Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 19, 2017
Previous Article Next Article

Competing phenol–imidazole and phenol–phenol interactions in the flexible supramolecular environment of N,N′-bis(3-imidazol-1-ylpropyl)naphthalenediimide causing domain expansion

Author affiliations

Abstract

The relevance of a fundamentally important imidazole⋯phenol interaction in the self-assembly of cocrystals and a salt of a bis-imidazole hinged through a flexible tether to a naphthalenediimide, namely N,N′-bis(3-imidazol-1-ylpropyl)naphthalenediimide (L), with a series of phenolic compounds is studied. Cocrystals of L with phenolic compounds, 1,2-dihydroxybenzene (cat), 1,3-dihydroxybenzene (res), and 1,3,5-trihydroxybenzene (phi), namely L·cat, L·(res)2, L·phi·H2O, and a salt with 2,4-dinitrophenol (dnp), L2+·(dnp)2, are structurally characterized. Hierarchical effects of oxime-imidazole synthons in the cocrystal of L with 2,3-dihydroxyphenylaldoxime, L·(dhpa)2, are also investigated. The cocrystals of L with cat and phi are formed in a 1 : 1 molar ratio, but the latter is a hydrated cocrystal. Compound L adopts a C-like shape in cocrystals L·cat and L·phi·H2O, whereas L adopts an S-like shape in the L·(res)2 cocrystal. It adopts an I-like shape in the salt L2+·(dnp)2 or in the cocrystal L·(dhpa)2. Analyses of cocrystals of L with these phenolic compounds show a significant presence of charge-transfer interactions between naphthalenediimide only with phi. Phenol⋯imidazole interactions together with C–H⋯N(imidazole) and N⋯π interactions cause domain expansion in L·cat by forming dimeric sub-assemblies providing C-like geometry to L. In this example, one of the flexible arms bearing imidazole is crystallographically disordered, and a low temperature 1H-NMR study reveals conformational changes. In contrast, in the case of L·phi·H2O, domain expansion that takes place due to the interplay of charge-transfer, imidazole⋯phenol and phenol⋯water interactions provides a C-like shape to L. In these cases, phenol⋯phenol interactions have less relevance. In the case of the 1 : 2 salt L2+·(dnp)2, imidazolium⋯phenolate interactions dominate and provide a stretched geometry to L, whereas competition to form homodimers between oximes and oxime⋯imidazole interactions predominates in the cocrystal L·(dhpa)2. This cocrystal has a stretched structure of L. In the lattice of this cocrystal, phenol⋯phenol interactions are not relevant. Cocrystal L·res is identified as one exception among the series where competition between phenol⋯phenol with phenol⋯imidazole interactions results in domain expansion facilitating an interpenetrated structure.

Graphical abstract: Competing phenol–imidazole and phenol–phenol interactions in the flexible supramolecular environment of N,N′-bis(3-imidazol-1-ylpropyl)naphthalenediimide causing domain expansion

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Publication details

The article was received on 29 Jun 2017, accepted on 20 Aug 2017 and first published on 21 Aug 2017


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ02322G
Citation: New J. Chem., 2017,41, 10750-10760
  •   Request permissions

    Competing phenol–imidazole and phenol–phenol interactions in the flexible supramolecular environment of N,N′-bis(3-imidazol-1-ylpropyl)naphthalenediimide causing domain expansion

    A. Tarai and J. B. Baruah, New J. Chem., 2017, 41, 10750
    DOI: 10.1039/C7NJ02322G

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements