Issue 40, 2010

A comparative study of F-DPPC/DPPC mixed monolayers. Influence of subphase temperature on F-DPPC and DPPC monolayers

Abstract

The surface behavior of two zwitterionic phospholipids: 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC) and 1-palmitoyl-2-[16-fluoropalmitoyl-phosphatidylcholine] (F-DPPC), has been investigated at the air–water interface at the temperature range from 10 to 30 °C. Surface pressure-area isotherms, BAM images and thickness-time curves were obtained for monolayers made from these pure phospholipids and from their mixtures.

The comparative study of the behavior of both phospholipid monolayers with temperature showed some differences as the disappearance of the liquid expanded (LE)-liquid condensed (LC) phase transition at low temperatures for the DPPC but not for F-DPPC, because the F-DPPC monolayer is more expanded and more resistant to changes of temperature. On the other hand, film elasticity (Cs−1) values calculated for both phospholipids show that the film condensation diminishes when the temperature increases, in accordance with the results obtained from surface pressure measurements.

BAM images for F-DPPC monolayers recorded at different surface pressures and temperatures show the existence of numerous ovoid-like domains when the LE-LC phase transition is reached. However, in the LE and LC phases, homogeneous images were obtained. Time evolution of relative thickness along the compression of F-DPPC and DPPC monolayers shows similar behavior of both phospholipids, except at low temperatures.

For DPPC/F-DPPC mixed systems, the plots of the mean molecular area as a function of F-DPPC mole fraction (XF-DPPC) indicated that, whatever the surface pressure, the experimental results match the theoretical values calculated from the additivity rule, a typical behavior for ideal mixed monolayers made of miscible components. This conclusion is confirmed from the values calculated for the free energy of excess (ΔGexc) of this system, which are practically zero, whatever the composition of the mixtures and the surface pressure at which ΔGexc values were calculated.

Graphical abstract: A comparative study of F-DPPC/DPPC mixed monolayers. Influence of subphase temperature on F-DPPC and DPPC monolayers

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
10 May 2010
Accepted
19 Jul 2010
First published
16 Sep 2010

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010,12, 13323-13332

A comparative study of F-DPPC/DPPC mixed monolayers. Influence of subphase temperature on F-DPPC and DPPC monolayers

P. Toimil, G. Prieto, J. Miñones Jr and F. Sarmiento, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 13323 DOI: 10.1039/C0CP00506A

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements