Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Photoinduced oxidative activation of electron-rich arenes: alkenylation with H2 evolution under external oxidant-free conditions

Xia Hu a, Guoting Zhang a, Faxiang Bu a, Xu Luo a, Kebing Yi a, Heng Zhang *a and Aiwen Lei *ab
aThe Institute for Advanced Studies (IAS), College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, P. R. China. E-mail: hengzhang@whu.edu.cn; aiwenlei@whu.edu.cn
bState Key Laboratory and Institute of Elemento-Organic Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, P.R. China

Received 26th October 2017 , Accepted 8th December 2017

First published on 8th December 2017


The dehydrogenative cross-coupling of arenes and alkenes is a particularly ideal approach for the synthesis of aryl alkenes. Herein, we report a photo-induced C–H/C–H cross-coupling between electron-rich arenes and styrene derivatives using a dual catalytic system containing an acridinium photosensitizer and a cobaloxime proton-reducing catalyst. This catalytic system enables the Csp2–Csp2 bond formation accompanying H2 evolution. Various substituted aryl alkenes can be afforded with good to excellent yields and high β-regioselectivity.


Introduction

Recent years have witnessed a steady increase in the utilization of the electron-transfer concept for the highly selective C–H functionalization of organic compounds.1 Electron-rich aromatic compounds are inclined to undergo electron-transfer reactions.2 One-electron oxidation of aromatic compounds would lead the generation of the corresponding arene radical cations that are very reactive species and tend to undergo follow-up reactions, such as rearrangement,3 trapping nucleophiles1d,4 or dimerization,5 to yield more persistent radical cations. Through a π radical cation of arenes, the biaryl dehydrodimerization of aromatic compounds has been well-studied under anodic or metal-ion oxidation conditions.6 Similar to aromatic compounds, alkenes are also good π donors. We speculate that alkenes might also be capable of capturing arene radical cations like aromatic compounds. Also, a novel dehydrogenative radical-cation Heck reaction of electron-rich arenes with styrenes could be achieved through the electron-transfer pathway (Scheme 1).
image file: c7sc04634k-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Synthesis of aryl alkenes via the single-electron transfer process.

However, the harsh oxidative conditions easily lead to the cleavage of C–C double bonds.7 Mild reaction conditions are more ideal choices for the radical cation dehydrogenative Heck reaction. Visible-light photoredox catalysis has been widely used in green synthetic chemistry and offers an opportunity to achieve complex transformations under ambient conditions.8 Recently, a photoredox/cobaloxime dual catalytic system was developed to provide a new strategy for bond formation between two nucleophiles without strong additional oxidants.9 Herein, we report an acceptorless dehydrogenative C–H alkenylation of electron-rich arenes with styrene derivatives using the photoredox/cobaloxime dual catalytic system via a photo-induced electron transfer process. Dehydrogenative Heck reactions have been demonstrated as a straightforward and atom- and step-economical alkenylation process for the synthesis of substituted alkenes.10 Compared with classical Mizoroki–Heck reactions, the tedious prefunctionalization of substrates steps can be obviated.11 Although “dehydrogenative” was used in the name, it is rare to observe the generation of H2 from the reactions.12 The requirement of stoichiometric oxidants still remains an unsolved problem. Hence, the catalytic dehydrogenative alkenylation of aromatic compounds under external oxidant-free conditions is a promising and ideal method for the construction of substituted aryl alkenes, since H2 is the only by-product of the reaction.

Results and discussion

To achieve this radical cation C–H alkenylation of electron-rich arenes, the cross-coupling between 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene (TMB, 1a) and styrene (2a) was chosen as a model reaction to test the reaction conditions. The reaction was conducted in acetonitrile by employing Fukuzumi’s acridinium (4) as the photosensitizer and a cobaloxime, Co(dmgH)2pyCl (5, dmgH = dimethylglyoximate and py = pyridine), as the co-catalyst (Table 1, entry 1). After illumination by blue LEDs for 24 hours at ambient temperature, the desired product 3aa can be detected in 17% yield as a mixture of E/Z stereoisomers. The generated H2 can be detected by gas chromatography. Further investigation of the solvent was conducted and 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE) gave the best yield (Table 1, entry 3). The exploration of various cobaloxime catalysts revealed that modifying the axial pyridine ligand to a more electron-donating 4-dimethylaminopyridine produced a higher reactivity for this transformation (Table 1, entry 4), whereas changing the cobaloxime co-catalyst into Co(dmgH)(dmgH2)Cl2 gave a lower yield and stereoselectivity (Table 1, entry 5). In contrast, no desired product can be observed in the absence of the cobaloxime catalyst (Table 1, entry 6). Control experiments without the addition of a photosensitizer or irradiation by visible-light clearly highlighted the essential roles of the photo-excited photosensitizer in this transformation (Table 1, entries 7–8).
Table 1 Optimization studiesa

image file: c7sc04634k-u1.tif

Entry Catalyst Solvent Yieldb (%)
a Conditions: 1a (0.20 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), Acr+-Mes ClO4 (3 mol%) and co-catalyst (10 mol%) were added in solvent (2 mL) under N2 and irradiated by blue LEDs for 24 h. b Yields were determined by GC with naphthalene as the internal standard and are the sum of the cis and trans isomers. The ratio of the E/Z isomers are shown in parenthesis. c Reaction was performed without photosensitizer. d Reaction was carried out in the dark.
1 Co(dmgH)pyCl CH3CN 17 (20[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1)
2 Co(dmgH)pyCl THF 14 (7[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1)
3 Co(dmgH)pyCl DCE 44 (7[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1)
4 Co(dmgH)2(4-NMe2py)Cl DCE 70 (12[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1)
5 Co(dmgH)(dmgH2)Cl2 DCE 14 (2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1)
6 None DCE n.d.
7c Co(dmgH)2(4-NMe2py)Cl DCE n.d.
8d Co(dmgH)2(4-NMe2py)Cl DCE n.d.
image file: c7sc04634k-u2.tif


With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, the scope and generality of this catalytic dehydrogenative olefination reaction were next investigated. A range of substituted styrene derivatives were compatible with the olefination of 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene (1a) (Scheme 2). Styrenes bearing electron-donating para-substituents, such as methyl, methoxy and tert-butyl, provided the corresponding products in moderate to good yields as an E/Z stereoisomer mixture (3ab–3ad). The transformation is tolerant of styrenes with halogen functional groups (Scheme 2, 3ae–3ag), which can be applied in the subsequent functionalization. Importantly, the extremely electron-withdrawing group, the cyano group, could also be tolerated (3ah, 43%). Therefore, unlike the previously reported olefin C–H functionalization via an alkene radical cation intermediate, the single electron oxidation of alkenes might not be a necessary step for the reaction.9d,e When 1,3,5-trimethyl-2-vinylbenzene was employed, the reaction proceeded with good reactivity (3ai, 93%), and only the E-isomer product can be observed because of the strong steric effect. The reaction could also be carried out with various diaryl–ethylenes, affording products in excellent yields (3aj–3aq). Functional groups such as alkyl, trifluoromethyl, fluoro, chloro and bromine can be well tolerated. Unsymmetrical diaryl ethylenes produced a mixture of E/Z isomers under the standard conditions (Scheme 2, 3ap and 3aq). When α-methyl-styrene was employed to react with 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene (1a), not only can the desired alkenylation product (3as) be observed, but an allylation product (3ar) was also produced. It is surprising that the internal olefin, β-methyl styrene, was inactive in this system. We reasoned that the steric hindrance of the methyl group might inhibit the radical addition process between the arene and olefin. Indeed, when the internal olefin with a smaller steric hindrance, indene, was employed, the desired product 3at was afforded in an acceptable yield. However, no reaction was observed when an aliphatic olefin was treated with 1a under this dual catalytic system (3au).


image file: c7sc04634k-s2.tif
Scheme 2 The alkene scope for the oxidant-free C–H olefination of electron-rich arenes. General conditions: irradiation of a mixture of 1a (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.4 mmol), 3 mol% 4 and 10 mol% 6 in 4 mL DCE by blue LEDs for 24 h. The isolated yields are shown and the ratios of E/Z isomers or regioisomers were determined by GC-FID and are shown in parenthesis. aα-Methyl–styrene was used as the coupling partner.

Besides 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene, other electron-rich aromatic compounds and heterocyclic aromatics were tested (Scheme 3). 1,3-dimethoxybenzene or 1,3-dimethoxy-5-methylbenzene can afford the corresponding alkenylation product with 1,1-diphenylethene (3ba–3bb) in good yields as a mixture of regioisomers. Sensitive functional groups, such as halogen (3bc, 75%), amide (3bd, 58%) and hydroxyl (3be, 58%) groups, can be tolerated in this dual catalytic system. Interestingly, an arene bearing an intramolecular aliphatic alkenyl group can also be tolerated in the reaction (3bf, 63%). Other electron-rich heterocyclic arenes, such as thiophenes (3bg–3bj), furans (3bk) and pyrroles (3bl and 3bq), could afford the corresponding products in good yields with 1,1-diphenylethene. When the heterocyclic compound 2-phenylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine and it derivatives were employed, the desired products (3bm–3bp) can be obtained. It is worth noting that zolimidine, an antiulcer drug, can also be employed as an electron-rich aromatic substrate to couple with 1,1-diphenylethene to produce the product in a moderate yield (3bp, 51%). An electron-rich pyridine derivative successfully produced the desired alkenylation product in good yield and regioselectivity (3bq, 83%). Other heterocyclic aromatics, such as imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine and 2-phenylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine, were also applicable to this catalytic system (3br and 3bs). To demonstrate the scalability of this protocol, a gram-scale synthesis of 3aj (10 mmol scale) was performed by employing only 0.3 mol% of photosensitizer 4 and 1 mol% of the cobalt complex 6 under irradiation by 30 W blue LEDs. 3aj can be obtained in 70% yield after 48 h.


image file: c7sc04634k-s3.tif
Scheme 3 The arene scope for the oxidant-free C–H olefination of electron-rich arenes. General conditions: irradiation of a solution of 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.4 mmol), 3 mol% 4 and 10 mol% 6 in DCE by blue LEDs for 24 h. The isolated yields are shown and the ratios of E/Z isomers or regioisomers were determined by GC-FID and are shown in parenthesis. a100 μL 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol was added. bPhotosensitizer 8 was used.

Surprisingly, attempts to move away from 1a to less electron-rich aromatics, such as naphthalenes and indoles, failed to observe the formation of the desired alkenylation products with 1,1-diphenylethene, despite the fact that the redox potential of these arenes can match well with the excited state of Fukuzumi’s acridinium catalyst. The lack of reactivity of these aromatics indicated that the radical addition of the arene radical cation onto the alkene might also be a crucial step in this transformation. Only a trace amount of the alkenylation product of anisole (1u) can be obtained under the standard conditions. The desired product 3bu can be obtained in 15% yield when a modified acridinium photosensitizer, 8, was used in the mixed-solvent system CHCl3/HFIP (40[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1) (Scheme 4). Due to its low nucleophilicity and strong hydrogen bonding properties, HFIP has been extensively employed as the solvent in several radical cation studies.13 It has been discovered that HFIP can increase the stability of the radical cation in an unprecedented manner.14


image file: c7sc04634k-s4.tif
Scheme 4 The external oxidant-free C–H alkenylation of anisole.

In addition, this dual catalytic system is also applicable for the alkynylation of 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene (1a), and the desired product (10) was produced in 34% yield using the acridinium photosensitizer 8, when 1-ethynyl-4-methoxybenzene (9) was employed as the radical trapper instead of styrene (Scheme 5). The photosensitizer 4 can provide the desired alkynylation product (10) in a lower yield (25%).


image file: c7sc04634k-s5.tif
Scheme 5 The external oxidant-free C–H alkynylation of 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene.

To gain further insight into this transformation, a series of Stern–Volmer studies were performed (Scheme 6). As revealed in Scheme 6, the emission intensity of the excited state of the photosensitizer 4 was weakened in the presence of 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene, 1a, following linear Stern–Volmer behavior. Similar observations can also be noticed in the presence of styrene, 2a, and 1,1-diphenylene, 2j, with relatively smaller rate constants. In contrast, emission quenching of the photosensitizer by 4-cyanostyrene was not observed. Although the alkene radical cation intermediate cannot be completely ruled out when other aromatics are used, the oxidation of styrene might not be a necessary step for the alkenylation of 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene.


image file: c7sc04634k-s6.tif
Scheme 6 Stern–Volmer emission quenching studies.

As shown in Scheme 3, the reaction of 1f with 1,1-diphenylethene provided the direct arene C–H olefination product (3bf), while no cyclization product can be detected, which suggests that the aryl-radical pathway might not be involved in the transformation.15 This speculation can also be supported by the result of the kinetic isotopic effect (KIE) experiment. The intermolecular and parallel KIE experiments showed that the aromatic C–H bond cleavage might not be involved in the rate-determining step (Scheme 7). Therefore, it could be proposed that the C–C bond formation might proceed through the direct addition of the arene radical cation intermediate to styrene. The DFT calculation showed that this pathway is thermodynamically beneficial (ΔG = −11.5 kcal mol−1 in DCE, Scheme 7c). The addition of 1a to the styrene radical cation was also theoretically feasible (ΔG = −20.6 kcal mol−1 in DCE). However, 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene is more inclined to lose an electron with a lower energy barrier. The electron-transfer from 1a to the styrene radical cation would be theoretically feasible, even if the styrene radical cation was generated. The calculation for the reaction of 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene (1a) and 1,1-diphenylethene (2j) provided a similar result (see the ESI).


image file: c7sc04634k-s7.tif
Scheme 7 Kinetic isotopic effect experiments and DFT calculation.

The kinetics of the reaction between 1a and 1,1-diphenylethylene (2i) were explored using operando IR to verify this mechanism proposal. It was found that the initial rate constants increased in a linear fashion with increasing 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene (TMB) concentration but were shown to be independent of the concentration of alkene and cobaloxime catalyst (Scheme 8). At low concentrations of photosensitizer, the initial rate constant is linearly related to the concentration of photosensitizer. However, the reaction rate is saturated at high concentrations of photosensitizer. This may be due to the limited number of photons from the LED lamp used. These kinetic behaviors suggest that the electron-transfer from the electron-rich arene to the photosensitizer might be involved in the rate-determining step.


image file: c7sc04634k-s8.tif
Scheme 8 Kinetic studies of the olefination of 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene with 1,1-diphenylethylene.

A detailed description of our proposed mechanistic cycle for the dehydrogenative C–H olefination reaction is outlined in Scheme 9. Firstly, electron-rich arenes (1) can be oxidized by the excited-state of the photosensitizer (4*) to generate the arene radical cation intermediate 12. Subsequently, the radical addition of 12 to alkenes would furnish a distonic radical cation 13, which would further deprotonate to form a C-radical intermediate 14. The desired product 3 can be afforded by sequential oxidation and elimination of 14. On the other hand, on the cobalt side, the Co(III) species (6) gains two electrons to provide a Co(I) species (16). The protonation of Co(I) (16) produces Co(III)-hydride (17), which releases H2 by interaction with a proton.16 The pathway for the radical addition of an alkene radical cation to arenes cannot be completely ruled out when other aromatic compounds are used (path b).


image file: c7sc04634k-s9.tif
Scheme 9 Proposed mechanism.

Conclusions

In summary, a catalytic protocol for the efficient C–H olefination of aromatics with styrene derivatives has been developed by employing a photo/cobaloxime dual catalytic system. In this process, Csp2–Csp2 bond formation proceeds through a key arene radical cation intermediate that is generated via electron transfer between the excited-state photosensitizer and the electron-rich arenes. Under external oxidant-free conditions, various substituted aryl alkenes can be afforded in good to excellent yields accompanied by H2 evolution. We anticipate that this method offers a novel aromatic C–H olefination strategy beyond traditional dehydrogenative Heck reactions using noble-metal catalysts and stoichiometric oxidants.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21390400, 21520102003, 21272180 and 21302148) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2016CFB571). The Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities of China (111 Program) is also appreciated. The numerical calculations in this paper have been carried out on the supercomputing system in the Supercomputing Center of Wuhan University.

Notes and references

  1. (a) L. Eberson, in Electron Transfer Reactions in Organic Chemistry, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1987, pp. 1–11 Search PubMed; (b) G. Pandey, in Photoinduced Electron Transfer V, ed. J. Mattay, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1993, pp. 175–221 Search PubMed; (c) M. Schmittel and A. Burghart, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1997, 36, 2550–2589 CrossRef; (d) N. A. Romero, K. A. Margrey, N. E. Tay and D. A. Nicewicz, Science, 2015, 349, 1326–1330 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. G. Gescheidt and M. D. N. Khan, in Electron Transfer in Chemistry, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, 2008, pp. 206–269 Search PubMed.
  3. (a) W. Adam, C. Sahin, J. Sendelbach, H. Walter, G.-F. Chen and F. Williams, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 2576–2584 CrossRef CAS; (b) J. B. Gerken, S. C. Wang, A. B. Preciado, Y. S. Park, G. Nishiguchi, D. J. Tantillo and R. D. Little, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 4598–4608 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. (a) K. Ohkubo, K. Mizushima, R. Iwata and S. Fukuzumi, Chem. Sci., 2011, 2, 715–722 RSC; (b) L. Niu, H. Yi, S. Wang, T. Liu, J. Liu and A. Lei, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 14226 CrossRef PubMed; (c) J. B. McManus and D. A. Nicewicz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 2880–2883 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) K. A. Margrey, J. B. McManus, S. Bonazzi, F. Zecri and D. A. Nicewicz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 11288–11299 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. (a) R. L. Hand and R. F. Nelson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1974, 96, 850–860 CrossRef CAS; (b) T. Osa, Y. Kashiwagi, Y. Yanagisawa and J. M. Bobbitt, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1994, 2535–2537 RSC.
  6. (a) A. Kirste, B. Elsler, G. Schnakenburg and S. R. Waldvogel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 3571–3576 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) T. Morofuji, A. Shimizu and J.-i. Yoshida, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 7259–7262 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) M. Schubert, P. Franzmann, A. Wünsche von Leupoldt, K. Koszinowski, K. Heinze and S. R. Waldvogel, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 1156–1159 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. K. Suga, K. Ohkubo and S. Fukuzumi, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2003, 107, 4339–4346 CrossRef CAS.
  8. (a) N. A. Romero and D. A. Nicewicz, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 10075–10166 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) T. P. Yoon, M. A. Ischay and J. Du, Nat. Chem., 2010, 2, 527–532 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) J. M. Narayanam and C. R. Stephenson, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 102–113 RSC; (d) J. Xuan and W. J. Xiao, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 6828–6838 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) Y. Yasu, T. Koike and M. Akita, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 9567–9571 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) D. P. Hari and B. König, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 4734–4743 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (g) C. K. Prier, D. A. Rankic and D. W. MacMillan, Chem. Rev., 2013, 113, 5322–5363 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (h) Y. Xi, H. Yi and A. Lei, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 2387–2403 RSC; (i) S. Fukuzumi and K. Ohkubo, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2014, 12, 6059–6071 RSC; (j) D. A. Nicewicz and T. M. Nguyen, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 355–360 CrossRef CAS.
  9. (a) J. J. Zhong, Q. Y. Meng, B. Liu, X. B. Li, X. W. Gao, T. Lei, C. J. Wu, Z. J. Li, C. H. Tung and L. Z. Wu, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 1988–1991 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) G. Zhang, C. Bian and A. Lei, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36, 1428–1439 CrossRef CAS; (c) Y.-W. Zheng, B. Chen, P. Ye, K. Feng, W. Wang, Q.-Y. Meng, L.-Z. Wu and C.-H. Tung, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 10080–10083 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) H. Yi, L. Niu, C. Song, Y. Li, B. Dou, A. K. Singh and A. Lei, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 1120–1124 Search PubMed; (e) G. Zhang, X. Hu, C.-W. Chiang, H. Yi, P. Pei, A. K. Singh and A. Lei, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 12037–12040 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) K.-H. He, F.-F. Tan, C.-Z. Zhou, G.-J. Zhou, X.-L. Yang and Y. Li, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 3080–3084 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. (a) J. Le Bras and J. Muzart, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 1170–1214 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) E. M. Beck, N. P. Grimster, R. Hatley and M. J. Gaunt, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 2528–2529 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) G. Cai, Y. Fu, Y. Li, X. Wan and Z. Shi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 7666–7673 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) D.-H. Wang, K. M. Engle, B.-F. Shi and J.-Q. Yu, Science, 2010, 327, 315–319 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) S. H. Park, J. Y. Kim and S. Chang, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 2372–2375 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (f) S. Rakshit, C. Grohmann, T. Besset and F. Glorius, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 2350–2353 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (g) P. B. Arockiam, C. Fischmeister, C. Bruneau and P. H. Dixneuf, Green Chem., 2011, 13, 3075–3078 RSC.
  11. I. P. Beletskaya and A. V. Cheprakov, in The Mizoroki–Heck Reaction, ed. M. Oestreich, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2009, ch. 2, pp. 51–132 Search PubMed.
  12. R. Manikandan, P. Madasamy and M. Jeganmohan, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 230–234 CrossRef CAS.
  13. (a) L. Eberson, O. Persson and M. P. Hartshorn, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1995, 34, 2268–2269 CrossRef; (b) L. Eberson, M. P. Hartshorn, F. Radner and O. Persson, Chem. Commun., 1996, 215–216 RSC.
  14. L. Eberson, M. P. Hartshorn, O. Persson and F. Radner, Chem. Commun., 1996, 2105–2112 RSC.
  15. A. Dahlen, A. Petersson and G. Hilmersson, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2003, 1, 2423–2426 CAS.
  16. (a) P. Du and R. Eisenberg, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 6012–6021 RSC; (b) P. Du, J. Schneider, G. Luo, W. W. Brennessel and R. Eisenberg, Inorg. Chem., 2009, 48, 4952–4962 CrossRef CAS PubMed.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7sc04634k
These authors contributed equally to this work.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018