Stefano
Dell’Orco
a,
Noemi
Leick
b,
Jeffrey L.
Alleman
b,
Susan E.
Habas
a and
Calvin
Mukarakate
*a
aCatalytic Carbon Transformation & Scale-up Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, CO 80401, USA. E-mail: Calvin.Mukarakate@nrel.gov
bMaterials, Chemical, and Computational Science Directorate, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, CO 80401, USA
First published on 16th July 2024
Exploring the dynamic interaction of non-thermal plasma (NTP) with catalytic processes is critical to unravelling elusive catalyst structure–function relationships under NTP conditions, specifically dielectric barrier discharges (DBD). This study investigates the efficacy of operando diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) as a tool for characterizing intermediates created by NTP on catalyst surfaces. Leveraging insights from traditional DRIFTS in thermochemical catalysis, we explore the complexities of plasma-induced catalytic reactions, discussing both opportunities and limitations of DRIFTS to study these reaction mechanisms. By summarizing findings from literature and addressing existing knowledge gaps, this perspective highlights how different DRIFTS configurations can affect results, stressing the importance of establishing best practices for studying DBD-driven reactions with DRIFTS. The intended outcomes of this work are to provide guidance on how to effectively use DRIFTS, share fundamental insights into DBD-assisted catalysis, and emphasize the need for complementary techniques to develop catalysts suited for NTP environments.
Broader contextIn the quest for sustainable energy and chemicals, the conversion of low-energy molecules such as water, carbon dioxide, and methane into valuable chemicals and fuels represents a significant challenge. The anticipated increase in renewable electricity availability further emphasizes the importance of electrifying chemical and fuel synthesis processes to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Non-thermal plasma (NTP) coupled with heterogeneous catalysis holds promise in enabling otherwise thermodynamically unfavorable reactions by energizing electrons. However, understanding the intricate interaction between plasma and catalysts still represents a challenge for developing novel catalyst formulations that enhance product selectivity and efficiency. In this context, operando diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) serves as a crucial analytical tool in unraveling the complexities of plasma-induced catalytic reactions, providing insights into the intermediates created by NTP on catalyst surfaces and elucidating reaction mechanisms under NTP conditions. Addressing the knowledge gap between plasma physics and catalyst development is crucial for advancing NTP-driven pathways in sustainable energy and chemicals. Thus, we present recent significant efforts on NTP-modified DRIFTS cells, providing guidance on best practices for DRIFTS usage and advocating for the use of complementary techniques to deepen the understanding of reaction mechanisms for catalysis development. |
Many applications of NTP, including DBD plasmas, require catalysts to tailor selectivity toward specific target products, leading to a growing interest in plasma catalysis that leverages NTP-relevant catalyst features to enhance catalytic reactions.1,5 Therefore, plasma catalysis, which integrates NTP with catalytic processes, has emerged as a promising field, offering both opportunities and challenges that necessitate further investigation to refine tailored catalyst materials for optimal performance in NTP-driven reactions.6,7 Typically, plasma catalysis, as for thermo-catalysis, involves a heterogeneous catalytic process where a solid catalyst, such as a transition metal on a support (e.g., metal oxide), is used to facilitate the transformation of reactive gases on the catalyst surfaces. Adsorbed species may undergo surface reactions via Langmuir–Hinshelwood or Eley–Rideal mechanisms.8 One benefit of plasma catalysis is the ability for ionized, excited species (i.e. vibrationally and electronically excited species), radicals and dissociated species to interact with a catalyst at near-ambient temperatures, a condition where traditional thermal catalysis would typically not be effective.9
In situ and operando infrared (IR) spectroscopy is a very useful technique to study surface species to inform reaction mechanisms. Transmission IR is particularly useful because it not only enables identification of surface species relevant to reaction mechanisms but also allows quantification of such species. However, it can be challenging to utilize this technique for absorbing and/or scattering catalysts. While transmission IR is commonly used for a broad range of research,10–12 Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) has become one of the most widely adopted techniques in catalysis research based on the ease of use, simple sample preparation, and commercial availability of in situ reactors that enable heating and gas flow through a catalyst bed. The extensive use of thermal DRIFTS for the characterization of surface species to inform reaction mechanisms and catalyst development provides valuable insights into the utility of the technique for plasma catalysis.13–17 DRIFTS can play a pivotal role in elucidating existing knowledge gaps in plasma catalysis by: (a) identification and quantification of species on catalyst surfaces, (b) evaluation of the effect of gas-phase plasma species on the chemistry at the catalyst surface, (c) determination of NTP-induced reaction mechanisms at the catalyst surface, and (d) differentiation of thermal and plasma-driven catalysis.
This perspective explores the opportunities and limitations of DRIFTS in advancing plasma catalysis, focusing on its role in tracking surface chemistry during NTP-catalyzed reactions. Specifically, we focus on DBD configurations to generate NTP as these are the most highly studied systems. Given the diverse nature of modified DBD DRIFTS cells, we use the denomination operando to highlight that the reaction mechanisms were investigated under operating conditions. When it is unknown or unclear, the more general term in situ is used.18 We review results and observations reported by researchers using DRIFTS in the presence of NTP, highlighting its use to propose reaction mechanisms during plasma catalysis. Custom designed DRIFTS cells incorporating DBD can be classified into two main categories: those that embed the power electrode in the catalyst bed or those that orient the power electrode over the catalyst bed. In both cases, in situ configurations are possible since the IR signal is not intercepted or disturbed by the plasma itself, assuming the electrode does not obstruct the IR beam. Additionally, NTP does not have IR components in the range of interest of adsorbate species that would dominate the IR spectrum. These different configurations will be discussed in detail, emphasizing the impact of the electrode location relative to the catalyst. The utility of DRIFTS to address existing knowledge gaps in plasma catalysis, such as coupling solid catalysts with NTP, is discussed as is the need for complimentary techniques to obtain a comprehensive understanding of reaction mechanisms. The goal of this work is to explore comprehensively DRIFTS in the context of plasma catalysis, elucidating both advantages and limitations. This study aims to advance fundamental knowledge and facilitate practical implementation of plasma catalysis for diverse applications, providing valuable guidance for future research.
![]() | ||
Fig. 1 Processes responsible for producing the diffuse reflected infrared spectrum of adsorbates on a powder catalyst. Purple regions represent schematically the presence of local plasma discharge zones, while red arrows represent infrared beam lines. Modified from Armaroli et al.19 |
Due to the complexity of the DRIFT signal, the Lambert–Beer law applied in transmission mode is not directly applicable. For highly absorbing samples, the Kubelka–Munk (K–M) equation provides an alternative way to obtain a spectrum similar to a transmission spectrum, and in the case of weakly absorbing samples, the DRIFT spectrum is best represented as absorbance (log(1/R)) where R denotes the sample reflectance. Additionally, the same catalyst sample and conditions may not yield the same DRIFT spectra as reproducibility challenges arise due to variations in diffusion coefficients between preparations. Spectra normalization to iso-intensity of a characteristic structure band of a bonded species helps mitigate this issue. This normalization process effectively ensures that any observed differences in spectra are more likely to be attributed to variations in surface species or functional groups rather than experimental variability.19
To inform the catalytic mechanism, surface analysis through DRIFTS alone may be insufficient, necessitating the examination of gases leaving the DRIFTS cell using downstream gas analysis through IR spectroscopy, gas chromatography (GC), or mass spectrometry (MS). Combining DRIFTS with complementary techniques (as later discussed in Section 2.3) can provide additional benefits in deepening the understanding of the reaction mechanism in terms of surface distribution of intermediates as well as near surface radicals and activation energies. Therefore, surface analysis through DRIFTS only can be a major drawback for understanding plasma catalysis. As illustrated in Fig. 2, in certain configurations, the plasma zone may not coincide with the surface probed by the IR radiation. Depending on the configuration, and the distance of the plasma zone from the catalyst surface and bulk, the plasma–catalyst interactions will differ as will the species observed by each characterization technique. Recently, plasma-assisted catalytic CO2 hydrogenation has gained significant interest and thanks to the large IR cross-sections of adsorbed CO2 and CO, and their sensitivity to co-adsorbates and local environmental factors, DRIFTS has demonstrated utility in helping to understand reaction mechanisms and informing catalyst design.21–26 Therefore, we will discuss the benefits and limitations of DRIFTS for plasma catalysis using CO2 hydrogenation as a probe reaction along with CH4 oxidation, dry reforming of methane, and selective catalytic reduction of hydrocarbons.
DRIFTS cells specifically tailored for in situ plasma catalysis studies can play a pivotal role in advancing the understanding of reaction mechanisms occurring on catalyst surfaces. Grasping the plasma–surface interactions will allow tailoring catalysts to tune plasma-driven catalytic reactions. Nevertheless, existing literature indicates that researchers have only recently explored approaches to introduce plasma in DRIFTS cells. Challenges originating from compact geometry of a DRIFTS cell have prompted scientists to design custom systems to measure the IR signal while simultaneously generating a NTP, either close to the catalyst bed or within the catalyst bed. Because the location of the plasma zone plays a crucial role in how the plasma species interact with the catalyst, thus affecting reaction mechanisms, different system configurations can measure different phenomena, all of which can be applicable to different types of plasma catalysis. For instance, certain systems solely activate the gas phase with NTP, focusing on the interaction of dissociated species with the catalyst. In contrast, others examine how NTP activates the catalyst bed as well. Further, the small size of DRIFTS cells limits the measurement of the injected voltage due to the large size of the probe, so the only NTP parameter commonly reported is the applied voltage. Furthermore, some cells have the capability to be heated and therefore to perform thermocatalytic experiments in the absence of NTP or to combine NTP with thermal catalysis and evaluate the impact of NTP on the reaction mechanisms, as well as to pretreat the catalyst before the reaction. Adding a heating element also presents additional difficulties since plastic components, while they are not electrically conductive, can limit the ability to heat the system. Fig. 2 illustrates DBD DRIFTS cell configurations that will be reviewed in this perspective, while Table 1 summarizes the methodologies and reaction mechanism insights determined using these DBD DRIFTS configurations.
DRIFTS and plasma type | Reaction conditions | Catalyst | Methodology highlights | Gas phase analysis | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
– Operando DRIFTS-MS | – CH4 oxidation | Pd/A2O3 | • DRIFTS cell design with embedded catalyst in NTP, simulating tubular DBD. | • MS | 27 |
– Fixed bed DBD | – Temperature: ambient | • The system presents no signal interference between IR beam and plasma plume. | |||
– Generator: AC | – Diluent gas: Ar | ||||
– Voltage: 5–6 kV | |||||
– Frequency: 27 kHz | |||||
– Operando DRIFTS | – CO2 hydrogenation | Ru/MgAl layered double hydroxide (LDH) | • DRIFTS with embedded catalyst in NTP. | • MS | 28 |
– Fixed bed DBD | – Temperature: ambient | • DRIFTS used for studying catalysts validated in tubular DBD. | • OES (not on DRIFTS cell) | ||
– Generator: AC | – Diluent gas: Ar | • Plasma and products gas phase characterization | |||
– Voltage: 5.0 kV | |||||
– Frequency: 23.5 kHz | |||||
– Operando DRIFTS | – CO2 hydrogenation | Ru/SiO2* | • DRIFTS with embedded catalyst in NTP. | • MS | 29 |
– Fixed bed DBD | – Temperature: ambient | • DRIFTS used for studying catalysts validated in tubular DBD. | |||
– Generator: AC | – Diluent gas: Ar | ||||
– Voltage: 5.5 kV | |||||
– Frequency: 27 kHz | |||||
– In situ DRIFTS | – CO2 hydrogenation | Fe2O3/γ-Al2O3 | • DRIFTS with embedded catalyst in NTP. | • None | 30 |
– Fixed bed DBD | – Temperature: ambient | • DRIFTS used for studying catalysts validated in tubular DBD. | |||
– Generator: AC | – Diluent gas: No | ||||
– Voltage: 24 kV | |||||
– Frequency: 9.5 kHz | |||||
– In situ DRIFTS | – No reaction, only Ar | KBr | • Helical surface DBD could improve the synergy plasma–catalyst. | • None | 31 |
– Helical surface DBD | – Temperature: ambient | • Adjusting gas and water content in a packed bed enables exploration of different plasma regimes, not feasible at atmospheric pressure. | |||
– Generator: AC | – Diluent gas: air or | ||||
– Voltage: 0.9 kV | Ar | ||||
– Frequency: 27 kHz | |||||
– In situ DRIFTS | – CO2 hydrogenation | Co/CeZrO4 | • DBD above the catalyst bed activating mainly the gas phase. | • None | 32 |
– DBD over catalyst surface | – Temperature: ambient | • Possibility of thermally treating the catalyst. | |||
– Generator: AC | • Temperature monitoring with IR and UV-vis. | ||||
– Voltage: 8 kV | – Diluent gas: No | ||||
– Frequency: 1 kHz | |||||
– Operando DRIFTS | – Hydrocarbon selective catalytic reduction (HC-SCR) deNOx reaction | Ag/Al2O3 | • DBD above the catalyst bed activating mainly the gas phase. | • MS | 33 |
– DBD over catalyst surface | • Gas temperature determined from the rotational temperature of the nitrogen measured spectroscopically through OES. | • OES for temperature | |||
– Generator: AC | – Temperature: ambient | measurement | |||
– Voltage: 4–7.5 kV | – Diluent gas: He | ||||
– Frequency: 20 kHz | |||||
– Operando DRIFTS | – CH4 decomposition | Ni/Al2O3–SiO2 | • Point-source DBD activating mainly the gas phase. | • IR | 34 |
– DBD over catalyst surface | – Temperature: ambient and 500 °C | • RF plasma jet. | |||
– Generator: RF | – Diluent gas: Ar | ||||
– Voltage: n.a. | |||||
– Frequency: 14.3 MHz | |||||
– In situ DRIFTS | – CH4 dry reforming | Ni/Al2O3 | • Point-source DBD activating mainly the gas phase. | • None | 35 |
– Point source DBD | – Temperature: 200 °C | La–Ni/Al2O3 | • Ex situ CO2-TPD to investigate the generation of carbonates at temperatures above 200 °C. | ||
– Generator: AC | – Diluent gas: He | ||||
– Voltage: 5.5 kV | |||||
– Frequency: 0.05 kHz | |||||
– Ex situ DRIFTS | – CO2 hydrogenation | Co/Al2O3 | • Ex situ DRIFTS to support findings from tubular DBD reactor. | • None | 36 |
– Samples transferred into the DRIFTS chamber inside a glove box under Ar |
Meng et al.30 performed NTP assisted CO2 hydrogenation to methanol over Fe2O3/γ-Al2O3 catalyst in a packed bed DRIFTS cell configuration similar to that shown in Fig. 2a. In their investigation they observed a gradual increase in surface carbonates in the presence of NTP, suggesting that the presence of carbonate species is not solely due to the physical adsorption of CO2. This effect was attributed to plasma excitation, specifically CO2 vibrational excitation on the catalyst surface. Bicarbonate transformation into formate and the presence of surface bonded CH3O (denoted from here onward with *) indicated the role of formate as a crucial intermediate in methanol synthesis. The absence of CO, except at high voltage, led to a proposed mechanism involving CO2 capture by chemisorbed oxygen species, forming CO3* and facilitating CO2 hydrogenation via the formate pathway. Subsequent events, including CH3OH desorption, oxygen vacancy emergence, and reverse water gas shift (RWGS) reactions, contributed to the measured CH3OH. This study focused on using DRIFTS in a tubular DBD reactor to study the effect of the catalyst, although without characterization of gas phase plasma-activated species or downstream monitoring of products.
In general, the packed bed DBD DRIFTS configuration (Fig. 2a) enables direct interaction of the plasma with the catalyst bed. However, even though there is no signal interference between IR beam and plasma plume, the IR signal may not capture specific transformations occurring at different vertical axis positions, as the beam only reaches the top surface of the catalyst. The advantage of this configuration is that it closely resembles a packed bed tubular DBD reactor, offering enhanced relevance in terms of yield, conversion, and selectivity measurements. In an alternative approach, Turan et al.31 developed a compact helical surface DBD DRIFTS system, where the helix acts as ground electrode, separated from the inner power electrode by a Kapton dielectric coating, thereby augmenting the plasma contact area with a packed bed (Fig. 2b). The experimental configuration, inclusive of optical and electrical measurements in both unpacked and packed bed systems, demonstrated the adaptable nature of the reactor, operating in either filamentary (discrete plasma) or glow-like (continuous) modes depending on the gas composition. The unintentional introduction of air into the DRIFTS chamber induced a transition from a filamentary to a glow discharge elucidating the consequential impact of water desorption from potassium bromide (KBr) on the plasma characteristics. This result underscores the importance of appropriate pre-treatment or drying of KBr.
In contrast, the configuration employing a tubular DBD reactor that generates plasma above the catalyst bed (Fig. 2c) activates gas phase molecules before they reach the catalyst, confining its engagement with the top layer of the catalyst surface. This modified DRIFTS cell was employed by Parastaev et al.32 for CO2 hydrogenation over a Co/CeZrO4 catalyst, demonstrating that cobalt (Co) nanoparticles on a CeZrO4 support allow efficient CO2 hydrogenation in NTP at ambient conditions. According to their observations, the process involved CO as an intermediate on metallic Co particles, with observed Ce3+ formation indicating ceria oxygen vacancies generated by a hydrogen plasma. Notably, hydroxyl generation on the catalyst surface was also observed, and in situ temperature monitoring attributed these effects to NTP rather than heating of the catalyst. The mechanism, determined solely based on DRIFTS measurements, proposes that CO2 activation occurs in the gas phase, leading to CO production that adsorbs on the Co surface where dissociation and hydrogenation proceeded.
A similar system was evaluated by Stere et al.,33 performing hydrocarbon selective catalytic reduction (HC-SCR) deNOx reaction over Ag/Al2O3. The study investigated the conversion of simulated diesel fuels, toluene, and n-octane, at low temperatures under NTP conditions. The authors observed the production of isocyanate from n-octane, aligning with the established thermal activation process at elevated temperatures. The results support the enhanced performance of the Ag catalyst in n-octane-SCR at low temperatures, with a proposed mechanism similar to thermal activation involving isocyanate as the active intermediate. They also confirmed that the catalyst activity was not influenced by thermal activation caused by gas heating under NTP conditions. The local maximum temperature, measured through rotational gas temperature of nitrogen molecules, was found to be a stable ∼110 °C at the maximum applied voltage of 7.5 kV. The authors also implemented a downstream MS to track the hydrocarbon generation, but the gas phase chemistry in the plasma was not investigated. In a similar DBD DRIFTS cell, Zhang et al.34 performed CH4 decomposition in Ar and Ar/O2 mixture over a Ni-supported Al2O3/SiO2 catalyst. The authors observed surface-bound C–O only in the presence of plasma, and the C–O IR signal intensity scales with temperature. However, when the catalyst was exposed to plasma-generated particle fluxes under highly oxidizing conditions, the formation of surface C–O was suppressed. The production of CO and CO2via plasma-catalytic reactions, measured through a downstream IR, follows the trend of surface C–O bond formation, which becomes significant when transitioning from low to high oxygen plasma conditions at catalyst temperatures of 500 °C. Additionally, the surface-bound CHn (n = 1, 2, 3) species on the catalyst were analyzed using DRIFTS, revealing a correlation between the destruction of CHn species and the formation of C–O bonds. This indicates a potential conversion process from CHn to CO in presence of NTP, suggesting a plasma-mediated catalyst regeneration mechanism through interactions between the plasma and catalyst surface.
Sheng et al.35 performed CH4 dry reforming in a point-source DBD reactor cell, wherein the high-voltage needle electrode was positioned above the catalyst powder and the ground electrode at the periphery of the ceramic catalyst holder to generate NTP between the needle and powder (Fig. 2d). This configuration activates molecules in the gas-phase and the NTP interacts mainly with the surface of the catalyst. In their study the CH4 conversion over Ni/Al2O3 and La–Ni/Al2O3 catalysts revealed notable differences in their CO2 adsorption behaviors. Ni/Al2O3 exhibited weak absorbance intensity for carbonate species, indicating limited active sites for CO2 activation at the Ni-nanocrystals/Al2O3 interface. In contrast, La–Ni/Al2O3 showed stronger and diverse carbonate peaks, suggesting a more active role of the La–Ni/Al2O3 system in CO2 activation. The proposed Langmuir–Hinshelwood mechanism suggests CH4 dissociatively chemisorbs on Ni as CH3* and H*, while CO2 binds to La in La–Ni/Al2O3, contributing to CO32− formation. During the reforming stages, CO2 activated in the plasma zone leads to an increase in surface carbonate species. These carbonate species in turn oxidize CHx* to form CHxO*, leading to syngas (CO and H2) release into the gas phase. The study suggests that increased carbonate generation by plasma-activated CO2 can boost surface reactions, promoting the conversion of CH4. Additionally, an Eley–Rideal mechanism involving vibrationally excited CO2 reacting with adsorbed CHx* is proposed, which could play a role in the formation of syngas.
The previously discussed examples highlight that downstream and gas phase products monitoring could strengthen the proposed reaction mechanisms, especially considering that the NTP predominantly activates gas phase species in this configuration rather than interacting with the catalyst surface. Interestingly the authors observed a correlation between the CH4 conversion and the amount of carbonate generated which was measured through DRIFTS at 200 °C and through ex situ CO2-TPD at 300–600 °C. A completely different approach was used by Wang et al.36 in a recent study on CO2 hydrogenation over Co/Al2O3 where ex situ DRIFTS was used to confirm reaction mechanisms proposed after investigating the thermal and NTP reaction in a tubular DBD system. After the reaction, the catalyst was loaded in the DRIFTS cell under Ar and the presence of surface species was evaluated.
The authors were able to observe the presence of long-lived surface species such as bidentate formate, bicarbonate, and monodentate carbonate, but no CO or CHx peaks were observed due to their short lifetimes. This approach highlights that it is possible to obtain useful information through an ex situ approach, although in situ DRIFTS is still needed to provide comprehensive insight into the reaction mechanism as a function of reaction parameters and time.
The final configuration reported in Fig. 2e and Fig. 2e′ shows two cross sectional representations of the operando DRIFTS system developed by the authors of this work. The NTP is generated above the surface of the catalyst, interacting with the gas phase and with the catalyst surface, and an additional downstream IR is connected to the cell output to measure the reaction products composition. The system has been designed with a tungsten filament encapsulated in a quartz sheath as the power electrode (Fig. 2e′), while the catalyst holder functions as ground electrode. In this configuration, the IR radiation interacts with the catalyst surface that is directly exposed to the NTP discharge, but at the same time the plasma does not interact with the whole catalyst bed. Therefore, as for the system in Fig. 2d, yield and conversion measurements might not be fully accurate due to the partial use of the catalyst, compared to a tubular DBD concept. The system is designed to generate plasma through an AC generator delivering a voltage up to 10 kV and a frequency in the range 1–10 kHz (see ESI† for additional details). Importantly, in this configuration, changing the position of the electrode has a large impact on the main discharge direction and intensity towards the catalyst surface, since the dome is electrically grounded too. Therefore, is important to visually inspect the correct location to direct the discharge towards the catalyst surface. In addition, our configuration allows heating of the catalyst holder up to 500 °C through an external electric resistance. The actual temperature of the catalyst bed was determined by calibrating the inner temperature using a second thermocouple and measuring the temperature with different gases, flow rates, and catalysts. It is also important to mention that this feature allows direct comparison of NTP and thermal conversion, in addition to performing NTP-assisted thermo-catalysis. Certain reactions, such as the dehydration of bicarbonates and formate during CO2 hydrogenation require higher temperatures, as suggested by Parastaev et al.32 Therefore, in order to properly design catalysts also for NTP, heating capability is a significant feature. Compared to other configurations previously described, this one requires the use of catalyst in pellet form instead of powder, to avoid particle entrainment due to static charge caused by the electric field between the power electrode and the dome that is in electrical contact with the ground. In general, the needle-plate DBD configurations, illustrated in Fig. 2d–e′, have a localized plasma zone on the catalyst surface that is centered around the needle electrode. Therefore, particular attention should be given in aligning the IR beam with the plasma activated surface.
In temperature-programmed desorption (TPD), after adsorption of a molecule of interest, a catalyst is heated, and the desorbed surface species are analyzed via MS, for example. From TPD, the activation energy of desorption can be extracted, offering insights into catalytic reaction kinetics and mechanisms.37–40 To assess the benefit of energy inputs other than temperature on activation energies, researchers have derived Arrhenius relationships for photo-assisted catalysis,41 and recently plasma catalysis.10,42 Characterizing the gas-phase composition often requires the use of multiple techniques to study both neutral and activated species (such as dissociated molecules or ionized species). Downstream IR, MS, and GC coupled with a detector are commonly used in-line to measure neutral and stable products such as CO, CH4, CO2, H2O, light hydrocarbons and other oxygenates.27,29,33 Conversion and product yields can be deduced from these measurements. To identify excited species in the plasma, the emission from radiative decay mechanisms is often unique enough to identify the associated species and can be measured using OES. OES provides crucial information on ionized intermediates and how the presence of a catalyst alters the gas-phase chemistry in NTP.43 Further, from OES, other plasma-relevant parameters can be extracted. For example, the electron temperature of Ar plasmas can be approximated44 and under certain conditions the gas temperature can be extracted from the rotational vibration of a diatomic molecule.45 Reaction mechanisms derived from DRIFTS often include assumptions regarding surface intermediates. Steady-state isotopic transient kinetic analysis (SSITKA) is a technique used to identify surface intermediates, their density on the catalyst surface, and their kinetic parameters. The technique involves achieving a steady-state catalytic reaction using an unlabeled reactant mixture followed by switching abruptly to an isotope-labeled mixture, without disrupting the steady state of the reaction. This transition does not alter the overall product formation rate or the surface chemical composition, but allows for the determination of surface residence time, and concentration and coverage of dominant surface intermediates.46,47
In contrast, molecular beam mass spectrometry (MBMS) has been found to be beneficial for observing the generation of species in the gas phase and near the catalyst surface, measuring radicals, ions, and stable molecules, and also their evolution over time, which is critical for understanding kinetics and reaction pathways.48–51 For example, Gurses et al.50 combined operando DRIFTS studies and near-surface MBMS (ns-MBMS) to investigate the formation of C2 oxygenates during methanol oxidation catalysis on MgO-supported Pd at atmospheric pressure. The observation of the oxygenates contributed to an enhanced understanding of the fate of surface CH2O, elucidating the desorption process, spillover, and reaction with surface oxygenates, thus deepening insights into C2 product generation. Their study also indicates that although there are methoxy and formate species on the surface, it is the presence of the dioxymethylene group in near-surface methoxymethanol that suggests the transient presence of formaldehyde, undetectable by DRIFTS only. Therefore, the MBMS complemented the reaction mechanism, highlighting the importance of formaldehyde as a building block for desorbing C2 oxygenates. Burger et al.,51 used MBMS coupled with a DBD reactor to study low temperature methane oxidation on CuO. Mechanistic insights were obtained by quantifying the fuel oxidation, stable intermediate species, and CO2 production, generating a reaction mechanism, while also observing the positive impact of plasma in reducing the oxidation temperature by 200 °C. On the other hand, MBMS can be used to detect reactive radicals as investigated by Zhang et al.48 in their work on plasma-assisted oxidation and pyrolysis of methane. They were able to link the observed radicals (CH2, CH3, O) and stable molecules (CH4, CO, O2, Ar) with the generation of C2–C5 hydrocarbons, confirming the possibility of measuring NTP excited species through MBMS. Another technique used to study radicals is photo-fragmentation laser-induced fluorescence (PF-LIF). It has been implemented to characterize local 2D distributions of CH3*52 or OH* and H2O2*,53 providing important additional information on how species evolve close to the catalyst surface.
Sample preparation is another important step to consider as it impacts the reliability of the data. In our system (Fig. 2e and e′), a pelletized catalyst is necessary to avoid static charging and attraction of particulates towards the metal dome, but the other systems (Fig. 2a–d) can be used with a powder catalyst. However, even when catalyst powder is used, there may be inconsistencies between experiments, leading to differences in peak intensities. These inconsistencies could be due, for example, to subtle changes in catalyst bed surface topology caused by particles entrained by the gas flow, thereby impacting the interaction of the IR beam with the catalyst. Hence, even though DRIFTS provides essential data for catalyst design, it requires complementary methods to deeply understand reaction mechanisms.4 Each DRIFTS system has advantages and disadvantages, and it is important to critically assess the results even when performing the same reaction with the same conditions and catalysts, because the impact of plasma discharge interactions can dramatically change the catalytic performance and characterization of relevant species. On one hand, if catalyst development is the focus, the configuration shown in Fig. 2a might represent the best option to simulate a catalyst fully immersed in a plasma zone, as it is often the case in larger scale tubular DBD reactors. This DRIFTS configuration also allows measurement of yields for a given hourly space velocity. In this configuration, however, the IR beam detects only the surface species at the top of the catalyst bed and doesn’t provide information about surface intermediates deeper into the catalyst bed. A maximized interaction between the plasma and the top surface of the catalyst material could be obtained by extending the length of the electrode slightly above the catalyst surface. The other configurations with plasma discharge partially or completely separated from the catalysts allow measurement of the catalyst interaction with species dissociated or vibrationally excited in the gas phase. In this case NTP interaction is limited only to a portion of the catalyst, and an overall lower energy transfer to adsorbates in the catalyst bulk is expected. For this reason, depending on the species of interest, one configuration might be more appropriate than the other, considering that NTP embedded with the catalyst bed could allow for analysis of short life excited species. On the other hand, plasma generated outside the catalyst bed can enable investigation of how dissociated species in the gas phase interact with the catalyst.
DRIFTS is usually used as a supporting technique to perform mechanistic studies coupled with catalytic performance studies in a larger scale reactor (e.g. tubular DBD reactor). However, the plasma discharge and synergy with the catalyst is strongly dependent on the geometry and reactor configuration. Therefore, it would be also beneficial to report different performances between DRIFTS cells and a larger scale reactor. Furthermore, to ascribe a mechanism obtained from DRIFTS to a reaction occurring in a reactor separate from the DRIFTS chamber, it is important to match the same discharge conditions in terms of power and frequency in both plasma discharges. Because different circuit impedances may arise due to different reactor geometries, we recommend measuring injected power in both configurations if possible. Additionally, it is strongly recommended to clearly report details of DRIFTS procedures used.
In order to clarify the impact of reporting experimental details, we performed plasma CO2 hydrogenation over a traditional Fischer–Tropsch catalyst, Co/Al2O3,54–56 in our operando DBD DRIFTS (Fig. 2e and e′) system. Details of the experimental procedure are reported in the ESI.† The DRIFT spectra obtained at 20 °C and 350 °C are shown in Fig. 4a–d, respectively. The data was processed in terms of absorbance (log(1/R)) and compared with the K–M transform, where the peak intensity was normalized to the gas-phase CO2 signal. Since K–M is most representative of highly absorbing catalysts, the correct choice of data processing methodology could depend on the catalyst Co loading and considering the two methods could be beneficial. In general, both K–M and absorbance spectra show peaks in same positions for each temperature, but differences in Fig. 4a–d can be noted. At low temperature, the broad and intense band around 3500 cm−1 corresponding to water, is clearly visible in both cases, but with stronger intensity in the absorbance spectrum. Regarding the peaks in the lower energy region, bicarbonate (HCO3−) was identified by characteristic bands at 1230, 1442 and 1646 cm−1, representing respectively the νas(C–O) asymmetric stretching frequency, the δ(O–C–O) bending mode and the νs(CO) symmetric stretching frequency.24,57,58 The bands at 1378 and 1392 cm−1 can be associated with the presence of formate (HCOO*) and the νs(C–O) symmetric stretching frequency and the δ(C–H) bending mode, respectively. When processing the measurements with K–M function (in Fig. 4b), the relative intensity to CO2 of each peak is lower. These species are mainly absorbed over the alumina surface and the K–M function transforms the IR signal into a low-intensity peak. This effect is even more noticeable at higher temperatures. The spectrum collected during reaction at 350 °C (Fig. 4c) shows lower intensity bands for bicarbonates due to desorption and the dehydration reaction yielding formate. Indeed, the absorbance spectrum shows stronger signal of HCOO*, where, in addition to the peaks at 1378 and 1392 cm−1, two additional peaks are strongly visible at 1592 and 2900 cm−1 representing the νas(C–O) asymmetric stretching frequency and the νas(C–H) asymmetric stretching frequency, respectively.22–24,26,59 In addition, the band at ∼2000 cm−1 can be associated with CO adsorbed on metallic Co sites,13,60 while the peak at 3014 cm−1 represents gas phase CH4 as it desorbs from the catalyst surface.10,61 In this case, when applying the K–M transformation (Fig. 4d), information could be lost due to the lower intensities of the CH4 and CO peaks. Indeed, these species are weakly bonded to the catalyst metal sites in comparison to HCO3− and HCOO* on the alumina, resulting in a limited capacity of K–M to highlight the presence of important intermediates formed over the catalyst surface. Therefore, it is very important to specify which method was used when presenting and reporting data to the scientific community.
When performing DRIFTS experiments it is also critical to clearly specify how the background was measured. Temperature and plasma can strongly affect the background. Fig. S1 (ESI†) shows the change in the background after 3 hours under Ar plasma (4000 V and 10 kHz), while Fig. S2 (ESI†) reports the change in the background measured under same plasma conditions but varying the temperature between 20 °C and 350 °C. In general, background variations may be affected by different factors. Temperature conditions can lead to variations in the concentration and distribution of surface species, which can influence the background signal observed in DRIFTS spectra, for example water in Fig. 4a and c, respectively. Physical changes due to thermal expansion of catalyst material could impact the optical properties of the sample. Additionally, when striking a plasma at ambient temperature, the background change can be related to similar phenomena, especially to increased temperatures (≤180 °C) from electron excitation and impact with catalyst surface, as suggested by Parastaev et al.32 A possible solution is to first record a background for each thermal and plasma condition, and then perform the measurements using the associated background. Additionally, for NTP-assisted thermocatalysis studies where the temperature is increased incrementally, another approach is to collect a background spectrum at the end of each temperature increase in order to evaluate the differences in adsorbate formation between two temperatures. Overall, it is essential to report the timespan between the background collection and the actual measurement, the gas flow rate used for the background collection and experiment, and to report if new backgrounds were collected before every measurement. Regardless of the DRIFTS cell design and procedure, to fully understand and validate the reaction mechanisms, additional analytical techniques are needed to complement observations of surface adsorbates. These are crucial to gather information on the plasma gas phase characteristics as well as reaction occurring in the gas phase and near the catalyst surface.
Currently, there is still lack of standardization related to custom-made DRIFTS cells, and cross studies and collaborations between experts could provide important advancements in the field. Round Robin experiments, where multiple laboratories independently perform experiments using standardized protocols and share results, could play a pivotal role in addressing this lack of standardization. Furthermore, important information related to catalyst and reactor design could be addressed by understanding the fundamental differences when the same reactions are performed with different plasma discharge modes. Additionally, operando systems and complementary analytical techniques, including TPD, downstream IR or MS, OES, SSITKA, MBMS and PF-LIF play a crucial role in obtaining a comprehensive understanding of reaction pathways, providing insights into gas-phase reactions, activation energies, and intermediate species on the catalyst surface. Overall, the integration of DRIFTS with complementary techniques and the systematic exploration of experimental parameters contribute to a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of catalytic processes, paving the way for designing novel materials and therefore advancing in sustainable and efficient chemical transformations via NTP.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ey00088a |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024 |