Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence

Corannulene and its complex with water: a tiny cup of water

Cristóbal Pérez abc, Amanda L. Steber abc, Anouk M. Rijs d, Berhane Temelso e, George C. Shields e, Juan Carlos Lopez f, Zbigniew Kisiel *g and Melanie Schnell *abc
aMax-Planck-Institut für Struktur und Dynamik der Materie and The Hamburg Centre for Ultrafast Imaging at the Universität Hamburg, Luruper Chaussee 149, D-22761 Hamburg, Germany
bDESY, Notkestrasse 85, D-22607 Hamburg, Germany. E-mail: melanie.schnell@desy.de
cInstitut für Physikalische Chemie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Max-Eyth-Strasse 1, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
dRadboud University, Institute for Molecules and Materials, FELIX Laboratory, Toernooiveld 7-c, 6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands
eProvost's Office and Department of Chemistry, Furman University, Greenville, South Carolina 29613, USA
fDepartamento de Quimica Fisica y Quimica Inorganica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain
gInstitute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, PL-02668 Warsaw, Poland. E-mail: kisiel@ifpan.edu.pl

Received 8th March 2017 , Accepted 18th April 2017

First published on 25th April 2017


We report the results of a broadband rotational spectroscopic study of corannulene, C20H10, all of its singly substituted 13C isotopologues, and a complex of corannulene with one molecule of water. Corannulene is a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) with a curved structure that results in a large dipole moment. Observation of 13C isotopic species in natural abundance allowed us to precisely determine the molecular structure of corannulene. The differences between the experimental C–C bond lengths correlate to the double-bond character predicted using Kekule's resonance structures. In the case of C20H10–H2O, the water molecule is found to reside inside the bowl-like structure of corannulene. Our experimental and theoretical results indicate that the water molecule rotates freely around its C2 axis and that dispersion interactions are the dominant contribution to the binding.


1 Introduction

Despite much spectroscopic effort, the interstellar role of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is not yet well understood. They are thought to be ubiquitous throughout the interstellar medium (ISM), in a wide variety of environments, and they are proposed to be the source of unidentified infrared (UIR) bands between 3 and 16 μm. From analysis of these bands, it is thought that PAHs account for about 20% of the galactic carbon budget.1,2

Though their presence has not been confirmed by the unambiguous identification of a single PAH, it is believed that the UIR bands are indicative of the presence of PAHs. Recently, two fullerenes, which are thought to be closely related to PAHs, C60 and C70 were detected in the mid-infrared frequency range in the planetary nebula, Tc1.3 In 2015, Campbell et al. attributed two lines of the diffuse interstellar bands to C60+ cations by using laboratory absorption spectroscopy of C60+ in the gas phase, cooled to 5.8 Kelvin.4 These observations triggered the discussion that PAHs, which could be fullerene precursors, might be more widespread in interstellar space than initially thought. PAHs and fullerenes are chemically connected to each other via hydrogenation and dehydrogenation pathways, potentially involving pseudofullerenes.3 PAHs are also discussed as missing links for the formation of more complex organic molecules in the Universe by providing seeds as starting points of chemical reactions, as formulated in the PAH hypothesis.2

A large fraction of the approximately 200 molecules detected in the ISM were identified via their rotational emission using radio astronomy,5–7 which allowed for their unambiguous identification. As new radio interferometers, such as the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) and the expanded Very Large Array (eVLA), as well as the James Webb Space Telescope for infrared studies come online, there are opportunities for the chemical inventory of the ISM to increase rapidly. These facilities have increased sensitivity and outstanding spatial resolution, and there is a large amount of new radioastronomic data from these instruments. The bottleneck in analyzing these datasets is the lack of laboratory data. The main constraint for pure rotational spectroscopy is the fact that the molecules must have a permanent electric dipole moment. This is not the case with most PAHs, which only have a small or non-existent dipole moment, and this stipulation is only fulfilled by some classes of PAHs, such as substituted species8 or PAHs that are not fully aromatic.9

An exception to this is corannulene, C20H10.10 It can be envisioned as the cap of C60, saturated with hydrogen atoms. Corannulene is a fully aromatic PAH with a permanent dipole moment of 2.07 D, as experimentally determined using rotational spectroscopy combined with Stark effect measurements.10 This extraordinarily large dipole moment originates from its curved shape and makes it a very promising candidate for radioastronomic detection of PAHs in the ISM, even though it is considered to be a small PAH by interstellar standards. However, subsequent radioastronomic searches in the Red Rectangle and TMC-1 were unsuccessful.11–13

Motivated by the potential role of PAHs in interstellar chemistry, recent developments in radioastronomy and new capabilities of rotational spectroscopy allowed by the advent of broadband chirped pulse rotational spectroscopy (CP-FTMW),14 we employ CP-FTMW spectroscopy14,15 to extend the set of available molecular parameters for corannulene. We use the cold and collision free conditions of a molecular jet to extend the previous microwave spectroscopic study on the corannulene monomer to provide a full analysis of this special PAH, including an accurate redetermination of its molecular structure. Moreover, we study the complexation of C20H10 with water, a potential starting point for PAH chemistry and ice formation on dust grains. For the C20H10–water complex, we aim at evaluating the preferred binding position of the water molecule to corannulene – inside the bowl or outside of the bowl – and whether the water molecule would show rotational or translational mobility on the surface provided by corannulene. Precise information on the corannulene–water interaction can be useful for models aiming at describing aerosol and ice grain formation. Independent of an astrochemical interest, this high resolution rotational spectroscopy study of corannulene and its water cluster is also of relevance in its own interest. Corannulene is a rigid, highly symmetric molecule (C5v point group), and thus exhibits the rotational spectrum of a symmetric top. As a result, the intensity of many rotational transitions is concentrated in a single resolvable spectroscopic line resulting in an intense rotational spectrum.10

2 Experimental and computational details

All rotational spectroscopy measurements were performed with the Hamburg COMPACT spectrometer, which has been described in detail elsewhere.16 The molecules were seeded into a supersonic expansion with neon as the carrier gas by using a pulse nozzle (Parker General Valve, Series 9) equipped with a heatable reservoir close to the valve orifice, operating at 4 Hz. Corannulene (C20H10) was purchased from TCI Deutschland GmbH (with a specified purity of more than 97%) and used without further purification. C20H10 is a solid at room temperature; it sublimes at 170 °C (0.02 Torr) and melts at 268–269 °C (under nitrogen). The sample was heated in the reservoir nozzle to around 170 °C in order to generate sufficient vapor pressure for recording the rotational spectrum. Clusters with water were generated by first flowing the carrier gas (neon) through a reservoir containing water that was external to the chamber. After supersonic expansion into vacuum using neon at 2 bar, the molecular jet was polarized with a 4 μs chirp spanning 2–8 GHz. The chirp was generated with an arbitrary waveform generator, amplified to 300 W with a traveling wave tube amplifier, and transmitted into the vacuum chamber via a horn antenna. Following excitation, the free induction decay (FID) of the macroscopic ensemble of polarized molecules was recorded. The fast frame capability17 of the Tektronix DPO 71254C was used in which eight consecutive excitation chirps, each followed by 50 μs so that the FID could be collected, were recorded and averaged. This resulted in an effective repetition rate of 32 Hz. For the spectrum of the corannulene monomer 2.5 million FIDs were coadded, and for the corannulene–water complex 4.1 million FIDs were coadded. Fourier transformation of the averaged time domain FID, recorded at point spacings of 10 ps, resulted in a frequency domain rotational spectrum with frequency resolution of 25 kHz. The intensity of the monomer spectrum was sufficient to observe the spectra of all 13C singly substituted species (see below) in addition to that of the parent isotopologue.

The experimental results were complemented by and compared with electronic structure calculations. M06-2X/cc-pVDZ, M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p) and conventional MP2/6-311++G(d,p) calculations were performed using the Gaussian 09, rev. D.0118 program suite to assess the sensitivity of the predictions to the choice of method and basis set. Symmetry adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) calculations19 in the PSI4 package20 were used to investigate the intermolecular interactions for the corannulene–water complex. The binding energy of the dimers Ed was determined with density fitted MP2 (RI-MP2) at 6-311++G**, aug-cc-pVDZ and aug-cc-pVTZ basis sets using the ORCA 3.0.3 software package.21 Because basis set superposition error (BSSE) can be large for binding energies of non-covalently bonded clusters, we also determined the counterpoise (CP)22 corrected binding energy. While the uncorrected energy often overbinds the clusters and the CP corrected one underbinds, the true binding energy falls somewhere between the uncorrected and CP corrected values. A more robust way to overcome BSSE as well as basis set incompleteness error (BSIE) is to use explicitly correlated methods. One such method, RI-MP2-F12,23 is implemented efficiently with the 3C(FIX) ansatz24 in the Molpro 2015 package.25 At the RI-MP2 optimized geometry, we calculated the RI-MP2-F12 energy with the cc-pVTZ-F12 (VTZ-F12) orbital basis with aVTZ/JKFIT DH-HF fitting basis, aVTZ/MP2FIT DF-MP2 fitting basis, VTZ-F12/OPTRI complementary auxiliary basis set (CABS).

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Rotational spectroscopy of corannulene

The high-resolution broadband rotational spectrum obtained for the corannulene monomer is displayed in Fig. 1. Corannulene is an oblate symmetric top of C5v symmetry and gives rise to a simple, characteristic spectrum. Five ΔJ = 1 rotational transitions were observed for the parent monomer (with J being the total angular momentum quantum number), and their assignment is indicated in the top panel of Fig. 1. In accordance with ref. 10, no K substructure was observed, with K being the quantum number associated with rotation about the principal rotation axis of the molecule. Previously, 15 rotational transitions between 5–20 GHz were recorded, and a set of rotational constants were obtained from fitting a symmetric-top Hamiltonian to the experimental transition frequencies.10 The results of jointly fitting these previous transitions with the newly obtained low-frequency transitions from the present CP-FTMW spectroscopy study are summarized in Table 1. Line lists are given in Table S1 of the ESI. The low-frequency range of our spectrometer enabled us to extend the dataset down to 3 GHz. The molecule is very rigid, as evidenced by the small experimentally determined centrifugal distortion constant DJ, even though transitions up to J = 19 are included.
image file: c7cp01506b-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Broadband rotational spectrum of corannulene (top panel) and its zoom illustrating rotational transitions from singly substituted 13C isotopologues (middle panel) (top traces: experimental data, lower traces: simulations based on spectral fits, Table 1). Rotational transitions arising from all three possible isotopologues, corresponding to substitution in the inner, middle, and outer carbon position, have been assigned and are indicated by the color code. On the bottom, the experimentally determined atom positions (colored balls) and the numerical values for the four distinct C–C bonds, labeled AD, from the present study (upper number) are compared with those from an MP2/6-311++G(d,p) calculation (lower number).
Table 1 The fitted spectroscopic constants for the parent and for all three possible singly substituted 13C isotopologues of the corannulene monomer
Parent 13Co (outer) 13Cm (middle) 13Ci (inner)
Exp.a Calc.b
a Current measurements combined with those from ref. 10. b DFT calculation at the M06-2X/cc-pVDZ level. c Calculated from the planar moment Pb(13Co) = 954.77(44) uÅ2 for the 13Co species and Ic = 2Pb(13Co) − Ia + Ib, where Ia and Ib are the moments of inertia for this species. d C = 263.74(60) MHz, if used as a parameter of fit. e Assumed value, taken from the parent species. f The number of fitted transitions. g Standard deviation of the fit.
A (MHz) 509.80864(26) 509.84975(41) 509.65615(73)
B (MHz) 509.842688(16) 509.72 504.41888(24) 506.70892(41) 508.90885(79)
C (MHz) [264.66]c 264.49 263.20(12) [263.81]c,d [264.46]c
D J (kHz) 0.004364(46) [0.004364]e [0.004364]e [0.004364]e
D JK (kHz) 0.083(21)
N 20 31 25 13
σ (kHz) 2.62 4.69 6.50 9.92


A zoom into the broadband spectrum, as shown in the middle part of Fig. 1, illustrates the J = 7–6 spectra of the three 13C isotopologues in natural abundance. The 13C isotopic lines are represented by the color code in which the red trace corresponds to isotopic substitution of a carbon atom Ci in the inner pentagon (five-fold degenerate due to C5v symmetry). The green trace corresponds to substitution of a carbon atom Cm in the intermediate circle (also five-fold degenerate), and the blue trace identifies the spectrum resulting from substitution of Co, a carbon atom in the outer circle, which is ten-fold degenerate due to a combination of C5 and σv symmetry operations. As the zoomed-in spectrum in Fig. 1 shows, the transition frequencies are shifted to lower frequency in relation to the parent in proportion to increasing distance of the substituted carbon atom from the molecular center of mass. The isotopic spectra for single 13C substitution are somewhat easier to observe than in other species since the high symmetry of corannulene leads to natural abundance spectra that are enhanced by a factor of five for 13Ci and 13Cm substitution, and a factor of ten for the 13Co isotopologue. A 13C substitution reduces the symmetry of the molecule from an oblate symmetric top to that of a near-oblate asymmetric top. This lower symmetry leads to K-type splitting in the spectra, which is the most pronounced for the 13Co isotopologue (13C substitution in the outer ring, blue trace in Fig. 1). Only for this 13Co isotopologue is the asymmetry splitting sufficiently large to allow for the determination of all three rotational constants. The standard assumption of isotopic invariance of molecular geometry then allowed us to use these constants to calculate the axial rotational constant C for the other isotopic species. This is possible since the 13C atom is in the ac-inertial plane for the substitution positions, so that the planar moment image file: c7cp01506b-t1.tif (where mi are atomic masses, and bi their b-principal axis coordinates) is the same for all of the measured isotopic species and thus equal to the value for the parent species.

The experimentally determined rotational constants of the three different 13C isotopologues are also summarized in Table 1 and the experimental frequencies are reported in Tables S2–S4 (ESI). We find that the DFT calculation at the M06-2X/cc-pVDZ is fortuitous at reproducing the ground state rotational B constant for corannulene, as well as the C constant estimated from the value of Pb(13Co).

The corannulene bowl is relatively shallow so that it can be subject to a motion inverting the bowl. Experimental investigations by NMR spectroscopy indicated that in solution this motion can occur at a rate of 200 kHz under room temperature conditions,26 yet both experiment26 and calculations27 estimate the barrier to this motion to be well over 40 kJ mol−1. The inversion motion is arrested in the crystal and has not yet been observed in the gas phase, including our present spectra. The signature of such a motion in rotational transitions would be a characteristic equal intensity line doubling resulting from inversion splitting of the ground vibrational state. Nevertheless, the magnitude of this splitting is inversely proportional to the barrier and to the reduced mass for the inversion motion. For corannulene both are much too high for such splitting to be resolved. Phrased differently, on the timescale of the experiment (a few tens of μs), no interconversion takes place, in accordance with previous gas-phase results.

3.2 Structure of corannulene

The high molecular symmetry of corannulene reduces the amount of the available spectroscopic information, but it also considerably reduces the number of independent structural parameters. In C20H10, there are only four distinct C–C bonds, indicated by AD in the structure in the bottom part of Fig. 1. These are the C–C bonds in the central pentagon (denoted by A), the bonds between an inner carbon atom and a carbon atom in the middle ring (denoted by B), the bonds between a middle carbon atom and a carbon atom in the outer ring (denoted by C), and finally bonds connecting two outer carbon atoms (denoted D), which are connected to hydrogen atoms as well.

As has been demonstrated for another higher-symmetry molecular species, namely cyclohexane,28 the relatively small number of measured isotopologues is not prohibitive to the determination of a reliable molecular geometry. This is providing that full advantage is taken of the molecular symmetry. The resulting r0 geometry determined for the D3d-symmetric cyclohexane was used to predict the value of the difficult to determine axial rotational constant, which was later confirmed by femtosecond rotational coherence spectroscopy.29 In the case of corannulene it turns out that only six independent structural parameters are needed to describe the carbon skeleton, when these parameters are defined in a centrosymmetric declaration as shown in Fig. 2. Another three structural parameters are required for the C–H bonds. A least squares fit of these parameters to all of the available experimental data can be conveniently set up using the STRFIT program,30 freely available on the PROSPE website.31,32 The primary results of such a fit are given in Table S5 (ESI). The fitted centrosymmetric parameters and their uncertainties have been converted into the chemically relevant structural parameters with the program EVAL (also on the PROSPE website) and are listed in Table 2. This table allows a comparison with other experimental results and with quantum chemistry calculations. Prior to discussing the actual values it should be noted that the present rotational data were insufficient to determine all nine structural parameters that define the complete structure of corannulene. For this reason we made some judicious assumptions concerning three of those parameters. The values in square brackets in Table 2 have been fixed to the average of the two cited quantum chemistry calculations. We note that a much broader range of calculations resulted in very similar values for these parameters. The two angles associated with the C–H bonds were found to have a minimal effect on the results of the structural fit, for example an uncertainty of 0.3° in their values added much less than 10% to the deviations of the parameters of the fit. It is only the dihedral angle Θo for the outer carbon atom that turned out to be critical, primarily for the uncertainty in bond D. The uncertainty for this bond as cited in Table 2 accounts for an assumed ±0.1° uncertainty in Θo, which encompasses the range of values seen in DFT and ab initio calculations.


image file: c7cp01506b-f2.tif
Fig. 2 The six unique structural coordinates defining the carbon skeleton of corannulene: the distance ri of the inner carbon Ci from the centre of the pentagon, the distance rm and the angle θm for the intermediate carbon Cm, and the distance ro, the angle θo, and the dihedral angle Θo for the outer carbon atom Co. Other members of the Ci, Cm, and Co atom subsets are generated by means of the C5 symmetry operation, while Co′ atoms are generated from the Co atoms by means of a reflection about the ac plane.
Table 2 Structural parameters (Å and degree) of corannulene from MW (this work), GED,33 X-ray34 and calculations (employing the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set) and comparison with the estimated double-bond (DB) character according to Kekule's resonance structures
Parameter MW, r0 GED, rα X-raya Calculated, re DB character
This work Ref. 33 Ref. 34 MP2 M06-2X
a Average values over chemically equivalent parameters in two crystallographically independent molecules. b The cited uncertainty is a single standard deviation. c The angle between the plane containing Co and the c-inertial axis and the plane containing Cm and the c-inertial axis. d Assumed value, fixed to the average of the two respective quantum-chemical calculations, see text.
A r(CiCi) 1.417(4)b 1.410(3) 1.413(2) 1.419 1.416 0.27
B r(CiCm) 1.387(6) 1.408(10) 1.391(4) 1.396 1.376 0.46
C r(CmCo) 1.441(3) 1.441(8) 1.440(2) 1.444 1.446 0.27
D r(CoCo) 1.391(11) 1.374(8) 1.402(5) 1.398 1.380 0.73
∠(AB) ∠(CiCiCm) 122.6(3) 122.4(3) 123.0(2) 122.5 122.8
∠(BC) ∠(CiCmCo) 114.5(3) 113.9(3) 114.3(1) 114.9 114.6
∠(CD) ∠(CmCoCo) 121.9(2) 122.4(2) 122.0(2) 121.8 121.9
Θ o [23.66]d 23.59 23.73
r(CH) 1.101(14) 1.112(9) 1.01(1) 1.089 1.085
∠(HCoCo) [118.45]d 118.2(1) 120.(1) 118.32 118.58
Θ(HCoCoCm) [174.13]d 174.02 174.23


It should be noted that the geometries for corannulene in Table 2 all have a slightly different physical meaning. Thus they can only be compared in an approximate manner. The present geometry (MW, r0) pertains to the ground vibrational state, the gas phase electron diffraction (GED) geometry33 includes harmonic vibration–rotation contributions, while the X-ray geometry34 results from averaging over many unequal values in two crystallographically independent molecules. The calculated geometries are equilibrium geometries, re, at the minimum of the molecular potential. With these caveats in mind we note from Table 2 that the current determination is in closest agreement with quantum chemistry calculations, as summarised also in Fig. 1. The agreement concerns not only the C–C bond lengths, but also the angles, which are all in good correlation with the calculated values.

It turns out that the relative C–C bond lengths can be usefully rationalised in terms of classical resonance structures. Taking into account the three possible Kekule type resonance structures and their multiplicities as discussed in ref. 33, the fraction of double-bond character (DB) for the individual bonds A, B, C, and D is 0.27, 0.46, 0.27, and 0.73, respectively. This approach thus predicts that bond D is the shortest, while bonds A and C are predicted to be the longest. Bond B is predicted to be of intermediate length, which is in fair agreement with our experimental findings. This is despite the fact that we observe bonds B and D to be of similar length. It is intriguing that the relative values of the bond lengths predicted by the basic concept of resonance among Kekule structures are in such a good agreement with the experimental structure for this nonplanar, aromatic molecule. It also turned out that the rotational spectroscopy data allows fitting C–H bond length and, even though it is not particularly precise, is at a typically larger value than the calculated equilibrium distances.

We note that there are some discrepancies between the various sets of values in Table 2. The Kekule picture can only be taken so far since the weight of experimental and computational evidence points to bond A being significantly shorter than bond C, even though both have the same DB character. Also bond B from the GED study appears to be longer (and comparable to bond A), which is perhaps due to the greatest uncertainty in the GED determination of the length of bond B. In contrast, the structure determination of crystalline C20H10 using X-ray diffraction results in a similar alternation in bond lengths and angles as in the microwave and quantum-chemical data, but with different absolute values. This is most likely due to packing effects in the crystal.34

3.3 Corannulene–water complex

In order to elucidate the preferred binding position of water on the corannulene surface, we recorded the rotational spectrum of the corannulene–water complex. There are two potential binding motifs: to the inside of the bowl (C20H10–w-in) or on the outside (C20H10–w-out). Ab initio calculations at the MP2 level of theory reveal that C20H10–w-in is the favored configuration of the complex and approximately 10 kJ mol−1 lower in energy than C20H10–w-out (see Fig. 3 and Table 3). In Fig. 3, we present results of three different theoretical approaches for the two isomers, and we highlight their energy differences ΔE. Note that these structures are C1-symmetric, with non-zero dipole-moment components μa and μb, even when performing the calculations using tight convergence criteria. The distances of the water oxygen to the nearest carbon atom (ROCi) are also given. We find that the respective bonds for the C20H10–w-in complex are always shorter than for those in the C20H10–w-out complex. Structures in which water is interacting with one or several of the hydrogen atoms of corannulene are found to be irrelevant.
image file: c7cp01506b-f3.tif
Fig. 3 The structures for the two isomers of the corannulene–water complex, C20H10–w-in (left) and C20H10–w-out (right), calculated at the RI-MP2 level of theory with different basis sets. The relative energies ΔE are given, and the closest oxygen–carbon distances ROCi are marked.
Table 3 Spectroscopic and molecular parameters obtained from a global analysis (including both internal rotation states m = 0 and m = 1) of the symmetric-top spectrum of the observed corannulene–water cluster, C20H10–w-in, and comparison with results from ab initio calculations at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory. Ed is the binding energy, which is counterpoise-corrected for the calculated values, and ΔE defines the relative energies of the two isomers
Exp. Calculated
In Out
a The value estimated for free corannulene, see Table 1. b Distance estimated by using the pseudo-diatomic model, see text. c Distance derived from Rcm by assuming the C20H10–w-in geometry. d Distance derived from Rcm by assuming the C20H10–w-out geometry. e Negative of Lennard-Jones well depth from the pseudo-diatomic model.
A (MHz) 460.8 407.9
B (MHz) 455.597043(55) 460.5 407.6
C (MHz) 264.66a 265.3 264.2
D J (kHz) 0.02013(57)
D Jm (MHz) 4.306704(78)
H Jm (kHz) 0.00801(81)
|μa| (D) 0.23 0.02
|μb| (D) 0.29 0.02
|μc| (D) 0.51 5.1
μ tot (D) 0.63 5.1
R cm (Å) 2.640b 2.468 3.804
R Ox (Å) 3.318,c 2.094d 3.179 3.240
R OCi (Å) 3.531,c 2.416d 3.399 3.447
E d (kJ mol−1) −12.0e −17.8 −11.3
ΔE (kJ mol−1) 0 +6.5


The observed rotational spectrum of the complex is that of an oblate symmetric top with no K-substructure, just as observed for free corannulene. This is contrary to our initial expectation that addition of a water molecule would break the high symmetry of corannulene and thus lead to an asymmetric rotor spectrum. The rotational spectrum of the corannulene–water complex only exhibits c-type transitions (i.e., interacting with the μc dipole moment component of the complex and following the selection rules J + 1Ka+1,KcJKa,Kc). It shows a characteristic fine structure, in which, every rotational transition is split into two components that are caused by the internal motion of the water molecule relative to corannulene. These two sets of rotational transitions can be attributed to two free-rotor states specified by the quantum number m = 0, ±1,… Both the m = 0 and the m = 1 transitions appear as symmetric tops. This situation is very similar to the one described and treated for the benzene–water complex.35,36 In that case a double symmetric-top spectrum was also observed, and rationalised by means of a low-barrier or even barrier-less internal rotation of the water molecule about the sixfold symmetry axis of benzene.

In general, internal rotation theory predicts symmetric-top spectra for coaxial rotors of at least three-fold and two-fold symmetry with a small effective barrier. As in the benzene–water complex, we used the treatment originally pioneered for the weakly bound cluster CF3H–NH3,37 allowing a global fit of transitions for both internal rotation substates. Such a global fit provides us with detailed experimental information about the structure and internal dynamics of the complex. The fit is based on the symmetric-top Hamiltonian37 inclusive of free internal rotation terms, such that the transition frequencies are described by ν(J,m) = 2(J + 1)[BDJmm2] − 4(J + 1)3[DJ + HJmm2]. Here, the quantum number m = 0, ±1,… specifies the internal rotation state, as mentioned above, and DJ, DJm, and HJm are centrifugal distortion constants. The results of this fit are summarised in Table 3, and the observed transition frequencies are given in Table S6 of the ESI.

The experimental rotational constants can be directly compared with the results from ab initio calculations (MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory), which are also included in Table 3. Note that theory predicts the complex to be slightly asymmetric, with the rotational constants A and B differing by several hundred kHz. It is, therefore, possible that the reported constant B may actually be equivalent to (A + B)/2 in the presence of some vibrational averaging of the water motion in the cluster. The calculated rotational constants for the two different isomers differ by about 50 MHz. Similar results are obtained at RI-MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ and RI-MP2/aug-cc-pVTZ and even with DFT using M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p) (see Table S7 of the ESI). The experimentally determined rotational constant B = 455.597043(55) MHz is close to the calculated values for the C20H10–w-in isomer, and this is the lower energy isomer (Fig. 3). C20H10–w-out is assumed to be invisible in the CP-FTMW experiment due to insufficient population in our supersonic expansion using neon carrier gas.

While the rotational constants for the two isomers differ by only about 50 MHz, the magnitudes of their dipole moments have the most notable difference. C20H10–w-out has a large overall dipole moment, arising from the large μc component. This component is significantly smaller for C20H10–w-in. This difference can be easily explained by the orientation of the molecules in the complex with respect to each other, as dipole moments are additive. For both isomers, the symmetry axes of the water and the corannulene monomers are almost coaxial with the c internal axis (see Fig. 4). For C20H10–w-out, their respective dipole moments (2.07 D for corannulene and 1.85 D for water) point in the same direction. This explains the large value of the μc component (approximately 5 D) with only negligible values for μa and μb (Table 3). For C20H10–w-in, the corannulene and water symmetry axes are likewise nearly coaxial with the internal axis c, but predicted to be slightly tilted, causing nonzero values for μa and μb.


image file: c7cp01506b-f4.tif
Fig. 4 The two isomers of the corannulene–water complex: C20H10–w-in (left) and C20H10–w-out (right). C20H10–w-out is calculated to be 10–15 kJ mol−1 higher in energy than C20H10–w-in (Fig. 3). The green arrow qualitatively indicates the magnitude of the μc dipole moment component. For C20H10–w-out, this value is significantly larger because the respective dipole-moment components add up constructively. For both isomers, the C2 symmetry axis of the water and the C5 symmetry axis of corannulene almost coincide. The higher stability of the lower dipole moment conformer is a direct indicator that electrostatic interactions are not dominant in the intermolecular interaction between the two molecules.

Most importantly, however, the dipole moments of water and corannulene point in almost opposite directions and therefore partially cancel, resulting in a small μc value in the region of 0.5 D. The contributions from μa and μb are sensitive to the relative orientations of the symmetry axes of water and corannulene with respect to each other. It is thus not surprising that different theoretical levels provide somewhat different calculated μa and μb values, as reported in Table S7 (ESI). Note that despite an extensive search, only c-type transitions have been observed experimentally. The missing a- and b-type transitions further support our analysis that low-barrier internal motion of the water molecule with respect to corannulene leads to the average structure of a symmetric top, with vanishingly small μa and μb dipole moment components.

The combination of experimental and theoretical results allows us to conclude the complex structure is that of the C20H10–w-in complex. The experimental results, even when limited to a single rotational constant and a single centrifugal distortion constant for the cluster, still allow useful information to be derived by means of the pseudo diatomic model. The model was first applied to weakly bound clusters in connection with Ar–HCl38 and was later extended by a succession of refinements taking into account various departures of complexed molecules from simple diatomic symmetry.39–42 The most useful relations from these papers have been embodied in the computer program DJ, recently added to the PROSPE website.

In the present case, the most useful result of the pseudo-diatomic model is the determination of the centre of mass separation, Rcm, of the clustered molecules from the rotational constants of the cluster and of the constituent molecules (eqn (17), ref. 42). The knowledge of the monomer geometries then allows the determination of the effective distance ROx between the water oxygen atom and the plane of the central carbon pentagon of corannulene, as well as of the shortest O–C distance. The model leads to Rcm = 2.640 Å for both C20H10–w-in and C20H10–w-out. A similar determination can be carried out with the STRFIT program by using the r0 geometries of water43 and of corannulene (as determined above), resulting in Rcm = 2.637 Å. Unambiguous distinction between the in and out conformations is now possible by comparing the Rcm distance and the derived distances with calculations. The comparison makes it clear that the C20H10–w-in isomer has been observed as the Rcm for the out isomer would be expected to be considerably larger. This is primarily due to the fact that in both isomers the water molecule attaches to corannulene at a distance close to the sum of van der Waals radii of oxygen and carbon (3.22 Å, ref. 44). For the out isomer this separation leads to calculated Rcm = 3.80 Å, which is much larger than the experimental value. Conversely, if the experimental value of Rcm is interpreted in terms of the out isomer then it leads to ROCi = 2.42 Å, which is untenable in view of known van der Waals radii of these atoms. The underlying reason for such a clear distinction is the bowl shape of corannulene, which results in its centre of mass being distant by 0.61 Å from the plane of the central pentagon.

The pseudo-diatomic model can deliver another useful quantity, namely the well depth obtained by approximating the interaction potential with the 6–12 Lennard-Jones potential. The estimate involves calculation of the intermolecular stretching force constant from the centrifugal distortion constant DJ42 followed by correction of the rotational constant of the dimer to equilibrium.39,41 The procedure and intermediate values are detailed in Table S7 and explored further in Table S8 (ESI). Considering the assumptive character of the pseudo-diatomic model, the resulting Lennard-Jones well depth of 12 kJ mol−1 compares reasonably with the computed dimerisation energies Ed listed in Table 3 and in Table S7 (ESI), even though we note that Ed values up to 28 kJ mol−1 have been computed (Table S7, ESI).

The value ROx = 3.32 Å for corannulene water can be compared to the oxygen-ring distance of ROx = 3.40 Å and ROC = 3.60 Å for the benzene–water cluster. These values have been estimated from Rcm = 3.329 Å,36 with the assumption that the water hydrogens are directed towards the ring. The interatomic distances appear to be weakly indicative of a stronger interaction energy in the case of C20H10–w-in compared to benzene–water. Evaluation of the Lennard-Jones well depth for benzene–water gives 8.3 kJ mol−1 compared to 12 kJ mol−1 for corannulene–water, in line with comparison of the calculated interaction energies reported in Table 4 below.

Table 4 SAPT analysis (SAPT2+3/aug-cc-pVDZ, all values in kJ mol−1) for the two C20H10–H2O isomers, in comparison with the water dimer, (H2O)2, and the benzene–water complex
Molecule Electrostatics Induction Dispersion Exchange Total
C20H10–w-in −16.05 −10.37 −37.41 +40.63 −22.40
C20H10–w-out −12.16 −5.64 −20.27 +25.71 −12.33
(H2O)2 −34.15 −10.37 −9.49 +35.0 −19.06
C6H6–H2O −13.29 −5.52 −14.50 +21.23 −12.08


We also note that a straightforward application of the pseudo-diatomic model using just point masses for the monomers leads to spurious results, including Rcm = 8.1 Å. This is due to the considerable disk-like mass distribution in corannulene, which is oriented perpendicular to the intermolecular interaction axis. A similar effect is visible for benzene–water where Rcm evaluated with an uncorrected formula is 0.8 Å greater than with an appropriate correction. This effect was not noticeable, for example, in clusters of hydrogen halides with rare gas atoms.

3.4 Decomposition of interaction energy for corannulene–water

An informative picture of the energetics of the intermolecular interaction is possible upon its decomposition into physically meaningful constituents. A picture of this underlying energetics was obtained for corannulene–water and related dimers by using symmetry adapted perturbation theory at the SAPT2+3/aug-cc-pVDZ level. The resulting values are listed in Table 4. For the C20H10–w-in isomer, the interaction energy is calculated to be 22.4 kJ mol−1 and thus it is in moderate agreement with the Ed value derived using the pseudo-diatomic model (Table 3). It is noteworthy that the values for corannulene–water and the water dimer are of the same order of magnitude. However, in the case of C20H10–w-in, dispersion interactions are the dominant attractive component, whereas electrostatic interactions dominate in the water dimer. In Table 4, we also included values for the benzene–water complex. For this complex, electrostatic and dispersion interactions contribute almost equally to the overall interaction energy.

Dispersion interactions are not very directional, which further supports the inference that the water molecule can rotate almost freely on the C20H10 surface. Note that the potential energy surface of the corannulene–water complex is very flat with a broad minimum (see Fig. S1 of the ESI). RI-MP2/6-311++G(d,p) calculations were employed to calculate the barrier to water rotation around its C2 axis in C20H10–w-in, which was determined to be significantly below 1 kJ mol−1. Such a small value becomes meaningless when zero-point effects are included. Thus, the water molecule can rotate almost freely inside the corannulene bowl, resulting in an average structure. This picture is in agreement with the discussion above.

Together, the experimental and theoretical results draw a coherent picture of the structure and internal dynamics of the C20H10–w-in complex, which has an oblate symmetric-top spectrum for both internal-rotation states m = 0 and m = 1, with both states exhibiting only c-type transitions. This is in agreement with a low-barrier internal rotation of the water molecule around its C2 axis, which is near coincident with the C5 symmetry axis of corannulene.

4 Summary and conclusions

In summary, we used broadband rotational spectroscopy to study the C5v-symmetry PAH corannulene, C20H10, and its complex with water. The high measurement speed and sensitivity of our instrument allowed us to record the singly substituted 13C isotopologues of C20H10 in natural abundance. These spectra were then exploited to accurately determine its structure. A comparison with Kekule resonance structures shows good agreement, despite the size and curved structure of corannulene.

In the complex of corannulene with water, the water molecule is found to reside inside the corannulene bowl. A complex in which the water resides on the outside of the bowl is calculated to be about 10 kJ mol−1 higher in energy and is therefore, despite its higher dipole moment, not observed in our spectra. The rotational spectrum of the water complex follows that of a symmetric top and shows a characteristic fine structure. These features arise from the internal motion of the water molecule with respect to the corannulene. Our experimental and theoretical results clearly show that the water molecule rotates almost freely inside the water bowl around its C2 axis, which almost coincides with the C5 symmetry axis of corannulene. The binding energy is approximately 20 kJ mol−1 and is thus comparable to that of the water dimer. Even though that is the case, the dominant interaction type in the corannulene–water complex is mainly dispersion interactions, while for the water dimer it is mainly electrostatic.

We find that the structure and internal dynamics of the corannulene–water complex are very similar to those observed for the benzene–water complex. In both spectra, a symmetric-top rotational spectrum indicating (almost) free internal rotation was observed. This behavior is intimately related to the high symmetry of the aromatic binding partner and the fact that the rotation axis of the water has to coincide with the symmetry axis of the aromatic species. For other PAH–water complexes that we are studying in parallel, i.e. those of acenaphthene and fluorene, which are of lower symmetry, such behavior is not observed.

Acknowledgements

This work was performed as part of our activities within the framework of the ERC Starting grant ‘Astrorot’, grant agreement number 638027. It has also been supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft within the priority program SPP1807 (Schnell1280/4-1) and by the excellence cluster ‘The Hamburg Centre for Ultrafast Imaging – Structure, Dynamics and Control of Matter at the Atomic Scale’ of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft via a Mildred Dresselhaus Guest Professorship for A. M. R. and a Louise Johnson Fellowship for A. L. S., B. T. and G. C. S. acknowledge support by NSF grants CHE-1213521 and CHE-1508556, and by NSF grant CHE-1229354 as part of the MERCURY high-performance computer consortium, while Z. K. acknowledges financial support from a grant from the Polish National Science Centre, decision number DEC/2011/02/A/ST2/00298. J. C. L. acknowledges a Mobility Grant (PRX14/00695) of the Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte (Spain) and Dr M. Schnell for her kind hospitality.

References

  1. O. Berne and A. G. G. M. Tielens, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2012, 109, 401–406 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. A. G. G. M. Tielens, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 2008, 46, 289–337 CrossRef CAS.
  3. W. W. Duley and A. Hu, Fullerenes and proto-fullerenes in interstellar carbon dust, Astrophys. J., 2012, 659, L11 CrossRef.
  4. E. K. Campbell, M. Holz, D. Gerlich and J. P. Maier, Laboratory confirmation of C60+ as the carrier of two diffuse interstellar bands, Nature, 2015, 523, 322–323 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  5. https://www.astro.uni-koeln.de/cdms, The Cologne Database for Molecular Spectroscopy (CDMS).
  6. H. S. P. Müller, S. Thorwirth, D. A. Roth and G. Winnewisser, Astron. Astrophys., 2001, 370, L49–L52 CrossRef.
  7. H. S. P. Müller, F. Schlöder, J. Stutzki and G. Winnewisser, J. Mol. Struct., 2005, 742, 215–227 CrossRef.
  8. D. McNaughton, P. D. Godfrey, R. D. Brown, S. Thorwirth and J.-U. Grabow, FT-MW and Millimeter Wave Spectroscopy of PANHs: Phenanthridine, Acridine, and 1,10-Phenanthroline, Astrophys. J., 2008, 6780(1), 309 CrossRef.
  9. S. Thorwirth, P. Theule, C. A. Gottlieb, M. C. McCarthy and P. Thaddeus, Rotational Spectra of Small PAHs: Acenaphthene, Acenaphthylene, Azulene, and Fluorene, Astrophys. J., 2007, 6620(2), 1309 CrossRef.
  10. F. J. Lovas, R. J. McMahon, J.-U. Grabow, M. Schnell, J. Mack, L. T. Scott and R. L. Kuczkowski, Interstellar chemistry: A strategy for detecting polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in space, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 1270(12), 4345–4349 CrossRef PubMed.
  11. P. Thaddeus, The prebiotic molecules observed in the interstellar gas, Philos. Trans. R. Soc., 2006, 361, 1681–1687 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. P. Pilleri, D. Herberth, T. F. Giesen, M. Gerin, C. Joblin, G. Mulas, G. Malloci, J.-U. Grabow, S. Brünken, L. Surin, B. D. Steinberg, K. R. Curtis and L. T. Scott, Search for corannulene (C20H10) in the red rectangle, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 2009, 3970(2), 1053–1060 CrossRef.
  13. W. Klemperer, Astronomical chemistry, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 2011, 620(1), 173–184 CrossRef PubMed.
  14. G. G. Brown, B. C. Dian, K. O. Douglass, S. M. Geyer, S. T. Shipman and B. H. Pate, A broadband Fourier transform microwave spectrometer based on chirped pulse excitation, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 2008, 79(5), 053103 CrossRef PubMed.
  15. M. Schnell, Broadband Rotational Spectroscopy for Molecular Structure and Dynamics Studies, Z. Phys. Chem., 2013, 227, 1–21 CrossRef CAS.
  16. D. Schmitz, V. A. Shubert, T. Betz and M. Schnell, Multi-resonance effects within a single chirp in broadband rotational spectroscopy: The rapid adiabatic passage regime for benzonitrile, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 2012, 280, 77–84 CrossRef CAS.
  17. C. Perez, S. Lobsiger, N. A. Seifert, D. P. Zaleski, B. Temelso, G. C. Shields, Z. Kisiel and B. H. Pate, Broadband fourier transform rotational spectroscopy for structure determination: The water heptamer, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2013, 571, 1–15 CrossRef CAS.
  18. G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, J. A. Montgomery, T. Vreven, K. N. Kudin, J. C. Burant, J. M. Millam, S. S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, M. Cossi, G. Scalmani, N. Rega, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, M. Klene, X. Li, J. E. Knox, H. P. Hratchian, J. B. Cross, V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R. E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A. J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J. W. Ochterski, P. Y. Ayala, K. Morokuma, G. A. Voth, P. Salvador, J. J. Dannenberg, V. G. Zakrzewski, S. Dapprich, A. D. Daniels, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. V. Ortiz, Q. Cui, A. G. Baboul, S. Clifford, J. Cioslowski, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, C. Gonzalez, J. A. Pople and M. J. Frisch, Gaussian 09, revision d.01, Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2009 Search PubMed.
  19. B. Jeziorski, R. Moszynski and K. Szalewicz, Perturbation theory approach to intermolecular potential energy surfaces of van der Waals complexes, Chem. Rev., 1994, 94, 1887–1930 CrossRef CAS.
  20. A. C. Simmonett, R. M. Parrish, E. G. Hohenstein, F. A. Evangelista, J. T. Fermann, B. J. Mintz, L. A. Burns, J. J. Wilke, M. L. Abrams, N. J. Russ, M. L. Leininger, C. L. Janssen, E. T. Seidl, W. D. Allen, H. F. Schaefer, R. A. King, E. F. Valeev, C. D. Sherrill, T. D. Crawford and J. M. Turney, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci., 2012, 2, 556–565 CrossRef.
  21. F. Neese, The ORCA program system, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci., 2012, 2, 73–78 CrossRef CAS.
  22. S. F. Boys and F. Bernardi, Calculation of small molecular interactions by differences of separate total energies – some procedures with reduced errors, Mol. Phys., 1970, 19, 533–566 CrossRef.
  23. W. Klopper, F. R. Manby, S. Ten-No and E. F. Valeev, R12 methods in explicitly correlated molecular electronic structure theory, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem., 2006, 25, 427–468 CrossRef CAS.
  24. H. J. Werner, T. B. Adler and F. R. Manby, Calculation of small molecular interactions by differences of separate total energies – some procedures with reduced errors, J. Chem. Phys., 2007, 126, 164102 CrossRef PubMed.
  25. H. J. Werner, P. J. Knowles, G. Knizia, F. R. Manby and M. Schütz, Molpro: A general-purpose quantum chemistry program package, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci., 2012, 2, 242–253 CrossRef CAS.
  26. T. L. Scott, M. M. Hashemi and M. S. Bratcher, Corannulene bowl-to-bowl inversion is rapid at room temperature, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 1920–1921 CrossRef.
  27. R. Pevarati and K. K. Baldridge, Implementation and performance of dft-d with respect to basis set and functional for study of dispersion interactions in nanoscale aromatic hydrocarbons, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2008, 4, 2030–2048 CrossRef PubMed.
  28. E. Białkowska-Jaworska, M. Jaworski and Z. Kisiel, The structure of cyclohexane, F-, Cl-, Br- and I-cyclohexane, J. Mol. Struct., 1995, 350, 247–254 CrossRef.
  29. C. Brügger, H.-M. Frey, P. Steinegger, F. Balmer and S. Leutwyler, Accurate determination of the structure of cyclohexane by femtosecond rotational coherence spectroscopy and ab initio calculations, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2011, 115, 9567–9578 CrossRef PubMed.
  30. Z. Kisiel, Least-squares mass-dependence molecular structures for selected weakly bound intermolecular clusters, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 2003, 218, 58–67 CrossRef CAS.
  31. Z. Kisiel, in Spectroscopy from Space, ed. Demaison J., et al., Assignment and analysis of complex rotational spectra, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, pp. 91–106 Search PubMed.
  32. Z. Kisiel, PROSPE. Programs for RotationalSpectroscopy. URL http://info.ifpan.edu.pl/∼kisiel/prospe.htm.
  33. L. Hedberg, K. Hedberg, P.-C. Cheng and L. T. Scott, Gas-phase molecular structure of corannulene, C20H10. An electron-diffraction study augmented by ab initio and normal coordinate calculations, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2000, 104, 7689–7694 CrossRef CAS.
  34. C. H. Hanson and C. E. Nordman, The crystal and molecular structure of corannulene, C20H10, Acta Crystallogr., 1976, B32, 1147–1153 CrossRef.
  35. S. Suzuki, P. G. Green, R. E. Bumgarner, S. Dasgupta, W. A. Goddard III and G. A. Blake, Benzene forms hydrogen bonds with water, Science, 1992, 257, 942–945 CAS.
  36. H. S. Gutowsky, T. Emilsson and E. Arunan, Low-j rotational spectra, internal rotation, and structures of several benzene–water dimers, J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 99, 4883–4893 CrossRef CAS.
  37. G. T. Fraser, F. J. Lovas, F. D. Suenram, D. D. Nelson and W. Klemperer, Rotational spectrum and structure of CF3H–NH3, J. Chem. Phys., 1986, 84, 5983–5988 CrossRef CAS.
  38. S. E. Novick, P. Davies, S. J. Harris and W. Klemperer, Determination of the structure of ArHCl, J. Chem. Phys., 1973, 59, 2273–2279 CrossRef CAS.
  39. T. J. Balle, E. J. Campbell, M. R. Keenan and W. H. Flygare, A new method for observing the rotational spectra of weak molecular complexes, J. Chem. Phys., 1980, 72, 922–932 CrossRef CAS.
  40. W. G. Read, E. J. Campbell and G. Henderson, The rotational spectrum and molecular structure of the benzene-hydrogen chloride complex, J. Chem. Phys., 1983, 78, 3501–3508 CrossRef CAS.
  41. S. G. Kukolich and E. J. Campbell, Microwave measurements of bromine quadrupole coupling constants and the molecular structure of XeHBr, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1983, 94, 73–76 CrossRef CAS.
  42. A. Bondi, van der Waals Volumes and Radii, J. Phys. Chem., 1964, 68, 441–451 CrossRef CAS.
  43. F. C. D. De Lucia, P. Helminger and W. Gordy, Millimeter- and Submillimeter-Wavelength Spectrum and Molecular Constants of T2O, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys., 1973, 8, 2785–2791 CrossRef CAS.
  44. D. J. Millen, Determination of stretching force constants of weakly bound dimers from centrifugal distortion constants, Can. J. Chem., 1985, 7, 1477–1479 CrossRef.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c7cp01506b

This journal is © the Owner Societies 2017