Runjia
Lin
a,
Zhuangnan
Li
a,
Dina Ibrahim
Abou El Amaiem
b,
Bingjie
Zhang
c,
Dan J. L.
Brett
b,
Guanjie
He
*a and
Ivan P.
Parkin
*a
aChristopher Ingold Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, UK. E-mail: guanjie.he.14@ucl.ac.uk; i.p.parkin@ucl.ac.uk
bElectrochemical Innovation Lab, Department Chemical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, UK
cDepartment of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
First published on 27th November 2017
Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) contains a high C/N ratio of 3/4; however, utilizing nitrogen atoms in pseudocapacitive energy storage systems remains a challenge due to the limited number of edge nitrogen atoms and inherent poor electrical conductivity of this semi-conductor material. 3D oxidized g-C3N4 functionalized graphene composites (GOOCN24), in which reduced graphene oxide providing high electron conductivity acts as a skeleton and hybridises with oxidized g-C3N4 segments, were synthesized using a facile two-step solution-based method. Due to the pre-oxidation treatment of g-C3N4, which breaks the polymeric nature of g-C3N4 and increases in the proportion of edge nitrogen atoms and the subsequent solubility in water, the GOOCN24 composites used as electrodes for supercapacitors show a specific capacitance as high as 265.6 F g−1 in acid electrolyte and 243.8 F g−1 in alkaline electrolyte in three-electrode configuration at a current density of 1 A g−1. In addition, low internal resistance, excellent rate performance of over 74% capacitance retention (over a 50-fold increase in current density), and outstanding cycling stability of over 94% capacitance retention after 5000 cyclic voltammetry cycles in both alkaline and acid electrolytes was attained. This translated into excellent energy density with appropriate power density when demonstrated in a symmetrical device.
Among current functionalization techniques, modifying graphene by nitrogen functionalization is considered promising. Theoretically speaking, there are four reasons which make nitrogen functionalization a promising approach to improve the properties of graphene-based materials.7 Nitrogen is a neighbour of carbon. This implies that only one extra electron will be added to the overall system if one nitrogen atom replaces one carbon atom, which improves the stability of the system as well as the ease of its modification. In addition, nitrogen atoms and carbon atoms have similar radii. Thus, significant mismatch of atomic size can be avoided during functionalization. Furthermore, nitrogen doping can improve overall electrical conductivity and capacitive properties of graphene materials. Moreover, pseudocapacitance is governed by fast surface redox reactions, which are induced by the doped nitrogen functional groups.8 Thus, nitrogen functionalization has been widely and successfully used to modify graphene-based electrode materials in supercapacitors. For instance, Sahu and co-workers have synthesised heavily nitrogen-doped graphene by pyrolyzing silk cocoon membrane at 400 °C.9 This material possesses a high specific capacitance of 220.5 F g−1 at 0.8 A g−1 current density based on galvanic charge and discharge test and a relatively small internal resistance of 4.2 Ω.
Recently, graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) has received substantial research interest in photocatalysis due to its suitable band gap of around 2.9 eV.10–15 Nevertheless, researchers have seldom studied its potential applications as an electrode material in energy storage devices. Since both g-C3N4 and graphene possess similar graphitic microstructures and g-C3N4 contains high-loading of nitrogen functional groups, modifying graphene with g-C3N4 is considered a potentially effective strategy to enhance the performance of graphene-based supercapacitors. Chen et al. have prepared graphene/g-C3N4 composites via a hydrothermal reaction.16 It is found that the composites show a high specific capacitance of 264 F g−1 at a current density of 0.4 A g−1 from galvanic charge and discharge test in acid electrolyte medium as well as outstanding cycling stability which retains over 80% of its initial capacitance after 10000 charge–discharge cycles. In addition, a graphene/porous carbon self-repairing g-C3N4 composite has been prepared by Ding and co-workers.17 The material exhibits a specific capacitance as high as 379.7 F g−1 at a current density of 0.25 A g−1 from galvanic charge and discharge test and 85% capacitance retention after 10000 galvanic charge–discharge cycles. However, as a polymeric semiconductor, g-C3N4 without modification suffers from low electrical conductivity and limited functional groups when composited with graphene materials. Its large molecular structure limits the number of edge nitrogen atoms, which are the major contributions for pseudocapacitance. Hence, further research is required to increase the electrochemical performance of the composite materials by increasing the number of edge nitrogen atoms of g-C3N4.
In this work, we developed a facile method to both increase the edge nitrogen content of g-C3N4 and the functional groups for use as strong hinges when combined with graphene materials by pre-oxidizing the g-C3N4. Following the oxidation process, the proportion of edge nitrogen increased significantly by cutting the large g-C3N4 layered structures to smaller segments. Moreover, its electrical conductivity improved substantially when it formed a composite with reduced graphene oxide aerogels. The composite exhibited high specific capacitance, excellent capacitive behaviour and outstanding stability in both alkaline and acid electrolytes.
The FTIR analysis shown in Fig. 2(a) confirms the presence of various oxygen-containing functional groups in OCN24 sample. The two wide peaks at 3116 and 3305 cm−1 are attributed to the stretching vibrations of hydroxyl (–OH) and amino (–NH) groups, respectively.23 Moreover, the presence of –OH bonds in carboxyl group is identified by the peak at 2761 cm−1. In addition, the sharp peak at 1047 cm−1 is caused by the vibration of C–O bonds in the hydroxyl group.24 These oxygen-containing functional groups are hydrophilic, resulting in the improved solubility of OCN24 sample in water. On the contrary, except for the broad peak ∼3157 cm−1 which corresponds to the stretching vibrations of amino (–NH) groups and surface absorbed water molecules,25 no obvious oxygen functional groups related peaks are found in the FTIR spectrum of the CN sample. As a result, CN shows poor solubility in water. Furthermore, in addition to oxygen-containing groups, characteristic g-C3N4 structures can also be identified by FTIR analysis. The sharp intense peak at ∼800 cm−1 in the FTIR spectra of both samples is attributed to a “breathing” vibration of the triazine rings in g-C3N4.26 As for the peaks in the range between 1200–1650 cm−1 (peaks at 1233, 1389 and 1625 cm−1 for OCN24 and peaks at 1222, 1397, 1541 and 1632 cm−1 for CN), they correspond to the stretching vibrations of aromatic C–N bonds in carbon–nitrogen heterocycles.27,28
Fig. 2 (a) FTIR spectra of CN and OCN24; (b–d) XPS (b) survey spectra of GOCN-3 and GOOCN24; (c) C 1s and (d) N 1s spectra of GOCN-3 and GOOCN24, respectively. |
The surface chemical structures and elemental contents of GOCN-3 and GOOCN24 samples were explored by XPS analysis. The XPS survey spectra of GOCN-3 and GOOCN24 are shown in Fig. 2(b). C 1s and C KLL peaks along with O 1s and O KLL peaks of both samples can be clearly seen in the survey spectra. N 1s and N KLL peaks of GOCN-3 sample were also found in Fig. 2(b), which corresponded to its high nitrogen content of 24.59 at%. However, only a much lower N 1s peak and a tiny N KLL signal of GOOCN24 sample was observed in Fig. 2(b). This corresponds to a much lower nitrogen content of GOOCN24 sample (only 2.5 at%), which is a result of the introduction of oxygen-containing groups to OCN24 sample due to the oxidation treatment and the break of the polymeric structures (detailed carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen contents of the samples can be found in Tables S2 and S3†). Moreover, Fig. 2(c) shows the XPS C 1s spectra of GOCN-3 and GOOCN24 samples which exhibit the chemical relationships of carbon. The peaks centred at 288.2 eV and 288.6 eV belong to C–NC coordination in GOCN-3 and GOOCN24, respectively.29 Peaks corresponding to C–C, CC, C–O, and CC coordination in both samples can be found from the C 1s spectra.30–32 Furthermore, the chemical states of the nitrogen in GOCN-3 and GOOCN24 composites are shown in Fig. 2(d). The four peaks in the N 1s spectrum of GOCN-3 sample are centred at 398.6 eV, 399.9 eV, 401.0 eV, and 404.6 eV and attributed to pyridinic N, pyrrolic N, graphitic N and π–π* satellite (governed by nitrogen-containing aromatic rings), respectively.33,34 Nevertheless, only the peaks of pyridinic N (398.4 eV), pyrrolic N (399.7 eV), and π–π* satellite (405.7 eV) can be observed in the N 1s spectrum of GOOCN24. This reveals that the graphitic nitrogen in the polymeric material had been successfully converted to edge nitrogen after the oxidation process. Similar situations also occur in other GOOCN and GOFOCN samples (Fig. S4†).
The performances of GOCN-3 and GOOCN24 as electrode materials for supercapacitors were first measured by cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanic charge–discharge (GCD), and electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) tests with a three-electrode system in 2 M KOH electrolyte. Fig. 3(a) displays the CV curves of GOCN-3 and GOOCN24 at a scan rate of 20 mV s−1. It is obvious that the GOOCN24 electrode acquires a much larger area for the CV curve than GOCN-3 electrode, which reveals its higher specific capacitance, further confirmed by the GCD test in Fig. 3(b). The GOOCN24 electrode possesses a high specific capacitance of 243.8 F g−1 at a current density of 1 A g−1, much higher than that of the GOCN-3 electrode (167.9 F g−1) at the same current density. No obvious potential drop appears, implying smaller internal resistance of this sample. It is noteworthy that during supercapacitor charge–discharge process, oxygen functional groups induced redox reactions such as C–OH ↔ C–O + H+ + e−, –COOH ↔ –COO + H+ + e−, and C–O + e− ↔ C–O− may occur, resulting in the improved specific capacitance of the supercapacitor.35 Hence, it is believed higher content of oxygen functional groups in GOOCN24 sample is one of reasons leads to its higher specific capacitance. Moreover, kinetic analysis was also conducted to investigate the capacitance contribution from surface capacitive effects and diffusion controlled processes at the GOOCN24 electrode.36 As shown in Fig. 3(c), the contribution of surface capacitive effects and diffusion controlled processes are 86.6% and 13.4%, respectively. Therefore, the surface capacitive effects are believed to dominate the capacitance of the GOOCN24 sample, whereby similar results can be detected from the GOCN-3 sample (Fig. S5(a),† 65.6% of total capacitance is a result of surface capacitive effects in GOCN-3 sample). The higher ratio of the surface-controlled process may provide better rate performance due to faster electrochemical reactions. To further investigate the rate performance of GOCN-3 and GOOCN24 electrodes, GCD tests were also conducted at current densities of 2, 5, 10, 20, and 50 A g−1, as shown in Fig. 3(d) and S6.† It can be found that GOOCN24 still retains a higher specific capacitance of 136.4 F g−1 at 50 A g−1 current density (59% of its value at 1 A g−1) compared to only 28.3 F g−1 (17% of its value at 1 A g−1) for the GOCN-3 sample. The results of rate performance are in accordance with the kinetic analysis of CV curves.
The excellent electrochemical performance of the GOOCN24 sample in alkaline electrolyte can be attributed to its improved electronic conductivity and capacitive behaviour, confirmed by the EIS measurements. As displayed in Fig. 3(e), the Nyquist plot of GOOCN24 electrode features a nearly vertical line from the low frequency range, indicating its ideal capacitive performance. The insert of Fig. 3(e) shows that the Nyquist plot of GOOCN24 electrode possesses a smaller Warburg region and a small depressed semicircle. This implies it has a lower charge transfer resistance and better electrolyte ion diffusion when compared to the GOCN-3 electrode. With the purpose of further comparing the interfacial electrochemical behaviours of GOCN-3 and GOOCN24 electrodes, an equivalent circuit (Fig. S7†) was introduced to fit the Nyquist plots (Table S4†).37 The internal resistance (Rs = 0.95 Ω) and charge transfer resistance (Rct = 0.06 Ω) of the GOOCN24 electrode are smaller than that of the GOCN-3 electrode (Rs = 1.04 Ω, Rct = 1.05 Ω). The low resistance values indicate the higher electron conductivity and ion migration speed of the GOOCN24 electrode over the GOCN-3 electrode. It is believed that the oxidation treatment of g-C3N4 results in the higher electron conductivity of GOOCN24 material by breaking the polymeric structures and inducing higher contents of edge N and O doping of the composites. In addition, it is recognizable that the more homogeneous dispersion of OCN24 on graphene oxide layers leads to better ion diffusion ability of GOOCN24 sample. The higher solubility in water of OCN24 avoids the aggregation of the polymeric material on the graphene oxide layers as more channels are available for ion transportation within the GOOCN24 sample. As a result, ions can move more freely without being hindered by large polymeric chunks.
Cycling stability test was also performed to evaluate the potentials of these materials for practical applications. Fig. 3(f) displays the temporal evolution of GOOCN24's specific capacitance over consecutive CV tests. It can be found that GOOCN24 retains 94.8% of its initial capacitance after 5000 CV cycles at a high scan rate of 100 mV s−1, indicating an excellent long-term stability of the GOOCN24 electrode.
In order to further explore the practical application potential of GOOCN24 composite, a symmetrical supercapacitor using GOOCN24 and 2 M KOH as the electrode material and electrolyte, respectively were assembled and measured in a two-electrode configuration. As depicted in Fig. 4(a), the CV curves of GOOCN24 electrode exhibit nearly rectangular shapes, revealing its ideal electrical double layer behaviour. Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the quasi-rectangular shape of the CV curve remains nearly unchanged when the scan rate was increased from 1 mV s−1 to 20 mV s−1, indicating outstanding rate performance. Furthermore, GCD measurements at six different current densities ranging from 0.1 A g−1 to 5.0 A g−1 and corresponding calculated specific capacitance are displayed in Fig. 4(b) and (c), respectively. The specific capacitance of GOOCN24 electrode in a symmetrical device at a 0.1 A g−1 current density can reach as high as 170.7 F g−1. As shown in Fig. 4(c), the electrode possesses a specific capacitance of 87.2 F g−1 when the current density was increases to 5 A g−1. These decent electrochemical performance value show that GOOCN24 has promising industrialization potential as electrodes for a supercapacitor.
EIS test was conducted to further evaluate its electronic conductivity and capacitive behaviour. From the Nyquist plot represented in Fig. 4(d), the insertion point on the real axis has a small value which indicates a small internal resistance value of the supercapacitor. In addition, the Nyquist plot also possesses a small semicircle in the frequency region, revealing a low charge transfer resistance value of the supercapacitor (Table S5†). In addition to good interfacial electrochemical performance, GOOCN24 supercapacitor has decent cycling stability. According to the results shown in Fig. 4(e), only 12.1% capacitance loss was observed after 10000 CV cycles compared to its initial value. To further investigate the practical application potential of these materials, a device consisting of two symmetrical supercapacitors (connected in series) was also fabricated and evaluated. The detailed electrochemical performance of two symmetrical supercapacitors in series were presented in Fig. S8.† As shown in the insert figure in Fig. 4(e), the device successfully powered a light-emitting diode (LED) to its standard working condition. Hence, we can conclude GOOCN24 has huge industrialization potential as supercapacitor electrode.
Fig. 4(f) shows the Ragone plot representing gravimetric energy density vs. gravimetric power density of GOOCN24 electrode in the as-assembled supercapacitor. The gravimetric energy density is 14.93 W h kg−1 and the gravimetric power density is 571.36 W kg−1 at a current density of 0.1 A g−1. When the gravimetric power density increases to 17028.26 W kg−1, the supercapacitor retains a gravimetric energy density of 2.71 W h kg−1. In addition, a Ragone plot representing volumetric energy density vs. volumetric power density of the as-assembled symmetrical device are shown in Fig. S9.† The volumetric energy density and the volumetric power density of the device is 0.022 W h L−1 and 0.85 W L−1, respectively at a current density of 0.1 A g−1. When the volumetric power density boosts to 25.48 W kg−1, the device still possesses a volumetric energy density of 0.004 W h kg−1.
To illustrate the influence of the supercapacitor performance from the concentration of the electrolyte, a symmetrical supercapacitor using GOOCN24 in 6 M KOH was also fabricated. The electrochemical behaviour demonstrated in Fig. S10† shows more rectangular CV curves and better cycling stability (94.4% capacitance retention after 24000 CV cycles at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1) compared to the one with 2 M KOH electrolyte. This result demonstrates that as-synthesized materials can work more steadily in high concentration electrolyte due to faster ion transfer.
In order to further investigate the applicability of GOOCN24 material as supercapacitor electrode, the GOOCN24 electrode was constructed with an NiCo2(OH)x/CNT electrode to constitute an asymmetrical supercapacitor, which was evaluated by CV and GCD tests (Fig. S11†). It is found that the as-fabricated asymmetrical device possesses an operating potential window of 0–1.4 V.
With the purpose of exploring the improved electrochemical performance in other aqueous electrolytes, GOOCN24 and GOCN-3 were also compared and tested in 1 M H2SO4 aqueous solution by CV, GCD, and EIS tests in a three-electrode system. Before the tests in acid electrolyte, the GOCN-3 and GOOCN24 electrodes were fully activated by a cycling CV test. The CV plots of GOCN-3 and GOOCN24 samples at 20 mV s−1 scan rate are illustrated in Fig. 5(a). It is obvious that the GOOCN24 electrode has a larger CV curve area than that of GOCN-3 electrode, indicating it has better electrochemical performance in acid electrolyte. It can be easily observed that the CV plots of both GOCN-3 and GOOCN24 electrodes show redox reaction peaks, revealing redox reactions occur probably between protons in the electrolytes and pyrrolic or pyridinic nitrogen atoms in nitrogen functional groups at the surface of composites during the charge and discharge processes (N + H+ + e− ↔ NH).38 It is worth mentioning that the redox peaks of GOOCN24 sample are much more distinct than that of the GOCN-3 sample. This indicates that the GOOCN24 composite is more capable of producing pseudocapacitance than the GOCN-3 composite, which confirms the success of converting graphitic nitrogen in g-C3N4 to other nitrogen atoms contributing to pseudocapacitance via oxidation treatment. Furthermore, the result of GCD test conducted at 1 A g−1 current density is displayed in Fig. 5(b). The specific capacitance of the GOOCN24 electrode can reach 265.6 F g−1, which is approximately 60% larger than the specific capacitance of GOCN-3 electrode. In addition, according to kinetic analysis in Fig. 5(c), although 78.3% of the GOOCN24 electrode's capacitance comes from surface capacitive effects, the proportion of capacitance produced by diffusion controlled process is 21.7% in acid electrolyte which is higher than the value obtained in alkaline electrolyte. This announces that GOOCN24 has a better ion diffusion behaviour in acid electrolyte due to the smaller hydrodynamic radius of H+ ions compared to OH− ions, suggesting one of the reasons for higher specific capacitance in acid electrolytes compared to alkaline. The rate performances of both electrodes in acid electrolyte are illustrated in Fig. 5(d). The GOOCN24 electrode possesses a high specific capacitance of 197.2 F g−1 at 50 A g−1 current density (74% of its value at 1 A g−1 current density), which is far better than that of GOCN-3 electrode (88.5 F g−1 at 50 A g−1 current density), indicating the outstanding rate performance of GOOCN24 electrode. Moreover, it is worth mentioning that both GOCN-3 and GOOCN24 possess better rate performance in acid electrolyte compared to alkaline electrolyte. This also can be further explained by the smaller hydrodynamic radius of H+ ions than OH− ions and intrinsic nature of kinetic mechanisms of surface redox reactions within nitrogen/oxygen atoms in carbon matrix and these ions.39–41
An EIS test was performed to further explain the tremendous electrochemical performance of GOOCN24 in acid electrolyte. The Nyquist plot displayed in Fig. 5(e) shows that GOOCN24 has a very small internal resistance and no obvious semicircle indicating a small charge transfer resistance. According to the data obtained by fitting the Nyquist plot using an equivalent circuit (Fig. S7†), the internal resistance and charge transfer resistance of GOOCN24 are 0.78 Ω and 0.04 Ω, respectively. It is obvious that the charge transfer resistance of GOOCN24 in acid electrolyte is much smaller than that in alkaline solution. It is believed that smaller charge transfer resistance value is one of the main reasons that lead to a far more outstanding electrochemical performance of GOOCN24 composite in acid electrolyte when compared to its performance in alkaline electrolyte.
The stability of GOOCN24 electrode in acid electrolyte was examined after 5000 CV cycles conducted at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1. It is shown in Fig. 5(f) that the GOOCN24 electrode still retains over 94% of its initial capacitance after the stability test, further confirming the excellent stability of GOOCN24 composite in acid electrolyte.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7ta09492b |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 |