Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Volume 198, 2017
Previous Article Next Article

Temperature dependence of photocatalytic CO2 reduction by trans(Cl)–Ru(bpy)(CO)2Cl2: activation energy difference between CO and formate production

Author affiliations

Abstract

The temperature dependence of photocatalytic CO2 reduction by trans(Cl)–Ru(bpy)(CO)2Cl2 (bpy: 2,2′-bipyridine) has been researched in ethanol (EtOH)/N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA) solutions containing [Ru(bpy)3]2+ (a photosensitizer) and 1-benzyl-1,4-dihydronicotinamide (BNAH, an electron donor). The catalytic system efficiently reduces CO2 to carbon monoxide (CO) with formate (HCOO) as a minor product. The mechanism of the catalysis consists of the electron-relay cycle and the catalytic cycle: in the former cycle the photochemically generated reduced species of the photosensitizer injects an electron to the catalyst, and in the latter the catalyst reduces CO2. At a low concentration of the catalyst (5.0 μM), where the catalytic cycle is rate-determining, the temperature dependence of CO/HCOO is also dependent on the EtOH contents: the selectivity of CO/HCOO decreases in 20% and 40%-EtOH/DMA with increasing temperature, while it increases in 60%-EtOH/DMA. The temperature dependence of the CO/HCOO selectivity indicates that the difference in activation energy (ΔΔG) between CO and HCOO production is estimated as ca. 3.06 kJ mol−1 in 40%-EtOH/DMA at 298 K.

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Publication details

The article was received on 26 Nov 2016, accepted on 12 Dec 2016 and first published on 15 Mar 2017


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C6FD00242K
Citation: Faraday Discuss., 2017,198, 263-277
  •   Request permissions

    Temperature dependence of photocatalytic CO2 reduction by trans(Cl)–Ru(bpy)(CO)2Cl2: activation energy difference between CO and formate production

    H. Ishida and A. Sakaba, Faraday Discuss., 2017, 198, 263
    DOI: 10.1039/C6FD00242K

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements