Jump to main content
Jump to site search

Issue 42, 2016
Previous Article Next Article

Distinguishing uniform switching from filamentary switching in resistance memory using a fracture test

Author affiliations

Abstract

Resistance random access memory (RRAM) is a rapidly developing emergent nanotechnology. For practical applications and basic understanding, it is important to ascertain whether RRAM undergoes uniform or filamentary switching, but on this point previous area-scaling studies have often shown ambiguous and conflicting findings. Here we demonstrate a simple test—physically breaking the device into two and studying their characteristics individually—can make a definitive determination. Our experiment on two prototypical RRAMs found that one (the nanometallic memory) switches and conducts uniformly while the other (the filamentary memory) does not. It also probes the statistics of nanofilaments: the resistance statistics of the filamentary memory reveals for the first time a large population of partially developed filaments in addition to the filament that dominates switching. Remarkably, the filamentary memory can also be stress-switched to a lower resistance state during fracture, which is reminiscent of stress-switching of the nanometallic memory and may be taken as direct evidence of electron–phonon interaction in the filaments.

Graphical abstract: Distinguishing uniform switching from filamentary switching in resistance memory using a fracture test

Back to tab navigation

Supplementary files

Publication details

The article was received on 14 Aug 2016, accepted on 25 Sep 2016 and first published on 26 Sep 2016


Article type: Paper
DOI: 10.1039/C6NR06427B
Citation: Nanoscale, 2016,8, 18113-18120
  •   Request permissions

    Distinguishing uniform switching from filamentary switching in resistance memory using a fracture test

    Y. Lu, J. H. Lee, X. Yang and I. Chen, Nanoscale, 2016, 8, 18113
    DOI: 10.1039/C6NR06427B

Search articles by author

Spotlight

Advertisements