Jump to main content
Jump to site search
PLANNED MAINTENANCE Close the message box

Scheduled maintenance upgrade on Thursday 4th of May 2017 from 8.00am to 9.00am (BST).

During this time our websites will be offline temporarily. If you have any questions please use the feedback button on this page. We apologise for any inconvenience this might cause and thank you for your patience.


Issue 6, 2017
Previous Article Next Article

Hypervalency, secondary bonding and hydrogen bonding: siblings under the skin

Author affiliations

Abstract

In hypervalent bonding (HVB), secondary bonding (SB) and hydrogen bonding (HB) a nucleophilic and an electrophilic partner form a new bond that is based on a similar bonding pattern across the whole series of interactions. The electrostatic contribution is reflected in the ‘σ hole’ model in which a positive patch on E attracts the nucleophilic component. The nucleophile, Y, possesses a corresponding negative patch, resulting in a linear structure Y⋯E–X having one strong E–X bond and one weaker, longer Y⋯E interaction; this is considered as a SB interaction between Y and E. The covalent component, more important in the stronger interactions, HVB and strong HB, involves charge transfer between the lone pair (n) of Y, and the σ* orbital of E–X as emphasized in the ‘n→σ*’ bonding model. For example, charge transfer from I to I2 gives rise to the linear, symmetrical [I–I–I] anion. We now have two short (2.95 Å) bonds of equal strength corresponding to true HVB. In HB the central element, E, is H, and we can have strong or weak hydrogen bonding. On the HVB/HB analogy, a strong symmetrical HB, as in [F–H–F], can be considered as containing hypervalent hydrogen. In the weak HB case, we have a lesser degree of interaction, leading to normal hydrogen bonds of type Y⋯H–X analogous to secondary bonding. Within both the HB and HVB series, strong and weak types form a smooth continuum with no sharp break in properties. HVB was once considered to involve the expansion of the octet to 10, 12 or even higher valence electron counts. Whether the σ hole or n→σ* model applies, any octet expansion is now seen as largely formal, however, because the central element essentially retains its eight valence electrons. Thus a range of interactions can be placed in one big tent, related by a combination of σ hole and n→σ* bonding contributions with retention of the octet by the central element, E.

Graphical abstract: Hypervalency, secondary bonding and hydrogen bonding: siblings under the skin

Back to tab navigation
Please wait while Download options loads

Publication details

The article was received on 20 Sep 2016 and first published on 27 Feb 2017


Article type: Tutorial Review
DOI: 10.1039/C6CS00688D
Citation: Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017,46, 1720-1729
  •   Request permissions

    Hypervalency, secondary bonding and hydrogen bonding: siblings under the skin

    R. H. Crabtree, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 1720
    DOI: 10.1039/C6CS00688D

Search articles by author