Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Structural origins of broadband emission from layered Pb–Br hybrid perovskites

Matthew D. Smith a, Adam Jaffea, Emma R. Dohnera, Aaron M. Lindenbergb and Hemamala I. Karunadasa*a
aDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA. E-mail:
bDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA

Received 10th April 2017 , Accepted 17th April 2017

First published on 24th April 2017

Through structural and optical studies of a series of two-dimensional hybrid perovskites, we show that broadband emission upon near-ultraviolet excitation is common to (001) lead-bromide perovskites. Importantly, we find that the relative intensity of the broad emission correlates with increasing out-of-plane distortion of the Pb–(μ-Br)–Pb angle in the inorganic sheets. Temperature- and power-dependent photoluminescence data obtained on a representative (001) perovskite support an intrinsic origin to the broad emission from the bulk material, where photogenerated carriers cause excited-state lattice distortions mediated through electron–lattice coupling. In contrast, most inorganic phosphors contain extrinsic emissive dopants or emissive surface sites. The design rules established here could allow us to systematically optimize white-light emission from layered hybrid perovskites by fine-tuning the bulk crystal structure.


Broadband white-light emission from a single-phase bulk material without extrinsic emissive sites is unusual. We recently described this phenomenon in two-dimensional (2D) hybrid perovskites.1,2 Upon near-ultraviolet excitation, these layered organic–inorganic hybrids (Fig. 1) emit radiation across the entire visible spectrum, approximating sunlight. Most broadband inorganic phosphors contain emissive extrinsic dopants (e.g., Ce3+-doped yttrium aluminum garnet)3,4 or surface defect sites (e.g., CdSe quantum dots).5 Instead, our initial mechanistic studies indicated an intrinsic origin to the broad emission from the bulk perovskites.2,6 We proposed that the broad photoluminescence (PL) originated from self-trapped excitons7,8—excited electron–hole pairs stabilized through strong coupling to a deformable lattice. Because these “excited-state defects” are mediated through electron–phonon coupling and lattice deformability, which depend on the bulk crystalline structure, we hypothesized that the white-light emission from these materials may be highly amenable to synthetic fine-tuning. Herein, through structural and optical studies on a series of 2D perovskites, we articulate synthetic design rules for realizing and optimizing white-light emission from these hybrid phosphors. Using temperature-dependent photoluminescence studies, we further relate the relative intensity of the broad emission to the thermodynamics of self-trapping.
image file: c7sc01590a-f1.tif
Fig. 1 X-ray crystal structures of 2D Pb–Br perovskites, where the inorganic sublattices can be conceptually derived from (A) the (001) and (B) the (110) crystallographic planes of the cubic 3D perovskite structure.1 Insets show cubic 3D perovskites with these crystallographic planes highlighted. Green, brown, blue, and gray spheres represent Pb, Br, N, and C atoms, respectively. H and disordered atoms are omitted for clarity.

Broadband phosphors have applications in artificial illumination and displays. Inorganic phosphors are typically synthesized at high temperatures3 and require binding agents or resins4 for deposition. In contrast, the solution-state film deposition methods available for hybrid perovskites are especially well-suited for inexpensive large-area coatings without the need for additives. Importantly, unlike in purely inorganic solids, hybrid perovskites allow us to systematically tune the inorganic lattice through templating effects from different organic molecules. This allows us to look for correlations between small changes to the bulk crystalline structure and the broadband emission.

Layered hybrid perovskites consist of anionic sheets of corner-sharing metal-halide octahedra partitioned by organic cations (Fig. 1).9 The first two examples of Pb–Br perovskite white-light phosphors featured corrugated inorganic sheets.1,2 These inorganic sheets can be structurally derived from the cubic three-dimensional (3D) perovskite framework by conceptually slicing along the (110) crystallographic plane9 (Fig. 1B). Such (110) perovskites are still rare; the Cambridge Structural Database contains only four (110) Pb–Br perovskites1,2,10,11 and a few Sn–I and Pb–I analogs.2,12,13 In contrast, (001) Pb–Br perovskites are much more common. In this structure type, the inorganic sheets resemble slices cut along the (001) crystallographic plane of the cubic 3D structure9 (Fig. 1A). We find that broadband emission with a large Stokes shift is not unique to the family of (110) Pb–Br perovskites. In fact, all (001) Pb–Br perovskites we have investigated exhibit broad PL features, albeit with a strong dependence on temperature. Although to our knowledge only five white-light-emitting perovskites have been reported to date,1,2,14,15 broad PL appears to be much more general to layered perovskites.

At room temperature, typical (001) Pb–Br perovskites exhibit narrow blue/near-UV PL with a small Stokes shift, which has previously been ascribed to radiative emission from free excitons (FEs).16 Although excitonic emission in these materials is influenced by material defects and other trap states, the emission remains narrow. Upon cooling, however, we observe the emergence of a new broad PL band with a large Stokes shift, which we attribute to radiative recombination of self-trapped excitons (STEs), analogous to the emission from the (110) Pb–Br perovskites (N-MEDA)PbBr4 and (EDBE)PbBr4 (N-MEDA = N1-methylethane-1,2-diammonium and EDBE = 2,2′-(ethylenedioxy)bis(ethylammonium)).1,2 Self-trapping occurs when charge carriers are stabilized by excited-state lattice distortions induced by the charge carriers themselves.8 The evolution of the relative intensities of the narrow and broad PL bands with temperature suggests an equilibrium between “free” and “self-trapped” emissive states, consistent with thermally activated trapping processes.6 Importantly, from single-crystal X-ray structures and temperature-dependent PL spectra obtained on a series of (001) Pb–Br perovskites, we see correlations between specific distortions in the bulk inorganic lattice and the intensity of the broad PL relative to that of the narrow emission. These correlations suggest that the broadband emission can indeed be optimized through structural tuning and provide design rules for the synthesis of perovskite white-light emitters. Using these design rules, we synthesize a new (001) Pb–Br perovskite that emits white light with high color rendition at room temperature.

Results and discussion

1. Structural trends in (001) Pb–Br perovskites

The 2D perovskite inorganic sublattice can exhibit local structural distortions in the metal coordination sphere (i.e., deviations from ideal octahedral symmetry)2,17 as well as distortions arising from interoctahedral tilting (i.e., deviations of the metal–(μ-halide)–metal angle from 180°).18 We examined the X-ray crystal structures of eight (001) Pb–Br perovskites to look for correlations between geometries and optical properties. Crystallographic details of the Pb–Br perovskite structures obtained in this study (seven of which have not been previously reported or required additional refinement) are included in the ESI (Tables S1–S3) and references to reported structures are given in Table 1.18–22
Table 1 Largest values for the distortion of selected bond angles in the inorganic sublattices of the 9 Pb–Br perovskites in this study. Here, Dtilt = 180° − θtilt, Dout = 180° − θout, and Din = 180° − θin, where θtilt, θout, and θin are shown in Fig. 2
Compound Reference Organic cation Dtilt (°) Dout (°) Din (°)
(BA)2PbBr4 This work image file: c7sc01590a-u1.tif 25.2 ± 1.3 2.8 ± 2.8 25.0 ± 0.1
(ETA)2PbBr4 19 image file: c7sc01590a-u2.tif 8.1 ± 0.8 6.3 ± 1.6 5.1 ± 1.0
(PEA)2PbBr4 20 image file: c7sc01590a-u3.tif 29.2 ± 0.5 10.4 ± 0.5 27.9 ± 0.2
(MPenDA)PbBr4 This work,21 image file: c7sc01590a-u4.tif 32.6 ± 0.2 17.9 ± 0.4 27.7 ± 0.1
(ODA)PbBr4 This work image file: c7sc01590a-u5.tif 31.8 ± 0.2 19.0 ± 0.4 26.0 ± 0.2
(BDA)PbBr4 This work,22 image file: c7sc01590a-u6.tif 31.6 ± 0.3 20.7 ± 0.7 24.4 ± 0.3
(AEA)PbBr4 This work image file: c7sc01590a-u7.tif 35.7 ± 0.9 22.4 ± 1.9 28.5 ± 0.7
(HIS)PbBr4 This work,18 image file: c7sc01590a-u8.tif 26.1 ± 0.2 22.8 ± 0.2 13.0 ± 0.3
(GABA)2PbBr4 This work image file: c7sc01590a-u9.tif 37.8 ± 0.4 23.9 ± 0.9 30.8 ± 0.3

For the series of (001) Pb–Br perovskite structures discussed here, the average Pb–(μ-Br)–Pb angle (θtilt) is 155° with a standard deviation of 9°. This θtilt angle can be separated into two components: in-plane (θin) and out-of-plane projections (θout) (Fig. 2 and Table 1), where the plane is defined by three adjacent Pb atoms within an inorganic layer. We define in-plane and out-of-plane distortions as the deviation of these angles from linearity, so that in-plane distortion Din = 180° − θin and out-of-plane distortion Dout = 180° − θout. The angles θin and θout are not necessarily independent, as previously noted for Sn–I 2D perovskites.23 For example, in-plane and out-of-plane distortions can indirectly influence each other through steric and hydrogen-bonding interactions with the organic cations.23 We considered a total of 52 structural parameters within the inorganic layers, such as bond distances, bond angles, interoctahedral torsion angles, and deviations from octahedral symmetry within the metal coordination sphere. We discuss the relationship between structure and optical properties in Section 4.

image file: c7sc01590a-f2.tif
Fig. 2 (A) Schematic of interoctahedral tilting (θtilt) in a single Pb–Br layer of a (001) perovskite, and its decomposition into (B) out-of-plane (θout) and (C) in-plane (θin) components. We define in-plane distortion as Din = 180° − θin and the out-of-plane distortion as Dout = 180° − θout. (D) Dependence of the excitonic absorption energy at 298 K on θtilt in the series of (001) Pb–Br perovskites. Green and brown spheres represent Pb and Br atoms, respectively.

2. Optical trends in (001) Pb–Br perovskites: absorption

Layered Pb–Br perovskites are wide-bandgap semiconductors with optical bandgaps of ca. 3.4 eV.24 Above-bandgap excitation generates excited electrons and holes in the inorganic sheets that are strongly attracted to each other owing to the quantum confinement of the inorganic sheets and to the poor shielding afforded by the low dielectric constant of the adjacent organic layers.25 These cooperative effects yield strongly bound electron–hole pairs, or excitons, with large exciton binding energies typically above 300 meV.24 The excitonic absorption energies in eight of the perovskites we investigated range from 2.97 to 3.24 eV (Table S5 and Fig. 2D). As average θtilt decreases from 172° to 148°, the excitonic absorption energy increases by ca. 270 meV. A similar trend has been reported in 2D Pb–I26 and Sn–I23 perovskites. Electronic structure calculations on 2D Sn–I perovskites reveal that increases in Dtilt (increased deviation of θtilt from 180°) reduce the overlap between the metal and halide orbitals, thereby decreasing band dispersion and increasing the bandgap.23 Similar distortions in the inorganic framework have been correlated to bandgap increases in the 3D perovskites APbI3 (A = CH3NH3+, (H2N)2CH+, and Cs+) as well.27,28 These trends are also reflected in high-pressure studies of (CH3NH3)PbI3, where increasing interoctahedral tilting with compression increases the bandgap and band-edge PL energy.29–31

We then sought to determine if, similar to their optical absorption, the broadband emission from 2D perovskites also showed a dependence on crystal structure. A strong structural dependence would support a significant component of the broad emission being intrinsic to the bulk material, enabling us to tune the emission through synthetic design.

3. Optical trends in (001) Pb–Br perovskites: emission

The PL from each (001) Pb–Br perovskite we investigated exhibits similar behavior upon cooling. Although the relative intensities of the broad and narrow emissions are highly variable across our series of eight Pb–Br perovskites, we could always detect the broadband emission at some temperature. To illustrate their emission properties, we first discuss in detail the temperature-dependent PL of (HIS)PbBr4 (HIS = histammonium, 4-(2-ammonioethyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium). The room-temperature PL spectrum of a (HIS)PbBr4 single crystal shows the narrow FE emission at ca. 3 eV that is characteristic of 2D Pb–Br perovskites. With decreasing temperature, we observe the growth of a broad emission at ca. 2 eV, with an onset temperature of ca. 200 K. This broad emission, which we assign to radiative decay from STEs (Fig. 3A), becomes the dominant PL feature at cryogenic temperatures (Fig. 3B). Because both the FE emission and the STE emission can have some contributions from material defects that affect their energy and/or bandwidth, we refer to the resulting PL bands simply as narrow emission (NE) and broad emission (BE), respectively.
image file: c7sc01590a-f3.tif
Fig. 3 (A) Schematic of exciton self-trapping (red arrow) and detrapping (blue arrow) in 2D Pb–Br perovskites (FE = free exciton state, STE = self-trapped exciton state, Ea,trap = activation energy for self-trapping, and Ea,detrap = activation energy for detrapping). FE emission and STE emission are shown in pink and orange, respectively.6 (B) Temperature-dependent photoluminescence (PL) of a single crystal of (HIS)PbBr4 (HIS = histammonium) showing the narrow emission (NE) at ca. 3 eV and the broad emission (BE) at ca. 2 eV. (C) Temperature-dependent ratio of integrated BE to NE PL intensity, ln(IBE·INE−1), in a single crystal of (HIS)PbBr4. The colored symbols in (C) correspond to the spectra shown in (B) depicted in the same color. (D) Temperature-dependent ln(IBE·INE−1) ratios for a series of (001) Pb–Br perovskites, abbreviated according to their organic cations (shown in Table 1).

Self-trapping of photogenerated carriers has previously been observed in polar dielectrics such as alkali halides,32–34 lead halides,35,36 and titania,37,38 where strong electron–lattice coupling leads to carrier localization through large excited-state lattice distortions.8 Broad PL features, similar to the broad emission we observed from (110) perovskites,1,2 have been recently reported at room temperature from films of the (001) perovskite: (C6H11NH3)2PbBr4.14,39 A broad, low intensity red emission in single crystals of CsPbCl3 over the temperature range ca. 4–150 K has also been attributed to STE emission.40

The ratio of integrated intensities of the broad emission (IBE) to the narrow emission (INE) for (HIS)PbBr4 evolves as a function of temperature. The plot of ln(IBE·INE−1) vs. T−1 (Fig. 3C) shows two regimes consistent with a simple model for thermally activated self-trapping, where the FE and STE states are separated by activation-energy barriers for trapping (Ea,trap) and detrapping (Ea,detrap) (Fig. 3A).6 Our recent mechanistic studies on a (110) perovskite are consistent with the presence of several STE states, where permanent material defects can lend further heterogeneity to the excited-state potential-energy surface.6 However, for simplicity we show only one STE state in Fig. 3A. At room temperature, we only observe the narrow emission. At these higher temperatures, the lattice has sufficient thermal energy to detrap carriers from STE states back to the FE state. Here, the timescale for carrier detrapping from the STE states back to a FE state (and subsequent radiative FE recombination that results in the narrow emission) is faster than the STE emission pathway. However, upon cooling below 200 K, the BE intensity increases relative to the NE intensity. This suggests that thermal energy is becoming decreasingly sufficient for carriers in the STE state to surmount the activation-energy barrier to detrap back into the FE state (kBT < Ea,detrap; kB = Boltzmann constant). As the temperature is decreased, the absolute intensities of both the narrow and broad emission bands also increase, likely due to reduced nonradiative recombination pathways. The IBE[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]INE ratio reaches its maximum at ca. 80 K (green data point at ca. 0.0125 K−1 in Fig. 3C). With continued cooling below this temperature, INE begins to increase again relative to IBE. We assign this as a temperature regime in which thermal energy is insufficient to easily exceed the activation-energy barrier for self-trapping (kBT < Ea,trap), thus hindering FEs from accessing the STE states. Such thermal equilibration between FEs and STEs has also been studied in organic molecular semiconductors such as pyrene.41,42 This relationship may be complicated at very low temperatures by processes such as intersystem crossing between singlet and triplet excitons,24,43 tunneling6,44 between FE and STE states, and other nonlinear processes such as biexcitonic emission.45 The continuous evolution of the emission energies of the perovskites suggests that there are no first-order phase transitions at these temperatures.

The difference between energy minima of FE and STE states is the self-trapping depth = Ea,detrapEa,trap = −ΔGself-trap (where ΔGself-trap < 0). The ratio of integrated broad and narrow emission intensities (IBE·INE−1) at a given temperature is related to ΔGself-trap and the radiative emission rates from the STE and FE states (kr,s and kr,f, respectively) through an Arrhenius relation (see ESI for the full derivation):

image file: c7sc01590a-t1.tif
Therefore, we can relate the relative energies of the FE and STE states and the tendency to form STEs to the ratio of PL intensities of the broad and narrow emissions at a given temperature (Fig. 3D).

The broad emission intensity in (HIS)PbBr4 at 20.0 K increases in a linear manner (y = y0 + axb; where a = 4.5(9) × 10−5, b = 0.96(5), y0 = 1(2) × 10−5) with increasing excitation intensity from 0.371 to 39.9 mW cm−2 (Fig. S9). The intensity of PL from permanent defects typically shows sublinear power dependence with eventual saturation at high excitation intensities owing to the limited number of defects.46 The linear power dependence we observe (similar to reported power dependence for excitonic processes in InGaN quantum wells)47 and the insensitivity of the emission band shape to excitation power density (Fig. S10) is consistent, however, with light-generated defects, which should scale with increasing excitation intensity.2 We also observe similar broad emission band shape from both single crystals and ball-milled powders of (HIS)PbBr4 (Fig. S11), indicating that the PL does not originate from defects at the crystal/particle surface. We further see the broad emission in perovskite samples crystallized using different methods, suggesting that the emission does not arise solely from lattice defects formed during synthesis. These temperature- and power-dependence studies of emission from crystals of the (001) perovskite (HIS)PbBr4 support our assignment of the broad emission originating from STEs, in agreement with our previous work on (110) Pb–Br perovskites.1,2

Because the temperature and power dependence of the broad emission in (HIS)PbBr4 pointed towards an intrinsic origin, we repeated the temperature-dependent PL measurements using eight Pb–Br perovskites listed in Table 1 (excluding (AEA)PbBr4, which is discussed in Section 4). We used ball-milled powders of the perovskites to avoid any angle dependence of incident light or heterogeneity between different crystals. Such heterogeneity in emission energy and lifetime has been previously observed in single crystals of Pb–I perovskites.48 The Arrhenius relations for each of the perovskites in our series appear qualitatively similar to that of single-crystal (HIS)PbBr4 (Fig. 3D). Upon cooling to ca. 80 K, the broad emission increases significantly for all the perovskites except for (ETA)2PbBr4 and (BA)2PbBr4, which both exhibit minimal broad emission.

4. Structural correlations to the broadband emission in (001) Pb–Br perovskites

We then examined a large number of structural parameters in the room-temperature single-crystal X-ray structures of the eight Pb–Br perovskites, to look for correlations between the emission and the crystal structures. Notably, similar to the excitonic absorption energy in other 2D perovskites,23,26 the broad emission also shows a dependence on the distortion along the Pb–(μ-Br)–Pb bond axis, supporting an intrinsic origin from the bulk structure to the emission. Interestingly, however, the key structural parameter that correlates with the broad emission is not Dtilt, but instead its out-of-plane component (Dout).

The case for Dout as the more relevant structural parameter for the broad emission is exemplified by comparing the two (001) perovskites, (BA)2PbBr4 (BA = butylammonium) and (HIS)PbBr4. Fig. 4 shows in-plane and out-of-plane views of the inorganic sheets of these perovskites. Both (BA)2PbBr4 and (HIS)PbBr4 have similar values for the smallest measured θtilt value (highest Dtilt value) of 155(1)° and 153.9(2)°, respectively. However, in (BA)2PbBr4 this distortion is almost entirely confined to the plane of the inorganic sheets with smallest measured θout of 177(3)° and θin of 155.0(1)°. This yields a minimal out-of-plane distortion with Dout = 3(3)° and a large in-plane distortion with Din = 25.0(1)° (Fig. 4A). Details of our methodology for angle calculation and error propagation analysis are available in the ESI. Variable-temperature PL spectra of (BA)2PbBr4 from 20 to 200 K show mostly the narrow emission with almost no broad emission (Fig. 4B). In contrast, (HIS)PbBr4 has a major out-of-plane component and a more minor in-plane component to θtilt with its smallest θout = 157.2(2)° and θin = 167.0(3)°. This affords a large out-of-plane distortion with Dout = 22.8(2)° and smaller in-plane distortion with Din = 13.0(3)° (Fig. 4C). Here, we see a much larger contribution from the broad emission in the variable-temperature PL spectra, with the integrated intensity of the broad emission dominating over that of the narrow emission at temperatures below 200 K (Fig. 4D).

image file: c7sc01590a-f4.tif
Fig. 4 In-plane tilting (θin), out-of-plane tilting (θout) and variable-temperature photoluminescence (PL) spectra for (A and B) (BA)2PbBr4 (BA = butylammonium) and (C and D) (HIS)PbBr4.

We then examined the relationship between Dout and ln(IBE·INE−1) across the series of Pb–Br perovskites. We chose the emission at 80 K for this analysis because ln(IBE·INE−1) tends to reach its maximum near this temperature for each perovskite. We find that increasing Dout correlates linearly with increasing ln(IBE·INE−1) across the entire series (Fig. 5A). The strongest correlation is evident when using the largest measured values of Dout for each perovskite, instead of their average values (Fig. S12). This is consistent with exciton self-trapping being primarily governed by the local geometry in the inorganic layers. We also observe weak relationships between ln(IBE·INE−1) and (i) the distance between terminal Br and Pb atoms and (ii) the torsion angle between terminal Br atoms (Br–Pb⋯Pb–Br) (Fig. S13A and 13B, respectively). We note, however, that not all parameters are independent of Dout. For example, Dout contributes to the terminal Br–Pb⋯Pb–Br torsion angle and to Dtilt. In contrast to the linear correlation with Dout, no clear trends could be seen for the relationship between ln(IBE·INE−1) and Dtilt or Din (Fig. 5B and C). Distortions from octahedral symmetry within the metal coordination sphere also yielded no clear correlations with ln(IBE·INE−1) (Fig. S15). Overall, we tested 52 parameters but observed no clear structural correlation to ln(IBE·INE−1), except for Dout.

image file: c7sc01590a-f5.tif
Fig. 5 Values of ln(IBE·INE−1) for the series of (001) Pb–Br perovskites plotted as a function of (A) largest measured Dout value, (B) largest measured Dtilt value, and (C) largest measured Din value. The linear fit for (A) is shown to track the correlation between the broad emission and Dout. Error bars correspond to uncertainties arising from structural parameter calculations and from multiple measurements of the ln(IBE·INE−1) values (detailed in the ESI).

To further test the correlation between Dout and the relative intensity of the broad emission, we chose the perovskite (AEA)PbBr4 (AEA = 3-(2-ammonioethyl)anilinium, Fig. 6A). The inorganic layers of this perovskite are highly distorted, with a high Dout = 22.4(19)°. We find that (AEA)PbBr4 displays higher broad-emission intensity than narrow-emission intensity over the entire temperature range from 20 to 296 K. The room-temperature emission from (AEA)PbBr4 (Fig. 6B) has CIE coordinates3,4 of (0.29, 0.34) and a color rendering index3,4 of 87, corresponding to white light with excellent color rendition.

image file: c7sc01590a-f6.tif
Fig. 6 (A) X-ray structure and (B) absorption and emission spectra of (AEA)PbBr4 (AEA = 3-(2-ammonioethyl)anilinium), a (001) Pb–Br perovskite with high out-of-plane distortion (Dout) that shows white-light emission at room temperature. Green, brown, blue, and gray spheres represent Pb, Br, N, and C atoms, respectively. H atoms omitted for clarity.

We are aware of one reported outlier to the structural-optical trends shown here: the (001) Pb–Br perovskite (C6H11NH3)2PbBr4.14,39 This perovskite shows no out-of-plane distortion (Dout = 0°), yet it exhibits broadband emission at room temperature.14,39 Notably, however, this material crystallizes in the polar space group Cmc21. Polar materials can exhibit a much higher degree of electron–phonon coupling compared to analogous non-polar materials.49 Because exciton self-trapping is mediated by interactions between the exciton and the lattice, electron–phonon coupling should play a significant role in the broad emission. For consistency, we considered only perovskites that crystallize in centrosymmetric space groups for our structural analysis. Examination of polar perovskites may provide additional routes for favoring broadband emission from these tunable materials.


We show that broadband emission with a large Stokes shift is common to (001) Pb–Br perovskites. The temperature- and power-dependence of the broad emission from a single crystal of a representative (001) Pb–Br perovskite indicates it is intrinsic to the bulk material, consistent with our proposal of self-trapping of photogenerated carriers through excited-state lattice distortions.

Self-trapping has been extensively studied in alkali halides32–34 and lead halides,35,36,50 which exhibit a number of similarities to lead-halide perovskites, such as band-edge orbital composition. However, unlike in purely inorganic solids, we can induce slight distortions in the inorganic lattice of hybrid perovskites by fine tuning the organic cations. This allows us to systematically study the effects of lattice distortions on their emissive properties. Indeed, our structural and optical studies on a series of eight (001) Pb–Br hybrid perovskites show that ln(IBE·INE−1) increases linearly with increasing out-of-plane distortion of the Pb–(μ-Br)–Pb angle (Dout), where IBE and INE are the integrated intensities of the broad emission and the narrow emission, respectively.

As we previously noted,2,6 we cannot eliminate contributions to the broad emission from permanent material defects where excited charge carriers, including self-trapped carriers, are loosely bound to acceptor or donor defects. Because self-trapping inherently induces local lattice distortions, it is difficult to distinguish between intrinsic self-trapping (mediated purely through electron–lattice coupling) and extrinsic self-trapping (mediated through self-trapped carriers interacting with permanent material defects) by using optical spectra.8 Furthermore, the transient lattice defects caused by self-trapping could also lead to permanent lattice defects. For example, self-trapping precedes defect formation in the creation of color centers in alkali-halide crystals.51 However, the correlations we see between the perovskites' crystal structures and PL provide compelling evidence that the broad emission has a significant component with an intrinsic, bulk origin.

Emission from most inorganic phosphors arises from extrinsic dopants or from ill-defined surface sites. In contrast, the broad emission from these crystalline hybrid perovskites appears to arise, to a significant degree, from the bulk crystal structure and is amenable to synthetic design. The structural correlations shown here allow us to predict which perovskites will exhibit broadband emission at a given temperature. Furthermore, the modular organic–inorganic architecture of these hybrids allows us to fine-tune the inorganic lattice through organic substitution. Several studies have investigated the templating effects of organic cations on distortions in the inorganic framework.17,18,52 Therefore, the design rules established here could allow us to systematically optimize white-light emission from 2D hybrid perovskites.


This research was supported through the Alfred P. Sloan Fellowship, and the Stanford Terman and Gabilan Faculty Fellowships. A. J. is supported by the William S. Johnson Fellowship through the Stanford Chemistry Department. M. D. S. is supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-114747). A. M. L. acknowledges support from the Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division. We are grateful to Prof. M. D. McGehee for generous access to equipment. Single-crystal XRD studies were performed at the Stanford Nanocharacterization Laboratory (SNL) and at beamline 11.3.1 at the Advanced Light Source (ALS) at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL). The ALS is supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

Notes and references

  1. E. R. Dohner, E. T. Hoke and H. I. Karunadasa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 1718–1721 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. E. R. Dohner, A. Jaffe, L. R. Bradshaw and H. I. Karunadasa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 13154–13157 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. S. Ye, F. Xiao, Y. X. Pan, Y. Y. Ma and Q. Y. Zhang, Mater. Sci. Eng., R, 2010, 71, 1–34 CrossRef.
  4. J. Silver and R. Withnall, in Luminescent Materials and Applications, ed. A. Kitai, John Wiley & Sons, Chicester, 2008, ch. 3, pp. 75–109 Search PubMed.
  5. M. J. Bowers, J. R. McBride and S. J. Rosenthal, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 15378–15379 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. T. Hu, M. D. Smith, E. R. Dohner, M.-J. Sher, X. Wu, M. T. Trinh, A. Fisher, J. Corbett, X.-Y. Zhu, H. I. Karunadasa and A. M. Lindenberg, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2016, 7, 2258–2263 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. Y. Toyozawa, Prog. Theor. Phys., 1961, 26, 29–44 CrossRef.
  8. K. S. Song and R. T. Williams, Self-Trapped Excitons, Springer, Germany, 2nd edn, 1996 Search PubMed.
  9. D. B. Mitzi, in Prog. Inorg. Chem., ed. K. D. Karlin, John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, 1999, vol. 48, pp. 1–121 Search PubMed.
  10. Y. Y. Li, G. L. Zheng and J. Lin, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2008, 2008, 1689–1692 CrossRef.
  11. Y. Y. Li, C. K. Lin, G. L. Zheng, Z. Y. Cheng, H. You, W. D. Wang and J. Lin, Chem. Mater., 2006, 18, 3463–3469 CrossRef CAS.
  12. D. B. Mitzi, S. Wang, C. A. Feild, C. A. Chess and A. M. Guloy, Science, 1995, 267, 1473–1476 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  13. M. Daub, C. Haber and H. Hillebrecht, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2017, 2017, 1120–1126 CrossRef CAS.
  14. A. Yangui, D. Garrot, J. S. Lauret, A. Lusson, G. Bouchez, E. Deleporte, S. Pillet, E. E. Bendeif, M. Castro, S. Triki, Y. Abid and K. Boukheddaden, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2015, 119, 23638–23647 CAS.
  15. L. Mao, Y. Wu, C. C. Stoumpos, M. R. Wasielewski and M. G. Kanatzidis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 5210–5215 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  16. K. Tanaka, T. Takahashi, T. Kondo, K. Umeda, K. Ema, T. Umebayashi, K. Asai, K. Uchida and N. Miura, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1, 2005, 44, 5923–5932 CrossRef CAS.
  17. Z. J. Tang, J. Guan and A. M. Guloy, J. Mater. Chem., 2001, 11, 479–482 RSC.
  18. Y. Y. Li, C. K. Lin, G. L. Zheng and J. Lin, J. Solid State Chem., 2007, 180, 173–179 CrossRef CAS.
  19. N. Mercier, S. Poiroux, A. Riou and P. Batail, Inorg. Chem., 2004, 43, 8361–8366 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  20. K. Shibuya, M. Koshimizu, F. Nishikido, H. Saito and S. Kishimoto, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. E: Struct. Rep. Online, 2009, 65, m1323–m1324 CAS.
  21. A. B. Corradi, A. M. Ferrari, G. C. Pellacani, A. Saccani, F. Sandrolini and P. Sgarabotto, Inorg. Chem., 1999, 38, 716–721 CrossRef CAS.
  22. A. Lemmerer and D. G. Billing, CrystEngComm, 2012, 14, 1954–1966 RSC.
  23. J. L. Knutson, J. D. Martin and D. B. Mitzi, Inorg. Chem., 2005, 44, 4699–4705 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  24. H. Takagi, H. Kunugita and K. Ema, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2013, 87, 125421 CrossRef.
  25. T. Ishihara, J. Lumin., 1994, 60–61, 269–274 CrossRef CAS.
  26. K. Pradeesh, K. Nageswara Rao and G. Vijaya Prakash, J. Appl. Phys., 2013, 113, 083523 CrossRef.
  27. A. Amat, E. Mosconi, E. Ronca, C. Quarti, P. Umari, M. K. Nazeeruddin, M. Grätzel and F. De Angelis, Nano Lett., 2014, 14, 3608–3616 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  28. M. R. Filip, G. E. Eperon, H. J. Snaith and F. Giustino, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 5757 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  29. A. Jaffe, Y. Lin, C. M. Beavers, J. Voss, W. L. Mao and H. I. Karunadasa, ACS Cent. Sci., 2016, 2, 201–209 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  30. S. Jiang, Y. Fang, R. Li, H. Xiao, J. Crowley, C. Wang, T. J. White, W. A. Goddard, Z. Wang, T. Baikie and J. Fang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 6540–6544 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  31. L. Kong, G. Liu, J. Gong, Q. Hu, R. D. Schaller, P. Dera, D. Zhang, Z. Liu, W. Yang, K. Zhu, Y. Tang, C. Wang, S.-H. Wei, T. Xu and H.-k. Mao, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2016, 113, 8910–8915 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  32. R. F. Wood, Phys. Rev., 1966, 151, 629–641 CrossRef CAS.
  33. A. M. Stoneham, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys., 1974, 7, 2476–2486 CrossRef CAS.
  34. P. E. Cade, A. M. Stoneham and P. W. Tasker, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 1984, 30, 4621–4639 CrossRef CAS.
  35. M. Iwanaga and T. Hayashi, J. Lumin., 2003, 102–103, 663–668 CrossRef CAS.
  36. M. Iwanaga, M. Shirai, K. Tanaka and T. Hayashi, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2002, 66, 064304 CrossRef.
  37. H. Tang, H. Berger, P. E. Schmid and F. Lévy, Solid State Commun., 1994, 92, 267–271 CrossRef CAS.
  38. N. Hosaka, T. Sekiya and S. Kurita, J. Lumin., 1997, 72–74, 874–875 CrossRef CAS.
  39. A. Yangui, S. Pillet, A. Lusson, E.-E. Bendeif, S. Triki, Y. Abid and K. Boukheddaden, J. Alloys Compd., 2017, 699, 1122–1133 CrossRef CAS.
  40. T. Hayashi, T. Kobayashi, M. Iwanaga and M. Watanabe, J. Lumin., 2001, 94–95, 255–259 CrossRef.
  41. A. Matsui and H. Nishimura, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 1980, 49, 657–663 CrossRef CAS.
  42. A. Matsui, K.-i. Mizuno, N. Tamai and I. Yamazaki, Chem. Phys., 1987, 113, 111–117 CrossRef CAS.
  43. N. Kitazawa, M. Aono and Y. Watanabe, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2012, 134, 875–880 CrossRef CAS.
  44. K. Nasu and Y. Toyozawa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 1981, 50, 235–245 CrossRef CAS.
  45. K. Ema, K. Umeda, M. Toda, C. Yajima, Y. Arai, H. Kunugita, D. Wolverson and J. J. Davies, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2006, 73, 241310 CrossRef.
  46. T. Schmidt, K. Lischka and W. Zulehner, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 1992, 45, 8989–8994 CrossRef.
  47. C. Netzel, V. Hoffmann, T. Wernicke, A. Knauer, M. Weyers, M. Kneissl and N. Szabo, J. Appl. Phys., 2010, 107, 033510 CrossRef.
  48. G. Grancini, V. D'Innocenzo, E. R. Dohner, N. Martino, A. R. Srimath Kandada, E. Mosconi, F. De Angelis, H. I. Karunadasa, E. T. Hoke and A. Petrozza, Chem. Sci., 2015, 6, 7305–7310 RSC.
  49. D. Emin, Polarons, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2013 Search PubMed.
  50. M. Iwanaga, J. Azuma, M. Shirai, K. Tanaka and T. Hayashi, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2002, 65, 214306 CrossRef.
  51. F. Seitz, Rev. Mod. Phys., 1954, 26, 7–94 CrossRef CAS.
  52. N. Mercier, N. Louvain and W. Bi, CrystEngComm, 2009, 11, 720–734 RSC.


Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. CCDC 1521053–1521055, 1521057–1521060 and 1521067. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c7sc01590a
These authors contributed equally.

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017