Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Mild, visible light-mediated decarboxylation of aryl carboxylic acids to access aryl radicals

L. Candish, M. Freitag, T. Gensch and F. Glorius*
Organisch-Chemisches Institut, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Corrensstrasse 40, 48149, Münster, Germany. E-mail:

Received 18th December 2016 , Accepted 27th February 2017

First published on the web 27th February 2017

Herein we present the first example of aryl radical formation via the visible light-mediated decarboxylation of aryl carboxylic acids using photoredox catalysis. This method constitutes a mild protocol for the decarboxylation of cheap and abundant aryl carboxylic acids and tolerates both electron-rich substrates and those lacking ortho-substitution. The in situ formation of an acyl hypobromite is proposed to prevent unproductive hydrogen atom abstraction and trapping of the intermediate aroyloxy radical, enabling mild decarboxylation.

Since seminal publications by Lei,1a Nishibayashi1b and MacMillan,1c the decarboxylation of alkyl carboxylic acids via photoredox catalysis2 has become a commanding method to generate alkyl radicals1d which can undergo either direct functionalisation or participate in dual-catalytic processes.1e Despite strong interest in this area, the decarboxylation of aryl carboxylic acids using photoredox catalysis is yet to be realised. While aryl radicals can be accessed via photoredox catalysis from electron-poor arenes, such as diazonium and iodonium salts, aryl halides,3 and aryl borates,4 many of these reagents are unstable, expensive and often not commercially available. In contrast, aryl carboxylic acids are abundant and cheap, making them appealing starting materials. Considering the wealth of methods for the functionalisation of alkyl carboxylic acids using photoredox catalysis,1 the development of a mild protocol for the decarboxylative functionalisation of aryl carboxylic acids is of high importance.

The decarboxylation of aroyloxy radicals (I) is known to be challenging,5a in fact, Barton categorised I as a “non-decarboxylating acyloxy radical”, noting that I does not decarboxylate at temperatures below 120–130 °C.5b,c Though generation of I via photoredox catalysis has been described, either via single electron reduction of benzoyl peroxide6a or single electron oxidation of benzoates,6b,7 decarboxylation was not reported in these cases. Instead, I has been reported to add to arenes to provide benzoate esters (Scheme 1a).6 Additionally, our laboratory recently disclosed the use of I as a hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) catalyst for the functionalisation of unactivated C(sp3)–H bonds.7 While the activation energy for the decarboxylation of I is only 8–9 kcal mol−1,8a the rate of decarboxylation (k = 1.4 × 106 s−1) is not competitive with nondecarboxylative pathways including addition to arenes (k = 2.2 × 108 M−1 s−1)8a and HAT (k = 1.2 × 107 M−1 s−1).8a,9 As such, while the decarboxylation of I is theoretically possible its realisation is practically challenging. By comparison, the more facile decarboxylation of alkyl carboxylic acids, which readily occurs at ambient temperatures, proceeds at least one thousand times faster than the decarboxylation of I.8c

image file: c6sc05533h-s1.tif
Scheme 1 Challenges of photoredox-catalysed decarboxylation of aryl carboxylic acids and this approach to achieve a mild decarboxylation protocol.

Recently, Greaney10a,b and Su10c disclosed their work describing the catalytic oxidative radical decarboxylation of aryl carboxylic acids using Ag(I) and a stoichiometric oxidant. This work is complementary to the aryl decarboxylation protocols developed by Goossen and Larrosa involving CO2 extrusion/arene metalation,11 however, characteristic of all methods for aryl decarboxylation is the requirement of forcing reaction conditions. Given photoredox catalysis has become a commanding method to generate radicals under mild reaction conditions2 we believed we could harness this potential in order to develop a mild process for the decarboxylation of aryl carboxylic acids. To this end, we were inspired by reports from Hammond12a and da Silva Corrêa12b that aroyloxy radicals, formed via the thermal decomposition of benzoyl peroxide, react rapidly with iodination reagents to yield benzoyl hypoiodites, such as II (X = I) (Scheme 1b). Acyl hypohalites are also proposed intermediates in the Hunsdiecker reaction, formed via the halogenation of stoichiometric metal carboxylates (M = Ag, Hg, Tl), with heating of the benzoyl hypohalite initiating a radical chain that furnishes the halogenated product.13,14 We proposed that generation of an aroyloxy radical via photoredox catalysis in the presence of a suitable bromination reagent may enable the in situ generation of benzoyl hypobromite II (X = Br), thus inhibiting undesired reactions of I including HAT and addition to arenes (Scheme 1c). It was hoped that a subsequent single electron reduction of II would facilitate decarboxylation, thus yielding an aryl radical, which could be trapped with arenes to furnish biaryl products.

As the success of this process hinges on the ability of II to participate in single electron reduction, and for the resultant radical anion to undergo decarboxylation at temperatures unprecedented for aryl carboxylic acids, hypobromite 1 was initially synthesised and subjected to photoredox conditions. Iridium-centred photocatalyst [Ir(dF(CF3)ppy)2(dtbbpy)]PF6 (dF(CF3)ppy = 2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)pyridine, dtbbpy = 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine) (PC) was selected, as luminescence quenching studies suggested it capable of oxidising benzoates, while also being significantly reducing (image file: c6sc05533h-t1.tif = −0.89 V or image file: c6sc05533h-t2.tif = −1.37 V vs. SCE). Hypobromite 1 was prepared at low temperature and then heated to 55 °C in chlorobenzene in the absence of PC.15 As predicted, both under irradiation with blue LEDs (λmax = 455 nm) and in the dark, only benzoate ester 2a was formed (eqn (1)). Gratifyingly, when hypobromite 1 was irradiated at 55 °C in the presence of PC the desired biaryl product 3a was afforded, along with ester 2a (eqn (2)). This result suggests that oxidative quenching of PC (image file: c6sc05533h-t3.tif = −0.89 V vs. SCE) by 1 is possible, thus providing radical anion III and facilitating decarboxylation. Addition of the aryl radical to the arene solvent and oxidation of the intermediary cyclohexadienyl radical by the Ir(IV) should, after deprotonation, afford biaryl 3a with regeneration of the ground-state PC.

image file: c6sc05533h-u1.tif(1)
image file: c6sc05533h-u2.tif(2)

With evidence that decarboxylation of a hypobromite could be facilitated by the photocatalyst and light, we commenced studies into the photoredox catalysed decarboxylation of aryl carboxylic acid 4a. The irradiation of 4a under visible light at 55 °C with PC (3 mol%) and Cs2CO3 (2 equiv.) in the absence of bromine resulted in only 1% yield of biaryl 3b (Chart 1). However, the addition of bromine (3.5 equiv.) to the reaction enabled the product 3b to form in 51% yield (Chart 1), along with approximately 10% of corresponding benzoate ester 2b. When this reaction was performed in the absence of PC, a mixture of mono-, di-, tri- and tetra-bromobenzene was observed,16 along with 14% 2b. As bromine is a toxic, volatile liquid, incompatible with numerous functional groups, we decided to explored alternative brominating agents to determine whether they could also affect the reaction. Pleasingly, we found many brominating reagents capable of facilitating product formation (see ESI for a list of the halogenation reagents screened). In line with our previous studies, bromomalonate derivatives were found to be excellent reagents,1h,17 with 5 providing the product in 77% yield (with no benzoate ester observed), while N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) and N-bromophthalimide (NBP) provided the product in lower yields (Chart 1).

image file: c6sc05533h-c1.tif
Chart 1 Screen of different bromination reagents. General reaction conditions: reactions were performed using 4a (0.1 mmol), PC (3 mol%), Cs2CO3 (2 equiv.), [Br] (3.5 equiv.), arene (2.2 mL), blue LED (λmax = 455 nm), 55 °C, 22 h. Yields determined by GC-MS using decane as standard.

To gain a deeper understanding of the decarboxylation, the influence of the sterics and electronics of the aryl carboxylate and the electronics of the trapping arene were studied (Scheme 2). The decarboxylation of electron-deficient acids with ortho-substituents proceeded smoothly at 55 °C to provide biaryls (3b–f). The reaction of ortho-bromobenzoic acid (4b) was performed on 1.5 mmol scale, though an extended reaction time (60 h) was required.

image file: c6sc05533h-s2.tif
Scheme 2 Scope of the biaryl synthesis. General reactions conditions; benzoic acid (0.2 mmol), PC (3 mol%), Cs2CO3 (2 equiv.), 5 (3.5 equiv.), arene (4.5 mL), blue LED (λmax = 455 nm), 55 °C, 22 h. Isolated yields (average of two reactions) following column chromatography. aReactions were performed with arene (150 equiv.) in CH3CN (1[thin space (1/6-em)]:[thin space (1/6-em)]1 v/v). bReactions were performed on 1.5 mmol scale, reaction time = 60 h. cReactions were performed with blue LED (λmax = 415 nm) at 80 °C. d2 equiv. 5 used. eReactions were performed using 23 W CFL. fRatio of isomers determined by GC-MS. gRatio of isomers determined by 19F NMR spectroscopic analysis of the crude mixture.

The reaction of electron-deficient acids containing meta- or para-substituents required heating the reaction to 80 °C to achieve acceptable yields of the products (3g–h). Acids containing electron-donating substituents are generally not tolerated in the catalytic oxidative radical decarboxylation reactions described by Greaney and Su,10b,c presumably because of their slower rate of decarboxylation.18 Interestingly, electron-rich acids were found to react smoothly under our reaction conditions to afford products 3j–n. A small amount of decarboxylative bromination was observed for electron-rich benzoic acids, although this could be suppressed by reducing the equivalents of 5, though lower yields of the biaryl products were observed. Pleasingly, the decarboxylation of para-tert-butylbenzoic acid proceeded smoothly, providing the product (3k) in similar yield (54% cf. 57%) using a 23 W CFL (compact fluorescent lamp) instead of blue LEDs. Substituted nicotinic and isonicotinic acids also underwent decarboxylative arylation in reasonable yields to provide phenylpyridines (3r–u).

The scope of the trapping arene was also explored, with 1,4-disubstituted arenes affording single biaryl products (3v–w), while electron-rich and electron-deficient monosubstituted arenes act as efficient radical traps to provide the coupled products as a mixture of isomers (3a, 3x–y). Additionally, electron-deficient heteroarenes also provided satisfactory yields of phenylpyridine products (3z, 3aa–ab).19 In all cases, the arene was used in excess. However, filtration of the crude reaction mixture through a short silica gel plug followed by distillation generally allowed greater than 80% of the remaining arene to be reisolated in high purity.

In order to gain insight into the reaction mechanism we studied the kinetics of the excited PC via Stern–Volmer luminescence quenching. On the basis of these results we propose that reductive quenching of PC (Ir(III)*/Ir(II)) by the benzoate anion provides aroyloxy radical I (Scheme 3). Two alternative pathways were then considered for the decarboxylation of I to provide the aryl radical. Pathway A involves the direct decarboxylation of I, a process that is known to be energetically feasible but is unprecedented at these reaction temperatures.5a,b,8a,20 Alternatively, pathway B is proposed to involve bromination of I to furnish hypobromite II, thus circumventing unproductive reactions of I with the solvent. Based on the results of the stoichiometric experiments of 1 (vide supra), we propose a single electron reduction of II by the sufficiently reducing Ir(II) (image file: c6sc05533h-t4.tif = −1.37 V vs. SCE) provides radical anion III, which undergoes decarboxylation to afford the aryl radical. Theoretical analysis suggests that upon reduction to the radical anion III, stepwise bond dissociation does not take place. Instead, concerted C–C and O–Br bond cleavage occurs to yield CO2, a bromide anion and the phenyl radical (see the ESI for details of computational analysis). Subsequent trapping of the aryl radical (formed via either pathway) with a (hetero)arene should generate the cyclohexadienyl radical IV, which, following oxidation to the aryl cation and deprotonation, affords the biaryl product 3.

image file: c6sc05533h-s3.tif
Scheme 3 Proposed reaction mechanism. Counterions and ligand sphere of Ir are omitted for clarity.

Our mechanistic hypothesis was supported by a number of experiments. The reaction was undertaken using biphenyl-2-carboxylic acid (4b), thus enabling trapping of the aroyloxy radical I via 6-endo-trig cyclisation to form lactone 6 in 89% yield (Scheme 4a).6b Additionally, to confirm the reaction was proceeding via the intermediacy of an aryl radical, the selectivity of the reaction of 4-methoxybenzoic acid with fluorobenzene was analysed and compared to the reported selectivity for the addition of 4-methoxyphenyl radical to fluorobenzene (Scheme 4b).21 The observation of identical regioselectivity for the biaryl product 3ac afforded to that reported suggests the reaction is proceeding via the same reactive species.

image file: c6sc05533h-s4.tif
Scheme 4 (a) Trapping of the intermediate aroyloxy radical; (b) comparison of selectivities for biaryl formation, ratio determined by 19F NMR spectroscopic analysis; (c) visible light-mediated decarboxylation of 4a at elevated temperatures.

We next attempted to determine whether the reaction proceeds via direct decarboxylation of I (pathway A), or if pathway B is more likely. Though the decarboxylation of aroyloxy radicals are unprecedented at 55 °C, we were curious whether the bromination reagents were merely acting as oxidants for PC. Thus, the reaction of 4a was performed under the standard reaction conditions, in the absence of 5, which was replaced with a number of reagents known to be capable of oxidising PC. Under these conditions, biaryl 3b was either not formed or only observed in trace amounts (<5%) (see ESI for details). Additionally, to test Barton's theory, that aroyloxy radicals require >120–130 °C to undergo decarboxylation (vide supra), the reaction of 4a was undertaken at 130 °C in the presence of ammonium persulfate. Biaryl 3b was afforded in 27%, cf. 1% when the reaction was performed at 55 °C (Scheme 4c). Finally, when the reaction of biphenyl-2-carboxylic acid (4b) was undertaken with ammonium persulfate, instead of 5, lactone 6 was isolated in 34% yield.6b This confirms that ammonium persulfate is a competent oxidant under the reaction conditions at 55 °C. Taken together, we believe that this provides strong experimental evidence, which is in-line with literature precedence, that the reaction is not proceeding via the direct decarboxylation of aroyloxy radical I (pathway A). Based on the results of these mechanistic studies and the stoichiometric experiments of hypobromite 1 (eqn (1) and (2)) we tentatively propose that pathway B is operative under our reaction conditions. Experimental studies and detailed computational analysis are currently on going to gain deeper insight into the reaction mechanism.


In summary, the first decarboxylation of aryl carboxylic acids to provide aryl radicals via photoredox catalysis is disclosed. Moreover, we have developed a method for the relatively mild decarboxylation of aryl carboxylic acids, proceeding at much lower temperatures than methods previously reported. The reaction does not require ortho-substituents on the aryl carboxylic acid, and, unlike previously reported catalytic oxidative decarboxylative protocols, tolerates electron-rich acids. It is proposed that the key to achieving this decarboxylation is the in situ formation of a benzoyl hypobromite. We strongly believe that this work paves the way for the development of mild protocols for the decarboxylative functionalisation of cheap, abundant aryl carboxylic acids.


We thank M. Teders, Dr A. Gómez-Suárez and Dr E. A. Standley (WWU Münster) for experimental assistance and helpful discussions. Generous financial support by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (L. C.) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Leibniz Award) are gratefully acknowledged.

Notes and references

  1. (a) J. Liu, Q. Liu, H. Yi, C. Qin, R. Bai, X. Qi, Y. Lan and A. Lei, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 502 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) Y. Miyake, K. Nakajima and Y. Nishibayashi, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 7854 RSC; (c) Z. Zuo and D. W. C. MacMillan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 5257 CrossRef CAS PubMed. For recent reviews on the visible light-promoted decarboxylation of alkyl carboxylic acids see; (d) J. Xuan, Z.-G. Zhang and W.-J. Xiao, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 15632 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) H. Huang, K. Jia and Y. Chen, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 4983 CrossRef CAS and references therein. For recent publications see; (f) J. D. Griffin, M. A. Zeller and D. A. Nicewicz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 11340 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (g) L. Candish, L. Pitzer, A. Gómez-Suárez and F. Glorius, Chem.–Eur. J., 2016, 22, 4753 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (h) L. Candish, E. A. Standley, A. Gómez-Suárez, S. Mukherjee and F. Glorius, Chem.–Eur. J., 2016, 22, 9971 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (i) A. Millet, Q. Lefebvre and M. Rueping, Chem.–Eur. J., 2016, 22, 13464 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. For selected reviews on visible light photoredox catalysis, see: (a) K. Zeitler, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 9785 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) J. M. R. Narayanam and C. R. J. Stephenson, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 102 RSC; (c) J. W. Tucker and C. R. J. Stephenson, J. Org. Chem., 2012, 77, 1617 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (d) J. Xuan and W.-J. Xiao, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 6828 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (e) L. Shi and W. Xia, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 7687 RSC; (f) S. Fukuzumi and K. Ohkubo, Chem. Sci., 2013, 4, 561 RSC; (g) D. P. Hari and B. König, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 4734 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (h) Y. Xi, H. Yi and A. Lei, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013, 11, 2387 RSC; (i) C. K. Prier, D. A. Rankic and D. W. C. MacMillan, Chem. Rev., 2013, 113, 5322 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (j) J. Xuan, L.-Q. Lu, J.-R. Chen and W.-J. Xiao, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2013, 6755 CrossRef CAS; (k) M. Reckenthäler and A. G. Griesbeck, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2013, 355, 2727 CrossRef; (l) M. N. Hopkinson, B. Sahoo, J.-L. Li and F. Glorius, Chem.–Eur. J., 2014, 20, 3874 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (m) T. Koike and M. Akita, Top. Catal., 2014, 57, 967 CrossRef CAS; (n) D. A. Nicewicz and T. M. Nguyen, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 355 CrossRef CAS; (o) E. Meggers, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 3290 RSC; (p) N. A. Romero and D. A. Nicewicz, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 10075 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (q) K. L. Skubi, T. R. Blum and T. P. Yoon, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 10035 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  3. I. Ghosh, L. Marzo, A. Das, R. Shaikh and B. König, Acc. Chem. Res., 2016, 49, 1566 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  4. Y. Yasu, T. Koike and M. Akita, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2012, 354, 3414 CrossRef CAS.
  5. (a) I. B. Seiple, S. Su, R. A. Rodriguez, R. Gianatassio, Y. Fujiwara, A. L. Sobel and P. S. Baran, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 13194 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (b) D. H. R. Barton and M. Ramesh, Tetrahedron Lett., 1990, 31, 949 CrossRef CAS; (c) D. H. R. Barton, B. Lacher and S. Z. Zard, Tetrahedron, 1987, 43, 4321 CrossRef CAS.
  6. (a) H. Rao, P. Wang and C.-J. Li, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2012, 6503 CAS; (b) N. P. Ramirez, I. Bosque and J. C. Gonzalez-Gomez, Org. Lett., 2015, 17, 4550 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  7. S. Mukherjee, B. Maji, A. Tlahuext-Aca and F. Glorius, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 16200 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  8. Rate constants for the decarboxylation (k in s−1): (a) Aroyloxy radical 4-ClC6H5C(O)O˙: 1.4 ± 0.3 × 106 (CCl4): J. Chateauneuf, J. Luszytyk and K. U. Ingold, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 2886 CrossRef CAS; (b) J. Chateauneuf, J. Luszytyk and K. U. Ingold, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 2877 CrossRef CAS; (c) Alkyloxy radical = 2.2 × 109 (CCl4): B. Giese, in Houben-Weyl, Methoden der Organischen Chemie, Band E 19a, C-Radikale, ed. M. Regitz and B. Giese, Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, New York, 1989, p. 140 Search PubMed.
  9. For selected example of HAT with I, see: (a) A. P. Krasutsky, C. J. Kuehl and V. V. Zhdankin, Synlett, 1995, 1081 CrossRef CAS; (b) V. V. Zhdankin, A. P. Krasutsky, C. J. Kuehl, A. J. Simonsen, J. K. Woodward, B. Mismash and J. T. Bolz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 5192 CrossRef CAS; (c) S. A. Moteki, A. Usui, S. Selvakumar, T. Zhang and K. Maruoka, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 11060 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  10. (a) S. Seo, J. B. Taylor and M. F. Greaney, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 8270 RSC; (b) S. Seo, M. Slater and M. F. Greaney, Org. Lett., 2012, 14, 2650 CrossRef CAS PubMed; (c) J. Kan, S. Huang, J. Lin, M. Zhang and W. Su, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 2199 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. (a) N. Rodríguez and L. J. Goossen, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 5030 RSC; (b) D. Katayev, D. Hackenberger and L. J. Goossen, The Catalyst Review, 2015, 28, 6 Search PubMed; (c) J. Cornella and I. Larrosa, Synthesis, 2012, 653 CAS; (d) R. Grainger, J. Cornella, D. C. Blakemore, I. Larrosa and J. M. Campanera, Chem.–Eur. J., 2014, 20, 16680 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. (a) G. S. Hammond, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1950, 72, 3737 CrossRef CAS; (b) C. M. M. da Silva Corrêa and M. A. B. C. S. Oliveira, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1983, 711 RSC.
  13. (a) R. G. Johnson and R. K. Ingham, Chem. Rev., 1956, 56, 219 CrossRef CAS; (b) The Hunsdiecker and Related Reactions, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, ed. B. M. Trost and I. Fleming, vol. 7, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991, p.717 Search PubMed.
  14. Heating (130 °C) of benzoyl hypoiodites (formed in situ from silver benzoate and I2) in chlorobenzene results in the formation of a mixture of biaryl, benzoate ester and benzoic acid products. Similar reactions, but with benzoyl hypobromites, affords only benzoate ester products, see: D. Bryce-Smith, Nature, 1953, 172, 863 CrossRef CAS.
  15. See ESI for details of the synthesis and characterisation of 1.
  16. The reaction of 2-chlorobenzoic acid under these conditions (without PC, Br2 (3.5 equiv.)) afforded phenyl 2-chlorobenzoate (12%). No chlorinated arene by-products were formed, only bromobenzene mixtures.
  17. M. N. Hopkinson, A. Gómez-Suárez, M. Teders, B. Sahoo and F. Glorius, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 4361 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  18. Rate constants for the decarboxylation of 4-CH3OC6H5C(O)O˙: k = 3.4 ± 0.3 × 105 s−1 (CCl4), ref. 8a.
  19. (a) F. V. Minisci and F. E. Fontane, Heterocycles, 1989, 28, 489 CrossRef CAS; (b) F. Minisci, E. Vismara, F. Fontana, G. Morini, M. Serravalle and C. Giordano, J. Org. Chem., 1986, 51, 4411 CrossRef CAS; (c) F. Minisci, F. Fontana and E. Vismara, J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1990, 27, 79 CrossRef CAS.
  20. G.-X. Li, C. A. Morales-Rivera, Y. Wang, F. Gao, G. He, P. Liu and G. Chen, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7, 6407 RSC.
  21. A. Dewanji, S. Murarka, D. P. Curran and A. Studer, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 6102 CrossRef CAS PubMed.


Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c6sc05533h

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017