Mikolaj Jan
Jankowski
*ac,
Raymond
Olsen
a,
Claus Jørgen
Nielsen
b,
Yngvar
Thomassen
ac and
Paal
Molander
a
aNational Institute of Occupational Health, P.O. Box 8149, Oslo N-0033, Norway. E-mail: mikolaj.j.jankowski@stami.no
bCTCC, Department of Chemistry, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1033, Oslo N-0315, Norway
cNorwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), P.O. Box 5003, Ås N-1432, Norway
First published on 6th February 2018
Correction for ‘The applicability of proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) for determination of isocyanic acid (ICA) in work room atmospheres’ by Mikolaj Jan Jankowski et al., Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 2014, 16, 2423–2431.
• In the penultimate sentence of the “Quantum mechanical calculations of the theoretical capture rate coefficient for ICA” section (p. 2426), the correct k value for ICA is 1.68 × 10−9 cm3 s−1.
• In the second sentence of the fourth paragraph of the “PTR-MS response versus FT-IR response of ICA” section (p. 2428), the correct value is 45%. The revised phrase should read “the PTR-MS response was approximately 45% of the FT-IR response”.
• In the first sentence of the eighth paragraph of the “PTR-MS response versus FT-IR response of ICA” section (p. 2428), the correction factor f should read “= 0.4352 − 0.0126 × AH”. The revised phrase is “the correction factor f (the relative PTR-MS response in relation to the FT-IR reference response) = 0.4352 − 0.0126 × AH”.
• Corrected eqn (5):
• Fig. 3: linear fit is replaced by the equation: y = 0.4352 − 0.0126 × AH.
• Fig. 4: uncorrected data points approximately 1.7 times higher with respect to PTR-MS.
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018 |