Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 40, 2017
Previous Article Next Article

Reply to the ‘Comment on “Elucidation of charge-transfer SERS selection rules by considering the excited state properties and the role of electrode potential”’ by M. Mohammadpour, M. H. Khodabandeh, L. Visscher and Z. Jamshidi, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 7833

Author affiliations

Abstract

We appreciate Aranda's comments on our recent work entitled ‘‘Elucidation of charge-transfer SERS selection rules by considering the excited state properties and the role of electrode potential’’. We would also like to thank the editor of Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics for giving us an opportunity to specify more details of our work in this reply. An important part of our article concerns the role of the electrode potential in charge-transfer SERS spectra and we would like to first address the questions that Aranda et al. posed about our labeling.

Graphical abstract: Reply to the ‘Comment on “Elucidation of charge-transfer SERS selection rules by considering the excited state properties and the role of electrode potential”’ by M. Mohammadpour, M. H. Khodabandeh, L. Visscher and Z. Jamshidi, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 7833

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Publication details

The article was received on 31 Jul 2017, accepted on 25 Sep 2017 and first published on 04 Oct 2017


Article type: Comment
DOI: 10.1039/C7CP05175A
Citation: Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017,19, 27892-27894
  •   Request permissions

    Reply to the ‘Comment on “Elucidation of charge-transfer SERS selection rules by considering the excited state properties and the role of electrode potential”’ by M. Mohammadpour, M. H. Khodabandeh, L. Visscher and Z. Jamshidi, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 7833

    Z. Jamshidi, M. H. Khodabandeh, M. Mohammadpour and L. Visscher, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 27892
    DOI: 10.1039/C7CP05175A

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements