Divergent reactivity of nucleophilic 1-bora-7a-azaindenide anions

Matthew M. Morgan a, J. Mikko Rautiainen *b, Warren E. Piers *a, Heikki M. Tuononen b and Chris Gendy a
aDepartment of Chemistry, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada. E-mail: wpiers@ucalgary.ca
bDepartment of Chemistry, Nanoscience Centre, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland. E-mail: j.mikko.rautiainen@jyu.fi

Received 18th November 2017 , Accepted 6th December 2017

First published on 12th December 2017


The reactions of 1-bora-7a-azaindenide anions, prepared in moderate to excellent yields by reduction of the appropriate 1-bora-7a-azaindenyl chlorides with KC8 in THF, with alkyl halides and carbon dioxide were studied. With alkyl halides (CH2Cl2, CH3I and BrCH(D)CH(D)tBu), the anions behave as boron anions, alkylating the boron centre via a classic SN2 mechanism. This was established with DFT methods and via experiments utilizing the neo-hexyl stereoprobe BrCH(D)CH(D)tBu. These reactions were in part driven by a re-aromatization of the six membered pyridyl ring upon formation of the product. Conversely, in the reaction of the 1-bora-7a-azaindenide anions with CO2, a novel carboxylation of the C-2 carbon alpha to boron was observed. Computations indicated that while carboxylation of the boron centre was kinetically feasible, the products of B-carboxylation were not thermodynamically favored relative to the observed C-2 carboxylated species, which were formed preferably due to the generation of both C–C and B–O bonds. In these products, the pyridyl ring remains non-aromatic, in part accounting for the observed reversibility of carboxylation.


Introduction

The synthesis and evaluation of BN isosteres of archetypical aromatic hydrocarbons has been a fruitful and active area of research in main group and organic materials chemistry in the past decade.1–6 The substitution of a C[double bond, length as m-dash]C double bond with the more polarized B[double bond, length as m-dash]N unit within a larger aromatic framework can have beneficial effects on the packing,7,8 absorption9,10 and electron transporting11,12 properties of the molecules and materials compared to the all carbon frameworks.13 As such, there has also been significant interest in defining the differences between all carbon and BN compounds at a more fundamental level in the most basic building units of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The groups of Liu14 and Braunschweig,15 for example, have developed general syntheses of all three possible isomers of azaborines, BN analogs of benzene, and evaluated the physical properties and reactivity of these compounds in detail.16–23 The undertaking of similar studies on even simple polycyclic building blocks becomes more complex due to heightened numbers of possible BN isomers, but investigations into the exhaustive evaluation of BN analogs of naphthalene24–26 and other PAHs27,28 have been initiated.

Indene and the indenide anion constitute another basic building block in PAH chemistry29–33 and there has also been recent interest in BN isosteres of this unit.34–38 Here, even only considering 1,2 BN compounds, there are 10 possible BN indenide isomers, (see Scheme S1 in the ESI) and so the mapping of properties and stabilities of each isomer is a complex endeavour just from a synthetic perspective. We recently reported a zirconocene mediated synthesis of the 1-bora-7a-azaindene framework represented by compounds 1a–b (Scheme 1)34 which is one of the possible 1,2-BN analogs of indene. Our synthesis differs from others reported35,36 in that the boron centre remains functionalized with a halide, and so the compound can be readily reduced by two electrons to form the 1-bora-7a-azaindenide anions 2a–b as shown. The syntheses can be carried out in gram quantities which has made it possible to conduct reactivity studies of these anions with electrophiles. Here we report two different reaction paths for these BN indenides, highlighting how aromaticity changes can dictate reaction paths and lead to unique reactivity in comparison to that observed in analogous reactions in the all-carbon reaction manifold.


image file: c7dt04350c-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Synthesis of 1-bora-7a-azaindenide anions 2.

Results and discussion

Compounds 1a and 2a were reported previously,34 and the methylated derivatives 1b and 2b were prepared analogously using 2-methyl pyridine in the zirconocene synthetic sequence. The 1-bora-7a-azaindenides 2 can be prepared without using the cryptand potassium ion sequestering agent but the K(2,2,2-c) salts are more easily handed and were therefore used throughout this study. As reported previously,34 NICS calculations on these anions indicate that the five-membered C3BN ring has significant aromaticity associated with it (the NICS(1) and NICS(0) values are −11.4 and −12.5, respectively, for 2a; a complete listing of NICS values computed for all compounds reported here can be found in Table S1). Conversely, the six-membered ring, with NICS values near 0, is essentially non-aromatic. This is reflected in the chemical shifts associated with the C–H protons of this ring in 2a and 2b, which are significantly upfield shifted in the 1H NMR spectrum, particularly the C-H5 and C-H6 protons. In 2a, they appear at 5.66 and 5.59 ppm, respectively, while in 2b, they arise at 5.49 and 5.28 ppm. These shifts are more consistent with a diene moiety than a pyridyl group. As reported earlier,34 the striking bond length alternation in the structure of 2a is completely consistent with this picture of the molecule (see Scheme S2). Molecular orbital analysis of the occupied π orbitals of an unsubstituted model of 2a (Fig. 1, top) in comparison to the all carbon indenide anion also supports the description of delocalized bonds in five-membered BN-containing ring. Four of the π orbitals are bonding and one is anti-bonding with respect to each of the bonds of the five-membered ring, apart from the transannular C–N bond for which only three π orbitals are bonding and two are anti-bonding. Similarly, the π orbitals support the localization of π electrons to two double bonds C4–C5 and C6–C7 in the six-membered ring.
image file: c7dt04350c-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Top: Highest occupied π orbitals of indenide (left) and 1-bora-7a-azaindenide (right). Bottom: Electrostatic potential [atomic units (au)] of 2a mapped on the electron density isosurface (0.005 au) at PBE0/def-TZVP level of theory.

Given this analysis, it is perhaps not surprising that an evaluation of the charge distribution (electrostatic potential) within the 1-bora-7a-azaindenide anion (Fig. 1, bottom) indicates that the electron rich areas of the molecule are mainly associated with the five-membered ring. Within this ring, C-2 and the boron atom have the most negative surface values, indicating the most likely sites for an attack by electrophiles, while the electrostatic potential on C-3 is less negative. This contrasts with the all carbon indenide ion itself, wherein the most electron rich areas are associated with the C-1/C-3 positions. We thus explored the reactions of anions 2a and 2b with simple electrophiles to ascertain the impact of this unusual charge distribution on the outcome of the reactions.

It was apparent early in our investigations that 2a was not stable in the presence of alkyl halides; attempts to obtain the 1H NMR spectrum of 2a in CD2Cl2 resulted in immediate and clean conversion to a new product as judged by a dark orange to pale yellow colour change and NMR spectroscopy. The characteristic 11B NMR chemical shift of 24.5 ppm for 2a shifted upfield to 1.9 ppm, in the range of neutral, four-coordinate borane compounds, and the C-H4–7 protons of the pyridyl unit all shifted downfield significantly, indicating a re-aromatization of this ring in comparison to 2a. Furthermore, when CH2Cl2 was employed, an AB quartet at 3.62 and 3.48 ppm (2JHH = 12.5 Hz) was observed for the diastereotopic protons deriving from the DCM electrophile in the product. While the electrostatic map in Fig. 1 suggests that C-2 might be the most nucleophilic site in the ring, subsequent investigations showed the product of this reaction to be the 1-chloromethyl-1-bora-7a-azaindenyl derivative 3 (Scheme 2). This was confirmed via a partial structural determination (connectivity only) on single crystals, and by the synthesis of the analogous methyl compounds, 4a–b, prepared by reaction of 2a–b with methyl iodide in good yields. For derivative 4a, the molecular structure was determined (Fig. 2) and clearly establishes that the alkyl groups in these reactions add to the boron centre. The metrical parameters for 4a support the notion that the pyridyl ring has re-aromatized, and a longer B1–N1 bond of 1.6198(16) Å compared to the distance of 1.438(4) Å in 2a is also consistent with conversion from a 1-bora-7a-azaindenide to an indenyl derivative.


image file: c7dt04350c-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Reactions of 1-bora-7a-azaindenide anions 2 with alkyl halides.

image file: c7dt04350c-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Molecular structure of 4a. Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity. Thermal ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level. Selected bond lengths (Å): B(1)–N(1), 1.6198(16); B(1)–C(1), 1.6218(18); C(1)–C(2), 1.3599(18); C(2)–C(3), 1.4596(18); C(3)–C(4), 1.3962(18); C(4)–C(5), 1.379(2); C(5)–C(6), 1.388(2); C(6)–C(7), 1.3742(19); C(7)–N(1), 1.3404(17); N(1)–C(3), 1.3571(16).

These observations indicate that 2a functions as a rare example of an anionic boron nucleophile39–43 in its reactions with alkyl halides, despite the more pronounced localization of negative charge on the C-2 carbon of the 1-bora-7a-azaindenide anion. Given that the indenide anion itself alkylates exclusively at the C-1/C-3 positions,44 it is notable that no evidence for alkylation of the C-3 position in anions 2 was observed. Density functional theory investigation of the reaction of 2a with CH2Cl2 shows that the lowest energy reaction path involves direct SN2 type attack of the boron on the alkyl halide (Fig. 3) while attempts to locate a transition state involving C-2 attack on the substrate were not successful. The boron displacement of chloride and B–C bond formation occurs through a transition state (TS1) with a barrier of 71 kJ mol−1 to yield product 3 in a strongly exergonic reaction (−200 kJ mol−1). Although it was possible to locate a transition state (TS2) for transfer of a CH2Cl+ fragment to C-2 starting from 3, it had a very high activation barrier (163 kJ mol−1) and the product of the reaction, 3′, is less stable than 3 by 71 kJ mol−1. We attribute this to the fact that, for 3, the formation of the B–C bond is accompanied by re-aromatization of the pyridine ring (a NICS(1) value of −8.2 is calculated for this ring in 3, see Table S1) while in 3′, the ring remains non-aromatic (NICS(1) = 2.5) and the five membered ring also loses aromaticity (NICS(1) = 0.3) as compared to 2a. Thus, the overall regiochemistry of this alkylation is determined to a large degree by the changes in aromaticity in 3/3′vs. the starting materials.


image file: c7dt04350c-f3.tif
Fig. 3 Calculated Gibbs free energies (kJ mol−1, PBE0/def-TZVP level of theory) for the reaction of 2a with CH2Cl2 in dichloromethane to give either 3 or 3′.

To provide experimental support for the computed transition state, the 7-methyl-1-bora-7a-azaindenide 2b was treated with the alkyl bromide 1-bromo-1,2-dideuterio-3,3-dimethylbutane. The dideuterated neo-hexyl group is a useful stereoprobe for acquiring mechanistic information because the change in stereochemistry at C-1 is easily monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy.45 The bromo alkyl substrate was prepared via hydrozirconation methodology as an 80[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]20 mixture of erythro[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]threo diastereomers using a literature procedure46 and reacted with 2b.§ A clean reaction to a new product (5, Fig. 4) was observed, but it required heating at 60 °C for 3 hours to go to completion due to the greater steric bulk of this substrate. For an SN2 mechanism, inversion of stereochemistry would be expected46 in the alkylborane product, while mechanisms involving, for example, electron transfer47 from 2 to the substrate, would lead to racemization. The experiment is somewhat complicated by the fact that the boron centre in the alkylated product 5 is also a stereocentre. There is no diastereoselectivity observed in the formation of this stereocentre, so four signals are observed for the protons of the stereoprobe in the product's 1H{2H} NMR spectrum. As can be seen in Fig. 4, the 1H NMR signal associated with the proton in the 2-position of the probe is well resolved and indicates that the probe has cleanly undergone conversion to an 80[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]20 mixture of threo[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]erythro isomers, as would be expected for an SN2 mechanism and therefore completely consistent with the computations presented above. Thus, these 1-bora-7a-azaindenides behave as pure SN2 nucleophiles to alkyl halides and the involvement of SET reaction mechanisms47 is negligible for this class of boron anions. Another topical area of research in main group chemistry involves the “metal-free” binding and activation of small molecules, particularly carbon dioxide48–54 (CO2). Compounds 2 undergo an immediate reaction with the electrophile CO2, as indicated by a dark orange to deep red colour change upon exposure of THF solutions to 1 atm of CO2. In situ NMR spectroscopy indicates that the reaction proceeds cleanly to one product; by analogy to the reactions with alkyl halides, initially it was postulated that the boron nucleophile attacked the electrophilic carbon of CO2. However, while the 11B NMR spectrum exhibited a signal at 5.3 ppm, consistent with four-coordinate boron, the 13C{1H} NMR spectrum contained a sharp signal at 176.0 ppm for the carbon in the product derived from CO2. This was confirmed by using 13CO2. If bonded to boron, this signal would be expected to be significantly broadened due to proximity to the quadrupolar boron centre. Furthermore, in the 1H NMR spectrum, the signals for the pyridyl ring C-H groups remain upfield shifted (C-H5 = 6.21 ppm; C-H6 = 4.94 ppm), suggesting that re-aromatization of the pyridyl ring is not featured in the product of this reaction. X-ray crystallography on the product of the reaction of 2a with CO2 revealed the structure of the products 6a–b to be as depicted in Scheme 3 and Fig. 5, wherein the electrophilic carbon of CO2 has been attacked by C-2 of the 1-bora-7a-indenide ring. Note that, although only one enantiomer is shown in Scheme 3, the reaction is not enantioselective, but essentially 100% diastereoselective due to the constraints of the B(1)–O(1)–C(1)–C(2) ring.


image file: c7dt04350c-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Reaction of 2b with an 80[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]20 erythro[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]threo mixture of 1-bromo-1,2-dideuterio-3,3-dimethylbutane. The 1H{2H} NMR spectra illustrate clean inversion to an 80[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]20 threo[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]erythro mixture in the 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 mixture of B-diastereomeric products of SN2 alkylation, 5.

image file: c7dt04350c-s3.tif
Scheme 3 Reactions of 1-bora-7a-azaindenide anions 2a–b with carbon dioxide.

image file: c7dt04350c-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Molecular structure of the anion of 6a. Hydrogen atoms and the (2,2,2-c) potassium ion have been omitted for clarity. Thermal ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level. Selected bond lengths (Å): B(1)–O(1), 1.562(3); B(1)–N(1), 1.534(4); B(1)–C(2), 1.665(4); C(2)–C(3), 1.525(3); C(3)–C(4), 1.371(4); C(4)–C(5), 1.447(4); C(5)–C(6), 1.354(4); C(6)–C(7), 1.420(5); C(7)–C(8), 1.363(4) C(8)–N(1), 1.355(4); N(1)–C(4), 1.405(3); C(1)–C(2), 1.530(3); C(1)–O(1), 1.334(3); C(1)–O(2), 1.208(3). Selected bond angles (°): O(1)–B(1)–C(2), 86.01(18); C(1)–C(2)–B(1), 80.75(18); O(1)–C(1)–(C2), 100.3(2); B(1)–O(2)–(C1), 91.04(18); O(1)–C(1)–O(2), 125.9(2).

The ions in compound 6a are well separated in the solid state; Fig. 5 shows only the anion, and reveals that the CO2 has added across the C(2)–B(1) bond. The C(1)–O(1) bond length of 1.334(3) Å is significantly lengthened compared to the 1.208(3) Å distance for C(1)–O(2); a stretching vibration of 1709 cm−1 in the IR spectrum of 6a is also consistent with a C(1)–O(2) double bond. Short bond lengths for C(3)–C(4), C(5)–C(6) and C(7)–C(8) alternate with longer lengths C(4)–C(5) and C(6)–C(7), indicating bond localization within the bicyclic framework and non-aromaticity within both rings. NICS(1) values of 0.2 for the pyridyl and −1.0 for the five-membered ring (see Table S1) support this notion; upon addition of CO2 to compounds 2, the aromaticity of the five-membered ring is disrupted, while the pyridyl ring remains non-aromatic.

The binding of CO2 to these compounds was found to be reversible in solution. When solutions of 6a were exposed to 13CO2, incorporation of the labelled carbon dioxide into 6a was facile. Furthermore, when 6a was treated with excess CH2Cl2, slow, irreversible conversion of the compound to compound 3 was observed. Presumably, the CO2 is released from 6a and 2a is trapped by the DCM via the SN2 reaction discussed above. This reversibility enabled us to probe the relative affinity of 2a and 2b for binding CO2 (Scheme 4). When freshly isolated 6a or 6b was dissolved in THF with one equivalent of 2b or 2a, respectively, the equilibrium established over the course of a few hours indicated that the CO2 adduct 6b is strongly favoured over 6a; Keq at 298 K was measured by 1H NMR spectroscopy to be 54(5).|| This is in keeping with the notion that methyl substituted 2b is a more electron rich anion that acts as a stronger nucleophile to RX or CO2 electrophiles.


image file: c7dt04350c-s4.tif
Scheme 4 Equilibrium constant measurement at room temperature for CO2 binding to compounds 2a and 2b.

The addition of CO2 to C-2 in compounds 2a–b directly contrasts with what is observed when the all-carbon indenide anion is trapped with CO2. Here, CO2 adds exclusively to the C-1 position resulting in indene-1-carboxylic acid or indene-3-carboxylic acid, depending on the nature of the work up procedure.55,56 The reaction of 2a with CO2 was probed computationally (Fig. 6) and while a transition state (TS4) was located for attack of the CO2 by the nucleophilic boron centre, the product of this reaction (6a′ in Fig. 6) is 34 kJ mol−1 less stable than the starting materials. Hence, the reverse reaction is essentially barrierless and the equilibrium favours 2a and CO2. The transition state TS3 for attack of CO2 by C-2, while slightly higher than TS4, is nonetheless readily accessible with an energy of only 59 kJ mol−1 above the starting materials.


image file: c7dt04350c-f6.tif
Fig. 6 Calculated Gibbs free energies (kJ mol−1, PBE0/def-TZVP level of theory) for the reaction of 2a with CO2 in toluene to give either 6a or 6a′.

This transition state leads directly to product 6a in a moderately exergonic reaction (41 kJ mol−1) which, despite the non-aromatic character of both rings and the absence of re-aromatization as a driving force is favoured by the formation of both new C–C and B–O bonds. Still, the barrier to CO2 loss is only 100 kJ mol−1 which is consistent with the observed tendency of 6a to lose CO2 at room temperature.

Conclusions

The study described here was aimed at examining the effects of BN substitution within the indenide framework on the course of reactions with simple electrophiles. We specifically utilized 1-bora-7a-azaindenide anions, prepared using organozirconocene based methods, one of ten possible BN indenide isomers. We found that the locus of electrophilic attack was confined to the five-membered BN containing ring, but that the regiochemistry observed was dependent on the nature of the electrophile. Alkyl halides reacted at the boron atom to give neutral BN-indenyl products in which the six-membered pyridyl ring is re-aromatized, a strong factor in determining the outcome of the reaction. This reactivity bears some similarity to what is observed in the reactions of the all carbon indenide anion with alkyl halides, which alkylate at the C-1/3 positions. The reactions of 2a–b with CO2, however, differs from the analogous reactivity in the indenides in that the CO2 electrophile adds to the C-2 carbon of the 1-bora-7a-azaindenides. Here, the Lewis base/Lewis acid nature of these BN compounds conspires to bind the CO2 without re-aromatizing the pyridyl ring. For this reason, the bonding of CO2 to compounds 2 is reversible at room temperature.

Experimental

For general experimental details and a description of the synthesis of compound 1b and 2b, see the ESI.

Synthesis of 3

In a glovebox, a 50 ml two-neck round bottom flask was charged with 1a (100 mg, 0.263 mmol) in 15 mL of THF. KC8 (75 mg, 0.552 mmol) was added and the flask attached to a swivel frit apparatus. The reaction was allowed to stir under argon for 10 minutes. CH2Cl2 was vacuum transferred into the flask, turning the dark orange solution into a clear colorless solution. Graphite was filtered off through the frit and solvent removed giving a pale yellow solid. This was then passed through a silica plug using dichloromethane to yield 3 as a white solid (76 mg, 0.20 mmol, 74%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, methylene chloride-d2) δ 8.36 (dd, J = 5.7, 1.3 Hz, 1H, PyH), 7.99 (ddd, J = 8.7, 7.5, 1.5 Hz, 1H, PyH), 7.48 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, PyH), 7.43–7.30 (m, 6H, ArH), 7.25–7.16 (m, 5H, ArH/PyH), 7.11–7.08 (m, 3H, ArH), 6.98–6.95 (m, 2H, ArH), 3.62 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H, CH2Cl), 3.48 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H, CH2Cl). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 161.03, 141.90, 140.42, 139.07, 135.29, 134.77, 131.48, 129.43, 128.11, 127.78, 127.09, 126.97, 126.83, 125.91, 125.60, 119.58, 118.45, 40.90 (br). 11B NMR (161 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 1.89. Elemental analysis calculated C 79.32; H 5.38; N 3.56, Found, C 79.44, H 5.26, N 3.55.

Synthesis of 4a

In a glovebox, a 50 ml two-neck round bottom flask was charged with 1a (106 mg, 0.279 mmol) in 15 mL of THF. KC8 (75 mg, 0.558 mmol) was added and the flask attached to a swivel frit apparatus. The reaction was allowed to stir under argon for 10 minutes. MeI (0.1 mL, 1.61 mmol) was added dropwise to the reaction, turning the dark orange solution into a clear colorless solution. Solvent was removed under vacuum and 10 mL of dichloromethane was added. Graphite and KCl were filtered off through the frit and solvent removed to yield 4a as a white solid (62 mg, 0.17 mmol, 62%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, methylene chloride-d2) δ 8.20 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H, PyH), 7.92–7.85 (m, 1H, PyH), 7.45–7.39 (m, 3H ArH/PyH), 7.39–7.32 (m, 3H ArH), 7.29–7.25 (m, 2H), 7.24–7.16 (m, 4H, ArH/PyH), 7.15–7.10 (m, 1H ArH), 7.08–7.03 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.01–6.98 (m, 2H, ArH), 0.43 (s, 3H, BMeH). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 179.78(br), 160.04, 149.54(br), 141.57, 139.30, 135.52, 132.95, 132.46, 131.41, 129.52, 128.15, 128.09, 126.83, 126.81, 126.62, 125.75, 124.98, 119.15, 118.21, 5.48(br). 11B NMR (161 MHz, CD2Cl2) δ 1.96. Elemental analysis calculated C 86.92; H 6.17; N 3.90, Found C 86.57, H 6.15, N 3.76.

Synthesis of 4b

In the glovebox, a 50 ml two-neck round bottom flask was charged with 1b (92 mg, 0.234 mmol) in 15 mL of THF. KC8 (66 mg, 0.491 mmol) was added and the flask attached to a swivel frit apparatus. The reaction was allowed to stir under argon for 10 minutes. MeI (0.1 mL, 1.61 mmol) was added dropwise to the reaction, turning the dark orange solution into a clear colorless solution. Solvent was removed under vacuum and 10 mL of dichloromethane was added. Graphite and KCl were filtered off through the frit and solvent removed to yield 4b as a white solid (55 mg, 0.15 mmol, 63%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, THF-d8) δ 7.85 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, PyH), 7.36–7.30 (m, 3H), 7.30–7.24 (m, 4H, Ar/PyH), 7.21 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H, ArH), 7.15 (td, J = 8.1, 7.7, 6.2 Hz, 2H, ArH), 7.11–7.06 (m, 2H, ArH), 6.94–6.90 (m, 2H, Ar/PyH), 6.75 (m, 2H, ArH), 2.38 (s, 3H, PyMeH), 0.38 (s, 3H, BMeH).13C NMR (126 MHz, THF-d8) δ 161.26, 154.71, 139.18, 135.73, 132.69, 132.53, 131.49, 129.64, 127.91, 127.58, 126.77, 126.59, 126.40, 125.28, 124.65, 120.66, 115.56, 20.14, 1.63 MeC. Note: Two of the carbons attached to boron are not observed. 11B NMR (161 MHz, THF-d8) δ 2.86. Elemental analysis calculated C 86.87; H 6.48; N 3.75, Found C 86.81, H 6.40, N 3.69.

Synthesis of 5

In a two-neck 50 mL round bottom flask 1b (50 mg, 0.13 mmol) was taken up in THF (15 mL). To this was added solid KC8 (37 mg, 0.27 mmol), turning the pale yellow solution a dark orange with a black precipitate of graphite forming immediately. The flask was then attached to a swivel frit apparatus and the reaction allowed to stir under argon for 10 minutes. A solution of the dideuterated neohexyl stereoprobe (24 mg, 0.14 mmol) in THF (2 mL) was added via syringe turning the dark orange solution a more pale yellow. This was heated at 60 °C for three hours before the solvent was removed in vacuo and taken back up into CH2Cl2 (25 mL) and filtered through the swivel frit to remove the graphite. The collected solution was passed through a silica plug with CH2Cl2 in the atmosphere, which after removal of solvent yielded 5 as a white solid (25 mg, 0.056 mmol, 43%).1H NMR (500 MHz, benzene-d6) δ 7.50 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, ArH), 7.33 (dd, J = 8.3, 7.1 Hz, 2H, ArH), 7.27–7.20 (m, 3H), 7.16–6.99 (m, 5H), 6.96–6.86 (m, 3H), 6.86–6.74 (m, 2H), 6.08–6.03 (m, 1H), 2.07 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 3H), 1.50 (m, 0.5H, BCHD), 1.30 (m, 0.5H, BCHD), 1.16 (m, 0.5H, CHDCHDtBu), 0.89 (s, 9H, tBuH), 0.63 (m, 0.5H, CHDCHDtBu). 13C NMR (126 MHz, C6D6) δ 161.84, 154.26, 147.39(br), 139.88, 138.47, 135.73, 133.54, 131.75, 129.78, 128.00, 127.81, 126.30, 125.72, 125.22, 119.73, 115.03, 38.61(br), 30.05, 28.71, 19.63, 11.28(br). Note: Two of the carbons attached to boron are not observed. 11B NMR (161 MHz, C6D6) δ 4.05. Elemental analysis calculated C 86.28, H 8.15, N 3.14, Found C 85.98, H 8.03, N 3.28.

Synthesis of 6a

In a J young NMR tube, 2a (10 mg) was taken up in THF-d8 (0.7 mL). The solution was degassed and placed under one atmosphere of CO2. After shaking the NMR tube for 5 minutes the sparingly soluble 2a was completely dissolved and the dark orange solution had turned a dark red colour, NMR of this showed quantitative conversion to 6a. When the THF solution was layered with pentane in the glove box, X-ray quality crystals of 6a were obtained (8 mg, 80% yield).1H NMR (500 MHz, THF-d8) δ 7.56–7.47 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.29–7.22 (m, 2H, ArH), 6.96–6.92 (m, 4H), 6.88 (td, J = 8.6, 7.2 Hz, 3H, Ar/PyH), 6.78–6.69 (m, 3H, Ar/PyH), 6.61–6.47 (m, 3H), 6.22 (ddd, J = 9.6, 5.9, 1.6 Hz, 1H, PyH), 4.94 (td, J = 6.2, 1.2 Hz, 1H, PyH), 3.55 (s, 12H, CryptH), 3.53–3.46 (m, 12H, CryptH), 2.55–2.49 (m, 12H, CryptH). 13C NMR (126 MHz, THF-d8) δ 176.48(CO2C), 147.25, 143.70, 140.97, 139.54, 132.21, 129.83, 126.02, 125.94, 125.48, 125.18, 125.16, 123.81, 120.41, 118.66, 114.61, 100.07, 97.16, 69.72, 66.94, 53.30. Note: Two carbons attached to boron are not observed. 11B NMR (161 MHz, THF-d8) δ 5.30. IR (KBr pellet) 1708.97 cm−1. Elemental analysis calculated C 65.74, H 6.90, N 5.23, Found C 65.48, H 6.99, N 5.50.

Synthesis of 6b

In a J young NMR tube, 2b (10 mg) was taken up in THF-d8 (0.7 mL). The solution was degassed and placed under one atmosphere of CO2. After shaking the NMR tube for <1 minute the sparingly soluble 2b was completely dissolved and the bright orange solution had turned a dark red colour, NMR of this showed quantitative conversion to 6b. When the THF solution was layered with pentane in the glove box, small needlelike crystals formed (5 mg, 50%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, THF-d8) δ 7.49–7.42 (m, 3H, ArH), 6.84 (m, 5H, ArH, PyH), 6.72 (m, 3H, ArH), 6.61 (m, 3H, ArH), 6.52–6.45 (m, 1H, ArH), 6.43–6.37 (m, 1H, ArH), 6.13 (dd, J = 9.5, 6.0 Hz, 1H, PyH), 4.77 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 1H, PyH), 3.54 (s, 12H, CryptH), 3.52–3.47 (m, 12H, CryptH), 2.54–2.49 (m, 12H, CryptH), 1.42 (s, 3H, MeH). 13C NMR (126 MHz, THF-d8) δ 173.01, 149.43, 143.90, 141.18, 130.05, 125.91, 125.82, 125.51, 125.25, 125.08, 124.35, 123.03, 120.22, 118.37, 112.33, 109.40, 98.70, 83.22, 69.73, 67.02, 53.56, 21.49. Note: Two carbons attached to boron are not observed. 11B NMR (161 MHz, THF-d8) δ 5.41.IR (KBr Pellet) 1709.63 cm−1. Elemental analysis calculated C 66.09, H 7.03, N 5.14, Found C 65.96, H 6.92, N 5.28.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

Funding for this work was provided by NSERC of Canada (Discovery Grant) the Canada Research Chair secretariat (Tier I CRC 2013–2020) to W. E. P. and the Academy of Finland (project #136929) and Emil Aaltonen Foundation to H. M. T. Finnish Grid and Cloud Infrastructure (urn:nbn:fi:research-infras-2016072533) is acknowledged for granting computational resources. W. E. P. acknowledges the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for a Research Fellowship. M. M. M. thanks NSERC of Canada for PGSD Scholarship support.

Notes and references

  1. M. J. D. Bosdet and W. E. Piers, Can. J. Chem., 2009, 87, 8–29 CrossRef.
  2. X.-Y. Wang, J.-Y. Wang and J. Pei, Chem. – Eur. J., 2015, 21, 3528–3539 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. M. M. Morgan and W. E. Piers, Dalton Trans., 2016, 45, 5920–5924 RSC.
  4. H. Helten, Chem. – Eur. J., 2016, 22, 12972–12982 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. E. R. Abbey and S. Y. Liu, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 2060–2069 CAS.
  6. B. J. Wang and M. P. Groziak, in Advances in Heterocyclic Chemistry, ed. E. F. V. Scriven and C. A. Ramsden, Academic Press, 2016, vol. 118, pp. 47–90 Search PubMed.
  7. M. J. D. Bosdet, W. E. Piers, T. S. Sorensen and M. Parvez, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 4940–4943 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. X.-Y. Wang, H.-R. Lin, T. Lei, D.-C. Yang, F.-D. Zhuang, J.-Y. Wang, S.-C. Yuan and J. Pei, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 3117–3120 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. H. N. Huang, Z. X. Pan and C. M. Cui, Chem. Commun., 2016, 52, 4227–4230 RSC.
  10. C. A. Jaska, D. J. H. Emslie, M. J. D. Bosdet, W. E. Piers, T. S. Sorensen and M. Parvez, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 10885–10896 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. T. Hatakeyama, S. Hashimoto, T. Oba and M. Nakamura, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 19600–19603 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. X.-Y. Wang, F.-D. Zhuang, X. Zhou, D.-C. Yang, J.-Y. Wang and J. Pei, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2014, 2, 8152–8161 RSC.
  13. Z. Liu and T. B. Marder, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 242–244 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  14. P. G. Campbell, A. J. V. Marwitz and S.-Y. Liu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 6074–6092 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  15. G. Bélanger-Chabot, H. Braunschweig and D. K. Roy, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2017, 2017, 4353–4368 CrossRef.
  16. E. R. Abbey, A. N. Lamm, A. W. Baggett, L. N. Zakharov and S.-Y. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 12908–12913 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  17. A. W. Baggett and S.-Y. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 15259–15264 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. H. Braunschweig, A. Damme, J. O. C. Jimenez-Halla, B. Pfaffinger, K. Radacki and J. Wolf, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 10034–10037 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  19. A. N. Lamm, E. B. Garner, D. A. Dixon and S.-Y. Liu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 8157–8160 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. X. G. Liu, Y. Z. Zhang, B. Li, L. N. Zakharov, M. Vasiliu, D. A. Dixon and S. Y. Liu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 8333–8337 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  21. J. Pan, J. W. Kampf and A. J. Ashe, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 679–681 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  22. S. Xu, L. N. Zakharov and S.-Y. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 20152–20155 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  23. S. Xu, T. C. Mikulas, L. N. Zakharov, D. A. Dixon and S.-Y. Liu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 7527–7531 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. Z. Liu, J. S. A. Ishibashi, C. Darrigan, A. Dargelos, A. Chrostowska, B. Li, M. Vasiliu, D. A. Dixon and S.-Y. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 6082–6085 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  25. G. A. Molander and S. R. Wisniewski, J. Org. Chem., 2014, 79, 6663–6678 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  26. G. A. Molander, S. R. Wisniewski and J. Amani, Org. Lett., 2014, 16, 5636–5639 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  27. J. S. A. Ishibashi, A. Dargelos, C. Darrigan, A. Chrostowska and S.-Y. Liu, Organometallics, 2017, 36, 2494–2497 CrossRef CAS.
  28. J. S. A. Ishibashi, J. L. Marshall, A. Mazière, G. J. Lovinger, B. Li, L. N. Zakharov, A. Dargelos, A. Graciaa, A. Chrostowska and S.-Y. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 15414–15421 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  29. C. K. Frederickson, B. D. Rose and M. M. Haley, Acc. Chem. Res., 2017, 50, 977–987 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. C. K. Frederickson, L. N. Zakharov and M. M. Haley, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 16827–16838 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. J. L. Marshall, N. J. O'Neal, L. N. Zakharov and M. M. Haley, J. Org. Chem., 2016, 81, 3674–3680 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  32. B. D. Rose, N. J. Sumner, A. S. Filatov, S. J. Peters, L. N. Zakharov, M. A. Petrukhina and M. M. Haley, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 9181–9189 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  33. G. E. Rudebusch, J. L. Zafra, K. Jorner, K. Fukuda, J. L. Marshall, I. Arrechea-Marcos, G. L. Espejo, R. Ponce Ortiz, C. J. Gómez-García, L. N. Zakharov, M. Nakano, H. Ottosson, J. Casado and M. M. Haley, Nat. Chem., 2016, 8, 753–759 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  34. M. M. Morgan, E. A. Patrick, J. M. Rautiainen, H. M. Tuononen, W. E. Piers and D. M. Spasyuk, Organometallics, 2017, 36, 2541–2551 CrossRef CAS.
  35. N. Ishida, M. Narumi and M. Murakami, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 1279–1281 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  36. K. Yuan, N. Suzuki, S. K. Mellerup, X. Wang, S. Yamaguchi and S. Wang, Org. Lett., 2016, 18, 720–723 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  37. A. N. Brown, B. Li and S.-Y. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 8932–8935 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  38. C. Zhu, Z.-H. Guo, A. U. Mu, Y. Liu, S. E. Wheeler and L. Fang, J. Org. Chem., 2016, 81, 4347–4352 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  39. Y. Segawa, Y. Suzuki, M. Yamashita and K. Nozaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 16069–16079 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  40. Y. Segawa, M. Yamashita and K. Nozaki, Science, 2006, 314, 113 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  41. A.-F. Pécharman, A. L. Colebatch, M. S. Hill, C. L. McMullin, M. F. Mahon and C. Weetman, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 15022 CrossRef PubMed.
  42. H. Braunschweig, C.-W. Chiu, K. Radacki and T. Kupfer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 2041–2044 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  43. J. Monot, A. Solovyev, H. Bonin-Dubarle, É. Derat, D. P. Curran, M. Robert, L. Fensterbank, M. Malacria and E. Lacôte, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 9166–9169 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  44. L. Meurling, Acta Chem. Scand., Ser. B, 1974, 28, 295–300 CrossRef CAS.
  45. P. L. Bock, D. J. Boschetto, J. R. Rasmussen, J. P. Demers and G. M. Whitesides, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1974, 96, 2814–2825 CrossRef CAS.
  46. A. Igau and J. A. Gladysz, Organometallics, 1991, 10, 2327–2334 CrossRef CAS.
  47. R. Bertermann, H. Braunschweig, R. D. Dewhurst, C. Hörl, T. Kramer and I. Krummenacher, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 5453–5457 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  48. C. M. Mömming, E. Otten, G. Kehr, R. Fröhlich, S. Grimme, D. W. Stephan and G. Erker, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 6643–6646 CrossRef PubMed.
  49. J. W. Taylor, A. McSkimming, C. F. Guzman and W. H. Harman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 11032–11035 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  50. C. Villiers, J.-P. Dognon, R. Pollet, P. Thuéry and M. Ephritikhine, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 3465–3468 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  51. N. von Wolff, G. Lefèvre, J. C. Berthet, P. Thuéry and T. Cantat, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 4526–4535 CrossRef CAS.
  52. T. Voss, T. Mahdi, E. Otten, R. Fröhlich, G. Kehr, D. W. Stephan and G. Erker, Organometallics, 2012, 31, 2367–2378 CrossRef CAS.
  53. B. Wang, Y. Li, R. Ganguly, H. Hirao and R. Kinjo, Nat. Commun., 2016, 7, 11871 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  54. D. Wu, L. Kong, Y. Li, R. Ganguly and R. Kinjo, Nat. Commun., 2015, 6, 7340 CrossRef PubMed.
  55. O. Methcohn and S. Gronowitz, Chem. Commun., 1966, 81–82 RSC.
  56. J. Pietruszka, R. C. Simon, F. Kruska and M. Braun, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2009, 6217–6224 CrossRef CAS.

Footnotes

Dedicated to Prof. Phil Power, a giant of modern main group chemistry, on the occasion of his 65th birthday.
Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Description of general methods, computational methods and results, Fig. S1–11 and crystallographic data for 4 and 6a. CCDC 1584567 and 1584568. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c7dt04350c
§ Compound 2b was employed because it was more reactive than 2a towards the stereoprobe and yielded 5 cleanly.
Compounds 2 do not react with excess CO, N2O, H2 or silanes (Et3SiH, PhMe2SiH, PhSiH3) at room temperature to 60 °C.
|| Attempts to obtain Keq at different temperatures were complicated by escape of CO2 into the headspace of the NMR tube, so these measurements and a van't Hoff analysis were precluded.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018