Correction: Sulfur–hydrazine hydrate-based chemical synthesis of sulfur@graphene composite for lithium–sulfur batteries

Jianmei Han; Baojuan Xi; Zhenyu Feng; Xiaojian Ma; Junhao Zhang; Shenglin Xiong; Yitai Qian

doi:10.1039/C8QI90007H

View PDF VersionPrevious ArticleNext Article

Open Access Article

This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

DOI: 10.1039/C8QI90007H (Correction) Inorg. Chem. Front., 2018, 5, 962-963

Correction: Sulfur–hydrazine hydrate-based chemical synthesis of sulfur@graphene composite for lithium–sulfur batteries

Jianmei Han ^ab, Baojuan Xi *^a, Zhenyu Feng ^a, Xiaojian Ma ^a, Junhao Zhang ^c, Shenglin Xiong ^a and Yitai Qian *^ad
^aKey Laboratory of the Colloid and Interface Chemistry, Ministry of Education, and School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, 250100, P. R. China. E-mail: baojuanxi@sdu.edu.cn; Qianyt@sdu.edu.cn
^bCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Taishan University, Tai'an, 271021, P. R. China
^cSchool of Environmental and Chemical Engineering and Marine Equipment and Technology Institute, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212003, PR China
^dHefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, PR China

Received 6th March 2018 , Accepted 6th March 2018

First published on 14th March 2018

Abstract

Correction for ‘Sulfur–hydrazine hydrate-based chemical synthesis of sulfur@graphene composite for lithium–sulfur batteries’ by Jianmei Han et al., Inorg. Chem. Front., 2018, DOI: 10.1039/c7qi00726d.

The authors regret that Fig. 5 was provided incorrectly. The correct version of Fig. 5 and the associated caption are provided below.


	Fig. 1 (A) CV curves of the S@N-rGO electrodes at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s⁻¹ in the potential range of 1.7–2.8 V versus Li⁺/Li for the first five cycles; (B) rate capability of S@N-rGO and S/N-rGO tested at different current densities; (C) cycling performance of S@N-rGO and S/N-rGO cathodes for 300 cycles at a current rate of 0.5C; (D) cycling performance of S@N-rGO cathode at a current rate of 1C.

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.