(Ge2P2)2−: a binary analogue of P4 as a precursor to the ternary cluster anion [Cd3(Ge3P)3]3−

Stefan Mitzinger ab, Jascha Bandemehr a, Kevin Reiter c, J. Scott McIndoe d, Xiulan Xie a, Florian Weigend *c, John F. Corrigan *b and Stefanie Dehnen *a
aFachbereich Chemie and Wissenschaftliches Zentrum für Materialwissenschaften, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Str. 4, 35043 Marburg, Germany. E-mail: dehnen@chemie.uni-marburg.de
bThe University of Western Ontario, Department of Chemistry, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada. E-mail: corrigan@uwo.ca
cKarlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Nanotechnology, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany. E-mail: florian.weigend@kit.edu
dUniversity of Victoria, Department of Chemistry, Elliott Building Room 301, Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada

Received 30th October 2017 , Accepted 21st December 2017

First published on 21st December 2017


The novel binary P4 analogue (Ge2P2)2− proved to be a suitable precursor for heteroatomic cluster synthesis. Over time in solution, it rearranges to form (Ge7P2)2−, as shown by NMR studies and X-ray diffraction. Reactions of (Ge2P2)2− with CdPh2 afford [K(crypt-222)]3[Cd3(Ge3P)3], containing an unprecedented ternary cluster anion with a triangular Cd3 moiety.


Homoatomic polyanions of germanium, Ge94− and Ge44−, are actively used for the synthesis of binary transition metal-main group metal complexes and intermetalloid clusters. Their relative stability and yet demonstrated reactivity towards organic and inorganic compounds has been reported for numerous examples,1–4 like the silylated cages [Ge9(SiPh2CHCH2)3],5 metal complexes like [(Ge9{Si(TMS)3}2)tBu2P]Au(NHCDipp),6 or the intermetalloid cluster [Ru@Ge12]3−.7 Within the last decade, a large variety of novel compounds was thus discovered: these compounds are exemplary for the high chemical flexibility of these homoatomic systems, which also includes mixed Ge/Si or Ge/Sn intertetrelide species.8

A complementary branch of transition metal-main group element cluster chemistry is based on the activation and derivatization of white phosphorus (P4) as a reagent, which has led to a multitude of beautiful and spectacular new compounds and molecular architectures.9–13

We transferred this concept to binary analogs14 by using the isoelectronic (E142E152)2− species (Ge2As2)2−,16 (Sn2Sb2)2−,17,18 (Sn2Bi2)2−,19–21 or (Pb2Bi2)2−.22 This way, the two aforementioned areas of research are bridged, with significant electronic and structural consequences for the reaction products. Isoelectronic substitution has proven a very powerful tool in the formation of intermetalloid cluster anions and heterometallic complexes in the recent past.22–27 The inclusion of E15 atoms to produce binary (E142E152)2− anions reduces their charge relative to their E14 analogues, (E144)4−, while retaining the overall valence electron number. The solubility is thus significantly enhanced. However, to date all studies with binary Zintl anions have so far addressed (semi-)metals of the fourth period upwards. In this work, we intended to approach the intriguing P4 chemistry even more closely by explicitly including this element type while retaining the Zintl anion style of chemistry.

A solid mixture of potassium, germanium and red phosphorus of the nominal composition “K2Ge2P2” was formed by fusing the elements in a 1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 ratio at 950 °C in an Nb ampoule. According to a comprehensive time-dependent electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) study of the extraction process of “K2Ge2P2”/crypt-222 in ethane-1,2-diamine (ethylene diamine, en), the (Ge2P2)2− anion is the only Zintl anion detected at the beginning of the extraction. It was detected as its protonated, mono-charged derivative (Ge2P2H) (Fig. S10 and S13, ESI), as a typical consequence of the ESI procedure of (especially light element) Zintl ions from en solutions, and in contrast to some anions that were intrinsically protonated and even crystallized in this form.28,29 Upon extracting the solid mixture with en/crypt-222 and subsequent layering with toluene, [K(crypt-222)]2(Ge2P2)·en (1·en) crystallized as yellow tabular prisms in approximately 20% yield within 3 days (Fig. S1, ESI). Larger amounts of 1 can be obtained by enforcing its precipitation by the rapid addition of THF to the filtered extraction mixture (yield approx. 70%). If undisturbed, dark orange cubes of [K(crypt-222)]2(Ge7P2) (2) also crystallize, in approximately 10% yield after two weeks (Fig. S2, ESI). If left undisturbed for several weeks, crystals of 1·en dissolve completely and large amounts of 2 crystallize. As the (Ge7P2)2− cluster anion contained in 2 has not been detected in the ESI(−) mass spectrum upon fresh extraction of the solid mixture in en, we anticipate its formation upon oxidation in solution over time.

The reactivity of the (Ge2P2)2− cluster anion towards d-block metal compounds was demonstrated by the addition of CdPh2, giving rise to the formation of [K(crypt-222)]3[Cd3(Ge3P)3]·tol (3·tol; tol = toluene). A reaction with the lighter homologue, ZnPh2, has not afforded identifiable products so far. Compound 1·en crystallizes as red, elongated square prisms that dendritically agglomerate into a leaf-like morphology (Fig. S3, ESI). 3 represents a new example of the rare family of compounds that contain direct Cd–Ge contacts, such as [CdGe(SiMe3)3]2I330 and [Ge9(Si(SiMe3)3)3]2Cd.2 At the same time the anion in 3 is the first species comprising more than two Cd atoms within an intermetalloid cluster structure.

The compositions of 1–3 were confirmed by means of ESI(−)-MS and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy. Their crystal structures were determined by means of single-crystal X-ray diffraction31,32 (see ESI for details).

1 crystallizes with one molecule of en per unit cell in the triclinic space group P1 (Z = 1). The bond lengths of the tetrahedral anion were found to vary between 2.387(2) and 2.635(2) Å. The shortest bond is thus notably longer than the P–P bonds in white phosphorus (2.209(5) Å),33 while the longest contact is slightly longer than the Ge–Ge bonds in the Ge44− anion in K4Ge4 (2.563(3) Å).34 However, the bond lengths are similar to known Ge–P distances (e.g., 2.34 Å for a Ge atom coordinated to a P4 unit;35e.g., 2.50–2.52 Å for Ge atoms coordinated to a P7 unit).36 Due to intrinsic disorder in the solid state structure, we cannot discriminate between specific Ge–P, Ge–Ge and P–P bonds.

The 31P-NMR spectrum, measured on a fresh solution of 1 in DMF-d7 at room temperature, shows a singlet at δ = −432 ppm (Fig. 1, bottom). This is slightly less shifted upfield than the values reported for white phosphorus itself (−488 to −527 ppm).37 However, the comparison of these values is problematic due to very different solvent environments. Recently, a planar Ge2P2 four-membered ring was reported that was synthesized via CO elimination of a phosphaketenyl germylene. For this compound, the 31P-NMR spectrum shows a singlet at 131.9 ppm, hence significantly deshielded in comparison with its parent molecule, which exhibits a singlet at −301.7 ppm before decarbonylation.38 However, a comparison with the anion in 1 is questionable for the Ge2P2 moiety being planar and not charged. A butterfly-type Ge2P2 motif was reported in a Ge(II) phosphinidene dimer, which also exhibits a low-field resonance 31P-NMR signal at 270.2 ppm.39 Here, the P atoms form four bonds each, again complicating a direct comparison with 1. The NMR data of (Ge2P2)2− compare best with butterfly-shaped Ge–P heterocycles reported by Drieß et al.: with all P atoms bound three-fold, the 31P-NMR resonance singlet is observed at −365 ppm,40 hence between the values reported herein for 1 and 2. This confirms the angles and the number of bonds to be the most important parameters for controlling the (de)shielding of the P atoms.


image file: c7cc08348c-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Time-dependent 31P NMR spectroscopy, indicating full conversion of (Ge2P2)2− anions to (Ge7P2)2− anions in the course of 14 days. The spectrum at the bottom was measured on a fresh solution of single crystals of compound 1 in DMF-d7, and comprises the singlet signal of the (Ge2P2) anion (see structure diagram to the right) at −432.38 ppm only. The spectrum in the centre was recorded from the same sample after 7 days, the topmost spectrum after 14 days. The latter comprises the singlet signal of the (Ge7P2)2− anion (see structure diagram to the left) at −252.21 ppm only, which is identical to the signal measured from single crystals of 2.

Time-dependent 31P-NMR spectroscopy in DMF-d7 in a flame-sealed NMR tube (Fig. 1) indicates the continuous formation of a second species over time. As mentioned above, this species was identified as the (Ge7P2)2− anion by crystallization of compound 2. The NMR data showed a complete conversion of (Ge2P2)2− to (Ge7P2)2− anions after two weeks, together with precipitation of red phosphorus, consistent with the lower relative phosphorus content in (Ge7P2)2− (3.5[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1) with regard to that in (Ge2P2)2− (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1). The loss of phosphorus by precipitation is reflected by a decrease of the 31P-NMR signal intensity. The 31P-NMR spectrum of the products features a singlet at δ = −252 ppm, in accordance with the less shielding chemical environment of seven neighboring Ge atoms with a total charge of 2− in (Ge7P2)2−, opposed to only two neighboring Ge atoms with the same total charge in (Ge2P2)2−. The ESI(−) mass spectrum recorded after the described conversion (Fig. S11, ESI) exhibits peaks for the corresponding single charged species (Ge7P2H) and {[K(crypt-222)](Ge7P2)}, respectively, in agreement with the described formation of (Ge2P2)2− into (Ge7P2)2−. Noteworthy, this result supports a recent assumption regarding the formation mechanism of the nido-type cages from tetrahedral anions, which was made based on quantum chemical calculations.15 Some calculations have also been done on the structure of neutral [Ge2P2],41 which are in full agreement with the known feature of an two-electron oxidation of the tetrahedral anions to result in the cleavage of the E14–E14 bond, which represents the clusters’ HOMO.19

Compound 2 crystallizes in the trigonal space group P[3 with combining macron]c1 (Z = 2). The cluster anion is disordered over three positions around a common center of gravity (Fig. S5 and S6, ESI). Each orientation shares two atom positions with another orientation. Its crystallographic constitution is therefore similar to that of the homologous (Ge7As2)2− cluster anion.15 The Ge–Ge distances are in accordance with those observed in the (Ge7As2)2− homolog.

The ternary cluster compound 3 crystallizes in the hexagonal space group P6522 (Z = 6) with one equivalent of toluene solvent (3·tol). Two cluster orientations, that can be converted into each other by a two-fold rotation, are disordered on the same anionic position, with site occupation factors of 0.5 for all atoms (Fig. S9, ESI). The structure of one of the orientations is shown in Fig. 2. The crystallographic assignment of Ge and P atoms is supported by quantum chemical calculations as well as 31P-NMR and 113Cd-NMR studies (see below).


image file: c7cc08348c-f2.tif
Fig. 2 Top view (top) and side view (bottom) of the molecular structure of the anion in 3·tol, shown for one of the two disordered positions. Selected distances [Å] and angles [°]: Cd1⋯Cd2A 2.985(3), Cd1⋯Cd2B 3.251(3), Cd2A⋯Cd2B 3.358(3), Cd–Ge 2.686(4)–3.170(4), Ge–Ge 2.232(6)–2.566(5), Ge–P 2.309(9)–2.440(14); Cd⋯Cd⋯Cd 10.70(4), 35.35(14), Ge–P–Ge 66.2(2)–71.5(6), Ge–Ge–Ge 57.3(2)–66.68(11), P–Ge–Ge 51.48(19)–57.01(17). Dashed Cd⋯Cd contacts are not meant to represent bonds.

The anion in compound 3 is based on three Cd atoms forming a nearly isosceles triangle (Cd⋯Cd 2.985(3)–3.358(3) Å) that is coordinated and thereby connected by three (Ge3P)3− tetrahedra. Notably, only Ge atoms of the latter interact with the Cd atoms, while the P atoms point outwards. Each of the Cd atoms interacts with two of the neighboring (Ge3P)3− units, one coordinating in a η3-type fashion, thereby forming a P(Ge3)Cd bipyramid, the other one coordinates in a η2-type manner. This leads to an idealized C3h symmetric structure, which is, however, perturbed by the irregularity of the central Cd3 ring.

Quantum chemical calculations of the anion that are carried out without symmetry restrictions did not reproduce the exact structure as global energy minimum, but a diversity of similar ones within 30 kJ mol−1, exhibiting weak modes (below 10 cm−1) for a rotation of the (Ge3P)3− unit about the virtual Cd⋯Popposite axes (see Fig. S19, ESI). This indicates a high fluxionality of the cluster at least under the given experimental conditions, which is in agreement with the NMR spectroscopic data of the cluster in solution.

The 113Cd-NMR spectrum of a solution of 3 in DMF-d7 revealed only one signal (δ = 636 ppm (t), 2J113Cd–31P = 72 Hz; see Fig. S18, ESI). The 31P-NMR is more complex and consists of a central singlet at −129 ppm with two symmetric satellites (72 Hz apart) and symmetric shoulders. After evaluation of several couplings enabled due to various Cd isotopes, an integral distribution of 2[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]19[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]58[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]19[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]2 was calculated and also observed in the experimental spectrum (see ESI for more details). The value of the 113Cd–31P coupling of 72 Hz is similar to 2J coupling constants reported for Cd-enriched enzyme phosphate complexes (30 Hz),42 whereas it deviates by more than one order of magnitude from reported values for a 1J113Cd–31P coupling (1123–2960 Hz).43,44 This supports the assignment of the P atoms in the (Ge3P)3− moiety in 3 as pointing outwards.

The originally unexpected presence of (Ge3P)3− units in the molecular structure of the anion in 3 was unambiguously confirmed by SCXRD as well as by ESI(−)-MS of re-dissolved single-crystals (Fig. 3), and it is in perfect agreement with the total 3− charge of that anion that results from a combination of three (Ge3P)3− units with three Cd2+ ions, balanced by three [K(crypt–222)]+ cations. Therefore, we propose that upon addition of CdPh2, the (Ge2P2)2− anions undergo a transformation into (Ge3P)3− anions and some phosphorus species, such as (GeP3) (for the simplest possible way to comply with atom and charge balance), or some yet unidentified polyphosphides.


image file: c7cc08348c-f3.tif
Fig. 3 High resolution ESI mass peak of the [Cd3(Ge3P)3]3− anion in 3, detected as {[K(crypt-222)]H[Cd3(Ge3P)3]} at m/z 1500. Top: Measured spectrum. Bottom: Calculated spectrum.

Moreover, in a detailed mass spectrometric study of the Ge/P system under different solvent conditions, we found evidence for “GeP3” moieties with solvent fragments (Fig. S14, ESI), which may support this first assumption. In our previous study of the Ge/As system15 a corresponding “(Ge3As)” moiety was detected in the ESI mass spectrum, which suggests that a similar process in solution is occurring in Ge/As and Ge/P systems. The mechanism of and the stimulus for this transformation remains puzzling and needs further investigation.

In conclusion, we were able to demonstrate the successful use of the novel P4 homolog (Ge2P2)2− for the synthesis of multi-metallic clusters using CdPh2 as a reagent. The novel trimeric cluster anion comprises an unusual triangular Cd geometry and a new (Ge3P)3− fragment which forms from (Ge2P2)2− in solution at a so far unknown pathway, that most probably releases (Ge3P)3− and (GeP3) fragments. The tetrahedral cluster anion (Ge2P2)2− undergoes an irreversible transformation in solution resulting in the 9-vertex-cluster anion (Ge7P2)2−. The novel homolog of P4 can be synthesized as the [K(crypt-222)]+ salt in high purity with approx. 70% yield and is therefore a good precursor for the development of new binary Ge/P cluster compounds. Although many questions remain unanswered in this process, we can conclude that these binary Zintl-type clusters possess a rich chemistry in solution. Their reactivity is to a degree solvent-specific, and they can undergo transformations into larger binary clusters. The quantitative understanding of this process alone would be of great value to develop a comprehensive chemistry around the so far selective knowledge we possess of multi-metallic clusters. This will be addressed in the future.

This article is dedicated to Professor Philip P. Power on the occasion of his 65th birthday. We thank Rhonda Stoddard and Dr Eric Janusson at the University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, for their help in utilizing various mass spectrometry methods, and Dr Mathew Willans at the University of Western Ontario, Ontario, Canada, for 31P-NMR and preliminary 111Cd-NMR and 113Cd-NMR measurements. This work was supported by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (S. M.), the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG; S. D.), and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC; J. F. C.). F. W. and K. R. acknowledge financial support from SFB 1176.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Notes and references

  1. S. C. Sevov and J. M. Goicoechea, Organometallics, 2006, 25, 5678–5692 CrossRef CAS .
  2. F. Henke, C. Schenk and A. Schnepf, Dalton Trans., 2009, 9141–9145 RSC .
  3. L. G. Perla and S. C. Sevov, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 9795–9798 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  4. K. Mayer, L.-A. Jantke, S. Schulz and T. F. Fässler, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 2350–2355 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  5. K. Mayer, L. J. Schiegerl, T. Kratky, S. Günther and T. F. Fässler, Chem. Commun., 2006, 11798–11801 Search PubMed .
  6. F. S. Geitner, J. V. Dums and T. F. Fässler, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 11933–11940 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  7. G. Espinoza-Quintero, J. C. A. Duckworth, W. K. Myers, J. E. McGrady and J. M. Goicoechea, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 1210–1213 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  8. M. Waibel, C. B. Benda, B. Wahl and T. F. Fässler, Chem. – Eur. J., 2011, 17, 12928–12931 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  9. M. Scheer, G. Balázs and A. Seitz, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 4236–4256 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  10. C. Schwarzmaier, A. Schindler, C. Heindl, S. Scheuermayer, E. V. Peresypkina, A. V. Virovets, M. Neumeier, R. Gschwind and M. Scheer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 10896–10899 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  11. C. Schwarzmaier, A. Y. Timoshkin, G. Balázs and M. Scheer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 9077–9081 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  12. J. D. Masuda, W. W. Schoeller, B. Donnadieu and G. Bertrand, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 7052–7055 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  13. J. D. Masuda, W. W. Schoeller, B. Donnadieu and G. Bertrand, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 14180–14181 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  14. B. Weinert and S. Dehnen, Binary and Ternary Intermetalloid Clusters, in Clusters – Contemporary Insight in Structure and Bonding. Structure and Bonding, ed. S. Dehnen, Springer, Cham, 2017, vol. 174 Search PubMed .
  15. S. Mitzinger, L. Broeckaert, W. Massa, F. Weigend and S. Dehnen, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 3866–3869 RSC .
  16. S. Mitzinger, L. Broeckaert, W. Massa, F. Weigend and S. Dehnen, Nat. Commun., 2016, 7, 10480 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  17. F. Lips, I. Schellenberg, R. Pöttgen and S. Dehnen, Chem. – Eur. J., 2009, 15, 12968–12973 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  18. R. J. Wilson, L. Broeckaert, F. Spitzer, F. Weigend and S. Dehnen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 11775–11780 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  19. S. C. Critchlow and J. D. Corbett, Inorg. Chem., 1982, 21, 3286–3290 CrossRef CAS .
  20. F. Lips, M. Raupach, W. Massa and S. Dehnen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 2011, 637, 859–863 CrossRef CAS .
  21. U. Friedrich, M. Neumeier, C. Koch and N. Korber, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 10544–10546 RSC .
  22. R. Ababei, J. Heine, M. Hołyńska, G. Thiele, B. Weinert, X. Xie, F. Weigend and S. Dehnen, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 11295–11297 RSC .
  23. B. Weinert, A. R. Eulenstein, R. Ababei and S. Dehnen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 4704–4708 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  24. N. Lichtenberger, R. J. Wilson, A. R. Eulenstein, W. Massa, R. Clérac, F. Weigend and S. Dehnen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 9033–9036 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  25. N. Lichtenberger, N. Spang, A. Eichhöfer and S. Dehnen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 778 CrossRef PubMed .
  26. R. J. Wilson and S. Dehnen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 3098–3102 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  27. Y. Wang, Q. Qin, J. Wang, R. Sang and L. Xu, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 4181 RSC .
  28. B. Weinert, F. Müller, K. Harms and S. Dehnen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 11979–11983 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  29. F. S. Kocak, D. O. Downing, P. Zavalij, Y.-F. Lam, A. N. Vedernikov and B. Eichhorn, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 9733–9740 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  30. S. P. Mallela, F. Schwan and R. A. Geanangel, Inorg. Chem., 1996, 35, 745–748 CrossRef CAS .
  31. A. Linden, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Struct. Chem., 2015, 71, 1–2 CrossRef PubMed .
  32. O. V. Dolomanov, L. J. Bourhis, R. J. Gildea, J. A. K. Howard and H. Puschmann, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2009, 42, 339–341 CrossRef CAS .
  33. A. Simon, H. Borrmann and H. Craubner, Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem., 1987, 30, 507–510 CrossRef CAS .
  34. H. G. von Schnering, J. Llanos, J. H. Chang, K. Peters, E. M. Peters and R. Nesper, Z. Kristallogr. - New Cryst. Struct., 2005, 220, 324–326 CAS .
  35. J. W. Dube, C. M. E. Graham, C. L. B. Macdonald, Z. D. Brown, P. P. Power and P. J. Ragogna, Chem. – Eur. J., 2014, 20, 6739–6744 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  36. G. E. Quintero, I. Paterson-Taylor, N. H. Rees and J. M. Goicoechea, Dalton Trans., 2016, 45, 1930–1936 RSC .
  37. O. Kühl, Phosphorus-31 NMR Spectroscopy, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2008 Search PubMed .
  38. Y. Wu, L. Liu, J. Su, J. Zhu, Z. Ji and Y. Zhao, Organometallics, 2016, 35, 1593–1596 CrossRef CAS .
  39. W. A. Merrill, E. Rivard, J. S. DeRopp, X. Wang, B. D. Ellis, J. C. Fettinger, B. Wrackmeyer and P. P. Power, Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49, 8481–8486 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
  40. M. Drieß, H. Pritzkow and U. Winkler, Chem. Ber., 1992, 125, 1541–1546 CrossRef .
  41. F. Hao, Y. Zhao, X. Jing, X. Li and F. Liu, THEOCHEM, 2006, 764, 47–52 CrossRef CAS .
  42. J. D. Otvos, J. R. Alger, J. E. Coleman and I. M. Armitage, J. Biol. Chem., 1979, 254, 1778–1780 CAS .
  43. B. E. Mann, Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Lett., 1971, 7, 595–597 CrossRef CAS .
  44. D. Dakternieks and C. L. Roll, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1985, 105, 213–217 CrossRef CAS .

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Synthesis details, crystallography, EDX spectroscopy, ESI mass spectrometry, NMR spectroscopy, quantum chemical calculations. CCDC 1579583–1579585. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c7cc08348c

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018