Issue 5, 2012

Substituent effects in a series of 1,7-C60(RF)2 compounds (RF = CF3, C2F5, n-C3F7, i-C3F7, n-C4F9, s-C4F9, n-C8F17): electron affinities, reduction potentials and E(LUMO) values are not always correlated

Abstract

A series of seven structurally-similar compounds with different pairs of RF groups were prepared, characterized spectroscopically, and studied by electrochemical methods (cyclic and square-wave voltammetry), low-temperature anion photoelectron spectroscopy, and DFT calculations (five of the compounds are reported here for the first time). This is the first time that a set of seven RF groups have been compared with respect to their relative effects on E1/2(0/−), electron affinity (EA), and the DFT-calculated LUMO energy. The compounds, 1,7-C60(RF)2 (RF = CF3, C2F5, i-C3F7, n-C3F7, s-C4F9, n-C4F9 and n-C8F21), were found to have statistically different electron affinities (EA), at the ±10 meV level of uncertainty, but virtually identical first reduction potentials, at the ±10 mV level of uncertainty. The lack of a correlation between EA and E1/2(0/−), and between E(LUMO) and E1/2(0/−), for such similar compounds is unprecedented and suggests that explanations for differences in figures of merit for materials and/or devices that are based on equating easily measurable E1/2(0/−) values with EAs or E(LUMO) values should be viewed with caution. The solubilities of the seven compounds in toluene varied by nearly a factor of six, but in an unpredictable way, with the C2F5 and s-C4F9 compounds being the most soluble and the i-C3F7 compound being the least soluble. The effects of the different RF groups on EAs, E(LUMO) values, and solubilities should help fluorine chemists choose the right RF group to design new materials with improved morphological, electronic, optical, and/or magnetic properties.

Graphical abstract: Substituent effects in a series of 1,7-C60(RF)2 compounds (RF = CF3, C2F5, n-C3F7, i-C3F7, n-C4F9, s-C4F9, n-C8F17): electron affinities, reduction potentials and E(LUMO) values are not always correlated

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Edge Article
Submitted
31 Dec 2011
Accepted
05 Feb 2012
First published
10 Feb 2012

Chem. Sci., 2012,3, 1399-1407

Substituent effects in a series of 1,7-C60(RF)2 compounds (RF = CF3, C2F5, n-C3F7, i-C3F7, n-C4F9, s-C4F9, n-C8F17): electron affinities, reduction potentials and E(LUMO) values are not always correlated

I. V. Kuvychko, J. B. Whitaker, B. W. Larson, T. C. Folsom, N. B. Shustova, S. M. Avdoshenko, Y. Chen, H. Wen, X. Wang, L. Dunsch, A. A. Popov, O. V. Boltalina and S. H. Strauss, Chem. Sci., 2012, 3, 1399 DOI: 10.1039/C2SC01133F

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements