Sebastian
Bette
*a,
Tomohiro
Takayama
a,
Kentaro
Kitagawa
b,
Riku
Takano
b,
Hidenori
Takagi
a and
Robert E.
Dinnebier
a
aMax Planck Institute for Solid State Research, Heisenbergstr. 1, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany. E-mail: S.Bette@fkf.mpg.de
bDepartment of Physics, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
First published on 25th September 2017
A powder sample of pure H3LiIr2O6 was synthesized from α-Li2IrO3 powder by a soft chemical replacement of Li+ with H+. The crystal structure of H3LiIr2O6 consists of sheets of edge sharing LiO6- and IrO6-octahedra forming a honeycomb network with layers stacked in a monoclinic distorted HCrO2 type pattern. Heavy stacking faulting of the sheets is indicated by anisotropic peak broadening in the X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) pattern. The ideal, faultless crystal structure was obtained by a Rietveld refinement of the laboratory XRPD pattern while using the LiIr2O63−-layers of α-Li2IrO3 as a starting model. The low radial distances of the PDF function, derived from synchrotron XRPD data, as constraints to stabilize the structural refinement. DIFFaX-simulations, structural considerations, high radial distances of the PDF function and a Rietveld compatible global optimization of a supercell were employed to derive a suitable faulting model and to refine the microstructure using the experimental data. We assumed that the overall stacking pattern of the layers in the structure of H3LiIr2O6 is governed by interlayer O–H⋯O contacts. From the constitution of the layers, different stacking patterns with similar amounts of strong O–H⋯O contacts are considered. Random transitions among these stacking patterns can occur as faults in the crystal structure of H3LiIr2O6, which quantitatively describe the observed XRPD.
2α-Li2IrO3(s) + 3H3O+(aq) → H3LiIr2O6(s) + 3H2O(l) + 3Li+(aq) | (1) |
Profound crystallographic knowledge of the α-Li2IrO3–H3LiIr2O6 system is essential for understanding and controlling the process presented in (eqn (1)) and in consequence also for the production of stable and reliable pH sensing IrOx-based solid state electrodes.
The crystal structure of α-Li2IrO3 was determined from X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) data.9 It consists of layers of edge sharing IrO6- and LiO6-octahedra and lithium ions that are situated in the interlayer spacing (Fig. 1, left). Accordingly the formula can be alternatively written as LiI3LiIIIrII2O6 with atoms situated in the interlayer space indicated be “I” and atoms within the layers indicated by “II”. O'Malley et al.9 observed the occurrence of stacking faults in the crystal structure of α-Li2IrO3, which is a common phenomenon in layered alkali- and earth alkali metal iridates.10,11 Hence the slight occupational disorder between Li+ and Ir4+ in the layers, which was introduced to the structural model during the refinement, could be an artefact from daubed reflection intensities due to diffraction line broadening by the appearance of stacking faults.10,11 The overall structural motif of α-Li2IrO3 is closely related, but not identical to LiCoO2.12 Due to the honeycomb ordering of the 2 Ir-sites and the Li-site within the layer of Li2IrO3 and the associated monoclinic distortion of the unit cell of α-Li2IrO3 the anion sublattice exhibits an ABCA′B′C′A′′B′′C′′…, stacking (Fig. 1, left), with anion positions indicated by capital Latin letters, that slight differs from the ABC anion stacking pattern in the structure of LiCoO2.
By acid treatment only the lithium ions situated in-between the layers are exchanged by protons which lead to the formation of H3LiIr2O6 (Fig. 1, right). The occurrence of stacking faults in α-Li2IrO3 is crucial for the production of H3LiIr2O6, as the degree of cation exchange is the higher, the higher the degree of faulting of the precursor material.1 O'Malley et al.1 expected H3LiIr2O6 to crystallize in a HCrO2 like structure with an AABBCC stacking pattern of the anion sublattice, where oxygen sites of neighbouring layers directly oppose each other, which results in strong H-bonds. Because of the pronounced occurrence of stacking faults they only determined a rough estimate of the crystal structure. Neither the exact type nor the degree of stacking faulting in the H3LiIr2O6 structure, which has an impact of the pH sensing properties,1 has been understood, yet.
H3LiIr2O6 attracts considerable attention not only as PH sensor materials but as a promising candidate for a topological quantum spin liquid described by Kitaev model.13 In particular iridates with a honeycomb like structural motif, like α-Li2IrO39 and β-Li2IrO314 are promising candidates for the materialization of the Kitaev model. In a honeycomb lattice strong spin frustration effects stabilize a quantum spin liquid state, in which novel excitations, like Majorana fermions and fluxes are apparent.15 α-Na2IrO316 and α-Li2IrO317–21 were first expected to be a materialization of Kitaev model but a magnetically ordered state was found to be the ground state of the two honeycomb iridium oxides. H3LiIr2O6, a modified honeycomb iridate, was visited as an alternative candidate and was discovered not to show any magnetic ordering down to 1 K.22 This is indicative for the realization of a spin liquid as the ground state. To clarify the reason why quantum spin liquid can be stabilized in H3LiIr2O6, a detailed structural understanding, including the microstructural effects like stacking faults, is necessary.
In the current study, we re-evaluate the structure model of H3LiIr2O6 given by O'Malley et al.1 and after we show that this model is not suitable, we describe the redetermination of the ideal crystal structure of H3LiIr2O6 by using XRPD data and PDF-analysis. As the XRPD data indicate a strongly stacking faulted crystal lattice, possible structural defects are derived from the crystal structure and investigated by systematic DIFFaX simulations. A Rietveld compatible approach was used to determine the real structure, i.e. the degree of faulting by using a supercell approach. The obtained superstructure is confirmed by PDF-analysis. The approach used in this study should pave a way to determine the crystal structure and the degree of stacking faulting of the layered materials of interest.
Fig. 2 Excerpt of the final Rietveld refinement of diffraction pattern of H3LiIr2O6 using the predicted crystal structure by O'Malley et al.1 as starting model. |
In addition, in the trigonal HCrO2 like structure model the cation sublattice is completely occupationally disordered between lithium and iridium and all oxygen sites are situated on an identical plane. If this model was appropriate, the cation exchange by acid treatment would have caused a vast change in the constitution of the layers. The solid-state NMR data, however, point to an ordered cation sublattice (ESI, Fig. S1†).
This shoulder also can't be explained by the instrumental profile, as the 130 and 31 reflections do not exhibit such a peak shape (Fig. 4). Accordingly the unusual profile of the 001 reflection must be caused by an overlap with another peak that is situated at a slightly lower diffraction angle. This was confirmed by a single line fit using two peaks. The additional reflection was indexed as 020 and its position pointed to a length of the b-axis of ≈9.24 Å. The information derived from the XRPD pattern was used for global optimization of the lattice parameters of H3LiIr2O6 by a series of Pawley fits34 employing the LP-search routine implemented into TOPAS.35 The resulting global minimum was used as a starting model for the determination of precise lattice parameters by using a LeBail36 fit and applying the fundamental parameter approach of TOPAS.27
For the determination of the layer constitution of H3LiIr2O6 the atomic positions of the LiIr2O63−-layers of α-Li2IrO3 were used as starting values. The inappropriate10,11 occupational disorder between Li and Ir on the metal site (2) in the structural model of O'Malley et al.9 was removed, as this is considered as an artefact of the refinement, caused by the occurrence of stacking faults. In order to avoid a correlation between the diffractional effects caused by the stacking faults and the refinement of the layer constitution, regions in the XRPD pattern that are affected by peak broadening (7.18–11.88° 2θ, 13.20–13.76° 2θ, 14.30–15.00° 2θ, 15.46–16.00° 2θ, 17.24–20.25° 2θ, 21.44–21.72° 2θ and 22.76–24.00° 2θ) were excluded. Due to the exclusion of various regions of the XRPD pattern, an unconstrained refinement of the atomic coordinates and the lattice parameters was not possible, as the result strongly depends on the sequence in which the parameters were released to refinement. In addition, some resulting Ir–O and Li–O distances were either unreasonable long (>2.20 Å) or short (<1.80 Å). In order to introduce reasonable con- and restraints, the low distance region (<2.5 Å) of the measured PDF-curve was used, which refers to intralayer cation–oxygen distances (Fig. 5). The measured PDF-curve exhibits some noise and artefacts appearing as sine-type modulation in the region of low distances. Despite this noise a well-defined peak is clearly visible at 2.01 Å (Fig. 5, red font colour). This peak is mainly attributed to Ir–O pairs as more iridium than lithium is present in the solid and as iridium is a much stronger scatterer than lithium. According to the peak width and shape (small shoulder at higher distances) the distribution of the metal–oxygen distances is not necessarily unimodal and those distances can range from ≈1.90 Å to ≈2.10 Å. In consequence artificial penalty function depending on the metal–oxygen distances with minimums at 2.0 Å both for the Ir–O and Li–O distances were included into the Rietveld refinements. This led to robust and reproducible results. During the refinement all atomic and lattice parameters were released iteratively and could be refined without using further con- or restraints. The crystallographic data and the refined atomic coordinates of H3LiIr2O6 are given in Tables 1 and 2, the graphical result of the refinement and the agreement factors are presented in Fig. 6.
Fig. 5 Low r-region of the measured PDF-curve (blue circles) of synthesized H3LiIr2O6, contributions of Ir–O, Ir–Ir and Ir–Li pairs are highlighted. |
α-Li2IrO31 | H3LiIr2O6 | |
---|---|---|
Space group | C2/m | C2/m |
a/Å | 5.1633(2) | 5.3489(8) |
b/Å | 8.9294(3) | 9.2431(14) |
c/Å | 5.1219(2) | 4.8734(6) |
β/° | 109.759(3) | 111.440(12) |
V/Å3 | 222.24(1) | 224.27(6) |
Atom | Wyck. | Site | S.O.F. | x | y | z | B/Å2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ir1 | 4g | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0.335(3) | 0 | 0.1(1) |
Li1 | 2a | 2/m | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1(1) |
O1 | 8j | 1 | 1 | 0.404(8) | 0.323(3) | 0.229(5) | 1.7(3) |
O2 | 4i | m | 1 | 0.417(8) | 0 | 0.220(9) | 1.7(3) |
The obtained structural model of the LiIr2O63−-layers of H3LiIr2O6 can be evaluated as a reasonable approximation (see below). According to the limits of the XRPD method no attempt was made to determine and refine the hydrogen positions. The stacking pattern of the LiIr2O63−-layers of H3LiIr2O6 in the structural model is determined by the lattice parameters and the space group symmetry. According to the pronounced occurrence of stacking faults, the obtained structural model cannot be considered as the crystal structure of H3LiIr2O6, but it will serve as a starting point for a detailed investigation of the microstructure of H3LiIr2O6.
Fig. 7 Comparison of the LiIr2O63−-layers in the crystal structures of α-Li2IrO39 and H3LiIrO6, (a) plan view on the layers, (b) stacking of the Ir6O1812− honeycombs (blue = bottom side layer, yellow = top side layer) with the LiO6/33− octahedra omitted, (c) view in a-, (d) view in b-direction. |
A comparison of the distorted LiO6/33−- and IrO6/3-octahedra in α-Li2IrO3 and H3LiIr2O6 is given in Fig. 8 and the metal–oxygen distances are listed in Table 3. In general the coordination polyhedra are only little affected by the cation exchange, only some bond distances in the LiO6-octahedra in H3LiIr2O6 are slightly elongated compared to α-Li2IrO3, whereas the IrO6-octahedra exhibits almost no change. All metal–oxygen distances are in reasonable range. The distances between the cations (Table 3, bottom) are slightly elongated. The obtained values (3.06 Å–3.10 Å), however, are in very good agreement with the PDF-data (Fig. 5). As no penalty function was applied on the distances between the cations, these results indicate that a suitable model of the layer constitution was derived by Rietveld refinement.
Fig. 8 LiO6/33− and IrO6/3 polyhedra in the crystal structures of α-Li2IrO39 and H3LiIr2O6, the distances between metal- and oxygen sites are labeled and listed in Table 3. |
Distance no. (Fig. 8) | Distance between atoms | Distance/Å | |
---|---|---|---|
α-Li2IrO3 | H3LiIr2O6 | ||
(1) | Li–O(1) | 2.19(1) | 2.15(3) |
(2) | Li–O(2) | 1.97(2) | 2.08(6) |
(3) | Li–O(1) | 2.19(1) | 2.15(3) |
(4) | Li–O(1) | 2.19(1) | 2.15(3) |
(5) | Li–O(2) | 1.97(2) | 2.08(6) |
(6) | Li–O(1) | 2.19(1) | 2.15(3) |
(7) | Ir–O(1) | 1.97(1) | 2.01(3) |
(8) | Ir–O(1) | 2.08(2) | 2.04(3) |
(9) | Ir–O(2) | 2.01(1) | 2.01(3) |
(10) | Ir–O(2) | 2.01(1) | 2.01(3) |
(11) | Ir–O(1) | 2.08(2) | 2.04(3) |
(12) | Ir–O(1) | 1.97(1) | 2.01(3) |
— | Ir–Ir | 3 × 2.98(1) | 2 × 3.10(1) |
1 × 3.06(1) | |||
— | Ir–Li | 4 × 2.98(1) | 2 × 3.09(1) |
2 × 3.08(1) |
The cation sublattice of H3LiIr2O6 reveals a pronounced pseudo symmetry. A pseudo trigonal lattice as described by O'Malley et al.1 can be found with a ≈3.1 Å (ESI, Fig. S2,† grey lines), which symmetry is broken by the ordering between Li and Ir. In addition the Ir6O1812− honeycombs (Fig. 7b, blue octahedra) exhibit a very pronounced pseudo hexagonal symmetry (ESI, Fig. S2,† green lines) that is only broken by the stacking order of the layers (see next sections).
The arrangement of the layers, i.e. the stacking order, in H3LiIr2O6 can be described by a stacking vector S1 that is identical with the c-axis of the monoclinic unit cell. The stacking pattern of the layers results almost in a CrOOH like stacking, (AγB)(BαC)(CβA)(AγB)i(BαC)i(CβA)i(AγB)i+1(BαC)i+1…, with anion positions indicated by capital Latin letters, anion positions indicated by small Greek letters and layers indicated by parenthesis (Fig. 9a). The stacking order exhibits a monoclinic distortion, i.e. layer i + 3 is not identical with layer i, which is indicated by superscripted I and I + 1. Anions of neighboring layers are situated almost in direct opposition to each other According to the limits of the XRPD-method no attempt was made to determine and refine the hydrogen positions of the crystal structure. Due to the low interlayer spacing and the short O–O distances (Fig. 9a) strong attractive interaction between the sheets, most likely mediated by hydrogen bonds can be expected. Hence the hydrogen atoms should be located at positions forming an O(layer i)–H–O (layer i + 1) angle of approx. 180°. With a stacking of the layers in a S1-pattern all oxygen sites of adjacent layers directly oppose each other. This leads to strong O(2)⋯H–O(2) contacts with d(O(2)–O(2)) = 2.54 Å and O(1)⋯H–O(1) contacts with d(O1–O1) = 2.46 Å (Fig. 9a). With respect to the site multiplicity (O(1) = 8j site and O(2) = 4i site) pure S1-stacking provides 2 very strong and 4 strong hydrogen bonds.
In the crystal structure of H3LiIr2O6 the arrangement of the layers can be altered by using a different stacking vector, S2, in such a way that 8 out of 12 oxygen sites directly oppose each other (Fig. 9c) by forming O(2)⋯H–O(1) and O(1)⋯H–O(2) contacts. Hence the anions of layer i are directly opposed by anions of layer i + 1, as well, but O(1) is now in opposition of O(2), which is indicated by a bar on top of the anion layer label. The resulting (AγB)(αC)(βA)(ĀγB)i(αC)i(βA)i(ĀγB)i+1(αC)i+1… stacking pattern provides 4 strong O(2)⋯H–O(1) and O(1)⋯H–O(2) contacts with d(O(1)–O(2)) = 2.50 Å and 4 oxygen sites (half of the O(2) sites) are located almost in direct opposition to each other (Fig. 10b). Hence hydrogen bonds between these sites can only be formed if the bond between oxygen and hydrogen in a hydroxide ion is canted. This S2-stacking pattern with 4 strong hydrogen bonds and 2 bonds with potentially canted hydroxide ions should be energetically a little less favored with respect to the S1-stacking pattern with 6 strong and hydrogen bonds (Fig. 10a). Nevertheless, within the S1-stacking pattern of LiIr2O3(OH)3 layers stacked in an alternative, S2-like way, can appear as stacking faults.
Alternative stacking vectors can be derived directly from the constitution of the layers. Due to the sharp 00l reflection in the diffraction pattern of H3LiIr2O6 (Fig. 12, blue line) the interlayer spacing is not affected by stacking faults, i.e. the z-component of each stacking vector must be 1.0. The stacking vector S1 (Fig. 11a, magenta) directs an oxygen site, e.g. O2, in direct opposition to an identical site (red ball) of the preceding layer. Alternative stacking vectors bring different oxygen atoms in the surrounding of this O2-site in direct opposition to the O2 site of the preceding layer. Thus the x- and y-components of alternative stacking vectors can be derived from a projection of an oxygen layer onto the ab-plane (Fig. 11b). Therefore, the position of one O2 site is used as the origin for fractional x- and y-coordinates using a- and b-lattice parameters. There are four O2 sites in direct surrounding of an O2 site, each of these positions can be reached by a shift, denoted as S1-1, of x = ±1/2 and y = ±1/2. Due to layer symmetry, with symmetry centers at (0,0); (±1/4, ±1/4) and (±1/2, ±1/2), each of these shifts is symmetry equivalent to S1 and therefore transitions among S1 and S1-1 stacking won't produce any additional diffraction effects. Six O1 sites are located in direct surrounding of one O2 site, as well. The shift from O2 to any of these sites produces a S2 like stacking described above. Accordingly, six alternative stacking vectors (S2-1 to S2-6) can be derived from the relative positions of O1 sites surrounding a central O2 site (Table 4).
Fig. 12 Measured (blue) and simulated (black) XRPD-pattern of a faultless sample of H3LiIr2O6 with pure S1-stacking. |
Stacking vector | Stacking vector components | O⋯H⋯O contacts | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
S x | S y | S z | ||
S1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | O(1)⋯H⋯O(1) |
S1-1 | ±1/2 | ±1/2 | 1 | O(2)⋯H⋯O(2) |
S2-1 | 0.4890 | 0.1770 | 1 | O(1)⋯H⋯O(2) |
S2-2 | 0.4890 | −0.1770 | 1 | O(2)⋯H⋯O(1) |
S2-3 | −0.0110 | −0.3230 | 1 | |
S2-4 | −0.5110 | −0.1770 | 1 | |
S2-5 | −0.5110 | 0.1770 | 1 | |
S2-6 | −0.0110 | 0.3230 | 1 |
In a hexagonal lattice all stacking vectors would be equal. The symmetry is broken, as one stacking vector, S1, seems to be preferred.
(1) |
Original unit cell | Transformed unit cell | ||
---|---|---|---|
a | 5.3489 Å | a′ = a | 5.3489 Å |
b | 9.2431 Å | b′ = b | 9.2431 Å |
c | 4.8734 Å | c′ = c·cos(β − 0.5·π) | 4.5362 Å |
α | 90° | α′ = α | 90° |
β | 111.440° | β′ | 90° |
γ | 90° | γ′ = γ | 90° |
Stacking vector | Stacking vector components | ||
---|---|---|---|
S x | S y | S z | |
S1 | −0.3330 | 0 | 1 |
S2-1 | 0.1560 | 0.1770 | 1 |
S2-2 | 0.1560 | −0.1770 | 1 |
S2-3 | −0.3440 | −0.3230 | 1 |
Transition probabilities | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
From ↓ | To → | S1 | S2-1 | S2-2 | S2-3 |
S1 | P 11 | P 12 | P 13 | P 14 | |
S2-1 | P 21 | P 22 | P 23 | P 24 | |
S2-2 | P 31 | P 32 | P 33 | P 34 | |
S2-3 | P 41 | P 42 | P 43 | P 44 |
The observed peak broadening and triangular peak shape in combination with structural considerations (Fig. 11) were used to introduce constraints for the transitions probabilities, Pij, to simplify the 4 × 4 transition probability matrix for systematic DIFFaX-simulations. As each alternative stacking vector, S2-i leads to the same number of strong O–H–O contacts, there shouldn't be any preference for any of these vectors after a shift from S1 stacking. Accordingly, the probability for a shift from S1-type stacking to S2-type stacking must be equal for all S2-i stacking vectors. In consequence the probability of a fault in an S1 stacking pattern can be described with the parameter x (Table 7). As each line of the transition probability matrix has to sum up to 1.0, each transition probability from S1 to S2-i can be expressed as x/3. With respect to the constitution of the layers, a shift from S1-stacking to S2-i does not implement any preference for a continuation of the S2-i stacking pattern, i.e. stacking faults do not have any range. This is indicated by the absence of additional, sharp reflections in the measured diffraction pattern of H3LiIr2O6. Hence each line of the transition probability matrix can be expressed by the same set of transitions probabilities (Table 7). In consequence a systematic DIFFaX study could be carried out by varying only one parameter, x, describing the probability of faulting in the S1-stacking pattern of H3LiIr2O6.
From ↓ | To → | S1 | S2-1 | S2-2 | S2-3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 1 − x | x/3 | x/3 | x/3 | |
S2-1 | 1 − x | x/3 | x/3 | x/3 | |
S2-2 | 1 − x | x/3 | x/3 | x/3 | |
S2-3 | 1 − x | x/3 | x/3 | x/3 |
The results of the systematic DIFFaX-study are summarized in Fig. 13. As predicted, increasing faulting in the S1-stacking of the crystal structure of LiIr2O3(OH)3 leads to broadening of all non 00l, 13l, 3l and l reflections. The higher the degree of faulting, x, the greater the similarity between simulated and measured diffraction patterns. In addition, triangular peaks shapes evolve by broadening of the 110, 11, 021, 1 and 240 reflections. At x = 0.4 the greatest similarity between simulated (Fig. 13, dark magenta line) and measured (blue line) XRPD pattern is reached. A further increase of the degree of faulting, which is identical with a complete random stacking using S1 and S2-i vectors, will lead to disappearance of the remnants of the 11, 021, 041 and 240 reflections. As only a finite number of crystals, having a limited crystalline size and therefore a limited number of layer-to-layer-transitions, contributed to the measured diffraction pattern and as recursive DIFFaX-simulations led to diffraction patterns, produced by an infinite number of crystals, there can't be a complete match between simulated and measured patterns. In addition in the DIFFaX-simulation only idealized stacking vectors were used, that were created on the assumption, that the O–H bond is orientated perpendicular to the layers, which is not necessarily the case, taking the asymmetric coordination spheres of the oxygen sites (2x Ir, 1x Li) into account. Nevertheless, a good agreement was reached, which confirms that a realistic microstructural model has been developed. The degree of faulting in the S1-stacking pattern, x = 0.4, that created the best agreement between the simulated and measured pattern, however, is most likely slightly different in the real microstructure of the sample. Hence a Rietveld compatible approach was used, that allowed the refinement of the stacking vectors.
Although the movement of the layer was not restrained each stacking vector within the supercell refined very close (≈±0.03x, ±0.02y) to an idealized pendant derived from structural considerations (Table 8). This means that the free unconstrained movement of the layers led to a stacking pattern in which all oxygens of neighbouring layers are almost on direct opposition to each other. S1-like stacking is dominant and small S1-stacked sections are present, which breaks the hexagonal symmetry, whereas transitions to and among S2-like stacking occur unsystematically. The obtained supercell provides good agreement between calculated and measured diffraction pattern with good agreement factors (Fig. 14).
Global optimization of the XRPD-pattern | Idealized structure model (Table 4) | Deviation | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Transition From layer i to layer i + 1 | Stacking vector | Stacking vector | Optimized ↔ idealized | ||||
x-Component | y-Component | x-Component | y-Component | Assignment | x-Component | y-Component | |
a Due to translation symmetry, layer 12 is followed by layer 1 of the subsequent unit cell. | |||||||
1 → 2 | 0.5043 | −0.1693 | 0.4890 | −0.1770 | ≡ S2-2 | 0.0153 | 0.0077 |
2 → 3 | 0.5165 | 0.1805 | 0.4890 | 0.1770 | ≡ S2-1 | 0.0275 | 0.0035 |
3 → 4 | 0.0090 | −0.0001 | 0 | 0 | ≡ S1 | 0.0090 | −0.0001 |
4 → 5 | 0.0080 | 0.0006 | 0 | 0 | ≡ S1 | 0.0080 | 0.0006 |
5 → 6 | 0.0031 | 0.0039 | 0 | 0 | ≡ S1 | 0.0031 | 0.0039 |
6 → 7 | 0.0079 | −0.3240 | −0.0110 | −0.3230 | ≡ S2-3 | 0.0189 | −0.0010 |
7 → 8 | −0.0020 | −0.3308 | −0.0110 | −0.3230 | ≡ S2-3 | 0.0090 | −0.0078 |
8 → 9 | 0.5038 | 0.1710 | 0.4890 | 0.1770 | ≡ S2-1 | 0.0148 | −0.0060 |
9 → 10 | 0.0119 | −0.3288 | −0.0110 | −0.3230 | ≡ S2-3 | 0.0229 | −0.0058 |
10 → 11 | 0.4885 | 0.4839 | 1/2 | 1/2 | ≡ S1-1 | −0.0115 | −0.0161 |
10 → 12 | 0.4837 | 0.4878 | 1/2 | 1/2 | ≡ S1-1 | −0.0163 | −0.0122 |
12 → 1a | 0.5053 | −0.1747 | 0.4890 | −0.1770 | ≡ S2-2 | 0.0163 | 0.0023 |
Fig. 15 PDF-curve (blue), calculated curve (red) and difference curve (grey) of H3LiIr2O6, (a) using the HCrO2 like structure model of O'Malley et al.,1 (b) using a faultless monoclinic structure model with pure S1 stacking, serious misfits are indicated by green ellipses (c) using a 12 c (12 layers) supercell obtained by global optimization (Table 8, Fig. 14). |
PDF-analysis clearly demonstrates that the HCrO2 like structure model of O'Malley et al.1 is not suitable as the match between measured and calculated curve is poor both in low and high distance region (Fig. 15a). The exact position of the first peak at ≈2.0 Å, referring mainly to Ir–O pairs cannot be described by this structure model, which means the constitution of the layers differs from the expected HCrO2 like structure model. In addition the misfit at higher distances indicates a different stacking pattern, as well. In contrast for the monoclinic structure model with pure S1-stacking there is a good match between calculated and measured curve at low distances (r < 7.0 Å) indicating that the constitution of the layers was refined properly (Fig. 15b). At high distances referring to interlayer pairs, however, there are serious deviations of the calculated PDF-curve from the measured one (green ellipses), which can be attributed to the occurrence of stacking faults.40 The usage of the structural data of the faulted 12 c supercell leads to a substantial improvement of the fit especially in the region of high interatomic distances (r > 7.0 Å). The match in this region is almost perfect. Thus the microstructure model which was obtained by structural considerations (Fig. 11, Table 4), DIFFaX-simulations (Table 6, Fig. 13) and Rietveld compatible global optimization using rigid body like layers (Table 8, Fig. 14) describes essential features of disorder in the crystal structure of H3LiIr2O6.
The approach for the determination of the faultless, ideal crystal structure and the kind and amount of faulting, i.e. the real crystal structure, presented in this can be adapted to all other, related layered honeycomb materials of interest, e.g. Cu3LiIr2O6,42 Cu3NaIr2O642 and Ag3LiIr2O6.43
Funding by DFG for the project “In search of structure” (grant EG 137/9-1) and Open Access funding provided by the Max Planck Society is gratefully acknowledged.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7dt02978k |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 |