Issue 38, 2017

Running out of lithium? A route to differentiate between capacity losses and active lithium losses in lithium-ion batteries

Abstract

Active lithium loss (ALL) resulting in a capacity loss (QALL), which is caused by lithium consuming parasitic reactions like SEI formation, is a major reason for capacity fading and, thus, for a reduction of the usable energy density of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). QALL is often equated with the accumulated irreversible capacity (QAIC). However, QAIC is also influenced by non-lithium consuming parasitic reactions, which do not reduce the active lithium content of the cell, but induce a parasitic current. In this work, a novel approach is proposed in order to differentiate between QAIC and QALL. The determination of QALL is based on the remaining active lithium content of a given cell, which can be determined by de-lithiation of the cathode with the help of the reference electrode of a three-electrode set-up. Lithium non-consuming parasitic reactions, which do not influence the active lithium content have no influence on this determination. In order to evaluate this novel approach, three different anode materials (graphite, carbon spheres and a silicon/graphite composite) were investigated. It is shown that during the first charge/discharge cycles QALL is described moderately well by QAIC. However, the difference between QAIC and QALL rises with increasing cycle number. With this approach, a differentiation between “simple” irreversible capacities and truly detrimental “active Li losses” is possible and, thus, Coulombic efficiency can be directly related to the remaining useable cell capacity for the first time. Overall, the exact determination of the remaining active lithium content of the cell is of great importance, because it allows a statement on whether the reduction in lithium content is crucial for capacity fading or whether the fading is related to other degradation mechanisms such as material or electrode failure.

Graphical abstract: Running out of lithium? A route to differentiate between capacity losses and active lithium losses in lithium-ion batteries

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
09 Aug 2017
Accepted
11 Sep 2017
First published
12 Sep 2017

Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017,19, 25905-25918

Running out of lithium? A route to differentiate between capacity losses and active lithium losses in lithium-ion batteries

F. Holtstiege, A. Wilken, M. Winter and T. Placke, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 25905 DOI: 10.1039/C7CP05405J

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements