Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 11, 2018
Previous Article Next Article

Dissimilar behavior of YAG:Ce and LuAG:Ce scintillator garnets regarding Li+ co-doping

Author affiliations

Abstract

Using a combination of experimental methods, the substitution tendencies of Li+ and involved charge compensation mechanisms are determined and compared in two important similar scintillators, LuAG:Ce and YAG:Ce. The studies were performed on polycrystalline samples prepared by solid phase reactions as well as in single crystals grown by the vertical Bridgman method. The results show that Li+ in LuAG:Ce, Li is localized mainly at Lu3+ sites with charge compensation brought about by Ce3+ → Ce4+ conversion and creation of anion vacancies. Surprisingly, unlike LuAG:Ce, Li, no evidence for Li+ substitution at Y3+ sites and conversion of Ce3+ to Ce4+ has been obtained in YAG:Ce, Li. It suggests that Li+ goes mainly to interstitial positions and does not interact with Ce3+. From an application point of view, Li+ co-doping of YAG:Ce is not efficient to improve the scintillationdecay parameters, however, it is efficient to reduce the amount of anion vacancies in both YAG and YAG:Ce.

Graphical abstract: Dissimilar behavior of YAG:Ce and LuAG:Ce scintillator garnets regarding Li+ co-doping

Back to tab navigation

Publication details

The article was received on 20 Dec 2017, accepted on 06 Feb 2018 and first published on 13 Feb 2018


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C7CE02194A
Citation: CrystEngComm, 2018,20, 1520-1526
  •   Request permissions

    Dissimilar behavior of YAG:Ce and LuAG:Ce scintillator garnets regarding Li+ co-doping

    M. V. Derdzyan, K. L. Hovhannesyan, A. V. Yeganyan, R. V. Sargsyan, A. Novikov, A. G. Petrosyan and C. Dujardin, CrystEngComm, 2018, 20, 1520
    DOI: 10.1039/C7CE02194A

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements