53(Al) and the dye molecules also had weak π–π interactions with one another. Seth et al.225 prepared an anionic trinuclear cadmium MOF using the tetratopic carboxylate ligand 3,3′,5,5′-tetrakis(p-carboxyphenyl)-2,2′,6,6′-tetramethoxy-1,10-biphenyl. This cadmium MOF demonstrated remarkable flexibility and durability and permitted post-synthetic metal exchange with several main groups and lanthanide ions, to produce new MOFs with the same structure. Particularly, the production of cationic MOFs, which have substantially different dye adsorption characteristics, resulted from the substitution of trivalent lanthanide ions for the divalent cadmium ions in the divalent cadmium solution. The anionic dye, bromophenol blue, was selectively adsorbed by the isostructural europium MOF, from a mixture that contained neutral or cationic dyes, in contrast to the parent cadmium MOF, which preferentially adsorbed only cationic methylene blue.

Dong et al.226 used (E)-4-(2-carboxyvinyl)benzoic acid (H2L) to prepare the cadmium MOF, [[CdL(H2O)]·4DMF·2H2O]. The adsorption of rhodamine B (RhB) by the MOF led to the formation of a luminous adduct. RhB@MOF experienced ligand-to-dye energy transfer, which caused the ligand and RhB emissions to be detected at 420 and 595 nm, respectively, even though the emission of RhB was suppressed in a ground mixture with the MOF. Luo and Wang227 carried out an experiment on the use of composites formed from MIL-100(Fe) and graphene oxide nanosheets, which were discovered to have a sandwich-like structure when the decomposition temperature increased from 280 to 350 °C. At a graphene oxide loading of 5%, it was discovered that this composite material had improved methyl orange and methylene blue adsorption capabilities from aqueous solution. MOF composites made from ZIF-8 with either graphene oxide or carbon nanotubes were also employed by Abdi et al.228 The composite materials in this example showed significantly improved malachite green adsorption capabilities, with maximum values of 1667, 2034, and 3300 mg g−1 for ZIF-8, ZIF-8@CNT, and ZIF-8@GO, respectively, at room temperature. The potential for practical applications of these composite materials was demonstrated by the increased uptake of malachite green and preservation of their adsorption ability in real wastewater at increasing temperatures.

Li et al.229 studied the adsorption characteristics of the Fe3O4/HKUST-1/GO hybrid toward methylene blue. With a better dye adsorption capacity than the more straightforward Fe3O4/HKUST-1 composite, the three-component Fe3O4/HKUST-1/GO composite demonstrated a good match in channel diameter and molecular breadth with methylene blue despite having a smaller specific surface area. The adsorption capability of Fe3O4/HKUST-1 was observed from desorption and regeneration studies to rapidly decrease with increasing numbers of cycles, from virtually quantitative adsorption to barely 60% after recycling for five times. The adsorption capacity of methylene blue for Fe3O4/HKUST-1/GO in the presence of graphene oxide as a component material was only marginally reduced, and the value remained over 90% after 5 cycles. Recent research conducted by Pei et al.230 developed MOF-polymer composites from HKUST-1 and a biocompatible binder consisting of calcium alginate and gelatin using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Methylene blue, malachite green, methyl violet, rhodamine B, and auramine O were the organic dyes that the 3D-printed composites adsorbed, and the adsorption performance depended on the printing geometry and the size and loading of the MOFs.

For dye removal from aqueous solution many MOF-based adsorbents have been employed, and the adsorption capacities of these arrays of adsorbents for dye removal are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Dye removal from aqueous solution and wastewater by MOF-based adsorbents
Adsorbate Adsorbent Adsorption capacity (mg g−1) Time (min) Ref.
Congo red Ni–Cu MOF 999.20 240 231
TMU-7(Cd) 97 45 232
Ni-MOF 276.7 300 233
Zn-MOF 132.2 300 233
Ni–Zn MOF 460.90 300 233
TFMOF(Zr) 252.25 10 234
Ce(III)-doped UiO-67 799.6 80 235
ln–TATAB 299 10 234
Co-MOFs 4885.20 720 236
Methylene blue UiO-66 69.8 120 237
Zn-MOF 326 60 238
Fe3O4@-SiO2@UiO-66 116 60 239
Fe3O4@-SiO2@UiO-66-NH2 128 60 239
Fe3O4@-SiO2@UiO-66-urea 121 60 239
Fe3O4@MIL-100(Fe) 221 5–1440 240
UiO-66-P 91.1 Over 1440 241
MIL-100(Fe) 1105 10–1440 242
Fe3O4@MIL-100(Fe) 73.8 420 243
H6P2W18O62@Cu3(BTC)2 298.34 60 244
MIL-68(Al) 1666.67 8 245
BUT-29 1119 6 246
UiO-66 543.48 300 247
GO–Cu-MOF 262 1440 248
CuBDC 41.01 20 249
Ce(III)-doped UiO-67 398.9 80 235
USTC-1 26.6 240 250
ABim–Zn-MOF 174.64 60 251
Methyl orange UiO-66 83.7 120 237
Fe3O4@-SiO2@UiO-66 219 60 239
Fe3O4@SiO2@UiO-66-NH2 130 60 239
Fe3O4@SiO2@UiO-66-urea 183 60 239
Ce(III)-doped UiO-67 401.2 80 235
USTC-1 0.8 240 250
Rhodamine B MIL-125(Ti) 59.92 180 252
Zn-MOF 3.75 60 238
MgFe2O4@MOF 219.78 5 253
POM@UiO-66 222.6 120 254
Fe3O4/MIL-100(Fe) 28.36 90 255
In-MOF@GO 267 60 256
MIL-68(Al) 1111.11 10 245
USTC-1 13.4 240 250
Methyl orange SCNU-Zl-Cl 285 60 257
Acid orange A SCNU-Zl-Cl 180 60 257
Congo red SCNU-Zl-Cl 585 60 257
Methyl blue SCNU-Zl-Cl 262 60 257
Malachite green Cd-ZIF 395.87 70 258
Malachite green ZIF-8 1000 180 259
Malachite green POM@UiO-66 190.6 120 254
Orange G POM@UiO-66 40 120 254
Chicago sky blue ABim–Zn-MOF 144.26 60 251
Methyl red Fe3O4@MIL-100(Fe) 625 360 214
Acid red 18 CoOF 44.26 500 260
Rose Bengal SmBTC 380 1440 261
Crystal violet BUT-29 832 4 246
Acid chrome blue K ln–TATAB 343 10 262
Acid red 26 ln–TATAB 259 10 262
Direct black 38 ln–TATAB 242 10 262
Orange II ln–TATAB 217 10 262


In summary, the carcinogenic effects of synthetic dyes on humans and aquatic life make them a serious environmental issue when it comes to water contamination. While adsorption is a popular method for eliminating dyes from wastewater, traditional adsorbents are sometimes ineffective for usage in industrial settings. These drawbacks can be overcome by using metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), which have good dye removal and degradation properties because of their multifunctionality, water stability, wide surface area, adjustable pore size, and recyclability. Magnetic MOFs continued to function well after several cycles.

3.1.2 Adsorption of heavy metal pollutants. A lot of research has been done on MOFs and MOF-based composites as possible adsorbents for heavy metal removal because of their intriguing structure and notable physical characteristics, which include flexibility, functionality, tunable pore size, large pore volume, high specific surface area, and the potential for case-specific customization of fundamental molecular architecture.2 With careful selection of a metal ion and an organic linker, the structure of a MOF can be designed. The topology, structural properties, and metal speciation of MOFs all influence the mechanism of heavy metal ion adsorption. Metal ions may transpire via diffusion into the MOF's core or via interactions at the framework's surface.263 These interactions may take the form of chemical bonds, coordination interactions, electrostatic interactions, acid–base interactions, van der Waals contacts, or chemical bonding.264–266 Compared to other common adsorbents such as activated carbon, zeolite, and mesoporous silica, these characteristics make the MOFs more appealing.
3.1.2.1 Arsenic. Arsenic is extremely harmful and causes cancer. Both the arsenate, As(V), and arsenite, As(III), forms are lethal to all living things.267 When it comes to metal ion pollution, the World Health Organization (WHO) has designated arsenic pollution as the top concern.268 The WHO recommends a maximum tolerable content of 10 μg l−1 for arsenic in drinking water.269 It is estimated that each year more than 60 kg of arsenic are emitted into the atmosphere.270 Various approaches have been implemented to eliminate As(III) and As(V) from wastewater. For the treatment of wastewater and water containing arsenic, MOFs have been designated as promising materials.

In order to remove arsenic (As) contaminants from aqueous solutions,271 a metal–organic coordination polymer (Fe–BTC) was synthesized using iron(III) and 1,3,5-benzene tricarboxylic acid via a solvothermal method. This Fe–BTC polymer demonstrated a significantly higher adsorption capacity for As(V) compared to commercial iron oxide powders and nanoparticles (50 nm). The Fe–BTC polymer exhibited an outstanding adsorption capacity for As(V) at 12.3 mg g−1, six times higher than that of Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Comprehensive analyses using FTIR and XPS spectroscopy confirmed significant adsorption before and after As(V) uptake. The arsenic ions were confirmed to adsorb within the Fe–BTC polymer rather than on the surface, indicated by the Fe–O–As IR peak and the presence of As(V) in the XPS spectra.

In order to address the issue caused by secondary pollution resulting from synthetic procedures for magnetic composites,272 a direct epitaxial synthesis of magnetic UiO-66 was proposed. The composite material was tested for the removal of As(V) and demonstrated an arsenic adsorption capacity of 73.2 mg g−1. The characterization techniques such as SEM, TEM, and N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms revealed that the composite has a unique core–shell structure and a high surface area (124.8 m3g−1), greater than that of pristine UiO-66 (27.1 m3 g−1). Furthermore, due to their ease of material recovery after adsorption, magnetically modified UiO-66 composites attracted a lot of attention.273

Liu et al.274 described the adsorptive removal of As(V) using heated MIL-100(Fe) to create α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles at various temperatures. According to the findings, there was a positive correlation between increasing particle size and rising calcination temperature (i.e., α-Fe2O3-350 °C (50 nm), α-Fe2O3-550 °C (150 nm), and α-Fe2O3-750 °C (200 nm)). For α-Fe2O3-350 °C, α-Fe2O3-350 °C, α-Fe2O3-750 °C, Fe2O3-550 °C, and MIL-100(Fe), the corresponding adsorption capacities were 94.9, 74.1, 70.5, 80.5, and 110 mg g−1 respectively. According to ref. 275, a comparable investigation revealed that γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles produced through easy thermolysis of MIL-100(Fe) had a 90.6 mg g−1 adsorption capability for As(V).

Wu et al.276 created a variety of ZIF-8 polymers with varying cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB):His (L-histidine) molar ratios (such that the polymers were ZIF-8-H2O, ZIF-8-MeOH, and 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 H-ZIF-8-11, 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]2 H-ZIF-8-12, and 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]4 H-ZIF-8-14). ZIF-8-H2O has the lowest capacity among all of them. ZIF-8 was hierarchically organized and synthesized using a distinct CTAB[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]His molar ratio with increased CTAB, indicating that this ratio had great adsorptive capabilities. Specifically, HZIF-8-14 exhibited a 30-fold greater adsorptive ability for As(V) (90.9 mg g−1) in comparison to active carbon (3 mg g−1). Additionally, it was reported by Liu et al.277 that zeolitic imidazolate frameworks with a variety of morphologies, including cubic, leaf-shaped, and dodecahedral ZIFs, had superior As(III) adsorption capabilities of more than 100 mg g−1. By contrast, γ-Fe2O3274 and ZIF-8278 demonstrated typical As(III) adsorption capacities of 62.9 and 49.5 mg g−1, respectively.

The significant presence of the Zn–OH functional group in the ZIF-8 adsorbent produced by Li et al.279 was responsible for its remarkable adsorption capacity of 76.5 mg g−1. ZIF-8 was functionalized with ethylenediamine by Massoudine et al.280 in order to increase its adsorption capacity, and the result was an adsorption capacity of 83.5 mg g−1. Another type of traditional MOF, MIL-53(Fe), which was produced via a solvothermal technique, was studied by Vu et al.281 An adsorption capacity of 21 mg g−1 was attained by the adsorbent. MIL-53(Al), MIL-88A, and MIL-88B are other adsorbents exhibiting adsorption capabilities of 106, 145, and 156 mg g−1, respectively.282,283 A number of other studies have demonstrated high arsenic adsorption capacities of adsorbents, including indium-based AUBM-1,284 Co-MOF,285 Ni-MOF,286 and MOF-808.287 With an adsorption capacity of 303 mg g−1, UiO-66 showed the greatest adsorption capacity among all of them.


3.1.2.2 Lead. Although lead (Pb) is a naturally occurring element in soil, its presence at lower concentrations can be considered an environmental contamination. Lead (Pb(II)) is widely used in industrial processes like metal plating, painting, smelting, oil refining, and battery manufacturing. Lead poisoning is a serious concern that has been linked to harmful and cancerous effects on human health.288 Little children are especially vulnerable to the toxicity of lead, which can impact many body systems such as the brain and nervous system. According to Ghorbam et al., Meng et al., and Qiao et al.,289–291 the growing fetus may be exposed to lead toxicity due to the release of lead from bone into the circulation during pregnancy. Higher amounts of lead consumption also primarily cause renal damage, slowed bone growth, mental decline, and neurological illnesses. Pb(II) content limits have been set by the WHO, European Union, and USEPA, respectively, at 0.01, 0.01, and 0.015 mg L−1.292

Huang et al.239 synthesized a range of Zr-based magnetic MOFs with core–shell amino functionalizations utilizing various functionalization agents. Three MOFs were prepared for their study: NH2-functionalized Fe3O4@-SiO2@UiO-66-NH2 (MFC-N), urea-functionalized Fe3O4@SiO2@UiO-66-urea (MFC-U), and non-functionalized Fe3O4@SiO2@UiO-66 (MFC-O). When compared to MFC-O, their findings showed that MFC-N and MFC-U had better Pb(II) adsorption capacities. The high adsorption is significantly influenced by the presence of amino groups. A stronger connection between the NH2 groups anchored on MFC-N and Pb(II) ions is indicated by the fact that MFC-N, out of the two amino-functionalized composites, has a higher adsorption capacity of 102 mg g−1 towards Pb(II) ions. According to Huang et al.,293 there has been further breakthrough on the adsorption of Pb(II) using artificial zeolite-imidazolate frameworks, ZIF-67 and ZIF-8. In comparison to certain other porous materials on the market, the MOFs' adsorption capabilities of 1348 and 1119 mg g−1, respectively, were higher.

In a different study, Luo et al.294 reported a Cr-based MOF functionalized with ethylenediamine (MIL-101) to eliminate Pb(II). In their research, the adsorption isotherms for Pb(II) adsorption on the amine-functionalized MIL-101 were compared to those for the non-functionalized MIL-101. The amine groups' partial obstruction of MIL-101's pores is indicated by the decreased pore volume following functionalization. For the adsorption of lead ions, the amino groups that have been altered on the MOF's exterior surface offer chelating binding sites. Reduced functionalization extent was observed along with a decline in maximum adsorption capabilities, which decreased from 81.09 to 15.78 mg g−1.

Li et al. 2019295 assessed the efficacy of two amide-based COFs (COF-TP and COF-TE) in the adsorptive removal of Pb(II). Based on their findings, the maximum adsorption capacities of 140 and 185.7 mg g−1 were determined for COF-TP and COF-TE, respectively. By acting as an active adsorption site for the metal ions through multi-coordination, the amide group improved the adsorption of Pb(II). A study conducted by Rivera et al.296 described the adsorption properties of MOF-5 for the removal of Pb(II). 750 and 660 mg g−1 of adsorption were observed at pH 4 and 6, respectively, indicating a rising trend in adsorption capacity with decreasing pH.

Yu et al.297 evaluated the effectiveness of a new metal–organic framework embellished with O and N[double bond, length as m-dash]N groups in order to adsorb Pb(II) from an aqueous solution. Based on their investigation, the maximum Pb(II) adsorption capacity was discovered to be 463.52 mg g−1, and a noteworthy affinity for the metal ion (Kd = 8.88 × 106 mL g−1) was observed. The characteristics of the borderline acid were exposed by the densely packed O groups and N[double bond, length as m-dash]N units, and they could interact with the borderline acid Pb(II) extremely quickly. Hasankola et al.298 reported the utilization of produced Cu-BTC and Zn-BTC MOFs by solvothermal reaction with benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid as a linker as a versatile adsorbent for the removal of Pb(II). The generated composites showed maximal adsorption capacities of 333 and 312 mg L−1, respectively. When it came to adsorbing Pb(II) ions, the frameworks performed similarly and could sustain the adsorption–desorption cycle three times.

Carbon paste electrodes utilizing MOF-5 for Pb(II) detection were demonstrated by Wang et al.299 A carbon-MOF-5 paste was created by combining carbon powder with a few drops of ethanol, allowing the fine powder to evaporate and then mixing it with mineral oil in a mortar. To create a MOF-based carbon paste electrode, the paste was placed within a glass tube and sealed with a copper wire. Using 0.1 M acetate buffer at pH 5, various Pb(II) concentrations were used for the differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) experiments. When the concentration of Pb(II) was increased from 1.0 × 10−8 to 1.0 × 10−6 M, the DPV peak was detected at −0.45 V and moved to lower potentials. This could be because of distinct interactions between the materials at the electrode surface and the thin layer of Pb that was deposited onto the electrode. A Pb(II) removal of 312 mg g−1 was accomplished by Zhang et al.300 using the synthesized HS-mSi@MOF-5 framework, a silica coated thiolated MOF-5 derivative. The pH of the solution had a significant impact on the MOF's performance, with low pH values producing the best results.

Yu et al.301 described the utilization of a Zn(II) based MOF decorated with O groups for Pb(II) adsorption. The material under investigation showed a remarkable adsorption capacity of 616.64 mg g−1, accompanied by 99.27% selectivity towards Pb(II) ions. Their investigation verified that the negatively charged O groups interact electrostatically with the Pb(II) ions to play a significant role in this ultrahigh adsorption capacity. Furthermore, the kinetics analysis demonstrated that Pb(II) sorption happened instantly and was attributed to the existence of several porosities that were heavily populated with O groups. A developed MOF (MnO2-MOF) was applied to adsorb Pb(II) in a study conducted by Qin et al.302 The MOF was synthesized using a simple oxidation process, and an equilibrium time of 1 hour was used to determine the metal uptake efficiency. The material revealed an adsorption capacity of 917 mg g−1, which was attained as a result of inner-sphere complexation of hydroxyl groups with the metal ions.

Yin et al.303 made an effort to modify melamine using a MOF that possesses a structure similar to that of UiO-66 and used it to remove Pb(II). In comparison with the pristine MOF, the modified MOF exhibited high Pb(II) adsorption capacity (205 mg g−1), at pH 6 and 40 °C. When the pH dropped from 6 to 5, a decrease in adsorption capacity of 122.0 mg g−1 was noticed. The adsorption capability dropped when the pH value dropped, and the low pH caused the modified MOF to regenerate by desorbing the metal ion. Abbasi et al.304 created three-dimensional Co-MOF composites for Pb(II) adsorption. The pH of the solution, the concentration of metal ions, and the duration of treatment impacted the adsorbent's effectiveness.

Ricco et al.305 produced a magnetic framework composite based on aluminum (MFCs) for the removal of Pb(II) ions. By adjusting the 2-amino-1, 4-benzene dicarboxylic acid loadings, they created a series of amino-functionalized MIL-53(Al) MOFs. The magnetic framework composites based on aluminum demonstrated a noteworthy capacity for adsorption, reaching up to 492.4 mg g−1. The investigation also found that as the degree of amino functionalization of the MOF increases, so does the metal ion absorption capability. Additionally, Sun et al.306 reported an Fe–BTC/PDA polymer-based MOF composite for Pb(II) adsorption, achieving an adsorption capacity of 394 mg g−1. Additionally, Chakraborty et al.307 proposed a MOF based on tetracarboxylate and zinc(II), which demonstrated a maximum metal uptake of 71 mg g−1.


3.1.2.3 Chromium. The two primary forms of chromium ions found in the environment are the trivalent (Cr(III)) and the hexavalent (Cr(VI)) species. Compared to Cr(VI), Cr(III) is less hazardous even though it is a target heavy metal pollutant in water. Because of its high toxicity, Cr(VI) has been linked to a number of disorders, including cancer, bronchial asthma, skin allergies, lung and nasal ulcers, and issues with reproduction and development.308 As per Lv et al.,286 the highest allowable concentration of chromium in drinking water is 0.1 ppm.

Using a microwave-assisted technique, Sathvika et al.309 created a Nitrosomonas-modified Uio-66 for the adsorption of Cr(VI). Primarily, the functional groups of the modified-MOF and the chromate ions interacted electrostatically to facilitate the uptake of Cr(VI). As for the Nitrosomonas-modified Uio-66, it attained 23.69 mg g−1, while the pristine Uio-66 MOF and Nitrosomonas sp. showed Langmuir adsorption capabilities of 13.33 and 8.98 mg g−1, respectively. The synergistic increase in the specific surface area and functional groups of the mixed materials is responsible for the improvement in adsorption performance. Saleem et al.310 reported the usage of modified UiO-66 for the adsorption of Cr(III). The research yielded a resultant optimal adsorption capacity of 67.3 mg g−1 for UiO-66-NHC(S)NHMe. Similar to this, post-synthetic alteration improved the performance of both the modified and unmodified UiO-66-NH2 in Cr(III) adsorption compared to the virgin UiO-66.

A cationic Zr-MOF (ZJU-101) was developed by Zhang et al.311 to remove Cr2O72−. By post-synthetically modifying MOF-867, they were able to create ZJU-101, which is composed of 2, 20-bipyridine-5, 50-dicarboxylate and zirconium metal ions. Tahmasebi et al.312 reported the synthesis and manufacture of three Zn-based MOFs using a mechanosynthesis approach: TMU-4, TMU-5, and TMU-6. According to their experimental findings, these MOFs showed maximum Cr(III) adsorption capacities of 127, 123, and 118 mg g−1, respectively. In order to successfully extract Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions, Noraee et al.313 used pristine Uio-66 and ZIF-8. It was shown that ZIF-8 and Uio-66 had maximal adsorption capabilities of 150 and 85.6 mg g−1, respectively. The greater performance of ZIF-8 was attributed to its higher surface area; the potential impact of the MOF's composition was not considered. In contrast, Yang et al.314 found that the adsorption capability of ZIF-67 was less than that of MMCs (18.0 mg g−1), a MOF composite composed of MIL-100(Fe) and magnetic iron oxide particles.

In order to remove Cr(VI) from water, Aboutorabi et al.315 created a novel three-dimensional framework based on lead and isonicotinate N-oxide (TMU-30). At a pH of 2–9, the optimum adsorption capacity was 145 mg g−1. The adsorption of metal ions is significantly aided by TMU-30's N-oxide functional groups. In order to create an electrostatic interaction with chromate species, the positive N-oxide groups can serve as appropriate sites for their adsorption. With R2 = 0.999, their findings demonstrated that the experimental isotherm data followed the Langmuir isotherm model.

An enhanced powder for Cr(VI) uptake from simulated wastewater was created by Guo et al.316 using a BUC-17 MOF [Co3(tib)2(H2O)12][(SO4)3]. Ion-exchange and electrostatic interactions between the MOF and Cr(VI) were responsible for the 121 mg g−1adsorption capacity that was attained. In order to adsorb chromate (CrO42−), Fei et al.317 created a MOF by changing the composition ratio of two transition metals, Co(II) and Zn(II). Adsorption capabilities for CrO42− varied across MOFs with varying Zn(II)/Co(II) ratios; the highest adsorption capacity for Cr(VI) was discovered for Zn0.5Co0.5-SLUG-35, which was 68.5 mg g−1, where Zn and Co were distributed evenly.

A solvothermal approach was used by Maleki et al.318 to synthesize copper-benzenetricarboxylate (Cu-BTC), which was then used to remove Cr(VI) from aqueous solution, and the produced MOF showed efficacious Cr(VI) adsorption. The utilization of a rhombic dodecahedral zeolitic imidazolate framework-67 (ZIF-67) based on Co is investigated by Li et al.319 as a potential method for eliminating Cr(VI) from water. The first step of the Cr(VI) adsorption process was found to be rapid, and the time taken to attain equilibrium increased with the initial concentrations. With a maximum adsorption capacity of 15.4 mg g−1 for Cr(VI), their findings indicate that ZIF-67's adsorption tends to follow the Langmuir isotherm model. Another development was the publication of Li et al.320 on the adsorption of Cr(VI) by a silver-triazolate MOF. A maximum absorption of 38 mg g−1 of the cationic MOF was observed during the adsorption of Cr(VI), which was mostly accomplished through anion-exchange.

Recently, Jamshidifard et al.321 have reported the adsorption of Cr(VI) using a hybrid system consisting of UiO-66-NH2, chitosan, and polyacrylonitrile. The hybrid Uio-66-NH2 was synthesized with the use of microwaves, and it was subsequently added to the chitosan/polyacrylonitrile solution by electrospinning and ultrasonication. For the regeneration of the adsorbent under study, five cautious cycles were performed, and the maximum adsorption capacity was found to be 373 mg g−1. The increased surface area and surface functional groups of the composite allowed the adsorbent to perform exceptionally well.


3.1.2.4 Mercury. Mercury (Hg(II)) is a heavy metal that can be harmful and deadly and can exist in three different forms: elemental, organic, and inorganic salts.322 However, there are major health risks associated with exposure to both organic and inorganic forms of mercury.323 Zhao et al.324 reported that methylmercury is the deadliest form of mercury, causing Minamata disease in individuals from Iraq and Japan who consumed foods contaminated with mercury. Furthermore, because of its affinity for the thiol group of proteins, mercury (Hg) can readily accumulate in the human body and can be harmful even at low concentrations. This means that exposure to Hg(II) can have an adverse effect on the human nervous system, brain, and kidneys.325 One of the most often employed technologies is adsorption, and several studies have documented the use of MOF-based adsorbents to extract Hg(II) from water. Although pristine MOFs can be employed for Hg(II) adsorption, most of these applications include functionalizing the MOFs to improve their Hg(II) selectivity.

According to Ke et al.,326 a thiol functionalized Cu-based MOF (Cu-BTC-DTG), which was created using a coordination-based post-synthetic approach, was able to adsorb Hg(II). The maximal Hg(II) adsorption capacity from water was found to be 714.29 mg g−1. Adsorption sites are provided by the thiol groups that are present on the porous MOF's inner surface. Additionally, they observed that the pristine MOF is unable to adsorb Hg(II) in comparable circumstances. Because of its special ability to bioaccumulate and biomagnify, mercury(II) is a unique metal ion that should be taken seriously at ultra-low concentrations.327 Another breakthrough involves an experiment conducted by Li et al.295 in which the NH2-MiL-68(In) MOF is synthesized using a solvothermal technique, and a thiol group (–SH) is added post-synthetically to generate SH-MiL-68(In), which is then utilized to remove Hg(II). A maximum adsorption capacity of 450 mg g−1 for Hg(II) was attained. Strong acid–base interactions allowed for the high adsorption to be achieved.

Liang et al.328 reported the addition of indium(III) sulphide nanoparticles (In2S3) to the MOF (MIL-101) for the adsorption of Hg(II). The procedure entails utilizing In(NO3)3 solution to transform pristine MIL-101 into In3+@MIL-101, which is then transformed into In2S3@MIL-101 via a solid–gas reaction with H2S, and the composite attained 518 mg g−1 Hg(II) adsorption capacity. Rudd et al.329 found that this method yielded a more potent adsorbent in comparison to certain other investigations that prepared a sulfur-functionalized MOF by the traditional solvothermal methodology.

Yang et al.330 suggested growing Zr-DMBD (Zr-2,5-dimercaptoterephthalic acid-based MOF) on 3D macroporous carbon using a free-standing electrode. Therefore, a vast surface area with 3D macropores is provided by the uniformly decorated MOF nanoarray, facilitating the quick measurement of Hg(II). Zr-DMBD MOFs demonstrated a dramatic response to the addition of 2 μM mercury under optimal pH settings at 0.2 M HAc-NaAc buffer (pH – 6.0), and the electrochemical response at the modified electrode is found to be six times higher than 3D kenaf stem-derived carbon.

A photo-assisted post-synthetic modification technique was examined by Yin et al.331 To evaluate the adsorption of Hg(II) from aqueous solutions, a pyrimidine–thione fragment was introduced onto ZIF-90. During synthesis, pristine ZIF-90, thioureas, and either tetrahydropyran (THP) or tetrahydrofuran (THF) under UV radiation underwent a multicomponent reaction. ZIF-90-THP and ZIF-90-THF exhibited the highest levels of Hg(II) adsorption among the functionalized materials, reaching 596 and 403 mg g−1, respectively. The pristine ZIF-90 demonstrated a lower adsorption capacity of only 47 mg g−1.

Li et al.332 reported using generated ZrOx, ZrOxyPhos, and ZrSulf from MOFs for the adsorption of Hg(II) via a ligand extraction approach. In the ligand extraction procedure, inorganic moieties were substituted for the pure MOF's organic ligand. Here, the inorganic moieties that were utilized to make ZrOx, ZrOxyPhos, and ZrSulf were NaOH, Na3PO4 and Na2S·9H2O, respectively. ZrSulf had the highest adsorption capability of 824 mg g−1, followed by ZrOxyPhos and ZrOx at 663 and 485 mg g−1, respectively. In comparison to the pristine UiO-66-50Benz, which has an adsorption capacity of 363 mg g−1, both demonstrated a strong removal capability.


3.1.2.5 Copper. Living organisms need trace elements like copper ions (Cu(II)) at low concentrations.333 However, at certain environmental concentrations, it becomes a contaminant to the environment and public health.334 Copper is released into the environment by several industries, including metal cleaning and plating, paints and pigments, mining, smelting, petroleum refinery, brass rinsing, paper board, wood pulp, and printed circuit boards. The environment frequently contains significant amounts of copper because of its widespread industrial use.335

Numerous health issues, including neuro/hepatodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's and Wilson's diseases, have been connected to the use of Cu(II).336 Furthermore, a high consumption of Cu(II) will raise blood pressure, cause damage to the kidneys and liver, and increase respiration rates.337 Strict recommendations have been made regarding the content of Cu(II) in drinking water in order to safeguard human health. For instance, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) sets the maximum limit of Cu(II) in drinking water at 1 mg L−1,338 whereas the World Health Organization (WHO) set it at 2 mg L−1.339

Ghaedi et al.340 investigated the usage of a Cd-based MOF (Cd-MOF-74) as an efficient adsorbent for the removal of Cu(II) from aqueous solutions. The optimum adsorption capacity of 435 mg g−1 for Cu(II) is exhibited by the produced MOF. While retaining its effectiveness, three conservative cycles were also noted throughout the regeneration research. To create the Cd-TPA template, terephthalate, dimethylformamide, and Cd(CH3COO)2·2H2O were combined in a room temperature ultrasonic driven reaction. Wang et al.341 reported the use of a ceramic membrane and a Zr-MOF functionalized with amino groups to remove Cu(II). Based on their research, a comparison was made between the adsorptive capacities of a ceramic membrane and a pure Zr-MOF. Cu(II) adsorption capacities of 988 and 60 mg g−1 were attained for the Zr-MOF/ceramic membrane and pristine Zr-MOF, respectively. The stability of the MOF is still a problem, despite the concerning improvement in the combined Zr-MOF/ceramic membrane adsorption capability.

Bakhtiari and Azizian342 examined and documented the adsorption of Cu(II) ions using a nanoporous zinc-based MOF. Results obtained from their experimental study showed a maximum adsorption capacity of 290 mg g−1 and a BET surface area of 888.5 m2 g−1. They also clarified that non-uniform adsorption of Cu(II) ions and slow kinetics are caused by the heterogeneity of the MOF surface. Graphene oxide was integrated into a pristine 2-aminoterephthalic acid-ZnO4 MOF (IRMOF-3) in an experimental work conducted by Rao et al.343 The objective of the work was to remove Cu(II) from an aqueous solution. The addition of graphene oxide increased the pristine IRMOF-3's adsorption capacity and selectivity; the maximum adsorption capacity reached 254 mg g−1. Zheng et al.344 used a solvothermal technique to create a Cd-based MOF (Cd-MOF-74) and evaluated its efficacy as an adsorbent to remove Cu(II) from solutions. An adsorption capacity of 190 mg g−1 was reached by the produced MOF. Mohmoodi et al.345 presented an example of how a magnetic bio nanocomposite consisting of an eggshell membrane-zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF) can be used to extract Cu(II) from an aqueous medium. The ZIF-67 MOF was effectively stabilized on the magnetic eggshell membrane surface functionalized with iron oxide, resulting in the formation of the ZIF-67@Fe3O4@ESM composite. ZIF-67@ Fe3O4@ESM has a maximum adsorption capacity of 344.82 mg g−1, which means that it may be effectively employed to remove Cu(II) ions. A significant contribution to the high Cu(II) can be attributed to the novel adsorbent's high surface area of 1263.9 m2 g−1.


3.1.2.6 Cadmium. Even in low amounts, cadmium (Cd) is one of the most hazardous non-essential heavy metals found in the environment. The exposure to Cd at low concentration levels is extremely harmful to the kidneys and can result in renal failure.346 Many industries, for example, electroplating, waste discharged nickel runoff, phosphate fertilizer, cadmium-nickel batteries, mining, pigments, stabilizers, alloys, petroleum refining, welding, and the pulp and paper sectors, release cadmium into the environment.347 Despite being present in the environment in small amounts, Cd is known to be bioaccumulative and to negatively impact a variety of creatures.348 When it comes to non-essential heavy metals in the environment, cadmium is among the most dangerous even in little amounts. The USEPA has set a maximum contamination level (MCL) of 0.005 mg L−1 for cadmium in drinking water.349

Wang et al.350 performed an experiment in order to determine Cd concentration at ultra-trace levels and also to improve the conductivity of a MOF. They did this by dispersing UiO-66-NH2 in HCl and then adding aniline and APS, which self-polymerizes to produce PANI loaded on the UiO-66-NH2 matrix. The deposition potential response indicated a linear connection between current and Cd content across the range of 0.5 to 600 mg L−1, and the detection limit was determined to be 0.3 mg L−1. A deposition potential of −1.2 V, an accumulation period of 120 s, and an optimum pH of 5.0 were selected. In a separate study, Roushani et al.351 reported the adsorption of Cd(II) on a TMU-16-NH2MOF. It was possible to get the maximal adsorption capacity of 126.6 mg g−1.

Wang et al.352 conducted an experiment to test the viability of removing Cd(II) from aqueous solution using the Cu3(BTC)2-SO3H framework, which was created by oxidizing Cu3(BTC)2. At a pH of 6, the maximum adsorption capacity was attained. Because SO3H has numerous binding sites and coordination modes, the sulfonic groups of the MOF and Cd(II) ions exhibited a chelation reaction during the adsorption process, which increased the selectivity for Cd(II).352 The PCN-100 MOF was presented by Fang et al. (2010) and was synthesized from TATAB ([[Zn4O(C24H15N6O6)2(H2O)2]·6H2O·DMF]n (1) using Zn4O(CO2)6 secondary building units and 4,4,4′′-s-triazine-1,3,5-triyltri-p aminobenzoate) linkers. It was discovered that the MOF used linkers to engage in chelating coordination mode interactions with metal ions. Rahimi and Mohaghegh353 also assessed the Cd(II) adsorption potential of a magnetic Cu-terephthalate MOF. The maximal adsorption capacity of 100 mg g−1 is achieved by the chemical adsorption technique. COOH groups on the MOF significantly improved the adsorption performance. Cd(II) adsorption by AMOF-1 was reported by Chakraborty.307 Utilizing Zn and tetracarboxylate linkers as its foundation, the MOF attained an adsorption capacity of 41 mg g−1 (Table 2).

Table 2 Summary of reported results for heavy metal removal from aqueous solution and wastewater by MOF-based adsorbents
Adsorbate Adsorbent Adsorption capacity (mg g−1) Time (min) Ref.
As NH2–MIL-88(Fe) 125 60 282
UiO-66 303 2880 268
Fe–BTC 12.3 10 271
Fe3O4@UiO-66 73.2 100 354
UiO-66-(SH)2 40 1440 355
γ-Fe2O3@CTF-1 198 1440 356
Zn-MOF-74 As(V): 325 4 357
As(III): 211
Pb MIL-101(Fe)/GO 128.6 15 358
Fe3O4–NHSO3H@HKUST-1 384.6 90 359
Cu(TCPBDA) 300 60 360
UiO-66-NH2@CA 89.40 4080 361
Amide-based COF 185.7 1440 362
PAN/chitosan/UiO-66-NH2 115 60 321
UiO-66-RSA 189.8 180 363
Fe–BTC/PDA 394 1440 306
MOF-2(Cd) 434.78 180 340
Cu-MOFs/Fe3O4 219 60 364
Cr ZIF-8 (150) 150 350 313
Cu-BTC 48 318
UiO-66 85.6 350 313
Nitrosomonas modified-UiO-66 921 180 309
IMF-Cr-MOF 321 50 365
PAN/chitosan/UiO-66-NH2 99.5 60 321
[Co3(tib)2(H2O)12](SO4)3(BUC-17) 121 480 316
HKUST-1 24.20 60 366
Hg γ-Fe2O3@CTF-1 165.8 1440 356
SH-MIL-68(In) 450 120 295
UiO-66-50Benz 824 120 367
In2S3@MIL-101 518.2 60 328
ZIF-90-THP 596 10 331
Fe–BTC/PDA 1634 1440 306
Cu MOF-2(Cd) 769.23 180 340
[(Zn3L3(H2O)6)][(Na)(NO3)] 379.13 368
Cd-MOF-74 189.5 10 344
IRMOF-3/GO 254.14 480 343
Cd γ-CD MOF-NPC 140.85 60 369
PAN/chitosan/UiO-66-NH2 107.6 60 321


In summary, metal–organic frameworks and their composites exhibit favorable adsorptive features for heavy metal removal. Functionalization of such metal–organic frameworks can increase their environmental acceptability, strengthen their bonds with heavy metals, decrease coagulation and enhance the adsorption efficiency, resulting in increased removal of heavy metals from wastewater and aqueous solutions. Moreover, most adsorption kinetics can be illustrated by the pseudo-second-order model and the adsorption equilibrium is well described by the Langmuir isotherm model. Comparative results of heavy metal removal utilizing metal–organic frameworks and other adsorbents are summarized, clearly indicating the relatively higher removal capacities of MOFs.

3.1.3 Adsorption of toxic gases. Actually, a significant portion of MOFs have demonstrated adsorption behavior for gas molecules, and a smaller subset of these MOFs has also been examined for the combination of gases through the use of techniques like gas chromatography or breakthrough tests. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that MOFs' selective adsorption performance may be adjusted by altering their molecular architectures and pore characteristics. The majority of these gases are waste products of industrial operations that are discharged into the environment; in certain instances, individuals are even exposed to them directly. Effective capture of these dangerous gases is extremely important for the protection of the environment. According to recent findings, MOFs are superior to other materials when it comes to the high adsorption of poisonous gases like CO2, CO, NO2, and H2S.370

According to Yazaydin et al.,371 the carbon dioxide adsorption capacities of Ni/DOBDC and Mg/DOBDC, which are also referred to as Ni-MOF-74 and Mg-MOF-74 or CPO-27-Ni and CPO-27-Mg, are 5.95 mol kg−1 and 4.07 mol kg−1, respectively, at 0.1 atm and 298 K. The authors observed that MOFs with a high density of open metal sites, such as Ni/DOBDC and Mg/DOBDC, are attractive candidates for CO2 extraction from gas samples instead of MOFs with high surface area or free volume. At 0.1 atm and 25 °C, they found that Ni/DOBDC has a greater CO2 adsorption capacity than 5 A zeolites and NaX. The possibility of using composites of MOFs (MOF-5, Cu-BTC, or MIL-100(Fe)) and a graphitic substance (graphite or graphite oxide, GO) as adsorbents for the removal of NH3, H2S and NO2 in ambient settings was investigated by Petit and Bandosz.372 In order to create composites with unique characteristics, a new pore space was created at the interface between the carbon layers and the MOF units as a result of the coordination between the oxygen groups of GO and the open metal sites of porous MOFs. When a GO/Cu-BTC composite was used instead of virgin Cu-BTC, there were increases in the adsorption capacity of over 12% for NH3, 50% for H2S, and 4% for NO2. The creation of additional porosity in the interface, where dispersive forces were strongest, provided an explanation for the increased adsorption capabilities for the dangerous gases. Ebrahim and Bandosz373 conducted an experiment showing that after grafting with melamine (melamine@UiO-66(Zr)-COOH and melamine@UiO-67(Zr)-COOH), respectively, the adsorption of NO2 gas onto UiO-66(Zr)-COOH and UiO-67(Zr)-COOH was dropped from 40–73 and 79–118 g kg−1 to 3–10 and 41–93 g kg−1.

The study conducted by Choi et al.374 involved the synthesis of a three-dimensional (3D) ABDC MOF (In) through the interaction of a ditopic azobenzene-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid (H2ABDC) and salt with 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([EMIM][BF4]) as an ionic liquid. When the 3D ABDC (In) MOF was used for CO2 gas adsorption, the pre-adsorbed CO2 molecules improved the subsequent adsorption of freshly introduced CO2 molecules. The amount of CO2 adsorbed by the ABDC (In) MOF was 81.3 cm3 g−1 (3.63 mM g−1). A fluorinated metal–organic framework (FMOF-2, derived from 2,2′-bis(4-carboxyphenyl)hexafluoropropane and zinc nitrate hexahydrate) was investigated by Fernandez et al.375 for the potential application in the elimination of harmful acidic gases. The adsorption of SO2 and H2S on FMOF-2 was remarkably stable. The weight capacities of SO2 and H2S with FMOF-2 at room temperature and 1 bar were calculated to be 14.0% and 8.3%, appropriately.

Glover et al.376 investigated the adsorption of various hazardous gases, such as NH3, CNCl, SO2, and octane vapor, using M-CPO-27 (M Zn, Co, Ni, or Mg) in both dry and humid settings. The results of this ground-breaking experiment showed that all of these MOFs with open metal sites can only effectively adsorb the hazardous gases under study when the environment is dry. In humid environments, on the other hand, the adsorption capacity is significantly decreased as water begins to adsorb competitively. With regard to NH3 gas, adsorption of ammonia occurred under both humid and dry circumstances, with little discernible drop in adsorption capability. Overall, it can be said that water vapor hinders different gases from adhering to CPO-27 type materials. A study conducted by Petit et al.377 found that the adsorption capacity of the Cu-BTC composite increased from 92 to 200 g H2S per kg in moist settings and from 110 to 135 g NO2 per kg under dry conditions as a result of graphite oxide (GO) grafting. However, as indicated by Petit and Bandosz,372 the adsorption of H2S and NO2 onto the GO@Cu-BTC composite under ambient circumstances resulted in a 50% and 12% increase in the adsorption capacity, respectively.

Comparative research on MOFs that exhibit stability and ease of regeneration upon H2S sorption via pressure swing adsorption mechanisms was conducted by Hamon et al.378 Low pressure causes the pores of MIL-53s(Al, Cr) to close due to the strong interaction between the polar H2S molecules and μ2-OH of the inorganic chain. Remarkably, as pressure increased, the strong H2S⋯HO (on the metal site of MOFs) contacts broke, reopening the pores. This led to the filling of all the pores through weak host–guest interactions, resulting in steps in the adsorption isotherm. The initial and subsequent phases commenced at 4.5, 118 kPa and 9.0, 210 kPa for MIL-53(Al) and MIL-53(Cr), correspondingly. At high pressure (1.6 MPa), the maximum H2S sorption capacities were reached at 13.12 and 11.77 mmol g−1 for MIL-53(Al) and MIL-53(Cr), respectively. The adsorption capacities of MIL-47 and MIL-53s(Al, Cr) at high pressure were comparable, indicating that the pores in MIL-53s reopened at high pressure. Additionally, the large pores of MIL-100(Cr) and MIL-101(Cr) showed type-I shaped adsorption isotherms, indicating significant uptake of H2S by the authors nevertheless, and the adsorption seemed to be irreversible. For MIL-100(Cr) and MIL-101(Cr), the optimum adsorbed quantities at 2 MPa were 16.7 and 38.4 mmol g−1, respectively. The irreversible adsorption phenomenon was explained by the possibility of either the framework being partially destroyed or experiencing significant interactions with the H2S molecules. Furthermore, in a separate research, it was also revealed by Hamon et al.379 that the adsorption of H2S primarily takes place via the hydrogen bond formation between the H2S molecules and the μ2-O atom of the V[double bond, length as m-dash]O⋯V moiety in MIL-47, wherein H2S functions as a hydrogen donor. It was also proposed that acidic H2S interacts with additional basic centers in MIL-47, such as the π electrons of the benzene ring and the oxygens of the carboxylate group.

Additional noteworthy instances are the flexible MOFs, where the opening of the pores is contingent upon the pressure at which the adsorbed guest molecules occur. Kitaura et al.380 originally noticed this phenomenon in Cu(dhbc)2(bipy) (dhbc = 2,5-dihydroxybenzoate; bipy = 4,4′-bipyridine). In a different study, Dathe et al.381 tested the efficacy of Ba(CH3COO)2 (or Ba(NO3)2) and BaCl2-impregnated Cu-BTC in adsorbing SO2. Little barium salt microcrystals were produced by impregnation in the pores of Cu-BTC, although only BaCl2 showed signs of partially destroying the host structure. Based on the concentration of Ba2+, the authors noted that at high temperatures, SO2 uptake exceeded the stoichiometric capacity. Thus, chemical interaction between the metal cations (from the MOF) and SO2 is responsible for the excess SO2 adsorption and for the synthesis of Cu-sulfates at the end. Cu-BTC responded well as a host material to hold widely distributed barium salts at low temperatures. Conversely, Cu-BTC broke down at high temperatures, resulting in isolated Cu species that served as SOx storage locations before Cu-sulfates were eventually formed.

Furthermore, Garcia-Ricard and Hernandez-Maidonado382 assessed the dynamics of CO2 adsorption on three distinct forms of Cu2(pzdc)2(bipy) (pzdc = pyrazine-2,3-dicarboxylate) pretreated at varying temperatures, while Zhao et al.383 investigated CO2 diffusion in cubic MOF-5 crystals and found that the process is activated and that CO2 loading has very little effect on the rate of diffusion. Gravimetric adsorption of NO on Cu-BTC's open metal sites at 196 K (1 bar) was reported by Xiao et al.384 The results showed that around 9 mmol NO was adsorbed over 1 g of Cu-BTC, which was much more than any other porous solid that had been reported for the adsorption of NO. MOF-74(Mg) demonstrated a much greater CO2 adsorption of 5.3 mM g−1 when exposed to 40 °C and 150 mbar.385 Lower adsorption capability (2.3 mM g−1) at 40 C and 150 mbar was obtained by using MIL-101(Cr)-SO3H-TAEA [tris(2-aminoethyl) amine], which was further lowered to 1.1 mM g−1 by lowering the temperature and pressure to 20 C and 0.4 mbar, respectively.386 Following cationic exchange, the adsorption capacity of CO2 onto the 3D anionic MOF (Ni) was greatly enhanced.387

A Cu-BTC framework with 4 weight percent water molecules coordinated to the open metal sites of the framework showed remarkable improvements in CO2 adsorption and selectivity over N2 and CH4, as reported by Yazaydin et al.388 The quadrupole moment of CO2 interacts with the sorbent's electric field gradient, which is enhanced when water fills the copper open metal site, and it was proposed that these interactions account for the majority of the boost in CO2 adsorption. The impact of the metal center on the CO2 adsorption selectivity and adsorption capacity was demonstrated by Dietzel et al.389 using a set of isostructural MOFs M-CPO-27 (M: Ni, Co, Zn, Mg, and Mn). The CO2 uptake values for CPO-27(Ni) and CPO-27(Mg) were reported to be 51 weight percent and 63 weight percent, respectively, at 298 K and high pressure (50 bar). According to Caskey et al.,390 using CPO-27(Co) and CPO-27(Mg), CO2 uptake values were 30.6 and 35.2 weight percent at 1 atm, respectively.

Furukawa et al.391 demonstrated a remarkable CO2 uptake using MOFs that have an ultrahigh surface area. MOF-210 [Zn4O(BTE)4/3(BPDC)] comprises two components: BPDC (biphenyl-4,4′-terephthalate) and BTE (benzene-1,3,5-triyl-tris(ethyne-2,1-diyl)). At 50 bar, MOF-200 [Zn4O(BBC)2(H2O)3 in which BBC: 4,4′,4′′-(benzene-1,3,5-triyl-tris(benzene-4,1-diyl))tribenzoate] with BET surface areas of 6240 and 4530 m2 g−1, respectively, were able to absorb 2400 mg g−1 CO2, surpassing the uptake values of other highly porous MOFs such as MOF-177, MIL-101(Cr)c, and so forth.392 Another development was the discovery by Karra and Waiton393 that Cu-BTC was a highly selective CO adsorbent at 298 K, as demonstrated by a molecular simulation analysis. The partial charges of CUS of Cu-BTC (Cu2+ sites) and the CO dipole were said to interact electrostatically, which dominated the adsorptive performance.

Britt et al.394 provided evidence regarding the potential utility of six MOFs, the Zn4O(CO2)6 cluster linked by terephthalate (MOF-5), 2-amino terephthalate (IRMOF-3), benzene-1,3,5-tris(4-benzoate) (MOF-177), diacetylene-1,4-bis(4-benzoic acid) (IRMOF-62), Zn2O2(CO2)2 chains linked by 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalate (CPO-27), and Cu-BTC, in the adsorption and separation of several hazardous gases or vapors, such as SO2, chlorine, NH3, benzene, ethylene oxide, and tetrahydrothiophene. The outcomes were compared with BPL carbon. Numerous elements have been demonstrated to be significant in influencing the dynamic adsorption performance of these MOFs, including the open metal sites of Cu-BTC or CPO-27 (also known as M2(dobdc)(H2O)2; H4dobdc = 2,5-dihydroxyterephthalic acid) and the active adsorption site with specific functional groups (like NH2 in IRMOF-3). The capacity of CPO-27 was six times greater than that of the BPL carbon and it outperformed the other MOFs in terms of SO2 adsorption capacity. The presence of both the potentially reactive oxo group in CPO-27 and a highly reactive 5-coordinate zinc species is the cause of this advantageous adsorption. However, because Cl2 does not naturally function as a ligand, Cu-BTC had a high efficiency that was on par with or higher than that of BPL carbon for all of the gases that were tested. Regarding NH3, the adsorptive performance of IRMOF-3 is significantly enhanced by the presence of NH2 in comparison to the virgin IRMOF-1 or MOF-5. Due to the NH3's propensity to form hydrogen bonds, IRMOF-3 was able to adsorb about 71 times as much NH3 prior to breakthrough than BPL carbon.

In summary metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are a novel class of adaptable porous materials with enormous surface areas, mechanical flexibility, programmable topologies, and tunable pore size and thickness. Adsorbents based on molecularly oxidized fuel (MOFs) are very suitable for absorbing gases, facilitating the assimilation of gaseous fuels and the elimination of greenhouse gases. A rigorous assessment was conducted on the adsorption of gaseous molecules utilizing MOFs. MOFs have potential as economical, moisture-stable adsorbents for natural gas.

3.1.4 Adsorption of antibiotics. In order to both prevent and treat major infections in living things, antibiotics are necessary. It is estimated that urine and feces excrete between 5 and 90 percent of the active antibiotic components that are eaten. According to Monahan et al.,395 these substances pollute groundwater and surface water, encouraging the microbial resistance of natural water bodies. They are categorized as J01 medications for systemic antibacterial usage in accordance with the WHO's therapeutic chemical categorization.396 Antibiotic excretion, however, can contaminate the environment and water sources, posing a threat to the world's ecology. Antibiotic overuse and drug resistance are the main causes of this pollution, which is becoming a global problem.397

Various methods are used to eliminate antibiotics, including membrane filtration, biological treatment, adsorption,398 electrochemical treatment,399 advanced oxidation technology,400 and photodegradation.401 Adsorption and photodegradation are particularly favored for their high efficacy, simplicity, low cost, sustainability, and versatility.402 Nevertheless, there are inherent restrictions on these techniques that make them less effective and difficult to use widely. These restrictions include things like the efficiency of removal, the complexity of function, and the production of byproducts that may cause cancer and mutations. MOFs' huge specific surface area, well-organized pores, and structural plasticity allow them to tackle these issues.

For the purpose of adsorbing nitrofuran antibiotics from wastewater, Lei et al.403 created a stable Cd-MOF (MOF-1) and created a composite with macroporous, elastic, and inexpensive melamine foam (MOF-1@MF) via a one-pot solvothermal synthesis. Strong hydrogen bonding between MOF-1's urea groups and the antibiotics' –NO2 groups was made possible. A chemically resistant, hydrophobic Zn-based MOF-1 ([{Zn(hfdba)(L1)}·DMF]n) and its membrane have been recently created by Mukherjee et al.404 for the detection of dangerous nitro-explosives and nitrofuran antibiotics, as well as for the adsorption of TNP from aqueous solutions. This MOF-1 exhibits outstanding ultralow sensitivity for precisely detecting TNP and NZF in environmental samples, thanks to its evenly functionalized lozenge-shaped pores.

Tetracycline adsorption from water was studied by Xia et al.405 utilizing three Zr-MOFs: MOF-525, NU-1000, and UiO-66. While NU-1000 had a BET surface area of 1487 m2 g−1 with a type-IV adsorption isotherm, UiO-66 and MOF-525 had BET surface values of 1249 and 2224 m2 g−1 with type-I adsorption isotherms. They were all capable of showing maximum adsorption capacities of 145, 356, and 807 mg g−1. According to Yang et al.,406 doping Mn onto UiO-66 increased its surface area and active centers, which improved the material's capacity to remove tetracycline by 4.9 times when compared to unadulterated UiO-66. Because of mesopores, Zhang et al.407 produced porous UiO-66 under reflux circumstances, which resulted in a 430% increase in tetracycline adsorption efficacy.

CuCo/MIL-101, a bimetallic doped material, for tetracycline adsorption was described by Jin et al.408 They proposed that metal doping modifies surface electrical characteristics and strengthens chemical interactions, which impact antibiotics' electrostatic interactions. Zn-MIL-53(Fe) was used by Xiong et al.409 to create magnetic carbon-aFe/Fe3C under N2 for tetracycline adsorption. According to Sun et al.,410 incorporation of additional functional groups made possible by graphene oxide (GO) allowed UiO-66-(OH)2/GO to greatly boost adsorption efficiency when compared to UiO-66-(OH)2 alone. Tetracycline adsorption was further improved by Wang et al.411 by in situ growth of UiO-66-(COOH)2 on GO. Hydrogel–GO was used as a substrate for ZIF-67 growth by Kong et al.,412 which reduced particle aggregation and increased adsorption efficiency.

In order to activate peroxymonosulfate for the oxidative degradation of oxytetracycline (OTC), Mao et al.413 developed Co@C-600, a highly efficient magnetic carbon generated from a Co-based MOF. Electron paramagnetic resonance experiments verified that they used both radical (OH and SO4) and nonradical pathways to achieve over 89% degradation of OTC in under 15 minutes. Tetracycline and norfloxacin were removed from an Fe MOF by both single and competitive adsorption processes, according to Zhou et al.414 When comparing the competing system to the single adsorption, they discovered lower tetracycline and norfloxacin adsorption efficiency. The substance showed signs of durability and reusability.

Wu et al.415 examined the use of a composite of Fe3O4 with HKUST-1, which is well-known for having a high surface area and accessible open metal sites (OMSs), to produce a water-stable magnetic composite (Fe3O4@HKUST-1). They investigated how well it eliminated medications called fluoroquinolones. Fe3O4 and other magnetic materials are highly valued for their ease of regeneration and separation in the presence of an external magnetic field. The protective effect of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on the Cu(II) metal sites, which thwarts breakdown by water molecules, is responsible for the water stability of these composites. Furthermore, Fe3O4@Cys@MIL125-NH2 was created by Lian et al.416 for the elimination of fluoroquinolones and could be retrieved using a magnet. MIL-101(Cr)–HSO3 was created by Guo et al.417 by functionalizing terephthalic acid with –HSO3 in order to improve electrostatic interactions with fluoroquinolones. In order to remove levofloxacin from water, Chaturvedi et al.418 produced Fe-based MOFs (MIL-100(Fe)) using a solid method. They achieved great adsorption efficiency (87.34 mg g−1), principally through electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonding mechanisms.

The best removal efficiency for ciprofloxacin and tetracycline was determined by Kim et al.419 utilizing a batch model to manufacture a rGO/alginate coated Al-based MOF adsorbent. At an operating temperature of 40 °C, the adsorbent exhibited the highest removal capacity of around 40.76 mg g−1for ciprofloxacin and 43.76 mg g−1for tetracycline at pH 7. The contact period was approximately 12 hours. In order to study ciprofloxacin adsorption behavior with various structural features, Li et al.420 synthesized nanoporous carbon (NPC) using ZIF-8 derived carbonization. Yuan et al.421 looked into the use of Konjac glucomannan (KGM) as a ZIF-8 carrier. KGM was chosen because it is inexpensive and biodegradable, which enables the formation of floating aerogels following lyophilization. According to the experimental findings, the aerogel could be effectively reused and demonstrated good adsorption performance for ciprofloxacin.

According to Moradi et al.,422 the magnetic composite Fe3O4 MIL-100(Fe) and MOF-235(Fe) was utilized to adsorb ciprofloxacin. Additionally, Wu et al.415 added Fe3O4 to HKUST-1 preparation to create a magnetic material (Fe3O4/HKUST-1) that can be recycled ten times for ciprofloxacin adsorption. Bayazit et al.423 used a sedimentation process in another advancement. In order to create composite materials with excellent ciprofloxacin adsorption capabilities, he added MIL-101(Cr) during the precipitation method of creating Fe3O4 by allowing Fe3O4 to be deposited on the surface of MIL-101(Cr).

To effectively remove cephalexin (CFX) from wastewater, Zhao et al.424 also synthesized another very stable Zr MOF PCN-777. The MOF in question demonstrated improved porosity, larger pore size, high specific surface area (2004 m2 g−1), and remarkable water stability. A mesoporous cage measuring 32 Å (a pore volume of 2.7 cm3 g−1), greater than cephalexin (12 Å × 7 Å), is present in PCN-777, which exhibits exceptional water stability and a high BET surface area of 2004 m2 g−1. PCN-777 demonstrated a maximum adsorption efficiency of 442.48 mg g−1 CFX at 303 K, higher than those of other types of adsorbents, such as activated carbon (AC), natural zeolites, SBA-15, etc. These results demonstrate PCN 777's appropriateness and potential use as an effective adsorbent for removing antibiotics from wastewater, as well as its ability to serve as a model for the synthesis and design of other adsorbents.

The effectiveness of the adsorptive removal of antibiotics from water was investigated by Gao et al.425 in relation to the breathing effect or framework flexibility. For the adsorptive removal of sulfamethoxazole (SMZ, a sulphonamide antibiotic often used to treat urinary tract infections) from aqueous solution, three isomorphous flexible MIL-53 adsorbents, namely MIL-53(Cr), MIL-53(Al), and MIL-53(Fe), were selected. Due to its flexibility, MIL-53 can take on several shapes, such as the narrow pore (NP), large pore (LP), and intermediate pore (INP) forms, depending on which metal ions are chosen. In order to achieve quick and selective adsorption of sulfamethoxazole from H2O solutions, Cheng et al.426 created a surface molecularly imprinted polymer on a MOF (MIP-IL@UIO-66). The MOF discussed above demonstrated a maximum adsorption efficiency of 284.66 mg g−1and reached adsorption equilibrium in 10 minutes. With an adsorption effectiveness of over 92% even after five cycles of reusability, the adsorbent showed good stability and reusability. Sulfamethoxazole and other antibiotics may be more effectively removed from water, thanks to the synthesized MOF's superior adsorption efficiency, selectivity, quick adsorption rate, and reusability, as demonstrated in the study.

Azhar et al.427 employed HKUST-1 in conjunction with open metal sites (OMS) to remove sulfachloropyridazine (SCP) from wastewater by adsorptive means. The pore volume (0.78 cm3 g−1) and pore size (1.7 nm) of HKUST-1 were both greater than those of SCP molecules (0.81 × 0.87 × 0.65 nm), suggesting that SCP would preferentially adsorb into the pores of HKUST-1. The BET surface area of HKUST-1 was estimated to be 1700 m2 g−1. At 298 K, HKUST-1's adsorption capacity of 384 mg g−1 toward SCP was observed, accompanied by a high rate of adsorption that was nearly finished in 15 minutes. An experiment was conducted by Zhao et al.428 to remove the antibiotic chloramphenicol from wastewater using a new MOF-based adsorbent known as PCN-222. This MOF-based material quickly reached adsorption equilibrium and showed improved adsorption efficiency. The remarkable ability of PCN-222 to eliminate substances was attributed to its unique pore structure, H-bonding, and electrostatic interactions. The study's conclusions suggest that these materials might be used to successfully remove antibiotics like chloramphenicol from aquatic ecosystems. Yang et al.429 created a porous magnetic derivative of MIL-101(Fe–Co) and used it in a related investigation to activate peroxymonosulfate, which broke down chloramphenicol in solution. After 120 minutes, the antibiotic had completely degraded at a catalyst concentration of 0.1 g L−1 (pH = 8.2). The principal oxidative species responsible for the breakdown of chloramphenicol have been identified as hydroxyl and sulfate radicals.

In order to recover 5-nitroimidazole antibiotics using LC-MS analysis, Lu et al.430 employed highly porous MIL-101(Cr) as an adsorbent for the first time. They functionalized the framework with –NH2 moieties and grafted urea or melamine into the OMS to create urea–MIL-101(Cr) and melamine–MIL-101(Cr) with BET surface areas of 1970 m2 g−1, 77 K from N2 adsorption and 1350 m2 g−1, 77 K from N2 adsorption, respectively, and investigated their potential for the adsorptive removal of NIABs (like metronidazole (MNZ), dimetridazole (DMZ), and menidazole (MZ)) from wastewater.

With a record-breaking adsorption capacity of 467.3 mg g−1, Peng et al.431 suggested using a highly flexible MOF MIL-53(Al) as a good adsorbent for the effective capture of dimetridazole (DMZ) from wastewater, outperforming all prior studies. Since the size of the pore channel changes with the concentration of DMZ, the results show that it may be widely employed for the adsorption of various DMZ concentrations. MOFs' great adsorption effectiveness is also a result of their enormous pore size. Additionally, for highly efficient adsorption of diclofenac sodium and chlorpromazine hydrochloride, Luo et al.432 decorated a MOF material ([(CH3)2NH2]{[Cu2(L)·(H2O)2xsolvent}n) to produce 3-D carboxylate groups because of improved π–π interactions. The adsorptive removal of antibiotics, namely the nitrofuran class (NFs) of antibiotics, using ultrarobust, hydrophobic, very porous Zr-MOFs (BUT-12 and BUT-13) was initially described by Wang et al.433 Based on 77 K N2 adsorption, the MOFs BUT-12 and BUT-13 showed ultrahigh BET surface areas of 3387 and 3948 m2 g−1, respectively, with pore widths of 24.7 and 30.2 Å.

3.2 Water desalination

To create high-purity or drinkable water for industrial usage, salt ions are extracted from saline water through the process of desalination. This section addresses several methods and how MOFs fit into the process.
3.2.1 Capacitive deionization. Over the last ten years, capacitive deionization, or CDI, has drawn interest as a substitute water treatment technique. Using electrostatic forces between electrodes that are oppositely charged, CDI extracts ions from saline water. Regenerating saturated electrodes can also be accomplished by releasing the adsorbed ions into wash water through the application of a reverse potential gradient.434 New materials are being developed and tested for membrane capacitive deionization. While a range of porous carbons, including activated carbon, reduced graphene oxide, carbon nanospheres, mesoporous carbon, carbon nanofibers, and nanotubes, have been employed as electrodes, their propensity to oxidize restricts their long-term and large-scale applications.435

In order to tackle this problem, MOFs were first used as active materials for capacitive deionization without carbonization by Wang et al.436 They created a three-dimensional hybrid material with interconnected ZIF-67(Co) particles that promoted electron transmission by integrating ZIF-67(Co) into polypyrrole nanotubes in situ. As a result, an outstanding desalination capacity of 11.34 mg g−1 and good recyclable quality were obtained. The application of bimetal MOFs (BMOFs) with different Co/Zn ratios for improved membrane-based capacitive deionization was shown by Ding et al.437 The specific surface area and graphitization were highly impacted by the Zn/Co molar ratio. With outstanding performance retention, the ideal porous carbon from BMOF (Zn = 3[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1) attained a salt removal capacity of 45.62 mg g−1 at 1.4 V.

3.2.2 Forward osmosis (FO). Although the concept of the forward osmosis (FO) process has been known for a long time, the process has received a lot of attention in the last ten years.438 FO consists of two primary processes: pure water penetration from the diluted draw solution and osmotic dilution of the draw solution.439 In order to remove new water from the feed solution, osmotic pressure must be created by the draw agents.440

A suitable thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membrane was manufactured by Dai et al.441 by introducing copper 1,4-benzene-dicarboxylate nanosheets (CuBDC-NS) into the PA active layer. The findings demonstrated that when 1.0 M NaCl was used in the AL-FS mode, the TFN membrane produced a 50% increase in water flux and a 50% decrease in reverse solute flux (RSF). Comparing conventional thin-film composite (TFC) membranes to a TFN membrane containing UiO-66 nanoparticles, Ma et al.442 found that the TFN membrane doubled water flux and decreased RSF. In order to facilitate the FO process, Zirehpour et al.443 added rod-shaped MOFs made of silver and 1,3,5-benzene tricarboxylic acid (3HBTC) to the polyamide (PA) layer of a TFN membrane. These MOFs' dangling carboxylic acid groups increased membrane hydrophilicity when they were distributed throughout the organic phase. The TFN membrane outperformed the TFC membrane (27 L m−2 h) in the Caspian Sea water test, with a water flux of 34 L m−2 h.

3.2.3 Reverse osmosis. Using pressure to overcome osmotic pressure, reverse osmosis (RO) is a water purification technique that separates water molecules from impurities using a semi-permeable membrane. Considerable efforts have been undertaken to enhance the kinetics–energetics balance of the process because of its extensive global use.444

Hu et al.158 proposed using MOF-embedded membranes for reverse osmosis desalination. A theoretical simulation was presented by them to illustrate the potential of ZIF-8(Zn) membranes at seawater concentrations in NaCl solutions. Hydrophobic ZIF-8(Zn) nanocrystals were experimentally added to the selective polyamide layer by Duan et al.,445 who demonstrated an 88% increase in water permeability at even a modest MOF loading (0.05 wt%). Water permeability was improved by 162% in comparison to pure PA with additional increases in ZIF-8(Zn) loading.

The impact of ZIF-8(Zn) nanoparticles of different sizes (60, 150, and 250 nm) on the reverse osmosis capabilities of thin-film nanocomposite membranes was examined by Lee et al.446 The interfacial area between ZIF-8(Zn) and the polyamide matrix was affected by the size-dependent deposition of nanoparticles on the support layer, which in turn affected the membrane's performance. Therefore, the performance of thin film nanocomposite membranes in reverse osmosis and interfacial polymerization is critically dependent on the filler size. Gupta et al.447 compared five varieties of ZIF membranes—ZIF-25, ZIF-71, ZIF-93, ZIF-96, and ZIF-97—for water desalination in a different study using simulations. ZIF-96 showed the greatest affinity for water among the studied membranes, while ZIF-71, ZIF-25, and ZIF-96 showed increased water flux in comparison to ZIF-97 and ZIF-93.

Xu and Hu5 developed a novel thin film nanocomposite membrane for water desalination by incorporating MIL-101(Cr) into a dense polyamide layer on a polysulfone substrate. MIL-101(Cr)'s porosity structure made it easier for direct water channels to form in the polyamide layer, which increased water permeance. Although the MOF loading was minimal (0.05%), the membrane showed a significant rejection of NaCl (>99%). Park et al.448 created a thin film composite membrane for reverse osmosis by using HKUST-1(Cu) in the support layer. Sulfuric acid treatment increased HKUST-1(Cu)'s hydrophilicity, dispersion, and hydrolytic stability inside the polysulfone membrane. When compared to pure reverse osmosis membranes, this alteration maintained salt rejection efficacy while increasing water flux by 33%.

In order to functionalize the mesoporous structure of Zr-based MOF PCN-222 for reverse osmosis membranes, Bonett et al.449 used post-synthetic modification (PSM). PCN-222 had poor salt rejection despite having a high water flux, which was improved by adding myristic acid via PSM to change the channel's dimensions and pore size distribution. The effect of adding ZIF-8(Zn) to membranes on fouling resistance was examined by Aljundi.450 The inclusion of ZIF-8(Zn) improved the anti-fouling capabilities of the reverse osmosis membrane by reducing fouling, according to an evaluation using a bovine serum albumin fouling model. Other chemically stable MOFs, such as UiO-66(Zr), have also been used in reverse osmosis procedures. Lin et al.451 developed hollow fiber-based thin film nanocomposite membranes with polydopamine-modified HKUST-1(Cu) for low-pressure reverse osmosis of brackish water. MOF particles were incorporated into the polyamide support matrix via interfacial polymerization, enhancing compatibility between the organic matrix and inorganic nanofillers. The MOF-composite membrane exhibited high pure water permeability (66.94 L m−2 h−1 bar−1) with NaCl rejection rates of 98.2% and 97.4% at 2 and 4 bars, respectively.

3.2.4 Membrane distillation. Membrane distillation is a thermal desalination technique that involves the use of a hydrophobic membrane to separate hot saline solution from cold water streams. A partial pressure differential caused by the temperature gradient enables vapor from the saline side to cross the membrane and reach the cooler side. Because it transports vapor selectively and blocks solid and non-volatile species, the hydrophobic character of the membrane is essential for guaranteeing the accumulation of pure water.436

Using a novel two-step synthesis approach, MOF crystals were produced on alumina tube supports by Zuo and Chung.452 To increase hydrophobicity and decrease surface energy, perfluoro molecules were then added. Using this method, a membrane with good desalination performance and a strong vacuum distillation flow of 32.3 L m−2 h−1 at 60 °C was produced.

A ZIF-8(Zn)/chitosan layer was added to the PVDF membrane surface in an ultrathin thin film composite membrane by Kebria et al.453 in order to improve membrane distillation performance for water desalination. When exposed to seawater, the membrane's antifouling capabilities increased, and it demonstrated a 350% increase in permeate water flux with the ZIF-8/chitosan layer. It also showed very high NaCl rejection (>99.5%). In order to create a unique super-hydrophobic nanofiber membrane for direct contact membrane distillation, Yang et al.454 electrospun an Fe–BTC MOF and PVDF onto a nonwoven support material. The membrane demonstrated increased hydrophobicity (water contact angle: 138.06° ± 2.18°) and 99.9% NaCl rejection (35 g L−1) in the direct contact membrane distillation process, achieving substrate attachment and a loading of up to 5 weight percent of the MOF.

3.2.5 Nanofiltration. Similar to reverse osmosis (RO), nanofiltration (NF) is a membrane liquid-separation technique.

Zhao et al.455 used blending IP and preloading IP techniques to assess the interaction between the PA layer and three water-stable MOFs (MIL-53(Al), ZIF-8, and UiO-66-NH2). In comparison to the control TFC membrane, their investigation showed that TFN membranes integrating these MOFs exhibited rougher surfaces, bigger PA layers, and higher surface negativity. Every TFN membrane showed improved performance; the TFN membrane containing UiO-66-NH2 had the maximum permeability, around 1.3 times higher than those of the TFN membranes containing the other two MOFs.·CuBTC was added to the substrate layer of a polysulfone substrate by Misdan et al.456 for NF procedures. With 0.25 weight percent CuBTC, they achieved a 25% improvement in pure water flux while keeping MgSO4 rejection at 97.3%. When CuBTC was added, the membrane's hydrophilicity was enhanced, surface negativity was raised, and the surface became smoother, which decreased BSA adhesion.

Navarro et al.457 used a Langmuir–Schaefer approach to creatively insert MOFs into the PA layer instead of blending them conventionally in the organic phase. After being placed on a cross-linked polyimide (P84) support, the MOF thin film underwent the standard IP procedure. Compared to traditional techniques that distribute MOFs throughout the organic phase, our strategy reduced the likelihood of MOF aggregation and thus membrane flaws. By adding palmitoyl chloride, Liu et al.458 improved the dispersity of UiO-66-NH2 within the PA layer. Because of this change, UiO-66-NH2 is more polar in organic solvents, which lessens its tendency to aggregate. With 95% Na2SO4 rejection, the improved UiO-66-NH2 demonstrated an increase in pure water flux from 8.1 to 12.4 L m−2 h bar. Over 80 hours of continuous filtering, the modified UiO-66-NH2 demonstrated strong durability and consistent membrane performance, even though the non-modified nanofillers initially had higher permeability.

Zhu et al.459 used the standard IP procedure with an organic solution after positioning UiO-66-NH2 dispersed in aqueous solution using a vacuum filtering method. This method reduced MOF loss and allowed for regulated loading of UiO-66-NH2, in contrast to conventional methods that cause MOF dispersion that is random and unpredictable. Better water movement access was made possible by the decreased interlocking effect without sacrificing membrane stability. ZIF-8 was used by Wang et al.460 as a sacrificial template to create a crumpled PA layer. Through the IP method, ZIF-8 and single-walled CNTs were integrated into the PA layer. Water broke the coordination bonds in MOFs due to their limited hydro-stability, which resulted in the collapse of MOF structures. According to their research, ZIF-67's geometric structure allowed for a higher effective surface area, which allowed for the accommodation of more water molecules. This led to an improved water flux of 1831 L m−2 h and a high Na2SO4 rejection rate of 97.2%.

3.3 Sensing

Because of its remarkable structural diversity and qualities, as well as its capacity to detect luminescence or electrochemical changes, MOFs have demonstrated an amazing aptitude in the field of sensing applications. According to Lustig et al.,461 MOFs have also demonstrated potential uses in the detection of a variety of analytes, including biomolecules, ionic species, and environmental pollutants. More precisely, detailed information will be given on DNA detection, ethylamine sensing based on MOF nanosheets, and luminous Fe3+ sensing.

Wang et al.462 reported the application of surfactant as a surfactant-assisted approach in the ultrathin M-TCPP(Fe) nanosheets (M = Zn, Cu, and Co) for the quantitative detection of H2O2. After being constructed onto electrodes, GC/M-TCPP(Fe) nanosheets showed a standard amperometric response to H2O2, but with a rather low detection limit. With a detection limit in the range of 0.4 × 10−6–50 × 1 × 106 M, good catalytic selectivity toward H2O2, high repeatability, and excellent long-term storage stability (at least five weeks), the GC/Co-TCPP(Fe) electrode demonstrated heme protein-like activity.

By taking advantage of their fluorescence quenching effect, Xu et al.463 investigated the possibility of extremely sensitive and fast-response luminescence sensing of Fe3+ using luminescent MOF Ti2(HDOBDC)2(H2-DOBDC) (NTU-9-NS) nanosheets. The NTU-9-NS nanosheets' fluorescence quenching only takes 10 s after the addition of Fe3+, in contrast to the bulky MOFs' slow response (typically several hours to a day), and their unique pore structure allows them to recognize compounds quickly. This is mainly because of the nanosheets' high dispersion and easy access to the active center on the surface. One possible explanation for NTU-9-NS's superior luminous sensing capability is the presence of easily accessible active sites on the nanosheet surface.

For the purpose of detecting cocaine, Su et al.464 developed Au nanocluster/521-MOF nanosheet-embedded zirconium-based MOF nanosheet composites, such as ZnO@ZIF-8 nanorods, Ti@TiO2/CdS/ZIF-67, and AuNCs@521-MOF. Typically, the immobilized AuNCs@521-MOF nanosheet with cocaine aptamer strands exhibited high electrochemical activity and bioaffinity, potentially creating a biosensitive platform for cocaine detection. This aptasensor demonstrated specific selectivity, a low detection limit of 0.44 ng−1 mL−1, a wide detection range of 0.001–1.0 ng−1 mL−1, and the ability to detect cocaine sensitivity.

The creation of a Cd-BTC MOF nanotube for the trace-level detection of nitroaromatic explosives was reported by Li et al.465 72.5% of the MOF nanotube's fluorescence was quenched after it was immersed in saturated vapor of 2,4-dinitrotoluene for ten seconds. Because of the special composition and structural benefits of LD MOFs, the Cd-BTC nanotube's response rate for 2,4-dinitrotoluene vapor was also among the highest values for reported fluorescence-based chemical sensing materials.

In order to accomplish two-color living cell imaging of intracellular adenosine, Wang et al.466 employed lanthanide-based MOF nanosheets as the bioanalytical platforms. It's noteworthy that it is possible to modify the molecular ratio of the TAMRA-aptamer to the FAM aptamer loaded on dye-aptamer/MOF-Ln nanosheets in order to further detect tiny molecules and DNA inside neurons. Also effectively used in this system was the target intracellular ATP. Additionally, this technique successfully administered the required intracellular ATP. Exfoliated ZSB-1 nanosheets have recently been employed as a fluorescence sensor to identify Fe3+ ions.467 The detection limit for Fe3+ ions using the ultrathin ZSB-1 nanosheets was found to be 0.054 × 10−6 m, significantly lower than that of the bulk equivalent (0.110 × 10−6 m). Apart from quenching fluorescence, the LD MOF materials' fluorescence turn-on response was also examined for the purpose of detecting particular analytes, like volatile organic chemicals and uric acid.468 Song469 reported another MOF nanosheet with fluorescence sensing capabilities. Mn(C6H8O4)(H2O) nanosheets demonstrated a lower detection limit (0.2 pM) and a comparatively wide linear detection range (1–200 pM) when combined with the hybrid chain reaction techniques. Additionally, this fluorescence sensing technology based on MOF nanosheets offered a reliable way to detect live cells.

By varying the fluorescence emission intensity and elevating the ethylamine content, Li et al.470 were able to produce [Zn(BDC)(H2O)]n sheets with fluorescence properties that could detect ethylamine both quantitatively and sensitively. A bio-friendly Pb(II)-based MOF nanotube was created for the purpose of detecting uric acid, as an example.468 With a low detection limit of 4.3 × 10−3 m, the MOF nanotube exhibits strong selectivity for uric acid due to its host–guest interactions with it, resulting in responsive turn-on fluorescence.

A tunable optochemical platform based on MOF {(HNEt3)}2[Zn3BDC4] solvent {solvent = DMF or DMA} nanosheets for the sensing of different small molecules was introduced by Chaudhari.471 Normally, the tiny light-emitting molecules may be absorbed by these nanosheets. These functionalized guest@MOF porous nanosheets might incorporate the peculiar optical features, given the high host–guest interaction effect. Consequently, a “guest@host” composite system with adjustable luminescence characteristics can function as a platform for chemical sensing via photonics. The outstanding capacitance and humidity-sensing characteristics of Cu3TCPP nanosheets were reported by Tian et al.472 Despite the hydrophobic nature of the MOF's pores, the massive –COOH functional groups that are suspended around the edges of the nanosheets give the MOF nanosheets superior proton conductivity. The Cu3TCPP nanosheets, which had been compacted into a pellet, demonstrated a high capacitance responsiveness and sensitivity at 1 kHz, along with a specific capacitance frequency characteristic at various relative humidities (RH). It's astounding that they had also shown a clear response peak from 60% to 98% RH, as well as good reversibility and repeatability over cycles of exposure and recovery from low to high RH.

In order to detect DNA, Zhao et al.473 employed M-TCPP nanosheets (where M = Co, Cu, Zn, and Cd) as novel sensing platforms. More specifically, the MOF nanosheets may adsorb the ssDNA tagged with a dye, dimming the dye's fluorescence. Additionally, quantitative experiments were conducted using target DNA at different concentrations, showing very low detection limits (20 × 10−12 M) and a broad detection range (0–5 × 10−12 M). All of these findings demonstrated the benefits of MOF nanosheets, which go beyond their larger surface area for DNA adsorption.

3.4 Photocatalytic degradation of pollutants

Photocatalysis (PC) utilizes semiconductor materials to initiate oxidation and reduction reactions through photon absorption, generating charge carriers (h+/e).8,474 Extending the lifetime of these photogenerated h+/e pairs is crucial for effective PC, facilitating the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) like hydroxyl radicals (˙OH), superoxide radicals (by conversion of O2 to ˙O2−), and positive holes (h+). This approach harnesses solar radiation to enhance photoexcitation efficiency. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) operate similarly to semiconductors, where organic linkers act as valence bands and metallic clusters as conduction bands. In MOFs, photogenerated electrons in the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) convert O2 to ˙O2−, while holes in the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) generate ˙OH.475
3.4.1 Degradation of organic dyes. Significant amounts of wastewater are contaminated with dyes as a result of the dye industry's introduction of various synthetic dyes in recent years for use in printing, dyeing, medicine, and cosmetics. Every year, the textile sector alone generates about 100 tons of effluent from dyeing.476 This effluent presents ongoing environmental concerns because it contains complex, refractory organic components with strong colors. Consequently, because MOF-based photocatalysts can drastically change dye hues, research has concentrated on employing them for dye degradation. Cu8Cl5(CPT)8(H2O)4(H2O)20(CH3CN)4, a new multi-metal MOF, was synthesized by Chen et al.477 by integrating the HCPT ligand with triazole and carboxylic acid functionalities. Under visible light with 30% H2O2, this MOF with a 3D interpenetrating network based on [[Cu2(CO2)4]] and (Cu4Cl)7+ clusters achieved 97% RhB degradation in 70 minutes. Mahmoodi et al. employed a green synthesis approach to produce Cu-based nanoporous MOF-199, which efficiently degraded Basic Blue 41 under UV light without oxidizing agents, achieving a 99% degradation rate at 0.04 g L−1 concentration. The catalyst primarily utilized generated ˙OH radicals for degradation.478

Enhancing photocatalytic conditions of MOFs often involves incorporating external electron acceptors. Gao et al. studied Fe-based MIL-53 for acid orange 7 degradation and found initial inefficiencies due to electron–hole recombination under visible light. Addition of persulfate significantly improved degradation, nearing 100% efficiency within 90 minutes, by facilitating effective electron–hole separation and radical generation.479 Despite advancements, standalone MOFs face challenges in meeting current photocatalytic demands for organic pollutant degradation. Composite catalysts combining MOFs with functionalized counterparts or other materials have emerged as viable solutions, leveraging heterojunctions to complement MOF deficiencies.480

TiO2, as a well-established photocatalytic semiconductor, is commonly integrated into MOF-based catalysts. Traditional MOFs like Cu-based HKUST-1, Zn-based ZIF-8, and Ti-based MIL-125 have been combined with TiO2 to enhance their catalytic activity for degrading dyes such as RhB or methyl orange.481,482 However, these composite catalysts often exhibit limited effectiveness under visible light. In subsequent experiments, the composite catalyst with 5% PCN-222 content demonstrated superior photocatalytic performance, achieving a 98.5% degradation rate of RhB under visible light. This rate was ten times faster compared to either pure TiO2 or PCN-222 alone. Analysis indicated that the composite material enhances MOFs' response to visible light and effectively suppresses electron–hole recombination by matching bandgap relationships. Key active species involved in dye degradation include h+, O2˙, and ˙OH radicals, suggesting potential catalytic applications of MOFs under visible light.483

3.4.2 Degradation of pharmaceuticals and personal care products. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) represent newly recognized water pollutants that have garnered significant attention. Since Daughton and Ternes first highlighted their environmental impact in 1999, countries worldwide have become increasingly concerned about PPCP pollution.484 Due to their persistence in toxicity and tendency for bioaccumulation, PPCPs enter water environments through various pathways after use, leading to severe environmental consequences. These pollutants can adversely affect human health, induce genetic mutations in bacteria, and contribute to the development of drug-resistant pathogens.485 Consequently, there is an urgent need to identify safe and effective methods for degrading PPCPs. MOF-based photocatalysts, as emerging materials, hold significant research promise for addressing this issue.
3.4.2.1 Degradation of antibiotics. Antibiotics are a prevalent category of substances within pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs). Current global annual antibiotic consumption is estimated to be between 100[thin space (1/6-em)]000 and 200[thin space (1/6-em)]000 tons.486 To address the environmental impact of antibiotics, numerous studies have explored the degradation of antibiotics using MOF-based photocatalysts, targeting compounds such as β-lactams, tetracyclines, and quinolones. β-Lactam antibiotics, including penicillin and cephalosporins, are the most used antibacterial drugs.487 Cephalosporins are widely utilized due to their broad-spectrum antibacterial properties. However, their extensive use necessitates the development of efficient degradation methods to mitigate environmental impact.

Askari et al.488 developed a CuWO4/Bi2S3/ZIF-67 ternary MOF-based heterojunction catalyst through a simple hydrothermal synthesis method. They investigated the photocatalytic degradation of cephalexin and metronidazole in a continuous flow mode, optimizing operating parameters using central composite design. Under optimal conditions and visible light irradiation, degradation efficiencies of cephalexin and metronidazole reached 90.1% and 95.6%, respectively, with maximum total organic carbon removal rates of 74% and 83.2%. The performance of the ternary photocatalyst significantly surpassed that of Bi2S3 and the binary CuWO4/Bi2S3 catalyst, exhibiting reaction rates nine and four times higher, respectively.

Wang et al.460 examined the photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline using various Fe-based MOFs (Fe–MIL-101, Fe–MIL-100, and Fe–MIL-53). They found that MIL-101 exhibited the highest degradation efficiency, removing 96.6% of tetracycline under visible light irradiation for 3 hours at an initial concentration of 50 mg L−1, outperforming MIL-100 and MIL-53 by factors of 1.7 and 2.4, respectively. Capture and ESR experiments identified O2˙, ˙OH radicals, and h+ as the primary active species in the degradation process, demonstrating MIL-101's efficacy and providing insights into designing MOF-based catalysts for recalcitrant antibiotics.

Lei et al.489 further optimized the photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline by constructing a composite catalyst using Fe-based MOF MIL-101 and non-metallic red phosphorus (RP). They synthesized the RP/MIL-101 heterojunction composite via a low-temperature solvothermal method. Under full-spectrum irradiation, the RP/MIL-101 catalyst with different red phosphorus mass fractions achieved tetracycline degradation efficiencies exceeding 85% within 80 minutes, significantly higher than the approximately 50% efficiency of MIL-101 alone. The RP/MIL-101 composite with 15% red phosphorus exhibited the best performance, with a degradation efficiency of 90.1% in 80 minutes.


3.4.2.2 Degradation of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), commonly used for fever and pain relief, are prevalent in daily life alongside antibiotics in PPCPs. Examples include acetaminophen (paracetamol), ibuprofen, and ketoprofen.490 Despite their low biological toxicity, these drugs are stable and can accumulate in aquatic environments and organisms, leading to significant ecological impacts.491

For the photocatalytic degradation of paracetamol, Gomez-Aviles et al.492 developed a hybrid Ti–Zr MOF photocatalyst by replacing some Ti atoms in the NH2–MIL-125 MOF with Zr atoms using a solvothermal method. The catalyst with 15% Zr doping exhibited the highest activity, completely degrading paracetamol under simulated sunlight in 90 minutes. Total organic carbon (TOC) analysis indicated a 65.3% reduction, demonstrating substantial mineralization.

Cao et al.493 synthesized a heterojunction composite catalyst of g-C3N4 and amino-functionalized In-based MOF MIL-68 using a solvothermal method with ultrasound assistance for the photocatalytic degradation of ibuprofen. The 10 wt% g-C3N4/MIL-68-NH2 composite showed the highest activity, achieving a 93% degradation rate of ibuprofen under 180 minutes of visible light irradiation without additional oxidants. TOC removal efficiency reached 70%, and the reaction rate was 19.28 times that of g-C3N4 alone, highlighting its superior photocatalytic activity.

For ketoprofen degradation, Miao et al.494 constructed a Pt/Ag-modified Ti-based MOF (MIL-125) photocatalyst using solvothermal and light deposition methods. The Pt/MIL-125/Ag composite exhibited a significant enhancement in visible light response and photogenerated electron–hole separation due to the dual interface effect between MOF and precious metals. Using an XPA-7 photocatalytic device, the ketoprofen degradation rate reached 95.5% under 120 minutes of visible light irradiation, representing a 20-fold increase over MIL-125 alone. This demonstrates the effectiveness of dual interface design between semiconductors and precious metals for degrading recalcitrant organic pollutants.

3.4.3 Degradation of other organic pollutants. In recent years, MOF-based catalysts have also been studied for the photocatalytic degradation of residual organic pesticides in water and phenolic pollutants in chemical wastewater, such as those from petrochemicals. While these studies are less extensive than those on organic dyes and PPCPs, they primarily focus on common substances in pesticides like atrazine and malathion, as well as phenolic pollutants such as phenol and nitrophenol.
3.4.3.1 Degradation of organic pesticides. Atrazine is a widely used herbicide in agricultural crop production, but its low biodegradability results in environmental risks as it can leach into water systems through precipitation and runoff.495 Photocatalytic degradation presents a viable solution. Xue et al. developed a MOF-based composite photocatalyst using BiOBr and UiO-66 via an in situ growth method to degrade atrazine under visible light. By forming a heterojunction with BiOBr, the recombination of UiO-66 photogenerated electron holes was reduced, enhancing visible light response. In a 240-minute reaction, 88% of atrazine was degraded, compared to 50% with BiOBr alone. The study also examined the impact of environmental factors, finding that low pH (3.1) conditions facilitated degradation, while other water qualities inhibited it. Capture experiments identified h+ and O2˙ as the active species.496

Similarly, malathion, an organophosphorus pesticide, poses environmental challenges due to its high toxicity, persistence, and residues.497 Fakhri et al. constructed a ternary MOF-based heterojunction catalyst using graphene oxide and ZnO to degrade malathion, based on UiO-66. The Z-type heterojunction and graphene oxide's electron mobility enhanced charge carrier separation and visible light response of UiO-66. The UiO-66@45 ZG composite achieved 100% malathion degradation within 90 minutes. This study offers an effective strategy for designing MOF-based photocatalysts.498


3.4.3.2 Degradation of phenolic pollutants. Phenolic pollutants in water primarily originate from human activities, with industries such as petrochemical and pharmaceuticals often discharging these toxic, stable, and slow-degrading substances into aquatic systems.499 Common phenolic pollutants include phenol, naphthol, chlorophenol, and nitrophenol.

Chen et al. developed a composite MOF-based photocatalyst, Pt@UiO-66-NH2, by dispersing Pt on UiO-66-NH2. To study phenol degradation, they created a photocatalytic membrane reactor (PMR) using α-Al2O3 as the base carrier. This catalyst, with a Pt/Zr ratio of 0.5, achieved 70% mineralization of phenol within 300 minutes under simulated sunlight. The PMR showed good reusability and maintained high catalytic activity after multiple cycles, providing a scalable design strategy for degrading phenolic pollutants in water.500

For α-naphthol, a toxic phenolic pollutant, Abdelhameed et al. designed a multi-component nanocatalyst by combining MOFs ZIF-67, ZIF-8, and MIL-125-NH2. The resulting ZIF-67@ZIF-8@MIL-125-NH2 catalyst degraded 98.9% of α-naphthol under visible light within 120 minutes, significantly outperforming ZIF-8@MIL-125-NH2 and ZIF-67@MIL-125-NH2. This ternary MOF material retained a 94% degradation rate after five uses, showing promise for industrial wastewater treatment.501

For chlorophenols, Zhang et al. synthesized a mesoporous core–shell heterojunction catalyst using NH2–MIL-125 and Bi2MoO6. This catalyst improved charge separation and provided ample active surface sites, achieving 93.28% and 92.19% degradation efficiency for dichlorophenol and trichlorophenol, respectively, under visible light in 180 minutes.

In a subsequent study, Zhang et al.502 developed a hierarchical tandem core–shell heterojunction catalyst, NH2–MIL-125(Ti)@ZnIn2S4/CdS, achieving 98.6% and 97.5% degradation efficiencies for dichlorophenol and trichlorophenol, respectively. For nitrophenol, Li et al. constructed a heterostructure using aminated Fe-based MOF NH2–MIL-53 grown on g-C3N4 doped with pyromellitimide (g-C3N4/PDI). The resulting g-C3N4/PDI@MOF catalyst achieved 100% degradation of p-nitrophenol within 30 minutes under visible light and in the presence of H2O2, demonstrating the effectiveness of energy-level matching heterojunctions in enhancing photogenerated electron transfer for MOFs.503


3.4.3.3 Degradation of other PPCPs. In addition to pharmaceuticals, various chemicals in personal care products can enter the environment post-use, causing ecological issues. Notable examples include the fungicide triclosan and the industrial chemical bisphenol A (BPA). Triclosan, a broad-spectrum bactericide, is present in nearly all daily toiletries.504

To investigate triclosan degradation under visible light, Bariki et al. constructed a coupled semiconductor heterojunction using heat-resistant and acid-resistant Zr-based MOF UiO-66 and CdIn2S4via a solvothermal method. The triclosan degradation rate reached 92% within 180 minutes, with a degradation rate constant approximately 12 times that of pure CdIn2S4, indicating the enhanced photocatalytic activity of the MOF-based photocatalyst. O2˙ and ˙OH radicals were identified as the main active species in the degradation reaction.505 Tang et al. developed a composite material by combining Cr-based MOF MIL-101 and the classic photocatalyst TiO2 to degrade BPA. The TiO2@MIL-101(Cr) composite catalyst, synthesized via a solvothermal method, demonstrated enhanced photocatalytic activity due to improved photogenerated electron–hole separation and reduced band gap width. In experiments, the composite catalyst achieved a 99.4% BPA degradation rate within 240 minutes under UV irradiation, significantly outperforming the individual catalysts. Mechanistic studies confirmed that O2˙ was the primary active species in the degradation process.506

4. Major challenges with the use of MOFs

In the last few years, great strides have been made in the energy and environmental applications of MOFs. In order to ensure robust field applications of MOF-based materials, a number of challenges as well as the potential research avenues for further investigation have been outlined here.

[1] The vast majority of documented research studies use popular MOF types like MIL, ZIF, PBAs, etc. as precursors or sacrificial templates for their investigations. In order to achieve optimal performance, it is crucial to investigate different MOFs, particularly those with characteristics that are specifically created. Furthermore, because of our limited knowledge of their reaction mechanisms, papers on metal chalcogenides, metal phosphides, and metal carbides are rather rare. Instead, the majority of documented investigations have concentrated on converting MOFs into carbonaceous materials, metal oxides, and their composites.

[2] When creating novel MOFs for the adsorption of contaminants, appropriate ligand and metal salt choices should be taken into account. It is important to monitor the reaction's operational parameters, such as temperature, pressure, solvent selection and quantity, to achieve tunable porosity forms and sizes as well as enhanced surface morphologies.

[3] A great deal of innovative MOF adsorbents still need to be created with intense and tenacious research interest for ground-breaking advancements for present and future applications, to highlight their potential for further laboratory, medical, industrial, and environmental usage.

[4] Although many MOF-derived materials have a high porosity and surface area, precise control over the size and shape of the pores is frequently lacking in the preparation processes of some of these materials. In order to effectively decontaminate water or wastewater systems containing an array of pollutants (e.g., synthetic dyes, heavy metals, endocrine-disrupting chemicals, pesticides, food additives, veterinary, pharmaceutical, personal care products, antibiotics, biological and chemical weapons, and other industrial chemicals), future research into finding more practical MOF synthetic techniques should focus on achieving very low-cost MOFs that are more useful especially as adsorbents. Such methods should yield adsorbents that are capable of taking the place of the pricy commercial activated carbons.

[5] The incomplete knowledge of self-assembly in a confined reaction environment makes it challenging to determine the morphology and structure of MOF derivatives target structures for the new form MOFs. Given our poor understanding of the evolution mechanism, the conversion process from MOFs to their derivatives remains unclear. Understanding these mechanisms is aided by emerging technologies such as aberration-corrected high-angle annular dark-field imaging scanning transmission electron microscopy, X-ray absorption near edge structure, and X-ray absorption fine structure. Our ability to design and build appropriate MOFs with regular or hierarchical porosity, customizable composition, and high surface area will depend on our profound understanding of the self-assembly mechanism.

[6] The usage of MOFs is hindered by their small pore sizes, which are within the micropore ranges in diameter. This places a substantial restriction on the amount of contaminants that the frameworks can absorb. This means that MOFs with pores in the mesoporous range must now be synthesized in order to improve their use over other adsorbent materials. However, the MOFs' regeneration mechanism and reusability continue to be crucial. Therefore, more thorough research is needed in this field to discover a better or alternate physical technique for recovering the used MOF adsorbents in order to create a more feasible and cost-effective option.

[7] Hybrid materials produced from MOFs have demonstrated promising uses in energy conversion and storage, but their volumetric energy densities are very modest. This restriction is mostly caused by their low-density porous architectures. To better understand the impact of various electronic and chemical environments as well as structural influences on materials' function, additional MOFs should be added to derivatives and composites for energy applications.

[8] Ultimately, it is necessary to conduct parallel analyses of the side effects of various MOF adsorbents and applications in order to confidently reap the benefits of employing qualified adsorbents in pollutant removal. Regretfully, most researchers consistently overlook this crucial component. As a result, it is anticipated that risk assessments will evaluate how consumers use the products, how to safely dispose the synthesized materials and apply the same for the adsorption of waste products, and how they might affect the receiving bodies.

Notwithstanding these enormous obstacles, the progress made thus far is genuinely encouraging, and studies on the materials discussed in this review are only the beginning of the research on MOF-based materials. There are excellent prospects to realize the practical applications of MOF-based materials in the realms of environmental science and renewable energy with continued research contributions in these areas.

5. Conclusion and future research perspectives

The overuse of fossil fuels, environmental pollution resulting from the indiscriminate usage, and the release or leakage of hazardous gases from industries have all contributed to a growing concern regarding the effective storage of renewable energy and the management of environmental pollution. Ensuring the efficient storage and utilization of eco-friendly energy sources and the removal of hazardous substances are critical for safeguarding the ecosystem and maintaining public health. Finding innovative materials with appropriate qualities has emerged as a powerful strategy to lessen the growing worries about environmental contamination. Current advancements in the study of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), MOF composites, and MOF derivatives (such as metals, oxides, sulfides, and their composites) have shown the effectiveness of using MOF-based materials as precursors or sacrificial templates to prepare a variety of novel materials with unusual structures. Thus far, a multitude of MOF-derived hybrid materials with diverse compositions, morphologies, structures, characteristics, and functions have been successfully obtained and applied to a broad range of applications. Owing to their encouraging characteristics, MOF-derived hybrid micro-/nanostructures have found extensive application in energy storage and conversion devices, such as fuel cells, solar cells, batteries, and supercapacitors. Apart from their varied applications in the adsorption of dyes and heavy metals and the elimination of hazardous gases from environmental pollution control systems, they have better reusability characteristics than many traditional adsorbents, which is helpful for lowering processing expenses and related wastes using the pollutant removal procedures.

In order to gain a basic understanding of the adsorption, catalytic, and sensing mechanisms as well as the relationship between the structure and performance of MOF derivatives, numerous issues still need to be investigated at the lab scale in the future. This knowledge could offer guidance for the redesign and development of MOF-derived nanomaterials. Undoubtedly, in order to truly achieve environmental protection, more work needs to be done on MOF derivatives in order to realize their commercial applications. Scientists need to concentrate on simplified synthesis processes and optimizing costs while exploring ways to enhance their stability, selectivity, and reusability. Hence, to optimize their efficiency and guarantee their industrial applications under a variety of challenging circumstances, emphasis must be placed on the manufacture of MOF derivatives with distinctive features. Finally, future research should focus heavily on how to integrate MOF films with other parts of the devices for real-world use.

Data availability

No primary research results, software or codes have been included and no new data have been generated or analysed as part of this review.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

References

  1. M. Yusuf, et al., Metal–organic framework-based composites for biogas and natural gas uptake: an overview of adsorption and storage mechanisms of gaseous fuels, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 147302 CrossRef CAS.
  2. M. Mon, et al., Metal–organic framework technologies for water remediation: towards a sustainable ecosystem, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6(12), 4912–4947 RSC.
  3. O. M. Yaghi, et al., Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials, Nature, 2003, 423(6941), 705–714 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. K. Madhushani, et al., Metal–Organic Framework-based Composites for Energy, Catalytic, and Environmental Applications: A Critical Review, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2023, 111446 CrossRef CAS.
  5. H. Xu and P. Hu, Progress on fundamentals of adsorption transport of metal–organic frameworks materials and sustainable applications for water harvesting and carbon capture, J. Cleaner Prod., 2023, 136253 Search PubMed.
  6. A. N. Amenaghawon, et al., A comprehensive review of recent advances in the synthesis and application of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) for the adsorptive sequestration of pollutants from wastewater, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2023, 123246 CrossRef CAS.
  7. O. K. Farha, et al., Metal–organic framework materials with ultrahigh surface areas: is the sky the limit?, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134(36), 15016–15021 Search PubMed.
  8. S. Gautam, et al., Metal oxides and metal organic frameworks for the photocatalytic degradation: a review, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2020, 8(3), 103726 CrossRef CAS.
  9. M. Moharramnejad, et al., A simple, robust, and efficient structural model to predict thermal stability of zinc metal–organic frameworks (Zn-MOFs): the QSPR approach, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2022, 336, 111815 CrossRef CAS.
  10. V. Ve Butova, et al., Metal–organic frameworks: structure, properties, methods of synthesis and characterization, Russ. Chem. Rev., 2016, 85(3), 280 Search PubMed.
  11. H. Deng, et al., Large-pore apertures in a series of metal–organic frameworks, Science, 2012, 336(6084), 1018–1023 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. H. Furukawa, et al., Isoreticular expansion of metal–organic frameworks with triangular and square building units and the lowest calculated density for porous crystals, Inorg. Chem., 2011, 50(18), 9147–9152 Search PubMed.
  13. H. Furukawa, et al., The chemistry and applications of metal–organic frameworks, Science, 2013, 341(6149), 1230444 Search PubMed.
  14. K. Hofmann and F. Küspert, Verbindungen von kohlenwasserstoffen mit metallsalzen, Z. Anorg. Chem., 1897, 15(1), 204–207 CrossRef CAS.
  15. J. Rayner and H. M. Powell, 67 Structure of molecular compounds. Part X. Crystal structure of the compound of benzene with an ammonia–nickel cyanide complex, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1952, 319–328 Search PubMed.
  16. B. F. Hoskins and R. Robson, Infinite polymeric frameworks consisting of three dimensionally linked rod-like segments, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111(15), 5962–5964 Search PubMed.
  17. B. F. Hoskins and R. Robson, Design and construction of a new class of scaffolding-like materials comprising infinite polymeric frameworks of 3D-linked molecular rods. A reappraisal of the zinc cyanide and cadmium cyanide structures and the synthesis and structure of the diamond-related frameworks [N(CH3)4][CuIZnII(CN)4] and CuI [4,4′,4′′,4′′′-tetracyanotetraphenylmethane] BF4·xC6H5NO2, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112(4), 1546–1554 CrossRef CAS.
  18. M. Fujita, et al., Preparation, clathration ability, and catalysis of a two-dimensional square network material composed of cadmium(II) and 4,4′-bipyridine, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116(3), 1151–1152 Search PubMed.
  19. O. M. Yaghi, G. Li and H. Li, Selective binding and removal of guests in a microporous metal–organic framework, Nature, 1995, 378(6558), 703–706 Search PubMed.
  20. H. Li, et al., Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal–organic framework, Nature, 1999, 402(6759), 276–279 CrossRef CAS.
  21. M. Eddaoudi, et al., Systematic design of pore size and functionality in isoreticular MOFs and their application in methane storage, Science, 2002, 295(5554), 469–472 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. D. N. Dybtsev, H. Chun and K. Kim, Rigid and flexible: a highly porous metal–organic framework with unusual guest-dependent dynamic behavior, Angew. Chem., 2004, 116(38), 5143–5146 Search PubMed.
  23. C. Jeong, et al., A review on metal–organic frameworks for the removal of hazardous environmental contaminants, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2023, 305, 122416 CrossRef CAS.
  24. L. Pellenz, et al., A comprehensive guide for characterization of adsorbent materials, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2023, 305, 122435 Search PubMed.
  25. A. Mahmad, et al., Experimental and molecular modelling approach for rapid adsorption of Bisphenol A using Zr and Fe based metal–organic frameworks, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2022, 142, 109604 CrossRef CAS.
  26. T. Yang, et al., Yttrium-based metal–organic frameworks: controllable synthesis, growth mechanism and the phase transformation to Y2O3:Eu3+ phosphors, J. Lumin., 2019, 214, 116567 Search PubMed.
  27. M. Gopiraman, et al., Three-dimensional cheese-like carbon nanoarchitecture with tremendous surface area and pore construction derived from corn as superior electrode materials for supercapacitors, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 409, 52–59 Search PubMed.
  28. R. Wang, et al., Transmission electron microscopy, Progress in Nanoscale Characterization and Manipulation, 2018, pp. 69–203 Search PubMed.
  29. P. Behera, et al., MOF derived nano-materials: a recent progress in strategic fabrication, characterization and mechanistic insight towards divergent photocatalytic applications, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2022, 456, 214392 Search PubMed.
  30. M. Thommes, Physical adsorption characterization of nanoporous materials, Chem. Ing. Tech., 2010, 82(7), 1059–1073 CrossRef CAS.
  31. G. Sargazi, et al., A systematic study on the use of ultrasound energy for the synthesis of nickel–metal organic framework compounds, Ultrason. Sonochem., 2015, 27, 395–402 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  32. P. V. Dau, K. K. Tanabe and S. M. Cohen, Functional group effects on metal–organic framework topology, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48(75), 9370–9372 Search PubMed.
  33. H. R. Abid, et al., Synthesis, characterization, and CO2 adsorption of three metal–organic frameworks (MOFs): MIL-53, MIL-96, and amino-MIL-53, Polyhedron, 2016, 120, 103–111 CrossRef CAS.
  34. Y. Zhao, et al., Synthesis of metal–organic framework nanosheets with high relaxation rate and singlet oxygen yield, Chem. Mater., 2018, 30(21), 7511–7520 Search PubMed.
  35. W. W. Lestari, et al., Solvothermal and electrochemical synthetic method of HKUST-1 and its methane storage capacity, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing, 2016 Search PubMed.
  36. P. Kalimuthu, et al., Comparative evaluation of Fe-, Zr-, and La-based metal–organic frameworks derived from recycled PET plastic bottles for arsenate removal, Chemosphere, 2022, 294, 133672 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  37. H. R. Abid, et al., Enhanced CO2 adsorption and selectivity of CO2/N2 on amino-MIL-53(Al) synthesized by polar co-solvents, Energy Fuels, 2017, 32(4), 4502–4510 Search PubMed.
  38. L. Bromberg, et al., Chromium(III) terephthalate metal organic framework (MIL-101): HF-free synthesis, structure, polyoxometalate composites, and catalytic properties, Chem. Mater., 2012, 24(9), 1664–1675 Search PubMed.
  39. K. Pandi, et al., Design and synthesis of biopolymer-derived porous graphitic carbon covered iron-organic frameworks for depollution of arsenic from waters, Chemosphere, 2020, 254, 126769 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  40. X. He, et al., Exceptional adsorption of arsenic by zirconium metal–organic frameworks: engineering exploration and mechanism insight, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2019, 539, 223–234 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  41. G. Lv, et al., Selectivity adsorptive mechanism of different nitrophenols on UiO-66 and UiO-66-NH2 in aqueous solution, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2016, 61(11), 3868–3876 CrossRef CAS.
  42. S. M. Prabhu, S. Imamura and K. Sasaki, Mono-, di-, and tricarboxylic acid facilitated lanthanum-based organic frameworks: insights into the structural stability and mechanistic approach for superior adsorption of arsenate from water, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2019, 7(7), 6917–6928 CrossRef CAS.
  43. S. Dang, Q.-L. Zhu and Q. Xu, Nanomaterials derived from metal–organic frameworks, Nat. Rev. Mater., 2017, 3(1), 1–14 Search PubMed.
  44. L. Wang, et al., Metal–organic frameworks for energy storage: batteries and supercapacitors, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2016, 307, 361–381 CrossRef CAS.
  45. Y. Korenblit, et al., High-rate electrochemical capacitors based on ordered mesoporous silicon carbide-derived carbon, ACS Nano, 2010, 4(3), 1337–1344 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  46. Y. Zhu, et al., Carbon-based supercapacitors produced by activation of graphene, Science, 2011, 332(6037), 1537–1541 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  47. M. Kaempgen, et al., Printable thin film supercapacitors using single-walled carbon nanotubes, Nano Lett., 2009, 9(5), 1872–1876 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  48. G. Wang, L. Zhang and J. Zhang, A review of electrode materials for electrochemical supercapacitors, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41(2), 797–828 RSC.
  49. P. Zhang, et al., Formation of double-shelled zinc–cobalt sulfide dodecahedral cages from bimetallic zeolitic imidazolate frameworks for hybrid supercapacitors, Angew. Chem., 2017, 129(25), 7247–7251 CrossRef.
  50. S. Kuyuldar, D. T. Genna and C. Burda, On the potential for nanoscale metal–organic frameworks for energy applications, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7(38), 21545–21576 Search PubMed.
  51. D. Sheberla, et al., Conductive MOF electrodes for stable supercapacitors with high areal capacitance, Nat. Mater., 2017, 16(2), 220–224 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  52. H. Ji, et al., Capacitance of carbon-based electrical double-layer capacitors, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5(1), 3317 CrossRef PubMed.
  53. K. M. Choi, et al., Supercapacitors of nanocrystalline metal–organic frameworks, ACS Nano, 2014, 8(7), 7451–7457 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  54. H. Wang, et al., Metal–organic frameworks for energy applications, Chem, 2017, 2(1), 52–80 CAS.
  55. W. H. Li, et al., Conductive metal–organic framework nanowire array electrodes for high-performance solid-state supercapacitors, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2017, 27(27), 1702067 CrossRef.
  56. B. Liu, et al., Metal–organic framework as a template for porous carbon synthesis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130(16), 5390–5391 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  57. J. Yang, et al., Metal–organic frameworks: a new promising class of materials for a high performance supercapacitor electrode, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2(39), 16640–16644 RSC.
  58. L. Wang, et al., Flexible solid-state supercapacitor based on a metal–organic framework interwoven by electrochemically-deposited PANI, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137(15), 4920–4923 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  59. D. Feng, et al., Robust and conductive two-dimensional metal–organic frameworks with exceptionally high volumetric and areal capacitance, Nat. Energy, 2018, 3(1), 30–36 CrossRef CAS.
  60. S. Bi, et al., Molecular understanding of charge storage and charging dynamics in supercapacitors with MOF electrodes and ionic liquid electrolytes, Nat. Mater., 2020, 19(5), 552–558 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  61. Q. Li, et al., Fabrication of ordered macro–microporous single-crystalline MOF and its derivative carbon material for supercapacitor, Adv. Energy Mater., 2020, 10(33), 1903750 CrossRef CAS.
  62. B. Y. Guan, et al., Formation of onion-like NiCo2S4 particles via sequential ion-exchange for hybrid supercapacitors, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29(6), 1605051 CrossRef PubMed.
  63. S. Sharma, K. K. Jain and A. Sharma, Solar cells: in research and applications—a review, Mater. Sci. Appl., 2015, 6(12), 1145 CAS.
  64. M. Yahya, et al., Organic/metal–organic photosensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC): recent developments, new trends, and future perceptions, Dyes Pigm., 2021, 192, 109227 CrossRef CAS.
  65. N. A. Karim, et al., Nanostructured photoanode and counter electrode materials for efficient Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs), Sol. Energy, 2019, 185, 165–188 CrossRef CAS.
  66. Z. L. Guo, et al., Enhanced electron extraction using ZnO/ZnO–SnO2 solid double-layer photoanode thin films for efficient dye sensitized solar cells, Thin Solid Films, 2019, 684, 1–8 CrossRef CAS.
  67. X. Sun, et al., One-step preparation of mirror-like NiS nanosheets on ITO for the efficient counter electrode of dye-sensitized solar cells, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50(69), 9869–9871 RSC.
  68. S. Peng, et al., Ni1−xPtx (x = 0–0.08) films as the photocathode of dye-sensitized solar cells with high efficiency, Nano Res., 2009, 2, 484–492 CrossRef CAS.
  69. M. Wu, et al., Low-cost dye-sensitized solar cell based on nine kinds of carbon counter electrodes, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4(6), 2308–2315 RSC.
  70. R. Trevisan, et al., PEDOT nanotube arrays as high performing counter electrodes for dye sensitized solar cells. Study of the interactions among electrolytes and counter electrodes, Adv. Energy Mater., 2011, 1(5), 781–784 Search PubMed.
  71. Y. Li, et al., Metal–organic frameworks: promising materials for improving the open circuit voltage of dye-sensitized solar cells, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21(43), 17259–17264 Search PubMed.
  72. W. Xing, et al., Tellurophene-based metal–organic framework nanosheets for high-performance organic solar cells, J. Power Sources, 2018, 401, 13–19 CrossRef CAS.
  73. G. Xiang, et al., Surface-specific interaction by structure-match confined pure high-energy facet of unstable TiO2(B) polymorph, Sci. Rep., 2013, 3(1), 1411 CrossRef PubMed.
  74. H. A. Lopez, et al., Photochemical response of commercial MOFs: Al2(BDC)3 and its use as active material in photovoltaic devices, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115(45), 22200–22206 CrossRef CAS.
  75. J. Dou, et al., Metal–organic framework derived hierarchical porous anatase TiO2 as a photoanode for dye-sensitized solar cell, Cryst. Growth Des., 2016, 16(1), 121–125 CrossRef CAS.
  76. Q. Fan, et al., High-performance as-cast nonfullerene polymer solar cells with thicker active layer and large area exceeding 11% power conversion efficiency, Adv. Mater., 2018, 30(6), 1704546 CrossRef PubMed.
  77. S. Dai, et al., Fused nonacyclic electron acceptors for efficient polymer solar cells, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139(3), 1336–1343 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  78. N. D. Eastham, et al., Hole-transfer dependence on blend morphology and energy level alignment in polymer: ITIC photovoltaic materials, Adv. Mater., 2018, 30(3), 1704263 CrossRef PubMed.
  79. K. Sasitharan, et al., Metal–organic framework nanosheets for enhanced performance of organic photovoltaic cells, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2020, 8(12), 6067–6075 RSC.
  80. J. Song, et al., Progress and perspective on inorganic CsPbI2Br perovskite solar cells, Adv. Energy Mater., 2022, 12(40), 2201854 CrossRef CAS.
  81. W. Tress, Perovskite solar cells on the way to their radiative efficiency limit–insights into a success story of high open-circuit voltage and low recombination, Adv. Energy Mater., 2017, 7(14), 1602358 CrossRef.
  82. M. I. H. Ansari, A. Qurashi and M. K. Nazeeruddin, Frontiers, opportunities, and challenges in perovskite solar cells: a critical review, J. Photochem. Photobiol., C, 2018, 35, 1–24 CrossRef CAS.
  83. Z. Wang, et al., Stability of perovskite solar cells: a prospective on the substitution of the A cation and X anion, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56(5), 1190–1212 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  84. Z. Chu, et al., Impact of grain boundaries on efficiency and stability of organic–inorganic trihalide perovskites, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8(1), 2230 CrossRef PubMed.
  85. Z. Song, et al., Pathways toward high-performance perovskite solar cells: review of recent advances in organo-metal halide perovskites for photovoltaic applications, J. Photonics Energy, 2016, 6(2), 022001 CrossRef.
  86. U. Ryu, et al., Nanocrystalline titanium metal–organic frameworks for highly efficient and flexible perovskite solar cells, ACS Nano, 2018, 12(5), 4968–4975 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  87. A. V. Vinogradov, et al., The first depleted heterojunction TiO2-MOF-based solar cell, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50(71), 10210–10213 RSC.
  88. C. C. Lee, et al., Enhancing efficiency and stability of photovoltaic cells by using perovskite/Zr-MOF heterojunction including bilayer and hybrid structures, Adv. Sci., 2019, 6(5), 1801715 CrossRef PubMed.
  89. M. Li, et al., Doping of [In2(phen)3Cl6]·CH3CN·2H2O Indium-Based Metal–Organic Framework into Hole Transport Layer for Enhancing Perovskite Solar Cell Efficiencies, Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8(10), 1702052 CrossRef.
  90. D. Shen, et al., Metal–organic frameworks at interfaces of hybrid perovskite solar cells for enhanced photovoltaic properties, Chem. Commun., 2018, 54(10), 1253–1256 RSC.
  91. R. F. Service, The battery builder, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2016 Search PubMed.
  92. R. Yuksel, et al., Metal–organic framework integrated anodes for aqueous zinc–ion batteries, Adv. Energy Mater., 2020, 10(16), 1904215 CrossRef CAS.
  93. H. Hong, et al., Ordered macro–microporous metal–organic framework single crystals and their derivatives for rechargeable aluminum–ion batteries, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141(37), 14764–14771 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  94. Y. Fu, et al., High-performance reversible aqueous Zn–ion battery based on porous MnOx nanorods coated by MOF-derived N-doped carbon, Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8(26), 1801445 CrossRef.
  95. M. E. Ziebel, et al., Effects of covalency on anionic redox chemistry in semiquinoid-based metal–organic frameworks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142(5), 2653–2664 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  96. S. Zhou, et al., Cellulose nanofiber@ conductive metal–organic frameworks for high-performance flexible supercapacitors, ACS Nano, 2019, 13(8), 9578–9586 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  97. Z. Zhang, H. Yoshikawa and K. Awaga, Monitoring the solid-state electrochemistry of Cu(2,7-AQDC)(AQDC = anthraquinone dicarboxylate) in a lithium battery: coexistence of metal and ligand redox activities in a metal–organic framework, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136(46), 16112–16115 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  98. K. Wada, et al., Multielectron-transfer-based rechargeable energy storage of two-dimensional coordination frameworks with non-innocent ligands, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2018, 57(29), 8886–8890 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  99. Q. Jiang, et al., A redox-active 2D metal–organic framework for efficient lithium storage with extraordinary high capacity, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2020, 59(13), 5273–5277 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  100. X. Lou, et al., Room-temperature synthesis of a cobalt 2,3,5,6-tetrafluoroterephthalic coordination polymer with enhanced capacity and cycling stability for lithium batteries, New J. Chem., 2017, 41(4), 1813–1819 RSC.
  101. T. Gong, et al., Pillared-layer metal–organic frameworks for improved lithium-ion storage performance, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9(26), 21839–21847 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  102. F. Zou, et al., Metal organic frameworks derived hierarchical hollow NiO/Ni/graphene composites for lithium and sodium storage, ACS Nano, 2016, 10(1), 377–386 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  103. P. Qi, et al., MOF derived composites for cathode protection: coatings of LiCoO2 from UiO-66 and MIL-53 as ultra-stable cathodes, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51(62), 12391–12394 RSC.
  104. X. Yang, et al., The catalytic effect of bismuth for VO2+/VO2+ and V3+/V2+ redox couples in vanadium flow batteries, J. Energy Chem., 2017, 26(1), 1–7 CrossRef.
  105. P. Su, et al., Enhanced lithium storage capacity of Co3O4 hexagonal nanorings derived from Co-based metal organic frameworks, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2(41), 17408–17414 RSC.
  106. H. Hu, et al., Unusual formation of CoSe@ carbon nanoboxes, which have an inhomogeneous shell, for efficient lithium storage, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55(33), 9514–9518 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  107. R. R. Kapaev, et al., Nickel(II) and copper(II) coordination polymers derived from 1,2,4,5-tetraaminobenzene for lithium-ion batteries, Chem. Mater., 2019, 31(14), 5197–5205 CrossRef CAS.
  108. T. L. A. Nguyen, et al., 3-D coordination polymers based on the tetrathiafulvalenetetracarboxylate (TTF-TC) derivative: synthesis, characterization, and oxidation issues, Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49(15), 7135–7143 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  109. Z. Peng, et al., Triphenylamine-based metal–organic frameworks as cathode materials in lithium-ion batteries with coexistence of redox active sites, high working voltage, and high rate stability, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8(23), 14578–14585 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  110. W. Guo, W. Sun and Y. Wang, Multilayer CuO@ NiO hollow spheres: microwave-assisted metal–organic-framework derivation and highly reversible structure-matched stepwise lithium storage, ACS Nano, 2015, 9(11), 11462–11471 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  111. G. Férey, et al., Mixed-valence Li/Fe-based metal–organic frameworks with both reversible redox and sorption properties, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46(18), 3259–3263 CrossRef PubMed.
  112. S. J. Yang, et al., Preparation and exceptional lithium anodic performance of porous carbon-coated ZnO quantum dots derived from a metal–organic framework, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135(20), 7394–7397 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  113. X.-F. Lu, et al., An alkaline-stable, metal hydroxide mimicking metal–organic framework for efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138(27), 8336–8339 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  114. J. Zhang, et al., Double-shelled nanocages with cobalt hydroxide inner shell and layered double hydroxides outer shell as high-efficiency polysulfide mediator for lithium–sulfur batteries, Angew. Chem., 2016, 128(12), 4050–4054 CrossRef.
  115. J. Zheng, et al., Lewis acid–base interactions between polysulfides and metal organic framework in lithium sulfur batteries, Nano Lett., 2014, 14(5), 2345–2352 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  116. S. Bai, et al., Metal–organic framework-based separator for lithium–sulfur batteries, Nat. Energy, 2016, 1(7), 1–6 Search PubMed.
  117. A. E. Baumann, et al., Promoting sulfur adsorption using surface Cu sites in metal–organic frameworks for lithium sulfur batteries, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6(11), 4811–4821 RSC.
  118. Y. He, et al., Simultaneously inhibiting lithium dendrites growth and polysulfides shuttle by a flexible MOF-based membrane in Li–S batteries, Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8(34), 1802130 CrossRef.
  119. M. Li, et al., Metal–organic framework-based separators for enhancing Li–S battery stability: mechanism of mitigating polysulfide diffusion, ACS Energy Lett., 2017, 2(10), 2362–2367 CrossRef CAS.
  120. B. Liu, et al., Metal–organic frameworks/conducting polymer hydrogel integrated three-dimensional free-standing monoliths as ultrahigh loading Li–S battery electrodes, Nano Lett., 2019, 19(7), 4391–4399 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  121. G. Xu, et al., Sulfur embedded in metal organic framework-derived hierarchically porous carbon nanoplates for high performance lithium–sulfur battery, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1(14), 4490–4496 RSC.
  122. H. B. Wu, et al., Embedding sulfur in MOF-derived microporous carbon polyhedrons for lithium–sulfur batteries, Chem. – Eur. J., 2013, 19(33), 10804–10808 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  123. T. Liu, et al., Selenium embedded in metal–organic framework derived hollow hierarchical porous carbon spheres for advanced lithium–selenium batteries, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8(25), 16063–16070 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  124. X.-J. Hong, et al., Cerium based metal–organic frameworks as an efficient separator coating catalyzing the conversion of polysulfides for high performance lithium–sulfur batteries, ACS Nano, 2019, 13(2), 1923–1931 CAS.
  125. H. B. Wu, et al., Porous molybdenum carbide nano-octahedrons synthesized via confined carburization in metal–organic frameworks for efficient hydrogen production, Nat. Commun., 2015, 6(1), 6512 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  126. J. Zhou, et al., The impact of the particle size of a metal–organic framework for sulfur storage in Li–S batteries, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3(16), 8272–8275 RSC.
  127. X.-J. Hong, et al., Confinement of polysulfides within bi-functional metal–organic frameworks for high performance lithium–sulfur batteries, Nanoscale, 2018, 10(6), 2774–2780 RSC.
  128. G. Zou, et al., Metal–organic framework-derived materials for sodium energy storage, Small, 2018, 14(3), 1702648 CrossRef PubMed.
  129. J.-Y. Hwang, S.-T. Myung and Y.-K. Sun, Sodium-ion batteries: present and future, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46(12), 3529–3614 RSC.
  130. P. Adelhelm, et al., From lithium to sodium: cell chemistry of room temperature sodium–air and sodium–sulfur batteries, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol., 2015, 6(1), 1016–1055 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  131. K. Chayambuka, et al., Sodium-ion battery materials and electrochemical properties reviewed, Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8(16), 1800079 CrossRef.
  132. L. Wang, et al., Rhombohedral Prussian white as cathode for rechargeable sodium-ion batteries, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137(7), 2548–2554 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  133. Y. Park, et al., Sodium terephthalate as an organic anode material for sodium ion batteries, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24(26), 3562–3567 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  134. L. Wang, et al., A superior low-cost cathode for a Na–ion battery, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52(7), 1964–1967 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  135. X. Zhang, et al., Metal–organic framework derived porous CuO/Cu2O composite hollow octahedrons as high performance anode materials for sodium ion batteries, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51(91), 16413–16416 RSC.
  136. Y. Yue, et al., Mesoporous prussian blue analogues: template-free synthesis and sodium-ion battery applications, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53(12), 3134–3137 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  137. J. Park, et al., Stabilization of hexaaminobenzene in a 2D conductive metal–organic framework for high power sodium storage, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140(32), 10315–10323 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  138. X. Zhang, et al., Porous CoFe2O4 nanocubes derived from metal–organic frameworks as high-performance anode for sodium ion batteries, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2017, 499, 145–150 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  139. Y. Guo, et al., MgFe2O4 hollow microboxes derived from metal–organic-frameworks as anode material for sodium-ion batteries, Mater. Lett., 2017, 199, 101–104 CrossRef CAS.
  140. Y. V. Kaneti, et al., Fabrication of an MOF-derived heteroatom-doped Co/CoO/carbon hybrid with superior sodium storage performance for sodium-ion batteries, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5(29), 15356–15366 RSC.
  141. G. Zou, et al., Cube-shaped porous carbon derived from MOF-5 as advanced material for sodium-ion batteries, Electrochim. Acta, 2016, 196, 413–421 CrossRef CAS.
  142. X. Ge, Z. Li and L. Yin, Metal–organic frameworks derived porous core/shellCoP@ C polyhedrons anchored on 3D reduced graphene oxide networks as anode for sodium-ion battery, Nano Energy, 2017, 32, 117–124 CrossRef CAS.
  143. Y. Zhang, et al., Nitrogen-doped yolk–shell-structured CoSe/C dodecahedra for high-performance sodium ion batteries, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9(4), 3624–3633 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  144. K.-N. Jung, et al., Rechargeable lithium–air batteries: a perspective on the development of oxygen electrodes, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4(37), 14050–14068 RSC.
  145. P. Tan, et al., Advances and challenges in lithium-air batteries, Appl. Energy, 2017, 204, 780–806 CrossRef.
  146. D. Wu, et al., Metal–organic frameworks as cathode materials for Li–O2 batteries, Adv. Mater., 2014, 26(20), 3258–3262 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  147. X. Mu, et al., Using a Heme-Based Nanozyme as Bifunctional Redox Mediator for Li–O2 Batteries, Batteries Supercaps, 2020, 3(4), 336–340 CrossRef CAS.
  148. B. D. McCloskey, et al., Solvents’ critical role in nonaqueous lithium–oxygen battery electrochemistry, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2011, 2(10), 1161–1166 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  149. B. Liu, et al., Stabilization of Li metal anode in DMSO-based electrolytes via optimization of salt–solvent coordination for Li–O2 batteries, Adv. Energy Mater., 2017, 7(14), 1602605 CrossRef.
  150. M. Yuan, et al., Ultrathin two-dimensional metal–organic framework nanosheets with the inherent open active sites as electrocatalysts in aprotic Li–O2 batteries, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11(12), 11403–11413 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  151. W. Yan, et al., Downsizing metal–organic frameworks with distinct morphologies as cathode materials for high-capacity Li–O2 batteries, Mater. Chem. Front., 2017, 1(7), 1324–1330 RSC.
  152. J. Read, Ether-based electrolytes for the lithium/oxygen organic electrolyte battery, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2005, 153(1), A96 CrossRef.
  153. M. Mao, et al., Charge storage mechanism of MOF-derived Mn2O3 as high performance cathode of aqueous zinc–ion batteries, J. Energy Chem., 2021, 52, 277–283 CrossRef CAS.
  154. G. Yuan, et al., Two-dimensional CuO nanosheets-induced MOF composites and derivatives for dendrite-free zinc–ion batteries, Nano Res., 2023, 16(5), 6881–6889 CrossRef CAS.
  155. Y. Ren, et al., Fabrication of copper-cobalt heterostructures confined inside N-doped carbon nanocages for long-lasting Zn-air batteries, J. Power Sources, 2022, 545, 231908 CrossRef CAS.
  156. G. Fang, et al., Recent advances in aqueous zinc–ion batteries, ACS Energy Lett., 2018, 3(10), 2480–2501 CrossRef CAS.
  157. K. W. Nam, et al., Conductive 2D metal–organic framework for high-performance cathodes in aqueous rechargeable zinc batteries, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10(1), 4948 CrossRef PubMed.
  158. Z. Hu, Y. Chen and J. Jiang, Zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 as a reverse osmosis membrane for water desalination: insight from molecular simulation, J. Chem. Phys., 2011, 134(13), 134705 CrossRef PubMed.
  159. K. Sun, et al., Oxygen vacancies enriched MOF-derived MnO/C hybrids for high-performance aqueous zinc ion battery, J. Alloys Compd., 2022, 923, 166470 CrossRef CAS.
  160. D. Jia, et al., Manganese-based metal–organic-framework derived hydrophilic cathode with carbon nanotubes introduced for long-life and high-performance aqueous zinc–ion battery, J. Alloys Compd., 2022, 910, 164876 CrossRef CAS.
  161. X. Pu, et al., High-performance aqueous zinc–ion batteries realized by MOF materials, Nano-Micro Lett., 2020, 12, 1–15 CrossRef PubMed.
  162. X. Luo, et al., Understanding of the electrochemical behaviors of aqueous zinc–manganese batteries: reaction processes and failure mechanisms, Green Energy Environ., 2022, 7(5), 858–899 CrossRef CAS.
  163. C. Li, et al., An ultra-high endurance and high-performance quasi-solid-state fiber-shaped Zn–Ag2O battery to harvest wind energy, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7(5), 2034–2040 RSC.
  164. K. Sun, et al., MOF-derived Zn/Co co-doped MnO/C microspheres as cathode and Ti3C2@Zn as anode for aqueous zinc–ion full battery, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 454, 140394 CrossRef CAS.
  165. C. A. Laska, et al., Effect of hydrogen carbonate and chloride on zinc corrosion investigated by a scanning flow cell system, Electrochim. Acta, 2015, 159, 198–209 CrossRef CAS.
  166. Z. Sang, et al., One-dimensional π–d conjugated conductive metal–organic framework with dual redox-active sites for high-capacity and durable cathodes for aqueous zinc batteries, ACS Nano, 2023, 17(3), 3077–3087 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  167. C. Li, et al., Conductive flower-like Ni–PTA–Mn as cathode for aqueous zinc–ion batteries, J. Alloys Compd., 2021, 882, 160587 CrossRef CAS.
  168. B. He, et al., Self-sacrificed synthesis of conductive vanadium-based metal–organic framework nanowire-bundle arrays as binder-free cathodes for high-rate and high-energy-density wearable Zn–ion batteries, Nano Energy, 2019, 64, 103935 CrossRef CAS.
  169. D. Linde and T. B. Reddy, Handbooks of batteries, McGraw-Hill Newyork, 2001 Search PubMed.
  170. G. Toussaint, et al., Development of a rechargeable zinc–air battery, ECS Trans., 2010, 28(32), 25 CrossRef CAS.
  171. W. Zhu, et al., New structures of thin air cathodes for zinc–air batteries, J. Appl. Electrochem., 2003, 33, 29–36 CrossRef CAS.
  172. T. Dirkse and D. Kroon, Effect of ionic strength on the passivation of zinc electrodes in KOH solutions, J. Appl. Electrochem., 1971, 1(4), 293–296 CrossRef CAS.
  173. A. Franco, et al., A 2D copper-imidazolate framework without thermal treatment as an efficient ORR electrocatalyst for Zn–air batteries, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2022, 10(46), 24590–24597 RSC.
  174. J. S. Lee, et al., Metal–air batteries with high energy density: Li–air versus Zn–air, Adv. Energy Mater., 2011, 1(1), 34–50 CrossRef CAS.
  175. C. Guan, et al., Decorating Co/CoNx nanoparticles in nitrogen-doped carbon nanoarrays for flexible and rechargeable zinc–air batteries, Energy Storage Mater., 2019, 16, 243–250 CrossRef.
  176. W. Li, et al., Core–Shell Carbon-Based Bifunctional Electrocatalysts Derived from COF@ MOF Hybrid for Advanced Rechargeable Zn–Air Batteries, Small, 2022, 18(31), 2202018 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  177. H. Zheng, et al., Mn, N co-doped Co nanoparticles/porous carbon as air cathode for highly efficient rechargeable Zn–air batteries, Nano Res., 2022, 1–7 Search PubMed.
  178. S. Agarwal, X. Yu and A. Manthiram, A pair of metal organic framework (MOF)-derived oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts for zinc–air batteries, Mater. Today Energy, 2020, 16, 100405 CrossRef.
  179. H. Wang, et al., Accelerating Triple Transport in Zinc-Air Batteries and Water Electrolysis by Spatially Confining Co Nanoparticles in Breathable Honeycomb-Like Macroporous N-Doped Carbon, Small, 2021, 17(49), 2103517 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  180. X. Duan, et al., MOF-derived Co-MOF, O-doped carbon as trifunctional electrocatalysts to enable highly efficient Zn–air batteries and water-splitting, J. Energy Chem., 2021, 56, 290–298 CrossRef CAS.
  181. N. Pan, et al., Conductive MOFs as bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysts for all-solid-state Zn–air batteries, Chem. Commun., 2020, 56(88), 13615–13618 RSC.
  182. J. Li, et al., Three-dimensional hierarchical conductive metal–organic frameworks/NiFe layered double hydroxide/carbon nanofibers: an efficient oxygen evolution reaction catalyst for Zn–air batteries, Inorg. Chem. Front., 2022, 9(20), 5335–5346 RSC.
  183. A. Ponrouch, et al., Towards a calcium-based rechargeable battery, Nat. Mater., 2016, 15(2), 169–172 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  184. D. Monti, et al., Multivalent batteries—prospects for high energy density: Ca batteries, Front. Chem., 2019, 7, 79 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  185. P. Padigi, et al., Potassium barium hexacyanoferrate–a potential cathode material for rechargeable calcium ion batteries, J. Power Sources, 2015, 273, 460–464 CrossRef CAS.
  186. R. Cohen, Y. Lavi and E. Peled, Calorimetric Study of the Calcium/Sr(AlCl4)2-SOCl2 Battery, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1990, 137(9), 2648 CrossRef CAS.
  187. B. Ji, et al., Recent advances and perspectives on calcium–ion storage: key materials and devices, Adv. Mater., 2021, 33(2), 2005501 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  188. M. E. Purbarani, J. Hyoung and S.-T. Hong, Crystal-water-free potassium vanadium bronze (K0.5V2O5) as a cathode material for Ca–ion batteries, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2021, 4(8), 7487–7491 CrossRef CAS.
  189. T. N. Vo, et al., Ultra-stable calcium ion batteries with Prussian blue nanodisks, EcoMat, 2023, 5(2), e12285 CrossRef CAS.
  190. Z. Song, et al., Origin of the high oxygen reduction reaction of nitrogen and sulfur co-doped MOF-derived nanocarbon electrocatalysts, Mater. Horiz., 2017, 4(5), 900–907 RSC.
  191. Y. Ren, G. H. Chia and Z. Gao, Metal–organic frameworks in fuel cell technologies, Nano Today, 2013, 8(6), 577–597 CrossRef CAS.
  192. G. E. Fenoy, et al., Powering up the oxygen reduction reaction through the integration of O2-adsorbing metal–organic frameworks on nanocomposite electrodes, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2018, 1(10), 5428–5436 CAS.
  193. S. Bureekaew, et al., One-dimensional imidazole aggregate in aluminium porous coordination polymers with high proton conductivity, Nat. Mater., 2009, 8(10), 831–836 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  194. D. Gui, et al., Unique proton transportation pathway in a robust inorganic coordination polymer leading to intrinsically high and sustainable anhydrous proton conductivity, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140(19), 6146–6155 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  195. J. M. Taylor, et al., The role of a three dimensionally ordered defect sublattice on the acidity of a sulfonated metal–organic framework, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137(35), 11498–11506 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  196. D. Ji, et al., Thin MoS2 nanosheets grafted MOFs-derived porous Co–N–C flakes grown on electrospun carbon nanofibers as self-supported bifunctional catalysts for overall water splitting, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5(45), 23898–23908 RSC.
  197. W. Yang, et al., A metal–organic framework devised Co–N doped carbon microsphere/nanofiber hybrid as a free-standing 3D oxygen catalyst, Chem. Commun., 2017, 53(28), 4034–4037 RSC.
  198. C. Liu, et al., Electrospun ZIF-based hierarchical carbon fiber as an efficient electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5(3), 1211–1220 RSC.
  199. X.-Y. Dong, et al., Synergy between isomorphous acid and basic metal–organic frameworks for anhydrous proton conduction of low-cost hybrid membranes at high temperatures, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10(44), 38209–38216 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  200. Y. Guo, et al., Zwitterion threaded metal–organic framework membranes for direct methanol fuel cells, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6(40), 19547–19554 RSC.
  201. H. Chen, et al., High conductive, long-term durable, anhydrous proton conductive solid-state electrolyte based on a metal–organic framework impregnated with binary ionic liquids: synthesis, characteristic and effect of anion, J. Power Sources, 2018, 376, 168–176 CrossRef CAS.
  202. M. Sadakiyo, T. Yamada and H. Kitagawa, Rational designs for highly proton-conductive metal− organic frameworks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131(29), 9906–9907 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  203. Q.-L. Zhu and Q. Xu, Metal–organic framework composites, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43(16), 5468–5512 RSC.
  204. S. Rojas and P. Horcajada, Metal–organic frameworks for the removal of emerging organic contaminants in water, Chem. Rev., 2020, 120(16), 8378–8415 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  205. H. Zhang, et al., Metal–organic-framework-based materials as platforms for renewable energy and environmental applications, Joule, 2017, 1(1), 77–107 CrossRef CAS.
  206. B. M. Connolly, et al., Shaping the future of fuel: monolithic metal–organic frameworks for high-density gas storage, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2020, 142(19), 8541–8549 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  207. G. Yilmaz, et al., Atomic-and Molecular-Level Design of Functional Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) and Derivatives for Energy and Environmental Applications, Adv. Sci., 2019, 6(21), 1901129 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  208. C. Byrne, G. Subramanian and S. C. Pillai, Recent advances in photocatalysis for environmental applications, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6(3), 3531–3555 CrossRef CAS.
  209. M. Rafatullah, et al., Adsorption of methylene blue on low-cost adsorbents: a review, J. Hazard. Mater., 2010, 177(1–3), 70–80 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  210. S.-H. Huo and X.-P. Yan, Metal–organic framework MIL-100(Fe) for the adsorption of malachite green from aqueous solution, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22(15), 7449–7455 RSC.
  211. X.-X. Huang, et al., Hierarchically mesostructured MIL-101 metal–organic frameworks: supramolecular template-directed synthesis and accelerated adsorption kinetics for dye removal, CrystEngComm, 2012, 14(5), 1613–1617 RSC.
  212. L. Li, et al., A MOF/graphite oxide hybrid (MOF: HKUST-1) material for the adsorption of methylene blue from aqueous solution, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1(35), 10292–10299 RSC.
  213. D. Liu, et al., Three-Dimensional Metal− Organic Frameworks Based on Tetrahedral and Square-Planar Building Blocks: Hydrogen Sorption and Dye Uptake Studies, Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49(20), 9107–9109 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  214. S. Dadfarnia, et al., Methyl red removal from water by iron based metal–organic frameworks loaded onto iron oxide nanoparticle adsorbent, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 330, 85–93 CrossRef CAS.
  215. E. Haque, et al., Adsorptive removal of methyl orange from aqueous solution with metal–organic frameworks, porous chromium–benzenedicarboxylates, J. Hazard. Mater., 2010, 181(1–3), 535–542 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  216. Q. Yang, et al., Selective separation of methyl orange from water using magnetic ZIF-67 composites, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 333, 49–57 CrossRef CAS.
  217. K. Wang, et al., Rational construction of defects in a metal–organic framework for highly efficient adsorption and separation of dyes, Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 289, 486–493 CrossRef CAS.
  218. K.-Y. A. Lin and H.-A. Chang, Ultra-high adsorption capacity of zeolitic imidazole framework-67 (ZIF-67) for removal of malachite green from water, Chemosphere, 2015, 139, 624–631 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  219. R. Qin and H. C. Zeng, Design and synthesis of supported nanoscale metal–organic frameworks: transformation from transition metal silicates, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018, 6(11), 14979–14988 CrossRef CAS.
  220. T. Wang, et al., Adsorption removal of organic dyes on covalent triazine framework (CTF), Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2014, 187, 63–70 CrossRef CAS.
  221. E. Haque, J. W. Jun and S. H. Jhung, Adsorptive removal of methyl orange and methylene blue from aqueous solution with a metal–organic framework material, iron terephthalate (MOF-235), J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, 185(1), 507–511 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  222. E. Haque, et al., Dichotomous adsorption behaviour of dyes on an amino-functionalised metal–organic framework, amino-MIL-101(Al), J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2(1), 193–203 RSC.
  223. Y. Zhou, et al., An anionic single-walled metal–organic nanotube with an armchair (3, 3) topology as an extremely smart adsorbent for the effective and selective adsorption of cationic carcinogenic dyes, Chem. Commun., 2018, 54(24), 3006–3009 RSC.
  224. C. Li, et al., The strengthening role of the amino group in metal–organic framework MIL-53(Al) for methylene blue and malachite green dye adsorption, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2015, 60(11), 3414–3422 CrossRef CAS.
  225. S. Seth, G. Savitha and J. N. Moorthy, Diverse isostructural MOFs by postsynthetic metal node metathesis: anionic-to-cationic framework conversion, luminescence and separation of dyes, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3(45), 22915–22922 RSC.
  226. M. J. Dong, et al., A luminescent dye@ MOF platform: emission fingerprint relationships of volatile organic molecules, Angew. Chem., 2014, 126(6), 1601–1605 CrossRef.
  227. S. Luo and J. Wang, MOF/grasphene oxide composite as an efficient adsorbent for the removal of organic dyes from aqueous solution, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2018, 25, 5521–5528 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  228. J. Abdi, et al., Synthesis of metal–organic framework hybrid nanocomposites based on GO and CNT with high adsorption capacity for dye removal, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 326, 1145–1158 CrossRef CAS.
  229. L. Li, et al., The adsorption on magnetic hybrid Fe3O4/HKUST-1/GO of methylene blue from water solution, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2(6), 1795–1801 RSC.
  230. R. Pei, et al., 3D-Printed metal–organic frameworks within biocompatible polymers as excellent adsorbents for organic dyes removal, J. Hazard. Mater., 2020, 384, 121418 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  231. J. Hu, et al., Enhanced adsorptive removal of hazardous anionic dye “congo red” by a Ni/Cu mixed-component metal–organic porous material, RSC Adv., 2014, 4(66), 35124–35130 RSC.
  232. M. Y. Masoomi, M. Bagheri and A. Morsali, Porosity and dye adsorption enhancement by ultrasonic synthesized Cd(II) based metal–organic framework, Ultrason. Sonochem., 2017, 37, 244–250 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  233. M. Yang and Q. Bai, Flower-like hierarchical Ni-Zn MOF microspheres: efficient adsorbents for dye removal, Colloids Surf., A, 2019, 582, 123795 CrossRef CAS.
  234. J. Liu, H. Yu and L. Wang, Superior absorption capacity of tremella like ferrocene based metal–organic framework in removal of organic dye from water, J. Hazard. Mater., 2020, 392, 122274 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  235. J.-M. Yang, et al., Rapid adsorptive removal of cationic and anionic dyes from aqueous solution by a Ce(III)-doped Zr-based metal–organic framework, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2020, 292, 109764 CrossRef CAS.
  236. N. Chen, et al., Effect of structures on the adsorption performance of Cobalt Metal Organic Framework obtained by microwave-assisted ball milling, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2018, 705, 23–30 CrossRef CAS.
  237. H. Molavi, et al., Selective dye adsorption by highly water stable metal–organic framework: long term stability analysis in aqueous media, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 445, 424–436 CrossRef CAS.
  238. J. Zhang, F. Li and Q. Sun, Rapid and selective adsorption of cationic dyes by a unique metal–organic framework with decorated pore surface, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 440, 1219–1226 CrossRef CAS.
  239. L. Huang, et al., Magnetic Zr-MOFs nanocomposites for rapid removal of heavy metal ions and dyes from water, Chemosphere, 2018, 199, 435–444 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  240. S. Aslam, et al., In situ one-step synthesis of Fe3O4@MIL-100(Fe) core-shells for adsorption of methylene blue from water, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2017, 505, 186–195 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  241. J.-M. Yang, A facile approach to fabricate an immobilized-phosphate zirconium-based metal–organic framework composite (UiO-66-P) and its activity in the adsorption and separation of organic dyes, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2017, 505, 178–185 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  242. F. Tan, et al., Facile synthesis of size-controlled MIL-100(Fe) with excellent adsorption capacity for methylene blue, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 281, 360–367 CrossRef CAS.
  243. Y. Shao, et al., Magnetic responsive metal–organic frameworks nanosphere with core–shell structure for highly efficient removal of methylene blue, Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 283, 1127–1136 CrossRef CAS.
  244. X. Liu, et al., Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solutions by an adsorbent based on metal–organic framework and polyoxometalate, J. Alloys Compd., 2015, 648, 986–993 CrossRef CAS.
  245. M. S. Tehrani and R. Zare-Dorabei, Highly efficient simultaneous ultrasonic-assisted adsorption of methylene blue and rhodamine B onto metal organic framework MIL-68(Al): central composite design optimization, RSC Adv., 2016, 6(33), 27416–27425 RSC.
  246. Q. Yang, et al., An anionic In(III)-based metal–organic framework with Lewis basic sites for the selective adsorption and separation of organic cationic dyes, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2019, 30(1), 234–238 CrossRef CAS.
  247. X. Song, et al., Facile synthesis of metal–organic framework UiO-66 for adsorptive removal of methylene blue from water, Chem. Phys., 2020, 531, 110655 CrossRef CAS.
  248. M. D. Firouzjaei, et al., Experimental and molecular dynamics study on dye removal from water by a graphene oxide–copper–metal organic framework nanocomposite, J. Water Process Eng., 2020, 34, 101180 CrossRef.
  249. V. D. Doan, et al., Utilization of waste plastic pet bottles to prepare copper-1, 4-benzenedicarboxylate metal–organic framework for methylene blue removal, Sep. Sci. Technol., 2020, 55(3), 444–455 CrossRef CAS.
  250. B. Li, et al., Dyes encapsulated in a novel flexible metal–organic framework show tunable and stimuli-responsive phosphorescence, Dyes Pigm., 2020, 174, 108017 CrossRef CAS.
  251. B. Sherino, et al., Simultaneous removal of carcinogenic anionic and cationic dyes from environmental water using a new Zn-based metal–organic framework, Sep. Sci. Technol., 2021, 56(2), 330–343 CrossRef CAS.
  252. H. Guo, et al., Metal–organic framework MIL-125(Ti) for efficient adsorptive removal of Rhodamine B from aqueous solution, Appl. Organomet. Chem., 2015, 29(1), 12–19 CrossRef CAS.
  253. H. Tian, et al., Preparation and performance study of MgFe2O4/metal–organic framework composite for rapid removal of organic dyes from water, J. Solid State Chem., 2018, 257, 40–48 CrossRef CAS.
  254. L. Zeng, et al., Trichloroacetic acid-modulated synthesis of polyoxometalate@UiO-66 for selective adsorption of cationic dyes, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2018, 516, 274–283 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  255. H. Liu, X. Ren and L. Chen, Synthesis and characterization of magnetic metal–organic framework for the adsorptive removal of Rhodamine B from aqueous solution, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2016, 34, 278–285 CrossRef CAS.
  256. C. Yang, et al., Indium-based metal–organic framework/graphite oxide composite as an efficient adsorbent in the adsorption of rhodamine B from aqueous solution, J. Alloys Compd., 2016, 687, 804–812 CrossRef CAS.
  257. S.-Q. Deng, et al., Hydrolytically stable nanotubular cationic metal–organic framework for rapid and efficient removal of toxic oxo-anions and dyes from water, Inorg. Chem., 2019, 58(4), 2899–2909 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  258. S. A. Sadat, et al., Rapid room-temperature synthesis of cadmium zeolitic imidazolate framework nanoparticles based on 1,1′-carbonyldiimidazole as ultra-high-efficiency adsorbent for ultrasound-assisted removal of malachite green dye, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 467, 1204–1212 CrossRef.
  259. N. M. Mahmoodi, et al., Synthesis of pearl necklace-like ZIF-8@ chitosan/PVA nanofiber with synergistic effect for recycling aqueous dye removal, Carbohydr. Polym., 2020, 227, 115364 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  260. M. Trukawka, et al., Carbonized metal–organic frameworks with trapped cobalt nanoparticles as biocompatible and efficient azo-dye adsorbent, Environ. Sci. Eur., 2019, 31(1), 1–15 CrossRef CAS.
  261. L.-W. Lee, et al., Membrane adsorber containing a new Sm(III)–organic framework for dye removal, Environ. Sci.: Nano, 2019, 6(4), 1067–1076 RSC.
  262. X. Liu, et al., Highly effective and fast removal of anionic carcinogenic dyes via an In 3-cluster-based cationic metal–organic framework with nitrogen-rich ligand, Mater. Chem. Front., 2020, 4(1), 182–188 RSC.
  263. P. A. Kobielska, et al., Metal–organic frameworks for heavy metal removal from water, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2018, 358, 92–107 CrossRef CAS.
  264. Y. Gu, et al., Facile fabrication of composition-tunable Fe/Mg bimetal–organic frameworks for exceptional arsenate removal, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 357, 579–588 CrossRef CAS.
  265. A. M. Nasir, et al., Application of two-dimensional leaf-shaped zeolitic imidazolate framework (2D ZIF-L) as arsenite adsorbent: kinetic, isotherm and mechanism, J. Mol. Liq., 2018, 250, 269–277 CrossRef CAS.
  266. F. Ke, et al., Highly selective removal of Hg2+ and Pb2+ by thiol-functionalized Fe3O4@ metal–organic framework core-shell magnetic microspheres, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 413, 266–274 CrossRef CAS.
  267. M. Jaishankar, et al., Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals, Interdiscip. Toxicol., 2014, 7(2), 60 CrossRef PubMed.
  268. C. Wang, et al., Superior removal of arsenic from water with zirconium metal–organic framework UiO-66, Sci. Rep., 2015, 5(1), 16613 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  269. A. Sherlala, et al., A review of the applications of organo-functionalized magnetic graphene oxide nanocomposites for heavy metal adsorption, Chemosphere, 2018, 193, 1004–1017 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  270. A. Sarkar and B. Paul, The global menace of arsenic and its conventional remediation-A critical review, Chemosphere, 2016, 158, 37–49 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  271. B.-J. Zhu, et al., Iron and 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic metal–organic coordination polymers prepared by solvothermal method and their application in efficient As(V) removal from aqueous solutions, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116(15), 8601–8607 CrossRef CAS.
  272. J.-B. Huo, et al., Direct epitaxial synthesis of magnetic Fe3O4@UiO-66 composite for efficient removal of arsenate from water, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2019, 276, 68–75 CrossRef CAS.
  273. L. Li, Y. Xu and D. Zhong, Highly efficient adsorption and reduction of Cr(VI) ions by a core–shell Fe3O4@UiO-66@ PANI composite, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2020, 124(14), 2854–2862 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  274. Z.-M. Liu, et al., Novel hematite nanorods and magnetite nanoparticles prepared from MIL-100(Fe) template for the removal of As(V), Mater. Lett., 2014, 132, 8–10 CrossRef CAS.
  275. S. Hei, Y. Jin and F. Zhang, Fabrication of γ-Fe3O4 nanoparticles by solid-state thermolysis of a metal–organic framework, MIL-100(Fe), for heavy metal ions removal, J. Chem., 2014, 2014 DOI:10.1155/2014/546956.
  276. Y.-N. Wu, et al., Amino acid assisted templating synthesis of hierarchical zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 for efficient arsenate removal, Nanoscale, 2014, 6(2), 1105–1112 RSC.
  277. B. Liu, et al., Highly efficient removal of arsenic(III) from aqueous solution by zeolitic imidazolate frameworks with different morphology, Colloids Surf., A, 2015, 481, 358–366 CrossRef CAS.
  278. M. Jian, et al., Adsorptive removal of arsenic from aqueous solution by zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) nanoparticles, Colloids Surf., A, 2015, 465, 67–76 CrossRef CAS.
  279. J. Li, et al., Zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 with high efficiency in trace arsenate adsorption and removal from water, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118(47), 27382–27387 CrossRef CAS.
  280. M. Massoudinejad, et al., Ethylenediamine-functionalized cubic ZIF-8 for arsenic adsorption from aqueous solution: modeling, isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics, J. Mol. Liq., 2018, 255, 263–268 CrossRef CAS.
  281. T. A. Vu, et al., Arsenic removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption using novel MIL-53(Fe) as a highly efficient adsorbent, RSC Adv., 2015, 5(7), 5261–5268 RSC.
  282. D. Xie, et al., Bifunctional NH2–MIL-88(Fe) metal–organic framework nanooctahedra for highly sensitive detection and efficient removal of arsenate in aqueous media, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5(45), 23794–23804 RSC.
  283. H. Wu, et al., Arsenic removal from water by metal–organic framework MIL-88A microrods, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2018, 25, 27196–27202 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  284. B. J. Abu Tarboush, et al., Metal–organic framework-74 for ultratrace arsenic removal from water: experimental and density functional theory studies, ACS Appl. Nano Mater., 2018, 1(7), 3283–3292 CrossRef CAS.
  285. C. Zhang, et al., A novel highly efficient adsorbent {[Co4(L)23-OH)2(H2O)3(4,4′-bipy)2](H2O)2}n: synthesis, crystal structure, magnetic and arsenic(V) absorption capacity, J. Solid State Chem., 2018, 261, 22–30 CrossRef CAS.
  286. Z. Lv, et al., MOFs-derived magnetic chestnut shell-like hollow sphere NiO/Ni@C composites and their removal performance for arsenic(V), Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 362, 413–421 CrossRef CAS.
  287. M. Gallegos-Garcia, K. Ramírez-Muñiz and S. Song, Arsenic removal from water by adsorption using iron oxide minerals as adsorbents: a review, Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev., 2012, 33(5), 301–315 CrossRef CAS.
  288. S.-H. Ho, et al., High-efficiency removal of lead from wastewater by biochar derived from anaerobic digestion sludge, Bioresour. Technol., 2017, 246, 142–149 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  289. M. Ghorbani, O. Seyedin and M. Aghamohammadhassan, Adsorptive removal of lead(II) ion from water and wastewater media using carbon-based nanomaterials as unique sorbents: a review, J. Environ. Manage., 2020, 254, 109814 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  290. L. Meng, et al., Lead removal from water by a newly isolated Geotrichum candidum LG-8 from Tibet kefir milk and its mechanism, Chemosphere, 2020, 259, 127507 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  291. X.-X. Qiao, et al., Highly efficient and selective removal of lead ions from aqueous solutions by conjugated microporous polymers with functionalized heterogeneous pores, Cryst. Growth Des., 2019, 20(1), 337–344 CrossRef.
  292. M. R. Awual, An efficient composite material for selective lead(II) monitoring and removal from wastewater, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2019, 7(3), 103087 CrossRef CAS.
  293. Y. Huang, et al., Heavy metal ion removal of wastewater by zeolite-imidazolate frameworks, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2018, 194, 462–469 CrossRef CAS.
  294. X. Luo, L. Ding and J. Luo, Adsorptive removal of Pb(II) ions from aqueous samples with amino-functionalization of metal–organic frameworks MIL-101(Cr), J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2015, 60(6), 1732–1743 CrossRef CAS.
  295. G. Li, et al., Amide-based covalent organic frameworks materials for efficient and recyclable removal of heavy metal lead(II), Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 370, 822–830 CrossRef CAS.
  296. J. M. Rivera, et al., Highly efficient adsorption of aqueous Pb(II) with mesoporous metal–organic framework-5: an equilibrium and kinetic study, J. Nanomater., 2016, 2016 DOI:10.1155/2016/8095737.
  297. C.-X. Yu, et al., Highly efficient and facile removal of Pb2+ from water by using a negatively charged azoxy-functionalized metal–organic framework, Cryst. Growth Des., 2020, 20(8), 5251–5260 CrossRef CAS.
  298. Z. S. Hasankola, R. Rahimi and V. Safarifard, Rapid and efficient ultrasonic-assisted removal of lead(II) in water using two copper-and zinc-based metal–organic frameworks, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2019, 107, 107474 CrossRef CAS.
  299. Y. Wang, et al., Metal–organic framework modified carbon paste electrode for lead sensor, Sens. Actuators, B, 2013, 177, 1161–1166 CrossRef CAS.
  300. J. Zhang, et al., Exploring a thiol-functionalized MOF for elimination of lead and cadmium from aqueous solution, J. Mol. Liq., 2016, 221, 43–50 CrossRef CAS.
  301. C. Yu, Z. Shao and H. Hou, A functionalized metal–organic framework decorated with O groups showing excellent performance for lead(II) removal from aqueous solution, Chem. Sci., 2017, 8(11), 7611–7619 RSC.
  302. Q. Qin, et al., An efficient approach for Pb(II) and Cd(II) removal using manganese dioxide formed in situ, Chem. Eng. J., 2011, 172(1), 68–74 CrossRef CAS.
  303. N. Yin, K. Wang and Z. Li, Novel melamine modified metal–organic frameworks for remarkably high removal of heavy metal Pb(II), Desalination, 2018, 430, 120–127 CrossRef CAS.
  304. A. Abbasi, T. Moradpour and K. Van Hecke, A new 3D cobalt(II) metal–organic framework nanostructure for heavy metal adsorption, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2015, 430, 261–267 CrossRef CAS.
  305. R. Ricco, et al., Lead(II) uptake by aluminium based magnetic framework composites (MFCs) in water, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3(39), 19822–19831 RSC.
  306. D. T. Sun, et al., Rapid, selective heavy metal removal from water by a metal–organic framework/polydopamine composite, ACS Cent. Sci., 2018, 4(3), 349–356 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  307. A. Chakraborty, et al., Post-synthetic metalation in an anionic MOF for efficient catalytic activity and removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution, Chem. Commun., 2016, 52(13), 2831–2834 RSC.
  308. K. Shekhawat, S. Chatterjee and B. Joshi, Chromium toxicity and its health hazards, Int. J. Adv. Res., 2015, 3(7), 167–172 CAS.
  309. T. Sathvika, et al., A co-operative endeavor by nitrifying bacteria Nitrosomonas and Zirconium based metal organic framework to remove hexavalent chromium, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 360, 879–889 CrossRef CAS.
  310. H. Saleem, U. Rafique and R. P. Davies, Investigations on post-synthetically modified UiO-66-NH2 for the adsorptive removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2016, 221, 238–244 CrossRef CAS.
  311. Q. Zhang, et al., A porous Zr-cluster-based cationic metal–organic framework for highly efficient Cr2 O72− removal from water, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51(79), 14732–14734 RSC.
  312. E. Tahmasebi, et al., Application of mechanosynthesized azine-decorated zinc(II) metal–organic frameworks for highly efficient removal and extraction of some heavy-metal ions from aqueous samples: a comparative study, Inorg. Chem., 2015, 54(2), 425–433 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  313. Z. Noraee, et al., Use of metal–organic framework to remove chromium(VI) from aqueous solutions, J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng., 2019, 17, 701–709 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  314. Q. Yang, et al., Fabrication of core–shell Fe3O4@MIL-100(Fe) magnetic microspheres for the removal of Cr(VI) in aqueous solution, J. Solid State Chem., 2016, 244, 25–30 CrossRef CAS.
  315. L. Aboutorabi, et al., Metal–organic framework based on isonicotinate N-oxide for fast and highly efficient aqueous phase Cr(VI) adsorption, Inorg. Chem., 2016, 55(11), 5507–5513 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  316. J. Guo, J.-J. Li and C.-C. Wang, Adsorptive removal of Cr(VI) from simulated wastewater in MOF BUC-17 ultrafine powder, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2019, 7(1), 102909 CrossRef CAS.
  317. H. Fei, et al., A cationic metal–organic solid solution based on Co(II) and Zn(II) for chromate trapping, Chem. Mater., 2013, 25(5), 647–652 CrossRef CAS.
  318. A. Maleki, et al., Adsorption of hexavalent chromium by metal organic frameworks from aqueous solution, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2015, 28, 211–216 CrossRef CAS.
  319. X. Li, et al., Mechanistic insight into the interaction and adsorption of Cr(VI) with zeolitic imidazolate framework-67 microcrystals from aqueous solution, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 274, 238–246 CrossRef CAS.
  320. L.-L. Li, et al., Cr(VI) removal via anion exchange on a silver-triazolate MOF, J. Hazard. Mater., 2017, 321, 622–628 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  321. S. Jamshidifard, et al., Incorporation of UiO-66-NH2 MOF into the PAN/chitosan nanofibers for adsorption and membrane filtration of Pb(II), Cd(II) and Cr(VI) ions from aqueous solutions, J. Hazard. Mater., 2019, 368, 10–20 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  322. L. Huang, et al., Portable colorimetric detection of mercury(II) based on a non-noble metal nanozyme with tunable activity, Inorg. Chem., 2019, 58(2), 1638–1646 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  323. H. Lohren, et al., Toxicity of organic and inorganic mercury species in differentiated human neurons and human astrocytes, J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol., 2015, 32, 200–208 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  324. Y. Zhao, et al., Environmental applications of diatomite minerals in removing heavy metals from water, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2019, 58(27), 11638–11652 CrossRef CAS.
  325. S. Halder, et al., A Ni-based MOF for selective detection and removal of Hg2+ in aqueous medium: a facile strategy, Dalton Trans., 2017, 46(6), 1943–1950 RSC.
  326. F. Ke, et al., Thiol-functionalization of metal–organic framework by a facile coordination-based postsynthetic strategy and enhanced removal of Hg2+ from water, J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, 196, 36–43 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  327. A. E. Poste, et al., Bioaccumulation and biomagnification of mercury in African lakes: the importance of trophic status, Sci. Total Environ., 2015, 506, 126–136 CrossRef PubMed.
  328. L. Liang, et al., Incorporation of In2S3 nanoparticles into a metal–organic framework for ultrafast removal of Hg from water, Inorg. Chem., 2018, 57(9), 4891–4897 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  329. N. D. Rudd, et al., Highly efficient luminescent metal–organic framework for the simultaneous detection and removal of heavy metals from water, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8(44), 30294–30303 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  330. H. Yang, et al., Three-dimensional macroporous Carbon/Zr-2,5-dimercaptoterephthalic acid metal–organic frameworks nanocomposites for removal and detection of Hg(II), Sens. Actuators, B, 2020, 320, 128447 CrossRef CAS.
  331. W. H. Yin, et al., Functionalizing a metal–organic framework by a photoassisted multicomponent postsynthetic modification approach showing highly effective Hg(II) removal, Inorg. Chem., 2018, 57(15), 8722–8725 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  332. J. Li, et al., Metal–organic framework-based materials: superior adsorbents for the capture of toxic and radioactive metal ions, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2018, 47(7), 2322–2356 RSC.
  333. P. Zhou, et al., Application of nanoparticles alleviates heavy metals stress and promotes plant growth: an overview, Nanomaterials, 2020, 11(1), 26 CrossRef PubMed.
  334. S. Kul, Removal of Cu(II) from aqueous solutions using modified sewage sludge ash, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2021, 18(12), 3795–3806 CrossRef CAS.
  335. P. Senthil Kumar, C. Senthamarai and A. Durgadevi, Adsorption kinetics, mechanism, isotherm, and thermodynamic analysis of copper ions onto the surface modified agricultural waste, Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy, 2014, 33(1), 28–37 CrossRef CAS.
  336. S. Bagheri, et al., Role of copper in the onset of Alzheimer's disease compared to other metals, Front. Aging Neurosci., 2018, 9, 446 CrossRef PubMed.
  337. M. R. Awual, et al., Trace copper(II) ions detection and removal from water using novel ligand modified composite adsorbent, Chem. Eng. J., 2013, 222, 67–76 CrossRef CAS.
  338. H. E. Patton, The Effectiveness of Point-of-Use Treatment in Improving Home Drinking Water Quality in Rural Households, Virginia Tech, 2023 Search PubMed.
  339. M. Yusuf, K. Song and L. Li, Fixed bed column and artificial neural network model to predict heavy metals adsorption dynamic on surfactant decorated graphene, Colloids Surf., A, 2020, 585, 124076 CrossRef CAS.
  340. A. M. Ghaedi, et al., Factorial experimental design for the optimization of highly selective adsorption removal of lead and copper ions using metal organic framework MOF-2(Cd), J. Mol. Liq., 2018, 272, 15–26 CrossRef CAS.
  341. K. Wang, Z. Tian and N. Yin, Significantly enhancing Cu(II) adsorption onto Zr-MOFs through novel cross-flow disturbance of ceramic membrane, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2018, 57(10), 3773–3780 CrossRef CAS.
  342. N. Bakhtiari and S. Azizian, Adsorption of copper ion from aqueous solution by nanoporous MOF-5: a kinetic and equilibrium study, J. Mol. Liq., 2015, 206, 114–118 CrossRef CAS.
  343. Z. Rao, et al., Surface decoration of amino-functionalized metal–organic framework/graphene oxide composite onto polydopamine-coated membrane substrate for highly efficient heavy metal removal, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9(3), 2594–2605 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  344. T.-T. Zheng, et al., A luminescent metal organic framework with high sensitivity for detecting and removing copper ions from simulated biological fluids, Dalton Trans., 2017, 46(8), 2456–2461 RSC.
  345. N. M. Mahmoodi, et al., Bio-based magnetic metal–organic framework nanocomposite: ultrasound-assisted synthesis and pollutant (heavy metal and dye) removal from aqueous media, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 480, 288–299 CrossRef CAS.
  346. M. Garmsiri and H. R. Mortaheb, Enhancing performance of hybrid liquid membrane process supported by porous anionic exchange membranes for removal of cadmium from wastewater, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 264, 241–250 CrossRef CAS.
  347. A. H. Dökmeci, Environmental impacts of heavy metals and their bioremediation, Heavy Metals-Their Environmental Impacts and Mitigation, IntechOpen, 2020 Search PubMed.
  348. H. Zhang and M. Reynolds, Cadmium exposure in living organisms: a short review, Sci. Total Environ., 2019, 678, 761–767 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  349. R. A. Alani, An Assessment of Drinking Water from Various Zip Codes in the Greater Houston Area for Potential Heavy Metal Contamination Using ICPMS, Texas Southern University, 2022 Search PubMed.
  350. Y. Wang, et al., A metal–organic framework and conducting polymer based electrochemical sensor for high performance cadmium ion detection, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5(18), 8385–8393 RSC.
  351. M. Roushani, Z. Saedi and Y. M. Baghelani, Removal of cadmium ions from aqueous solutions using TMU-16-NH2 metal organic framework, Environ. Nanotechnol., Monit. Manage., 2017, 7, 89–96 Search PubMed.
  352. Y. Wang, et al., Functionalized metal–organic framework as a new platform for efficient and selective removal of cadmium(II) from aqueous solution, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3(29), 15292–15298 RSC.
  353. E. Rahimi and N. Mohaghegh, Removal of toxic metal ions from sungun acid rock drainage using mordenite zeolite, graphene nanosheets, and a novel metal–organic framework, Mine Water Environ., 2016, 35(1), 18 CrossRef CAS.
  354. S. Hou, et al., Green synthesis and evaluation of an iron-based metal–organic framework MIL-88B for efficient decontamination of arsenate from water, Dalton Trans., 2018, 47(7), 2222–2231 RSC.
  355. C. O. Audu, et al., The dual capture of As(V) and As(III) by UiO-66 and analogues, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7(10), 6492–6498 RSC.
  356. K. Leus, et al., Removal of arsenic and mercury species from water by covalent triazine framework encapsulated γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles, J. Hazard. Mater., 2018, 353, 312–319 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  357. W. Yu, et al., Metal–organic framework (MOF) showing both ultrahigh As(V) and As(III) removal from aqueous solution, J. Solid State Chem., 2019, 269, 264–270 CrossRef CAS.
  358. M. Lu, et al., Highly efficient removal of Pb2+ by a sandwich structure of metal–organic framework/GO composite with enhanced stability, New J. Chem., 2019, 43(2), 1032–1037 RSC.
  359. M. A. Karimi, et al., Highly efficient removal of toxic lead ions from aqueous solutions using a new magnetic metal–organic framework nanocomposite, J. Chin. Chem. Soc., 2019, 66(10), 1327–1335 CrossRef CAS.
  360. Y. Wu, et al., Synthesis of two novel H4TCPBDA-based metal–organic frameworks and their application in lead ion adsorption, J. Mater. Sci., 2019, 54(3), 2093–2101 CrossRef CAS.
  361. C. Lei, et al., Fabrication of metal–organic frameworks@ cellulose aerogels composite materials for removal of heavy metal ions in water, Carbohydr. Polym., 2019, 205, 35–41 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  362. G.-P. Li, et al., Thiol-functionalized pores via post-synthesis modification in a metal–organic framework with selective removal of Hg(II) in water, Inorg. Chem., 2019, 58(5), 3409–3415 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  363. L. Fu, et al., Post-modification of UiO-66-NH2 by resorcyl aldehyde for selective removal of Pb(II) in aqueous media, J. Cleaner Prod., 2019, 229, 470–479 CrossRef CAS.
  364. Z. Shi, et al., Magnetic metal organic frameworks (MOFs) composite for removal of lead and malachite green in wastewater, Colloids Surf., A, 2018, 539, 382–390 CrossRef CAS.
  365. Y.-H. Zou, et al., A mesoporous cationic metal–organic framework with a high density of positive charge for enhanced removal of dichromate from water, Dalton Trans., 2019, 48(20), 6680–6684 RSC.
  366. Y. Zheng, et al., A facile fabrication of MOF for selective removal of chromium(III) from aqueous solution, J. Dispersion Sci. Technol., 2019, 40(6), 918–924 CrossRef CAS.
  367. J. Li, et al., Synthesis of highly porous inorganic adsorbents derived from metal–organic frameworks and their application in efficient elimination of mercury(II), J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2018, 517, 61–71 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  368. C. Yu, et al., Efficient and selective removal of copper(II) from aqueous solution by a highly stable hydrogen-bonded metal–organic framework, Cryst. Growth Des., 2018, 18(5), 3082–3088 CrossRef CAS.
  369. C. Liu, et al., Ultrafast Removal of Cadmium(II) by Green Cyclodextrin Metal–Organic-Framework-Based Nanoporous Carbon: Adsorption Mechanism and Application, Chem. – Asian J., 2019, 14(2), 261–268 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  370. E. Martínez-Ahumada, et al., MOF Materials for the Capture of Highly Toxic H2S and SO2, Organometallics, 2020, 39(7), 883–915 CrossRef.
  371. A. O. Yazaydın, et al., Screening of metal– organic frameworks for carbon dioxide capture from flue gas using a combined experimental and modeling approach, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131(51), 18198–18199 CrossRef PubMed.
  372. C. Petit and T. J. Bandosz, Exploring the coordination chemistry of MOF-graphite oxide composites and their applications as adsorbents, Dalton Trans., 2012, 41(14), 4027–4035 RSC.
  373. A. M. Ebrahim and T. J. Bandosz, Effect of amine modification on the properties of zirconium–carboxylic acid based materials and their applications as NO2 adsorbents at ambient conditions, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2014, 188, 149–162 CrossRef CAS.
  374. I.-H. Choi, et al., Gas sorption properties of a new three-dimensional in-abdc mof with a diamond net, Front. Mater., 2019, 6, 218 CrossRef.
  375. C. A. Fernandez, et al., Gas-induced expansion and contraction of a fluorinated metal–organic framework, Cryst. Growth Des., 2010, 10(3), 1037–1039 CrossRef CAS.
  376. T. G. Glover, et al., MOF-74 building unit has a direct impact on toxic gas adsorption, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2011, 66(2), 163–170 CrossRef.
  377. C. Petit, et al., Reactive adsorption of acidic gases on MOF/graphite oxide composites, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2012, 154, 107–112 CrossRef CAS.
  378. L. Hamon, et al., Comparative study of hydrogen sulfide adsorption in the MIL-53(Al, Cr, Fe), MIL-47(V), MIL-100(Cr), and MIL-101(Cr) metal–organic frameworks at room temperature, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131(25), 8775–8777 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  379. L. Hamon, et al., Molecular insight into the adsorption of H2S in the flexible MIL-53(Cr) and rigid MIL-47(V) MOFs: infrared spectroscopy combined to molecular simulations, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115(5), 2047–2056 CrossRef CAS.
  380. R. Kitaura, et al., Porous coordination-polymer crystals with gated channels specific for supercritical gases, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42(4), 428–431 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  381. H. Dathe, et al., Metal organic frameworks based on Cu2+ and benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate as host for SO2 trapping agents, C. R. Chim., 2005, 8(3–4), 753–763 CrossRef CAS.
  382. O. J. García-Ricard and A. J. Hernández-Maldonado, Cu2(pyrazine-2,3-dicarboxylate)2(4,4′-bipyridine) porous coordination sorbents: activation temperature, textural properties, and CO2 adsorption at low pressure range, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114(4), 1827–1834 CrossRef.
  383. Z. Zhao, Z. Li and Y. Lin, Adsorption and diffusion of carbon dioxide on metal–organic framework (MOF-5), Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2009, 48(22), 10015–10020 CrossRef CAS.
  384. B. Xiao, et al., High-capacity hydrogen and nitric oxide adsorption and storage in a metal–organic framework, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129(5), 1203–1209 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  385. J. A. Mason, et al., Evaluating metal–organic frameworks for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture via temperature swing adsorption, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4(8), 3030–3040 RSC.
  386. H. Li, et al., Incorporation of alkylamine into metal–organic frameworks through a Brønsted acid–base reaction for CO2 capture, ChemSusChem, 2016, 9(19), 2832–2840 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  387. Y. L. Huang, L. Jiang and T. B. Lu, Modulation of gas sorption properties through cation exchange within an anionic metal–organic framework, ChemPlusChem, 2016, 81(8), 780–785 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  388. A. O. Yazaydın, et al., Enhanced CO2 adsorption in metal–organic frameworks via occupation of open-metal sites by coordinated water molecules, Chem. Mater., 2009, 21(8), 1425–1430 CrossRef.
  389. P. D. Dietzel, V. Besikiotis and R. Blom, Application of metal–organic frameworks with coordinatively unsaturated metal sites in storage and separation of methane and carbon dioxide, J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19(39), 7362–7370 RSC.
  390. S. R. Caskey, A. G. Wong-Foy and A. J. Matzger, Dramatic tuning of carbon dioxide uptake via metal substitution in a coordination polymer with cylindrical pores, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130(33), 10870–10871 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  391. H. Furukawa, et al., Ultrahigh porosity in metal–organic frameworks, Science, 2010, 329(5990), 424–428 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  392. P. L. Llewellyn, et al., High uptakes of CO2 and CH4 in mesoporous metal organic frameworks MIL-100 and MIL-101, Langmuir, 2008, 24(14), 7245–7250 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  393. J. R. Karra and K. S. Walton, Effect of open metal sites on adsorption of polar and nonpolar molecules in metal–organic framework Cu-BTC, Langmuir, 2008, 24(16), 8620–8626 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  394. D. Britt, D. Tranchemontagne and O. M. Yaghi, Metal–organic frameworks with high capacity and selectivity for harmful gases, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2008, 105(33), 11623–11627 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  395. C. Monahan, et al., Antibiotic residues in the aquatic environment–current perspective and risk considerations, J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng., 2021, 56(7), 733–751 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  396. J. Wilkinson, et al., Occurrence, fate and transformation of emerging contaminants in water: an overarching review of the field, Environ. Pollut., 2017, 231, 954–970 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  397. F. Hooriabad Saboor, et al., The effectiveness of MOFs for the removal of pharmaceuticals from aquatic environments: a review focused on antibiotics removal, Chem. – Asian J., 2022, 17(4), e202101105 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  398. M. Stylianou, et al., Adsorption and removal of seven antibiotic compounds present in water with the use of biochar derived from the pyrolysis of organic waste feedstocks, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2021, 9(5), 105868 CrossRef CAS.
  399. P. Song, et al., Electrocoagulation treatment of arsenic in wastewaters: a comprehensive review, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 317, 707–725 CrossRef CAS.
  400. S. K. Mondal, A. K. Saha and A. Sinha, Removal of ciprofloxacin using modified advanced oxidation processes: kinetics, pathways and process optimization, J. Cleaner Prod., 2018, 171, 1203–1214 CrossRef CAS.
  401. K. Qin, et al., A review of bismuth-based photocatalysts for antibiotic degradation: insight into the photocatalytic degradation performance, pathways and relevant mechanisms, Environ. Res., 2021, 199, 111360 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  402. K.-W. Jung, J.-H. Kim and J.-W. Choi, Synthesis of magnetic porous carbon composite derived from metal–organic framework using recovered terephthalic acid from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste bottles as organic ligand and its potential as adsorbent for antibiotic tetracycline hydrochloride, Composites, Part B, 2020, 187, 107867 CrossRef CAS.
  403. M. Lei, et al., A water-stable Cd-MOF and corresponding MOF@ melamine foam composite for detection and removal of antibiotics, explosives, and anions, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2022, 286, 120433 CrossRef CAS.
  404. D. Mukherjee, et al., Devising robust hydrophobic MOFs and its membrane for ultra-sensitive aqueous phase detection of antibiotics and toxic nitro-explosives and adsorption of TNP, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2023, 11(5), 110528 CrossRef CAS.
  405. J. Xia, Y. Gao and G. Yu, Tetracycline removal from aqueous solution using zirconium-based metal–organic frameworks (Zr-MOFs) with different pore size and topology: adsorption isotherm, kinetic and mechanism studies, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2021, 590, 495–505 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  406. Z.-h Yang, et al., Mn-doped zirconium metal–organic framework as an effective adsorbent for removal of tetracycline and Cr(VI) from aqueous solution, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2019, 277, 277–285 CrossRef CAS.
  407. Y. Zhang, et al., Synthesis of hierarchical-pore metal–organic framework on liter scale for large organic pollutants capture in wastewater, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2018, 525, 39–47 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  408. J. Jin, et al., Cu and Co nanoparticles co-doped MIL-101 as a novel adsorbent for efficient removal of tetracycline from aqueous solutions, Sci. Total Environ., 2019, 650, 408–418 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  409. W. Xiong, et al., Metal–organic frameworks derived magnetic carbon-αFe/Fe3C composites as a highly effective adsorbent for tetracycline removal from aqueous solution, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 374, 91–99 CrossRef CAS.
  410. Y. Sun, et al., Adsorptive removal of dye and antibiotic from water with functionalized zirconium-based metal organic framework and graphene oxide composite nanomaterial Uio-66-(OH)2/GO, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2020, 525, 146614 CrossRef CAS.
  411. K. Wang, et al., Highly effective pH-universal removal of tetracycline hydrochloride antibiotics by UiO-66-(COOH)2/GO metal–organic framework composites, J. Solid State Chem., 2020, 284, 121200 CrossRef CAS.
  412. Y. Kong, et al., Enhanced tetracycline adsorption using alginate-graphene-ZIF67 aerogel, Colloids Surf., A, 2020, 588, 124360 CrossRef CAS.
  413. W. Mao, et al., Efficient cobalt-based metal–organic framework derived magnetic Co@C-600 Nanoreactor for peroxymonosulfate activation and oxytetracycline degradation, Colloids Surf., A, 2022, 648, 129234 CrossRef CAS.
  414. Y. Zhou, et al., Simultaneous removal of tetracycline and norfloxacin from water by iron-trimesic metal–organic frameworks, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2022, 10(3), 107403 CrossRef CAS.
  415. G. Wu, et al., Magnetic copper-based metal organic framework as an effective and recyclable adsorbent for removal of two fluoroquinolone antibiotics from aqueous solutions, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2018, 528, 360–371 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  416. L. Lian, et al., Magnetic solid-phase extraction of fluoroquinolones from water samples using titanium-based metal–organic framework functionalized magnetic microspheres, J. Chromatogr. A, 2018, 1579, 1–8 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  417. X. Guo, et al., Exploration of functional MOFs for efficient removal of fluoroquinolone antibiotics from water, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2019, 286, 84–91 CrossRef CAS.
  418. G. Chaturvedi, et al., Removal of fluoroquinolone drug, levofloxacin, from aqueous phase over iron based MOFs, MIL-100(Fe), J. Solid State Chem., 2020, 281, 121029 CrossRef CAS.
  419. N. Kim, et al., Effective sequestration of tetracycline and ciprofloxacin from aqueous solutions by Al-based metal organic framework and reduced graphene oxide immobilized alginate biosorbents, Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 450, 138068 CrossRef CAS.
  420. S. Li, X. Zhang and Y. Huang, Zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 derived nanoporous carbon as an effective and recyclable adsorbent for removal of ciprofloxacin antibiotics from water, J. Hazard. Mater., 2017, 321, 711–719 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  421. Y. Yuan, et al., Preparation of konjac glucomannan-based zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 composite aerogels with high adsorptive capacity of ciprofloxacin from water, Colloids Surf., A, 2018, 544, 187–195 CrossRef CAS.
  422. S. E. Moradi, et al., Effective removal of ciprofloxacin from aqueous solutions using magnetic metal–organic framework sorbents: mechanisms, isotherms and kinetics, J. Iran. Chem. Soc., 2016, 13, 1617–1627 CrossRef CAS.
  423. Ş. S. Bayazit, et al., Preparation of magnetic MIL-101(Cr) for efficient removal of ciprofloxacin, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2017, 24, 25452–25461 CrossRef PubMed.
  424. Y. Zhao, et al., Synergistic effect of electrostatic and coordination interactions for adsorption removal of cephalexin from water using a zirconium-based metal–organic framework, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2020, 580, 256–263 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  425. Y. Gao, et al., Understanding the adsorption of sulfonamide antibiotics on MIL-53s: metal dependence of breathing effect and adsorptive performance in aqueous solution, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2019, 535, 159–168 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  426. G. Cheng, et al., Surface imprinted polymer on a metal–organic framework for rapid and highly selective adsorption of sulfamethoxazole in environmental samples, J. Hazard. Mater., 2022, 423, 127087 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  427. M. R. Azhar, et al., Excellent performance of copper based metal organic framework in adsorptive removal of toxic sulfonamide antibiotics from wastewater, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2016, 478, 344–352 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  428. X. Zhao, et al., A metal–organic framework with large 1-D channels and rich OH sites for high-efficiency chloramphenicol removal from water, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2018, 526, 28–34 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  429. L.-X. Yang, J.-C. E. Yang and M.-L. Fu, Magnetic CoFe2O4 nanocrystals derived from MIL-101(Fe/Co) for peroxymonosulfate activation toward degradation of chloramphenicol, Chemosphere, 2021, 272, 129567 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  430. N. Lu, et al., Experimental and molecular docking investigation on metal–organic framework MIL-101(Cr) as a sorbent for vortex assisted dispersive micro-solid-phase extraction of trace 5-nitroimidazole residues in environmental water samples prior to UPLC-MS/MS analysis, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2016, 408, 8515–8528 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  431. Y. Peng, et al., Flexibility induced high-performance MOF-based adsorbent for nitroimidazole antibiotics capture, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 333, 678–685 CrossRef CAS.
  432. Z. Luo, et al., A 3D stable metal–organic framework for highly efficient adsorption and removal of drug contaminants from water, Polymers, 2018, 10(2), 209 CrossRef PubMed.
  433. B. Wang, et al., Highly stable Zr(IV)-based metal–organic frameworks for the detection and removal of antibiotics and organic explosives in water, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138(19), 6204–6216 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  434. M. S. Gaikwad and C. Balomajumder, Capacitive deionization for desalination using nanostructured electrodes, Anal. Lett., 2016, 49(11), 1641–1655 CrossRef CAS.
  435. S. Dutta, et al., Metal–organic frameworks for water desalination, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2023, 2304790 CrossRef.
  436. Z. Wang, et al., Nanoarchitectured metal–organic framework/polypyrrole hybrids for brackish water desalination using capacitive deionization, Mater. Horiz., 2019, 6(7), 1433–1437 RSC.
  437. M. Ding, et al., Bimetallic metal–organic framework derived porous carbon nanostructures for high performance membrane capacitive desalination, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5(13), 6113–6121 RSC.
  438. M. Kadhom and B. Deng, Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) in water filtration membranes for desalination and other applications, Appl. Mater. Today, 2018, 11, 219–230 CrossRef.
  439. S. Xiong, et al., Novel thin film composite forward osmosis membrane of enhanced water flux and anti-fouling property with N-[3-(trimethoxysilyl) propyl] ethylenediamine incorporated, J. Membr. Sci., 2016, 520, 400–414 CrossRef CAS.
  440. D. L. Shaffer, et al., Forward osmosis: where are we now?, Desalination, 2015, 356, 271–284 CrossRef CAS.
  441. R. Dai, et al., Porous metal organic framework CuBDC nanosheet incorporated thin-film nanocomposite membrane for high-performance forward osmosis, J. Membr. Sci., 2019, 573, 46–54 CrossRef CAS.
  442. D. Ma, et al., Thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes incorporated with super-hydrophilic metal–organic framework (MOF) UiO-66: toward enhancement of water flux and salt rejection, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9(8), 7523–7534 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  443. A. Zirehpour, A. Rahimpour and M. Ulbricht, Nano-sized metal organic framework to improve the structural properties and desalination performance of thin film composite forward osmosis membrane, J. Membr. Sci., 2017, 531, 59–67 CrossRef CAS.
  444. S. Lin and M. Elimelech, Kinetics and energetics trade-off in reverse osmosis desalination with different configurations, Desalination, 2017, 401, 42–52 CrossRef CAS.
  445. J. Duan, et al., High-performance polyamide thin-film-nanocomposite reverse osmosis membranes containing hydrophobic zeolitic imidazolate framework-8, J. Membr. Sci., 2015, 476, 303–310 CrossRef CAS.
  446. T. H. Lee, et al., ZIF-8 particle size effects on reverse osmosis performance of polyamide thin-film nanocomposite membranes: importance of particle deposition, J. Membr. Sci., 2019, 570, 23–33 CrossRef.
  447. K. M. Gupta, K. Zhang and J. Jiang, Water desalination through zeolitic imidazolate framework membranes: significant role of functional groups, Langmuir, 2015, 31(48), 13230–13237 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  448. H. M. Park, K. Y. Jee and Y. T. Lee, Preparation and characterization of a thin-film composite reverse osmosis membrane using a polysulfone membrane including metal–organic frameworks, J. Membr. Sci., 2017, 541, 510–518 CrossRef CAS.
  449. B. L. Bonnett, et al., PCN-222 metal–organic framework nanoparticles with tunable pore size for nanocomposite reverse osmosis membranes, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12(13), 15765–15773 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  450. I. H. Aljundi, Desalination characteristics of TFN-RO membrane incorporated with ZIF-8 nanoparticles, Desalination, 2017, 420, 12–20 CrossRef CAS.
  451. Y. Lin, Y. Chen and R. Wang, Thin film nanocomposite hollow fiber membranes incorporated with surface functionalized HKUST-1 for highly-efficient reverses osmosis desalination process, J. Membr. Sci., 2019, 589, 117249 CrossRef CAS.
  452. J. Zuo and T.-S. Chung, Metal–organic framework-functionalized alumina membranes for vacuum membrane distillation, Water, 2016, 8(12), 586 CrossRef.
  453. M. R. S. Kebria, et al., Experimental and theoretical investigation of thin ZIF-8/chitosan coated layer on air gap membrane distillation performance of PVDF membrane, Desalination, 2019, 450, 21–32 CrossRef CAS.
  454. F. Yang, et al., Metal–organic frameworks supported on nanofiber for desalination by direct contact membrane distillation, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10(13), 11251–11260 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  455. Y.-y Zhao, et al., Impacts of metal–organic frameworks on structure and performance of polyamide thin-film nanocomposite membranes, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11(14), 13724–13734 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  456. N. Misdan, et al., CuBTC metal organic framework incorporation for enhancing separation and antifouling properties of nanofiltration membrane, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 2019, 148, 227–239 CrossRef CAS.
  457. M. Navarro, et al., Thin-film nanocomposite membrane with the minimum amount of MOF by the Langmuir–schaefer technique for nanofiltration, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10(1), 1278–1287 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  458. H. Liu, et al., Enhanced dispersibility of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) in the organic phase via surface modification for TFN nanofiltration membrane preparation, RSC Adv., 2020, 10(7), 4045–4057 RSC.
  459. J. Zhu, et al., MOF-positioned polyamide membranes with a fishnet-like structure for elevated nanofiltration performance, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7(27), 16313–16322 RSC.
  460. Z. Wang, et al., Nanoparticle-templated nanofiltration membranes for ultrahigh performance desalination, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9(1), 2004 CrossRef PubMed.
  461. W. P. Lustig, et al., Metal–organic frameworks: functional luminescent and photonic materials for sensing applications, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46(11), 3242–3285 RSC.
  462. Y. Wang, et al., Bioinspired design of ultrathin 2D bimetallic metal–organic-framework nanosheets used as biomimetic enzymes, Adv. Mater., 2016, 28(21), 4149–4155 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  463. H. Xu, et al., Metal–organic framework nanosheets for fast-response and highly sensitive luminescent sensing of Fe3+, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4(28), 10900–10905 RSC.
  464. F. Su, et al., Two-dimensional zirconium-based metal–organic framework nanosheet composites embedded with Au nanoclusters: a highly sensitive electrochemical aptasensor toward detecting cocaine, ACS Sens., 2017, 2(7), 998–1005 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  465. R. Li, et al., A rational self-sacrificing template route to metal–organic framework nanotubes and reversible vapor-phase detection of nitroaromatic explosives, Small, 2011, 8(2), 225–230 CrossRef PubMed.
  466. H.-S. Wang, et al., Lanthanide-based metal–organic framework nanosheets with unique fluorescence quenching properties for two-color intracellular adenosine imaging in living cells, NPG Asia Mater., 2017, 9(3), e354 CrossRef CAS.
  467. L. J. Han, et al., A Highly Solvent-Stable Metal–Organic Framework Nanosheet: Morphology Control, Exfoliation, and Luminescent Property, Small, 2018, 14(17), 1703873 CrossRef PubMed.
  468. X. Xin, et al., Fluorescence turn-on detection of uric acid by a water-stable metal–organic nanotube with high selectivity and sensitivity, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2017, 5(3), 601–606 RSC.
  469. W.-J. Song, Intracellular DNA and microRNA sensing based on metal–organic framework nanosheets with enzyme-free signal amplification, Talanta, 2017, 170, 74–80 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  470. Z.-Q. Li, et al., Fabrication of nanosheets of a fluorescent metal–organic framework [Zn(BDC)(H2O)]n (BDC = 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate): ultrasonic synthesis and sensing of ethylamine, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2008, 11(11), 1375–1377 CrossRef CAS.
  471. A. K. Chaudhari, et al., Optochemically responsive 2D nanosheets of a 3D metal–organic framework material, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29(27), 1701463 CrossRef PubMed.
  472. M. Tian, et al., Synthesis of large and uniform Cu3TCPP truncated quadrilateral nano-flake and its humidity sensing properties, RSC Adv., 2016, 6(92), 88991–88995 RSC.
  473. M. Zhao, et al., Ultrathin 2D metal–organic framework nanosheets, Adv. Mater., 2015, 27(45), 7372–7378 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  474. S. A. Younis, et al., Metal–organic framework as a photocatalyst: progress in modulation strategies and environmental/energy applications, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 2020, 81, 100870 CrossRef.
  475. T. Zhang, et al., Modulating photoelectronic performance of metal–organic frameworks for premium photocatalysis, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2019, 380, 201–229 CrossRef CAS.
  476. B. Mu and A. Wang, Adsorption of dyes onto palygorskite and its composites: a review, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2016, 4(1), 1274–1294 CrossRef CAS.
  477. D.-M. Chen, et al., An acid-base resistant polyoxometalate-based metal–organic framework constructed from {Cu4Cl}7+ and {Cu2(CO2)4} clusters for photocatalytic degradation of organic dye, J. Solid State Chem., 2020, 287, 121384 CrossRef CAS.
  478. N. M. Mahmoodi and J. Abdi, Nanoporous metal–organic framework (MOF-199): synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic degradation of Basic Blue 41, Microchem. J., 2019, 144, 436–442 CrossRef.
  479. Y. Gao, et al., Accelerated photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutant over metal–organic framework MIL-53(Fe) under visible LED light mediated by persulfate, Appl. Catal., B, 2017, 202, 165–174 CrossRef CAS.
  480. X. Zhang, et al., Functionalized metal–organic frameworks for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in environment, Chemosphere, 2020, 242, 125144 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  481. D. Tuncel and A. Ökte, Efficient photoactivity of TiO2-hybrid-porous nanocomposite: effect of humidity, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 458, 546–554 CrossRef CAS.
  482. C. Xue, et al., MIL-125 and NH2–MIL-125 modified TiO2 nanotube array as efficient photocatalysts for pollute degradation, Chem. Lett., 2018, 47(6), 711–714 CrossRef CAS.
  483. L. Li, et al., Fabrication of a novel type visible-light-driven heterojunction photocatalyst: metal-porphyrinic metal organic framework coupled with PW12/TiO2, Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 386, 123955 CrossRef CAS.
  484. C. G. Daughton and T. A. Ternes, Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: agents of subtle change?, Environ. Health Perspect., 1999, 107(6), 907–938 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  485. M. Xu, et al., Occurrence and ecological risk of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and pesticides in typical surface watersheds, China, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2019, 175, 289–298 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  486. Q. Chen, et al., Photocatalytic degradation of amoxicillin by carbon quantum dots modified K2Ti6O13 nanotubes: effect of light wavelength, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2019, 30(6), 1214–1218 CrossRef CAS.
  487. J. Chen, et al., Multiple roles of Cu(II) in catalyzing hydrolysis and oxidation of β-lactam antibiotics, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2016, 50(22), 12156–12165 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  488. N. Askari, et al., Fabrication of CuWO4/Bi2S3/ZIF67 MOF: a novel double Z-scheme ternary heterostructure for boosting visible-light photodegradation of antibiotics, Chemosphere, 2020, 251, 126453 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  489. X. Lei, et al., Constructing novel red phosphorus decorated iron-based metal organic framework composite with efficient photocatalytic performance, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2020, 528, 146963 CrossRef CAS.
  490. I. Sudano, et al., Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and hypertension, Curr. Hypertens. Rep., 2012, 14, 304–309 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  491. T. Ding, et al., Toxicity, degradation and metabolic fate of ibuprofen on freshwater diatom Navicula sp, J. Hazard. Mater., 2017, 330, 127–134 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  492. A. Gómez-Avilés, et al., Mixed Ti–Zr metal–organic-frameworks for the photodegradation of acetaminophen under solar irradiation, Appl. Catal., B, 2019, 253, 253–262 CrossRef.
  493. W. Cao, et al., In-situ fabrication of g-C3N4/MIL-68(In)-NH2 heterojunction composites with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity for degradation of ibuprofen, Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 391, 123608 CrossRef CAS.
  494. S. Miao, et al., Improved photocatalytic degradation of ketoprofen by Pt/MIL-125(Ti)/Ag with synergetic effect of Pt-MOF and MOF-Ag double interfaces: mechanism and degradation pathway, Chemosphere, 2020, 257, 127123 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  495. L. Yue, et al., Adsorption–desorption behavior of atrazine on agricultural soils in China, J. Environ. Sci., 2017, 57, 180–189 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  496. Y. Xue, et al., Efficient degradation of atrazine by BiOBr/UiO-66 composite photocatalyst under visible light irradiation: environmental factors, mechanisms and degradation pathways, Chemosphere, 2018, 203, 497–505 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  497. Y. Liu, et al., The degradation behaviour, residue distribution, and dietary risk assessment of malathion on vegetables and fruits in China by GC-FPD, Food Control, 2020, 107, 106754 CrossRef CAS.
  498. H. Fakhri and H. Bagheri, Two novel sets of UiO-66@ metal oxide/graphene oxide Z-scheme heterojunction: insight into tetracycline and malathion photodegradation, J. Environ. Sci., 2020, 91, 222–236 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  499. F. Ghanbari and M. Moradi, Application of peroxymonosulfate and its activation methods for degradation of environmental organic pollutants, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 310, 41–62 CrossRef CAS.
  500. S. S. Chen, et al., De Novo synthesis of platinum-nanoparticle-encapsulated UiO-66-NH2 for photocatalytic thin film fabrication with enhanced performance of phenol degradation, J. Hazard. Mater., 2020, 397, 122431 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  501. R. M. Abdelhameed, M. Abu-Elghait and M. El-Shahat, Hybrid three MOFs composites (ZIF-67@ZIF-8@MIL-125-NH2): enhancement the biological and visible-light photocatalytic activity, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2020, 8(5), 104107 CrossRef CAS.
  502. S. Zhang, et al., Surface-defect-rich mesoporous NH2–MIL-125(Ti)@Bi2MoO6 core-shell heterojunction with improved charge separation and enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic performance, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2019, 554, 324–334 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  503. Y. Li, et al., Construction of g-C3N4/PDI@MOF heterojunctions for the highly efficient visible light-driven degradation of pharmaceutical and phenolic micropollutants, Appl. Catal., B, 2019, 250, 150–162 CrossRef CAS.
  504. H. Wang, et al., Synthesis and applications of novel graphitic carbon nitride/metal–organic frameworks mesoporous photocatalyst for dyes removal, Appl. Catal., B, 2015, 174, 445–454 CrossRef.
  505. R. Bariki, et al., Facile synthesis and photocatalytic efficacy of UiO-66/CdIn2S4 nanocomposites with flowerlike 3D-microspheres towards aqueous phase decontamination of triclosan and H2 evolution, Appl. Catal., B, 2020, 270, 118882 CrossRef CAS.
  506. Y. Tang, et al., Anatase TiO2@MIL-101(Cr) nanocomposite for photocatalytic degradation of bisphenol A, Colloids Surf., A, 2020, 596, 124745 CrossRef CAS.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024