Issue 8, 1989

The second emission of the uranyl ion in aqueous solution

Abstract

The second lower-energy emission (LEE), weaker than the normal higher-energy luminescence (HEE) of UO2+2(aq) and previously assigned to the *(OUOHOUO)4+(aq) exciplex in the exciplex-formation model (EXFM) and also recently attributed to the π3uδu(X*) emission in the π3uΦu(U*)⇌π3uδu(X*) reversible-crossing model (RCM), has been investigated. Results from detailed emission studies as well as spectral data from other authors, show that, contrary to what is advanced in the RCM, the LEE at pH ≈ 3 (attributed to the X* state in the RCM) is not identical to the LEE at pH ⩽ 2. It is unambiguously shown that the LEE at pH = 3, assigned to the π3uδu(X*) state in the RCM, is actually the emission of the well defined dinuclear species (UO2)2(OH2+2(aq). The exciplex-formation model is further corroborated by the influence of perchlorate and methanol on the emission of UO2+2(aq).

Article information

Article type
Paper

J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1, 1989,85, 2481-2498

The second emission of the uranyl ion in aqueous solution

M. D. Marcantonatos and M. M. Pawlowska, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1, 1989, 85, 2481 DOI: 10.1039/F19898502481

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements