Weilong
Zhang
and
Lin
Lu
*
Renewable Energy Research Group (RERG), Department of Building Services Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China. E-mail: vivien.lu@polyu.edu.hk
First published on 8th June 2017
Building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) have become a promising technology due to the urgent demand for sustainable energy supplies. Effective thermal regulation of BIPV is of great importance because the undesirable heat produced by photovoltaic (PV) modules will not only decrease the energy conversion efficiency, but also increase the building cooling load. The photovoltaic double skin façade (PV-DSF), regarded as one of the most feasible approaches to mitigate these problems, has been widely adopted and constructed globally. This paper presents a comprehensive literature review on PV-DSFs in terms of both energy performance and heat transfer characteristics. The energy performance of PV-DSFs involves a combination of energy supply from PV systems and energy demand for indoor heating, cooling and lighting. Investigations on the air flow and heat transfer characteristics in PV-DSFs are essential for understanding the heat transfer mechanisms and optimizing the system configurations. Based on the literature review, an outlook for future research is provided. This review article is expected to serve as a useful reference for future research and development of the PV-DSF technology.
Building envelopes, which separate the interior conditioned space from the exterior unconditioned environment, are the key determinants of building energy efficiency and indoor thermal comfort.^{3} Heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) and lighting are two major energy consumers in buildings, accounting for 35% and 11% of total building energy consumption, respectively.^{4} As a principal component of building envelopes, building facades play an important role in the energy performance of buildings, especially when glazed facades are extensively used in modern architectures to enhance building aesthetics and maximize daylight quality.^{5} Therefore, developments and improvements in building facades have great potential to accelerate building energy efficiency. One of the most promising façade design concepts in recent years is the double skin façade (DSF), which is made up of two parallel façade layers and a ventilated air cavity in between.^{6} The ventilated air cavity can reduce the heat gain during the cooling season and the heat loss during the heating season, while mitigating the thermal discomfort caused by asymmetric thermal radiation.^{7}
On the other hand, the growing awareness of energy and environmental challenges has encouraged the development of renewable energy technologies such as the solar photovoltaics (PV). PV modules, made up of multiple solar cells connected in series or in parallel, are electrical devices that convert the energy of light directly into electricity via the photovoltaic effect.^{8} Integrating PV modules into conventional building envelopes, such as roofs and facades, to form the building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) system is considered one of the most effective ways to promote renewable energy technologies.^{9} The development of semi-transparent solar cells enables the incorporation of PV modules into windows and glazed facades.^{10} A well-designed BIPV system can not only generate electricity in situ, but also contribute to the building comfort by providing weather protection, thermal insulation, noise protection and daylight modulation.^{11}
At present, however, only a small fraction of the solar energy incident on a PV module can be converted into electricity, with most of the absorbed solar energy transformed into heat.^{12} This heat can increase the operating temperature and thereby decrease the energy conversion efficiency of the PV module.^{13} With every Kelvin increase in the cell temperature, the PV power output drops by approximately 0.4% for a crystalline silicon (c-Si) PV module and 0.1% for an amorphous silicon (a-Si) PV module.^{14} In addition, the excess heat may be transferred through the building envelope and increase the building cooling load;^{13} many researchers are therefore seeking solutions to mitigate these problems. During the last few years, the photovoltaic double skin facade (PV-DSF) has gained more and more attention among scholars. The external skin of the DSF is extremely suitable for the PV integration because the ventilated air cavity can not only lower the PV module temperature, but also improve the thermal performance of the building facade.^{15}
Current research on PV-DSF systems mainly focuses on two aspects: one is the energy performance of PV-DSFs, including both the energy supply from PV systems and the energy demand for HVAC and lighting; the other is the air flow and heat transfer characteristics in PV-DSFs, which are essential for understanding the heat transfer mechanisms and optimizing the system configurations. Despite the fact that considerable research has been devoted to PV-DSF systems, little attention has been paid to analysing and summarising previous studies. This review article aims to enable better understanding of the PV-DSF technology, and indicate the opportunities for future research.
Commercial PV modules are either opaque or semi-transparent, so PV-DSFs can be classified into opaque PV-DSFs and semi-transparent PV-DSFs according to the transparency. Opaque PV modules, made of monocrystalline silicon (mc-Si) or polycrystalline silicon (pc-Si) solar cells, can be integrated into roofs and walls. With the development of semi-transparent PV technologies, PV glazings are widely used as windows and glazed facades, owing to their energy saving potentials.^{16–30} The transparency of semi-transparent PV modules is normally achieved by two approaches. Firstly, semi-transparent c-Si solar cells can be achieved by laser cutting, mechanical grinding and dicing procedures.^{31} As a second approach, thin-film solar cells with a certain degree of visible light transmittance, such as a-Si, cadmium telluride (CdTe), copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) and dye-sensitized solar cells, are applicable for PV glazings.^{32}Fig. 1 shows the structure of an opaque PV-DSF, consisting of an opaque PV module as the external skin, a conventional wall as the internal skin, and a ventilated air cavity in between. Opaque PV-DSFs can be used for both new buildings and the renovation of older buildings with poorly performing walls. In contrast, a semi-transparent PV-DSF is generally made up of an outside layer of semi-transparent PV modules, an inside layer of windows or glazed facades, and a ventilated air cavity, as shown in Fig. 2. Semi-transparent PV-DSFs can be adopted as windows and glazed facades.
Fig. 1 The structure of an opaque PV-DSF.^{33} Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2013, Elsevier. |
Fig. 2 The structure of a semi-transparent PV-DSF.^{34} Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2015, Elsevier. |
According to the driving force for airflow, PV-DSFs are classified into naturally ventilated PV-DSFs and mechanically-ventilated PV-DSFs. The driving force for airflow in naturally ventilated PV-DSFs can be buoyancy, caused by the heat transferred from the rear of the PV module to the air in the cavity, and/or a pressure difference between the inlet and outlet of the cavity, caused by wind effects.^{35} In contrast, the driving force for airflow in mechanically ventilated PV-DSFs is supplied by mechanical devices like fans. Compared to mechanically ventilated PV-DSFs, naturally ventilated PV-DSFs do not need extra mechanical devices, which may produce noise and raise the installation and maintenance costs. However, the mechanically ventilated PV-DSF can operate at a certain air flow rate, regardless of the varying ambient temperature and the varying wind speed.^{36}
Reference | Transparency (cell type) | Region (climate) | Study | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
37 | Opaque (c-Si) | Hong Kong, Shanghai and Beijing | Determining the cooling load component through PV walls using a simplified method | The PV integration on a massive wall could lead to a reduction of the corresponding cooling load component by 32.5% in Hong Kong, 41.1% in Shanghai and 50.1% in Beijing. Generally, the higher the local solar intensity, the higher the cooling load component reduction ratio. |
38 | Opaque (c-Si) | Tianjin | Assessment of the impact of BIPV on building heating and cooling loads based on the one-dimensional transient model | The optimum method for BIPV application in summer was the PV with the ventilated air gap because of the high PV conversion efficiency and the low building cooling load; whereas, the PV with the non-ventilated air gap was appropriate in winter, due to the combination of the low building heating load and the high PV power output. |
33 | Opaque (c-Si) | Hong Kong (subtropical) | Investigation on the annual thermal performance of a PV wall based on numerical heat transfer models | In summer, the total heat gain of the south-facing PV wall was less than 50% of that of the corresponding normal wall. In winter, 69% of the heat gain during daytime and 32% of the heat loss during nighttime were reduced by mounting PV modules on the south-facing normal wall. The optimal thickness for the air gap of the south-facing PV wall could be 0.06 m |
39 | Semi-transparent (a-Si) | Hong Kong (subtropical) | Evaluation of the overall energy performance of a ventilated PV window using an energy model | The power output from the ventilated PV window decreased linearly with the solar cell transmittance. The surface convective and radiative heat transfer through the ventilated PV window was dominated by the inner glazing property, while the overall heat transfer was affected by both outer and inner glazing properties. The optimal solar cell transmittance for the best integrated electricity saving in air-conditioning and lighting was around 0.45–0.55 |
40 | Semi-transparent (a-Si) | Hong Kong (subtropical) | Experimental evaluation of the energy performance of four configurations of PV glazing systems on a typical summer day | PV glazing could effectively reduce the direct solar transmission and enhance the thermal comfort. The energy saving potentials of PV glazing systems were generally better in air-conditioning power consumption, but much inferior in lighting power consumption compared to the absorptive glazing |
41 | Semi-transparent (a-Si) | Hong Kong (subtropical) | Investigation of the annual energy performance of ventilated PV glazing in office environment | The single PV glazing and naturally ventilated double PV glazing were able to save 23% and 28% of the annual space cooling electricity consumption, respectively, compared with the commonly used single absorptive glazing. However, the space heating demand was increased by 9.6% for single PV glazing and 0.92% for natural-ventilated double PV glazing |
42 | Semi-transparent (a-Si) | Hefei | Experimental and numerical investigation on the thermal and power performance of PV single-glazed window and ventilated PV double-glazed window | The average second heat gain (convective and infrared radiation heat transfer) and the total heat gain of the ventilated PV double-glazed window were 45.8% and 53.5% of those of the PV single-glazed window. The ventilated PV double-glazed window improved the thermal comfort of the indoor occupants, due to its lower inner glazing surface temperature |
43 | Semi-transparent (a-Si) | Hong Kong (subtropical) | Experimental and numerical evaluation of the thermal and power performance of a ventilated PV-DSF, compared with a conventional clear glazed facade | The internal air temperature for the PV-DSF was much lower and less affected by the outdoor environment than that for the conventional clear glazed facade. The PV-DSF could not only generate electricity, but also reduce the building cooling load and provide indoor visual comfort |
34 and 44 | Semi-transparent (a-Si) | Hong Kong (subtropical) | Experimental study on the thermal and power performance of a semi-transparent PV-DSF under ventilated, buoyancy-induced ventilated and non-ventilated conditions | The ventilated PV-DSF has the lowest average solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC), while the non-ventilated PV-DSF has the lowest U-value. The dynamic power output of the ventilated, buoyancy-induced ventilated and non-ventilated PV-DSFs decreased in sequence. The optimum operation strategy for the PV-DSF under different weather conditions was proposed to maximize its overall energy efficiency |
45 | Semi-transparent (a-Si) | Hong Kong (subtropical) | Developing a method for evaluating the overall energy performance of a ventilated semi-transparent PV-DSF | A comprehensive simulation model based on the EnergyPlus was developed for simulating the overall energy performance of a ventilated PV-DSF, taking thermal, daylighting and dynamic power output performances into account. This model was validated by the experimental data and could be used for sensitivity analysis and design optimization for PV-DSFs in various climate zones |
46 | Semi-transparent (a-Si) | Berkeley (cool-summer Mediterranean climate) | Numerical investigation on the energy saving potential of a semi-transparent PV-DSF | The optimal air gap depth for a PV-DSF ranged from 400 mm to 600 mm, taking into account energy use, cost, facade cleaning and maintenance, and the optimal ventilation mode was natural ventilation in terms of energy saving. The PV-DSF was able to reduce incoming solar radiation, but provide considerable interior daylight as well. Around 50% of the net electricity consumption could be reduced by PV-DSFs, compared with other commonly used glazing systems |
47 | Semi-transparent (a-Si) | Harbin, Beijing, Changsha, Kunming and Hong Kong | Comparative study of energy performance between PV-DSFs and PV insulating glass units (PV-IGUs) | The PV-DSF was better than the PV-IGU in reducing solar heat gain, while the PV-IGU was more exceptional than the PV-DSF in thermal insulation performance. On average, the PV-DSF and PV-IGU were able to save 28.4% and 30% of energy, respectively, compared to the conventional insulating glass windows in the five regions. The PV-DSF outperformed the PV-IGU if the louvers were closed in the heating season |
48 | Semi-transparent (c-Si) | Toulouse | Experimental evaluation of a full-scale prototype naturally-ventilated PV-DSF operating under real conditions | A full-scale prototype naturally-ventilated PV-DSF operating under real conditions was carried out. The energy performance of a simplified double-skin component could be extended to real complex systems with regard to geometry and environment |
49 | Semi-transparent (c-Si) | Nice, Paris and Lyon | Numerical study of a semi-transparent naturally-ventilated PV-DSF using the zonal approach | The cooling needs increased with the increase of the degree of transparency of PV-DSF. The heating load could be lowered by adopting PV modules with a higher degree of transparency and lower air change rate |
50 | Semi-transparent (c-Si) | Berkshire and Izmir | Assessment of the energy performance of a ventilated PV facade system based on a rigorous combined experimental and numerical approach | The effectiveness of ventilation was significant on the energy performance of a ventilated PV facade system. A long-term high resolution measurement of a typical ventilated PV facade system was carried out to assess the energy performance of the system in real outdoor conditions, and to provide a reliable database to verify a numerical model |
51 | Semi-transparent (c-Si) | Barcelona, Stuttgart and Loughborough | Investigation of the thermal performance of a ventilated PV facade with additional solar air collectors using a thermal building model | The cooling load of the building with the ventilated PV facade was marginally higher than that with the conventional structure in the three locations. 12% of heating load could be served by the ventilation heat gain in Barcelona, but only 2% in Stuttgart and Loughborough |
52 and 53 | Semi-transparent (c-Si) | Mataró, Barcelona and Stuttgart | Exploring a particular methodology to estimate the thermal performance of ventilated PV facades | A simplified approach based on an extension of U-value and g-value was developed to estimate the thermal performance of semi-transparent ventilated PV facades |
54 | Semi-transparent (c-Si) | Stockholm, London and Madrid | Evaluation of the overall energy performance of a ventilated PV facade using a new index | A new index, effectiveness of a PV facade (PVEF), was developed to evaluate the overall energy performance of a PV facade. The effects of changes in climate, building, facade and PV system elements on the overall energy performance were investigated. The air gap behind the PV modules was indispensable to prevent overheating in summer and the ventilation performance could be improved by locating the air outlet in a region of wind-induced negative pressure |
55 | Opaque (c-Si) | Volos | Assessment of the annual energy performance of an improved concept of PV-DSFs | Both the electricity and the heat generated by the PV modules were exploited to increase the building energy efficiency. The performance of the PV-DSF was determined by air flow rates and duct dimensions. Only an energy efficient building could benefit from such PV-DSF concept |
The energy performances of opaque and semi-transparent PV-DSFs are different due to their module compositions. Commercial opaque PV modules are usually made of c-Si solar cells, while semi-transparent PV modules are made of see-through c-Si or thin-film solar cells; therefore, the overall energy conversion efficiency of the opaque PV-DSF is better than the semi-transparent PV-DSF. On the other hand, opaque PV-DSFs are generally incorporated into buildings by replacing external wall cladding materials, while semi-transparent PV-DSFs are employed as windows and glazed facades. Both generate electricity by absorbing the incoming solar radiation, but semi-transparent PV-DSFs also transmit solar radiation, bringing both daylight and solar heat gain into the buildings. As a consequence, different research methods are used for evaluating the energy performances of opaque and semi-transparent PV-DSFs.
The overall heat transmission through a semi-transparent PV-DSF includes both the direct solar transmission and the inner surface convective and radiative heat transfer.^{39} The energy performance characteristics for windows, such as solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC), U-value and g-value, were adopted in several studies to evaluate the thermal performance of semi-transparent PV-DSFs.^{34,44,47,52,53} Compared to the non-ventilated semi-transparent PV-DSF or the PV insulating glass units (PV-IGU), the ventilated semi-transparent PV-DSF have a lower SHGC, but a higher U-value.^{47} The ventilation modes affect both the thermal and power performance of PV-DSFs and hence, the optimum operation strategies for semi-transparent PV-DSFs should be carefully assessed under different weather conditions.^{34,44}
The utilization of daylight can significantly affect the building energy performance. As in semi-transparent PV windows, the daylighting performance of a semi-transparent PV-DSF is mainly determined by its overall visible transparency. Increasing the overall visible transparency of the semi-transparent PV-DSF can improve the indoor daylight availability and thus reduce the lighting energy use. However, higher visible transparency also results in more solar heat gain and less power output.^{49} Therefore, there is a complex interrelationship among the thermal, daylighting and power performance of a semi-transparent PV-DSF.
The energy flow in a semi-transparent PV-DSF is more complicated than that in an opaque PV-DSF. Fig. 4 presents the heat transfer process in a semi-transparent PV-DSF. The incident solar radiation is partly reflected and partly absorbed by the PV module, while the remainder passes through the PV module. The solar energy absorbed by the PV module is partly converted into electricity and the remainder appears as heat. The transmitted solar radiation is partly absorbed by the inner glass in the form of heat, and the remainder enters the room providing solar heat gain. The air in the cavity exchanges heat with the PV module and the inner glass by convection. The PV module and the inner glass also exchange heat by radiation.
Fig. 4 Heat transfer process in the semi-transparent PV-DSF.^{44} Reproduced with permission. Copyright 2013, Elsevier. |
Previous research on the air flow and heat transfer characteristics in PV-DSFs can be divided into analytical, numerical and experimental studies.
Brinkworth et al. have done a lot of analytical studies on the flow and heat transfer in PV cooling ducts. They presented a simplified method suitable for general use, based on single loop analysis in which the buoyancy force developed due to a change in temperature was balanced by the pressure drop due to friction.^{58} The hypothesis was that the friction factors and internal heat gain coefficients for buoyancy-induced flows behaved the same as those for forced convection flows. This hypothesis was then validated against experiments for the case of developing laminar flow without any wind effects using a PV cladding arrangement. The predicted mass flow rates were in excellent agreement with the measured ones and therefore, the hypothesis was proved. A generalised PV model was also derived to describe the thermal behaviour of ventilated PV cooling ducts for both design and validation exercises.
Brinkworth also set out a practical and convenient procedure for determining the flow and convective heat transfer in PV cooling ducts.^{35} This method covered the cases of free convection induced by the buoyancy effect, forced convection induced by the wind effect, and mixed convection induced by both buoyancy and wind effects. With an initial assumption of the relevant input heat flux and a prescribed duct geometry, the wall heat transfer coefficients were derived, leading to a better estimate of the input heat flux and ultimately converged to the solution. Generalised solutions were given for a representative case to illustrate how the flow and heat transfer characteristics were affected by the operating conditions and the duct geometries.
In practical situations, the flow in the duct might be obstructed by obstructions at the inlet and the outlet, or by support structures across the ducts. Brinkworth and Sandberg developed a procedure to predict the buoyancy-induced flow in PV cooling ducts, considering various pressure losses.^{59} The hypothesis was that the pressure remained at the value where the expansion or contraction started. This procedure was validated by the measured flow rate in a duct heated from one side, with and without obstructions and support structures. Satisfactory agreement indicated that this procedure was adequate for practical application.
A design procedure for PV cooling ducts to minimise the PV conversion efficiency loss due to the temperature rise was put forward by Brinkworth and Sandberg.^{60} It was found that there was an optimum depth of the PV cooling duct when the PV module temperature was the highest and the PV conversion efficiency was most affected. For a duct whose length was long enough for the flow to become fully-developed, the optimum ratio (the length to the hydraulic diameter) was found to be about 20. The results agreed reasonably well with the measurements on a full-size test rig. The optimum depth was also confirmed by a first-order theoretical foundation developed by Brinkworth.^{61}
Sandberg and Moshfegh investigated the effects of the air gap geometry and the PV module location on the air flow in PV facades using lumped parameter analysis.^{62} The velocity and the temperature were assumed to be uniform across the air gap and only a function of height. Only buoyancy-induced flow was considered and the amount of heat transferred to the air gap was assumed to be known. The derived expressions were verified against measurements by varying outlet openings, aspect ratios and PV module positions.
Brinkworth pointed out that the convective and radiative heat transfer were intimately coupled together and should be treated in combination. A method for fully representing the coupling between the convective and radiative heat transfer in PV cooling ducts was then developed.^{63} This method, in which the radiative heat transfer was represented in terms of local wall temperatures, was validated by comparison with other published work. This method does not need iteration and is applicable for both laminar and turbulent flows. Finally, the incorporation of duct heat transfer within thermal models of PV installation was given for a practical application.
Conservation of mass
(1) |
Conservation of momentum
(2) |
(3) |
Conservation of energy
(4) |
Numerical studies are usually required because these PDEs are too complex to provide analytical solutions. Three classical numerical methods for solving PDEs are the finite difference method (FDM), the finite element method (FEM) and the finite volume method (FVM).^{65} Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is one of the most useful numerical techniques to study the fluid flow and heat transfer.^{66}
Moshfegh and Sandberg investigated the air flow and heat transfer characteristics of buoyancy-induced convection between a heated wall and an insulated wall in parallel, using a steady-state two-dimensional numerical model.^{67} Both convective and radiative heat exchanges were taken into account as the flow and heat transfer mechanisms. The governing equation was solved by the FEM using FIDAP. Velocity and temperature profiles of the air at the outlet of the channel, and surface temperature profiles of the heated and the insulated walls were derived for various input heat fluxes and aspect ratios. It was found that for a given aspect ratio, the outlet air velocity and temperature increased with the increase of the input heat flux, while for a given heat flux, the outlet air velocity decreased while the outlet air temperature increased with the increase of the aspect ratio. The effect of surface emissivity on flow and heat transfer was reported in their subsequent study.^{57} This study revealed the importance of radiative heat transfer in the heat transfer mechanisms in the air channel.
Liao et al. presented a CFD study of the air flow and heat transfer in a BIPV/T system using FLUENT.^{64} The realizable k–ε viscous model was used to simulate the turbulent air flow and convective heat transfer in the cavity, and the surface to surface (S2S) radiation model was used to simulate the radiative heat transfer between boundary surfaces. The convective heat transfer coefficient was generated with the CFD model using experimental data as boundary conditions. The air velocity profiles from the CFD model were in good agreement with the ones from particle image velocimetry (PIV) experimental data. The computed heat transfer coefficients could be utilized in simple lumped parameter models for the design and analysis of BIPV/T systems. Convective heat transfer coefficient correlations were finally developed as a function of dimensionless characteristic numbers.
The CFD technique was also used to predict the optimum design of PV-DSFs, owing to its ability to provide information about flow and temperature fields. Usually, the length and the width of a PV-DSF are determined by the PV array dimension. The depth is then one of the most important variables in the design of a PV-DSF because the air gap size would influence the air circulation for cooling and therefore the energy conversion efficiency of PV panels. Many studies have been devoted to the determinations of the optimum depths for PV-DSFs. Gan utilized FLUENT to determine the adequate air gap on the power performance of PV modules mounted on pitched roofs and vertical facades.^{68,69} The simulation was performed for realistic PV modules including module frames under bright sunshine and no wind when overheating of PV modules would be most likely to occur. The renormalization group (RNG) k–ε viscous model and the discrete ordinates (DO) radiation model were employed for modelling turbulent and radiative heat transfer, respectively. It was found that the air velocity generally increased with pitch angles under the constant solar heat gain, while the air velocity peaked at pitch angles of around 60 degrees for a certain location where the solar heat gain varied with inclination. The maximum PV temperature decreased with the increase in pitch angles and air gap depths, but increased with the increase in panel lengths in general. Based on CFD modelling, the minimum air gap depths for single and multiple PV module installations were given to reduce the possible overheating of PV modules.
Traditional numerical studies on PV-DSF are usually based on approximations or simplifications of boundary and initial conditions. However, more precise estimations are still required to simulate the performance of PV-DSFs. Grey-box modelling, based on a combination of prior physical knowledge and statistics, is a promising method for describing the heat dynamics of PV-DSFs and can be applied for simulation and prediction. Jiménez et al. found that the method for modelling non-linear stochastic systems using continuous-discrete stochastic state space models was suitable to describe the PV-DSF system.^{70} However, more detailed measurements were needed to estimate the unknown physical parameters. This model was then applied to study the influence of forced ventilation where fins were placed in the air gap.^{71} The results showed that the heat transfer was increased with fins and a high forced velocity in the air gap.
In many studies, the thermal behaviour of PV panels are usually mimicked with heating foils. Sandberg and Moshfesh carried out an experimental study on the air flow and heat transfer in a vertical channel between two surfaces.^{73} A mock-up of a PV facade with one surface heated by heating foils was built in the laboratory. Tests were carried out using a channel with a rain protection at the top and a channel with both ends open. This is because the flow was constrained and expected to be laminar in the channel with a rain protection at the top, whereas in the channel with both ends open, the flow was expected to transition from laminar to turbulent. Air and surface temperatures were recorded and the flow rate was measured using the tracer gas technique. The results showed that 40% of the heat supplied by heating foils was transferred to the unheated surface by radiative heat transfer, and that the relation between the air flow rate and the input heat flux followed a power law relationship. Similar experiments were also conducted to investigate the air flow and heat transfer in ventilated solar roof.^{74}
Another experimental study was performed by Fossa et al. to investigate the natural convection in an open channel by changing the geometrical configurations of heat sources.^{75} Surface temperatures were measured using thermocouples in order to infer information on the best cooling configurations for PV-DSF applications. The results indicated that the proper selection of the wall distance and the heating configuration could remarkably reduce the surface temperature and hence increase the PV conversion efficiency.
A testing device was specially designed by Zogou and Stapountzis to investigate the transient thermal behaviour of a PV-DSF in real insolation conditions in Volos, Greece.^{76} K-type thermocouples were used to measure the inlet and outlet air temperatures and the PV panel back surface temperatures. An air velocity transducer was used to measure the outlet air velocity. Three operating modes were tested, including natural convection and forced convection with fans at two different nominal flow rates (110 m^{3} h^{−1} and 190 m^{3} h^{−1} with power consumption of 20 W and 22 W respectively). It was found that the use of fans, especially for the one with higher capacity, contributed to a significant decrease in the mean PV panel temperature and therefore an increase in the PV conversion efficiency. The experimental results also revealed the complexity of the air flow field inside the PV-DSF channel. Based on these findings, a further experimental investigation was carried out using flow visualization and HWA measurements.^{77} The results were combined with CFD modelling to determine the wall heat transfer coefficients for building energy simulation. The results indicated that the air flow rates and heat transfer coefficients were critical to the performance of PV-DSF.
Kaiser et al. carried out an experimental study to investigate the impact of the channel aspect ratio and the induced air velocity on the PV module temperature for various incident solar radiations and ambient temperatures.^{78} Resistance temperature detectors were attached to measure the PV module back surface temperature. The temperature sensors and wind speed sensors with hot film anemometers were used to determine the air conditions. The results indicated that higher aspect ratios resulted in lower PV module temperatures. The optimal aspect ratio to minimize the overheating of PV modules under natural convection ventilation was found to be 0.11. In addition, induced air velocity in the channel significantly affected the cooling effect. Lower aspect ratios could be used for achieving the same cooling effect if the induced air velocity was higher than that under the corresponding natural convection ventilation. Semi-empirical correlations were proposed for predicting the thermal behaviour of the PV-DSF.
An overwhelming amount of research has been done in natural convection in vertical channels with various boundary conditions. The most popular natural convection correlations for symmetric or asymmetric, isothermal or isoflux boundary conditions were developed by Bar-Cohen and Rohsenow.^{79} The symmetric boundary conditions represent that the two vertical parallel plates are under the same conditions, either isothermal or isoflux, and the asymmetric boundary conditions represent that one vertical plate is isothermal or isoflux, while the other is insulated. The asymmetric isoflux condition is better for representing the boundary condition for opaque PV-DSFs, since the PV panel as the external skin is heated by the constant solar radiation, whereas the wall as the internal skin can be considered as adiabatic due to its thickness. However, for semi-transparent PV-DSFs, the shortwave solar radiation passes through the external semi-transparent PV panel and heats the internal skin, resulting in a more complex asymmetric boundary condition.^{80}
Despite the fact that various heat transfer correlations have been given in the literature, few correlations can be applied to natural convection in PV-DSFs. Al-Kayiem and Yassen argued that the application of heat transfer correlations suggested by Hollands^{81} in many studies was incorrect because these correlations were developed for a closed cavity.^{82} They therefore carried out an experiment using a rectangular passage solar air heater and then compared the experimental results with three widely used natural convection correlations – Hollands correlation,^{81} Bar-Cohen and Rohsenow correlation^{79} and Tiwari correlation.^{83} It was found that the Nusselt number was underestimated in the Hollands and Bar-Cohen correlations, but overestimated in the Tiwari correlation for the range of tested Rayleigh numbers. Agathokleous and Kalogirou also indicated that the Nusselt number correlation from Hollands cannot be used in an open channel, although the range of Nusselt numbers from Hollands et al. was the same as those from Bar-Cohen and Rohesnow for isothermal plates.^{36} Cipriano et al. evaluated the accuracy of the existing heat transfer correlations for the average Nusselt number and air mass flow rate in PV-DSFs using Alya, a CFD code based on FEM.^{80} The most appropriate correlations for natural convective PV-DSFs were obtained, as shown in Table 2.
Authors | Correlations | Notes |
---|---|---|
Symmetric, isothermal plates | ||
Olsson^{84} | Nu_{s} = [(Nu_{fd})^{−1.3} + (Nu_{plate})^{−1.3}]^{−1.3} | Ra′ ≤ 10^{5} |
Nu_{plate} = c_{l}(Ra′)^{1/4f} | ||
f = 1 + (Ra′)^{−0.4} | ||
Asymmetric, isothermal and adiabatic plates | ||
Bar-Cohen and Rohsenow^{79} | Ra′ ≤ 10^{5} | |
Symmetric, isoflux plates | ||
Olsson^{84} | Nu = [(Nu_{fd})^{−3.5} + (Nu_{plate})^{−3.5}]^{−1/3.5} | |
Nu_{fd} = 0.29(Ra′′)^{1/2} | ||
Nu_{plate} = c_{1}(Ra′′)^{1/5} | ||
Bar-Cohen and Rohsenow^{79} | ||
Asymmetric, isoflux and adiabatic plates | ||
Bar-Cohen and Rohsenow^{79} | ||
Heat transfer analysis in naturally ventilated PV-DSFs is complex because the parameters and conditions are difficult to determine. The more accurate the boundary and initial conditions, the more reasonable the heat transfer coefficients. Compared to the natural convection, the forced convection is the controlled flow and has more known parameters.^{85–88} Heat transfer coefficients for forced convection are much higher than those for natural convection.^{36}
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 |