Issue 6, 1994

Square-wave anodic stripping voltammetry in stationary and flowing solution: a comparative study

Abstract

A comparison has been made between square-wave anodic stripping voltammetry (SWASV) at a stationary, mercury thin-film electrode and at a wall-jet mercury thin-film electrode in flowing solution using cadmium(II) and lead(II) as test species. Mercury thin films were prepared on glassy carbon electrode substrates. The effects of square wave amplitude and frequency on the peak current and peak potential in the determination step were studied, and these parameters optimized. Deposition time was varied, and the effect of flow rate in flowing solution investigated. Practical detection limits were found to be 10–8 mol l–1 at stationary electrodes and 2 × 10–9 mol l–1 at wall-jet electrodes. It was found that SWASV gives good results in the presence and absence of dissolved oxygen for both analysis modes, which augurs well for its future application in flow systems, and particularly at wall-jet electrodes.

Article information

Article type
Paper

Analyst, 1994,119, 1229-1233

Square-wave anodic stripping voltammetry in stationary and flowing solution: a comparative study

C. M. A. Brett, J. L. F. C. Lima and M. B. Q. Garcia, Analyst, 1994, 119, 1229 DOI: 10.1039/AN9941901229

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements