Issue 9, 2023

You get what you screen for: a benchmark analysis of leaf branch compost cutinase variants for polyethylene terephthalate (PET) degradation

Abstract

Enzymatic recycling of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is an innovative and environmentally friendly way to promote a circular plastics economy and reduce the use of petroleum-based plastic monomers. Despite, or rather because of the large number of natural and engineered enzymes discovered in recent years, there are substantial difficulties in comparing PET degradation rates between studies. The present study therefore gathered knowledge about potential pitfalls and the question of how benchmarking for enzymatic PET degradation should be performed. Since there is no progress to establish a well-defined standard substrate as well as uniform reaction conditions for comparative studies of PET hydrolases, we propose to carry a well-characterized enzyme as a reference in all studies. In this way, variants of the leaf branch compost cutinase (LCC) were benchmarked in miniaturized stirred tank reactors. Different mutants with amino acid exchanges inspired by natural or engineered PET hydrolases were compared. The best enzyme resulted from a combination of mutations contained in the ICCG variant of the LCC and the so-called DuraPETase. The product release rate of the resulting variant ICCGDAQI was 27% higher than the reference enzyme ICCG. Although the relative performance of the different enzymes seemed to be independent of the PET material used (bottles, textile fibres), the absolute degradation rates were strongly influenced by the substrate properties. In particular, compared to bottle PET, post-industrial textile fibres were efficiently degraded releasing 40 mg terephthalic acid per hour and mgenzyme, resulting in complete degradation within less than 24 hours.

Graphical abstract: You get what you screen for: a benchmark analysis of leaf branch compost cutinase variants for polyethylene terephthalate (PET) degradation

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
27 Qun 2023
Accepted
14 Cax 2023
First published
15 Cax 2023

React. Chem. Eng., 2023,8, 2156-2169

You get what you screen for: a benchmark analysis of leaf branch compost cutinase variants for polyethylene terephthalate (PET) degradation

S. Fritzsche, F. Tischer, W. Peukert and K. Castiglione, React. Chem. Eng., 2023, 8, 2156 DOI: 10.1039/D3RE00056G

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements